Trump’s Venezuela Deal Helps His Rich Friends—And That’s It

Read the original at Mother Jones ↗
Cite

Nguyen, A. (2026, September 10). Trump’s Venezuela Deal Helps His Rich Friends—And That’s It. Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/09/trump-venezuela-oil-deal-chevron-delcy-nabep/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Mother Jones · collected 2026-09-10 · by Alex Nguyen

Quick Summary

The Trump administration has announced a deal with Venezuela that would grant US company North American Blue Energy Partners (NABEP) rights to 17 oil fields for 100 years, in exchange for giving the Pentagon a 35% stake in its corporate parent and allowing the State Department to buy up to 80% of NABEP's oil. The agreement involves 65 billion barrels worth of oil fields and daily production of 800,000 barrels. Political scientist Jeff Colgan calls this "petro-imperialism", citing similarities with Trump's actions in Iran. Critics from Venezuela's opposition and former Maduro regime members have denounced the deal as neo-colonialism.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-10, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The Trump administration announced an arrangement with Venezuela last week that would see the US gain control over 65 billion barrels worth of oil fields, representing about one-fifth of Venezuela’s total reserves. This deal includes a 35 percent stake for the Pentagon in North American Blue Energy Partners (NABEP), a firm led by Venezuelan businessman Alejandro Betancourt, who was previously under U.S. money-laundering investigation. The State Department also gets preferential rights to buy 20% of NABEP’s oil at cost and first refusal for the remaining 80 percent.

Venezuela’s acting president Delcy Rodriguez claims this agreement will bring much-needed foreign investment to her country's struggling oil industry, but many in Venezuela view her as illegitimate after the U.S. military captured former President Nicolás Maduro earlier this year. Opposition leader María Corina Machado has criticized the deal, arguing that Venezuela’s natural resources belong to its people rather than "an illegitimate regime."

The arrangement raises concerns among Venezuelan opposition figures who fear it could bolster the authoritarian government's control and undermine democratic progress in the country.

Written for “US Venezuela Oil Deal” on 2026-10-25, grounded in this article and the 127 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Venezuela Oil Deal
Politics · 128 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 19% hedged 10 of 54 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A mentions an announcement from 'last week', while Article B refers to an arrangement announced by the Trump administration, indicating different time references”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 5 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses Congress rejecting the Pentagon's office's equity power, while Article B describes a Trump administration deal with Venezuela involving oil fields and a stake in North American Blue Energy Partners”
The Dispatch
⚖️ Centre further right than this 🔴 20% hedged 3 of 15 📰 publisher trust 61
“Article A discusses an interview with James Story about U.S.-Venezuelan relations, while Article B reports on a specific deal between Trump's administration and Venezuela, mentioning a previous American strike in January”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 19 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article B mentions an American strike on Caracas in January, which is not mentioned in Article A”
Reason · 0.92 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 19% hedged 11 of 57 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the US government taking a 35% passive stake in North American Blue Energy Partners, with similar details about the company and its Venezuelan connection”
NPR
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 23% hedged 8 of 35 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A describes the opposition's reaction to the oil deal, while Article B provides more details about the terms of the agreement itself”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 5% hedged 3 of 65 📰 publisher trust 95
“The dates of publication are different, suggesting they cover related but not identical events”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 20% hedged 6 of 30 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A mentions Trump removing Maduro in 2026, while Article B mentions an American strike on Caracas abducting Maduro in January, indicating a difference in timing”
Euronews
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 9% hedged 2 of 22 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A describes a multi-billion-dollar deal signed on Wednesday, while Article B refers to an arrangement announced by the Trump administration last week, with different specifics and context”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
54
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
5 of 54 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
95/100
Mother Jones's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
128
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Mother Jones · 364 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Alex Nguyen
37 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The problem is reaching a level where banks have been forced to scale up their investment of resources into preparing for breaches and restoring customer access as quickly as possible—which, given other recent developments in AI-powered cybersecurity breaches, might not have been a bad idea anyway.
🔮 In the five-minute confrontation that has now gone viral, the young man, who the Handbasket first identified as Thomas “Tommy” Teepell, asked El-Sayed if he would “disavow” the Muslim Brotherhood.
🔮 Elon Musk’s SpaceX and AI giant Anthropic have said they will give billions of dollars in shares to the public as general sentiment around the technology’s economic and societal consequences continues to plummet.
2026-10-20 · assertive framing · One SpaceX Share Per Child: The New AI PR Strategy
🔮 Construction to create “one of the Best and Most Spectacular Golf Courses anywhere in the World” at East Potomac Park would start on November 15, the president wrote on Truth Social.
🔮 The five-minute conversation took place in Caro, Michigan, where a man who identified himself as “Tommy” asked from the audience: “Will you disavow the Muslim Brotherhood?”
🔮 She has been a wonderful asset to the team, and we wish her well,” Zacharia said.
🔮 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced shortly after that the execution would be livestreamed.
🔮 “I suggest they get a new leader who can make a deal because he could have made many deals and for some reason he never does,” Trump said on Saturday, suggesting that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has not done enough to broker a peace deal with Russia.
🔮 A former AI researcher played by Jason Schwartzman, presented as a prophet who sees the future of the tech with clarity, tells Sutskever that it could lead, if not to total human extinction, at least to life under AI subjugation.
🔮 This fall, Hollywood will release four movies on tech executives: Luca Guadagnino’s Artificial, on CEO Sam Altman’s tumultuous time as the head of OpenAI; Aaron Sorkin’s The Social Reckoning, on the investigation into Facebook and CEO Mark Zuckerberg dismissing its platforms’ negative impacts on young users and inciting violence and hate speech; the all-encompassing Musk, by documentarian Alex Gibney, on the Tesla and SpaceX CEO’s family life, corporate controversies, and engagement in right-wing politics; and You Can See Everything, an unsettling documentary in which directors Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim follow Elizabeth Holmes, who invited them to film her in the weeks before she began serving her federal prison sentence for defrauding investors at the now-defunct health tech company Theranos. If the 2010s brought the first major wave of examining Silicon Valley leaders, such as relatively human depictions of Zuckerberg with The Social Network and multiple movies on longtime Apple CEO Steve Jobs—they largely paint pictures of difficult, ambitious individuals who may have burned a few bridges to achieve the remarkable—this recent group represents an opportunity, as I wrote in September, to rethink that perspective.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · Is Hollywood Finally Turning on Tech Oligarchs?
Also by Alex Nguyen
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 37 articles by Alex Nguyen →

