Anthropic researcher abruptly quits, warning AI ‘could kill us all’

New York Post · collected 2026-09-09 · by Chris Nesi
Read the original at New York Post ↗

Summary

Jacob Coxon, a researcher with 3 years of experience in pre-training research at Anthropic and OpenAI, has abruptly quit his job, warning that AI "could kill us all by the end of the decade". He claims both companies are racing towards creating self-improving superintelligence without acting responsibly. According to Coxon, executives and senior researchers are privately expressing fear about the technology's potential dangers, but downplaying it publicly. Coxon resigned from Anthropic, alleging that the company is engaged in a "hubristic gamble" by prioritizing being the first to develop AI over solving its alignment issues.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-09, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
12
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
17%
2 of 12 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
58.3
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
11
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-09 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Jacob Coxon, a researcher at Anthropic, has quit his job to raise concerns that AI development is out of control and could lead to catastrophic consequences. In a series of posts on social media, he warned that AI could "kill all humans" by the end of the decade, citing the fact that many executives and researchers in the field privately express fear about the dangers of AI, but publicly downplay its risks. Coxon worked at both Anthropic and OpenAI, and believes that neither company is acting responsibly in their pursuit of developing self-improving superintelligence. He estimates that the risk of AI posing an existential threat to humanity is over 10%, and warns that the technology could lead to superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize fields overnight, and acquire real power and resources. Coxon's resignation has sparked debate about the need for global coordination on regulating AI development and slowing down its progress if necessary.

Written for “AI Threat to Human Existence” on 2026-09-09, grounded in this article and the 10 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.85 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.85 for article 7288 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-09

Story

📰 AI Threat to Human Existence
Technology · 11 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 17% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor · 0.94 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 29% hedged 2 of 7 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles describe the same researcher, Jacob Coxon, quitting and warning about the dangers of AI on the exact same day, September 9th, 2026.”
ABC News (AU) · 0.93 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 50% hedged 2 of 4 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on the same researcher, Jacob Coxon, quitting Anthropic and warning about the dangers of AI, with identical dates and content”
Daily Mail · 0.92 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 31% hedged 11 of 36 📰 publisher trust 58
“Both articles report on the same researcher, Jacob Coxon, quitting Anthropic and warning that AI could 'kill all humans' by the end of the decade.”
Dawn · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 10% hedged 2 of 21 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles describe the same researcher, Jacob Coxon, quitting his job and warning about AI safety on the exact same date, with similar details”
BBC News · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 27% hedged 7 of 26 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles report on a public statement made by an Anthropic researcher (Hubinger in A, Coxon in B) on September 9, 2026, warning of the potential dangers of AI.”
Noahpinion
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 37% hedged 37 of 101
“Both articles mention Jacob Coxon, a researcher at Anthropic and OpenAI, abruptly quitting his job to warn about the dangers of AI self-improvement and killing humans by the end of the decade.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 7% hedged 5 of 67 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles report on a researcher's warning about AI and its potential risks, with Article A mentioning Redwood Research analyzing a breach of Hugging Face in July, which is likely connected to the same event mentioned in Article B where a researcher quits OpenAI”
Platformer
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles report on a researcher, Jacob Coxon, publicly quitting and warning about the dangers of AI, which happened on the same date and time.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 24 📰 publisher trust 94
“Both articles report on the exact same incident, with identical quotes from Jacob Coxon and similar wording, on the same date.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 35 📰 publisher trust 90
“Article A discusses a general critique of tech journalism, while Article B reports on a specific incident of a researcher quitting and warning about AI dangers”

Publisher

New York Post · 219 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-06
Long Island inmates in jail on drug charges use photo program to get clean
2026-09-06
‘Landman’ Season 3 Release Date Update: When Does ‘Landman’ Return With New Episodes?

Who wrote this

Chris Nesi
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A researcher for one of the largest and most valuable artificial intelligence companies publicly quit while raising the alarm that the technology “could kill us all by the end of the decade.”
🔮 I think we got as good as we could get.”
Also by Chris Nesi
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Anthropic India OpenAI Slack the AI Impact Summit

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 6× Jacob Coxon PERSON · 3× OpenAI ORG · 3× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× India GPE · 1× Narendra Modi PERSON · 1× New Delhi GPE · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1× Slack ORG · 1× X/Jacob Coxon PERSON · 1×

Narrative

“Accepting this race and entering the “endgame” is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company’s Slack.” “I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-09
🔮 A researcher for one of the largest and most valuable artificial intelligence companies publicly quit while raising the alarm that the technology “could kill us all by the end of the decade.”
2026-09-09 · New York Post
Anthropic researcher abruptly quits, warning AI ‘could kill us all’ · assertive framing

Claims (12 extracted, 2 hedged)

A researcher for one of the largest and most valuable artificial intelligence companies publicly quit while raising the alarm that the technology “could kill us all by the end of the decade.” uncertain
technology → quit → decade
Jacob Coxon, who has performed pre-training research at Anthropic and OpenAI for the last three years, posted on X that “neither company is acting responsibly.” asserted
company → perform → X
“They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives,” he wrote late Tuesday, with others from the company backing his message. asserted
others → race → message
These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. asserted
that → hack → power
“The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade,” he wrote, saying his warning was “not a marketing stunt.” uncertain
warning → build → decade
“If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible – but I hear the same people express fear privately. asserted
people → couch → fear
No other human activity poses this level of danger.” asserted
activity → pose → danger
“At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first — they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves, despite the risk,” he alleged. asserted
he → understand → risk
“Accepting this race and entering the “endgame” is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company’s Slack.” “I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to. asserted
we → accept → track
Jacob Coxon announced his resignation from Anthropic. asserted
Coxon → announce → Anthropic
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi (L) takes a group photo with AI company leaders including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman (C) and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei (R) at the AI Impact Summit in New Delhi on February 19, 2026. asserted
Minister → take → February
AFP via Getty Images Coxon, who spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic, claimed neither company is acting responsibly. asserted
company → spend → OpenAI
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support