Topics

American Caracas Chevron Venezuela White House

Subjects

Venezuela GPE · 10× Trump PERSON · 7× American NORP · 5× Venezuelan NORP · 4× Americans NORP · 2× Chevron ORG · 2× Colgan PERSON · 2× Iran GPE · 2× White House ORG · 2× Caracas GPE · 1×

Narrative

The Trump administration announced an arrangement with Venezuela last week that would see the US take control of 65 billion barrels worth of oil fields and a significant share of the country’s production of 800,000 barrels of oil per day—the latest development after an American strike on Caracas abducted the country’s president Nicolás Maduro in January.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-10
🔮 The Trump administration announced an arrangement with Venezuela last week that would see the US take control of 65 billion barrels worth of oil fields and a significant share of the country’s production of 800,000 barrels of oil per day—the latest development after an American strike on Caracas abducted the country’s president Nicolás Maduro in January.
2026-09-10 · Mother Jones
Trump’s Venezuela Deal Helps His Rich Friends—And That’s It · assertive framing

Claims (54 extracted, 5 hedged)

The Trump administration announced an arrangement with Venezuela last week that would see the US take control of 65 billion barrels worth of oil fields and a significant share of the country’s production of 800,000 barrels of oil per day—the latest development after an American strike on Caracas abducted the country’s president Nicolás Maduro in January. asserted
strike → announce → January
According to the White House statement, Venezuela will grant a firm called North American Blue Energy Partners, rights to 17 oil fields for 100 years; that company will give the Pentagon a 35 percent stake in its corporate parent and the State Department the ability to buy 20 percent of its oil, with right of first refusal for the remaining 80 percent. uncertain
Department → accord → percent
The US government can also veto any appointment to NABEP’s board of directors. asserted
government → veto → directors
The deal is one of the public-private partnerships that have become customary in Donald Trump’s foreign relations. asserted
that → become → relations
Just days after the White House announcement, Chevron said it would expand its operations in Venezuela. asserted
it → say → Venezuela
But Chevron is already the largest foreign oil operator in the country, and others have indicated that the uncertainty of Trump’s plan, let alone how long the process of scaling up production would take, has made them hesitant to invest. asserted
them → indicate → production
What is clear is that the oil deal is a direct seizure of another country’s resources under threat of force, what political scientist Jeff Colgan, who directs the Climate Solutions Lab at Brown University’s Watson Institute for Public and International Affairs, calls “petro-imperialism.” asserted
who → direct → Affairs
In March, I spoke with Colgan, who has long studied the role of oil in international politics and war about how the idea of military intervention in global oil markets to support the US oil industry informed Trump’s actions in Iran. asserted
idea → speak → Iran
Trump has publicly signaled that he is interested in making Venezuela the 51st state, and according to reports Tuesday, is seeking more access to the country’s minerals, including gold. uncertain
Venezuela → signal → gold
To better understand what to make of all of this, I spoke with Colgan again last week. asserted
I → understand → Colgan
Much isn’t known about Trump’s agreement to secure partial control of Venezuela’s oil industry. asserted
Much → know → industry
What are you watching out for? asserted
you → watch → What
I’m keeping an eye on the different ways the Venezuelan government and the US government are describing the deal, because of course, their two audiences want very different things, and I’m not sure how easy it’s going to be for politicians to try to square that circle. asserted
politicians → keep → circle
Already, you see significant criticism from the political opposition in Venezuela [led by officials like conservative María Corina Machado], and even from some of the old [Nicolás] Maduro regime members saying, “This oil is ours, we don’t want to give it to the United States, and this is a form of neo-colonialism.” asserted
this → see → colonialism
She, of course, is trying to finesse that by saying, “Look, this is an arrangement that will bring in American investment into an oil sector that really needs it,” because [Venezuela’s oil industry] has been inefficiently run for 20 years or so. asserted
industry → try → years
It is true on some level, but American dollars going into the Venezuelan oil sector is different from what President Trump is telling Americans—that this is going to be a great deal by which Americans get access to Venezuelan oil at zero cost to American taxpayers. asserted
Americans → go → taxpayers
Those two messages seem fundamentally incompatible. asserted
messages → seem → ?
The Trump administration claims that Venezuelan oil will lower American gas prices amid the war in Iran. uncertain
oil → claim → Iran
What do you think? asserted
you → think → What
I think the argument is complete nonsense. asserted
argument → think → ?
Yes, there might be new investment that comes in, but then you’re really talking about production that is years down the road. uncertain
that → come → road
And because the oil system is very globally integrated, what happens in Venezuela is not going to lead in a direct fashion to lower prices for Americans. asserted
happens → integrate → Americans
In fact, if anything, more investment in Venezuela might drive out investment in the rest of the world as companies react to wherever they think is the most profitable approach to meeting oil demand. uncertain
they → drive → demand
They can cancel or just not make investments elsewhere in the world. asserted
They → cancel → world
The disruption in [the Strait of] Hormuz is going to affect oil prices in the next few years, well before any new Venezuelan production. asserted
disruption → go → production
Are there any historical comparisons to what we know about the Trump administration’s oil deal? asserted
we → know → deal
I know a British company owned a lot of Iran’s oil sector before Iran nationalized it in the 1950s. asserted
Iran → know → 1950s
I think the comparison to Iran is a good one. asserted
comparison → think → Iran
The Anglo-Iranian oil company, which today we know as BP, did control the Iranian oil sector and made all the decisions about it from London rather than on behalf of Iranians. asserted
we → know → Iranians
That’s one of the reasons, of course, why you had [Mohammad] Mosaddegh get elected [as prime minister of Iran] in 1951 and a coup against him in 1953 as he tried to nationalize the oil sector, and that continues to be a grievance that Iranians feel against both Britain and the United States as evil overlords of their oil sector. asserted
Iranians → ’ → sector
Another is PDVSA, the Venezuelan national oil company that was created out of mostly American oil companies. asserted
that → create → companies
It used to be Exxon, Mobil, [what is now] Chevron, [and others]. asserted
what → use → ?
These companies were operating Venezuela’s oil sector until, in 1976, the government nationalized them, saying “okay, everybody who’s currently working for those companies: now you’re working for PDVSA.” asserted
you → operate → PDVSA
And they showed up to the same office the same the next day doing the same job, just for a different company. asserted
they → show → company
It was nationalised, and since the ’70s, Venezuela has tried to close the sector off and concentrate the profits of the oil sector in Venezuela. asserted
Venezuela → nationalise → Venezuela
That only works for so long, and they need more foreign investment. asserted
they → work → investment
So then they open the sector back up and close it again every 10 or 15 years. asserted
they → open → it
Now we’re in a new phase of [Venezuela] needing foreign investment to reinvigorate their oil sector. asserted
Venezuela → ’re → sector
But there are good and bad ways of doing this, and this is one that is very likely to be seen by Venezuelans as just Americans stealing Venezuelan oil. asserted
that → be → oil
I think it would be hard to shape that perception because of the way that Maduro was taken out of the country and also because you have President Trump saying how this [deal] is acquiring all of these resources for America. asserted
deal → think → America
…and 14 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support