AI could 'kill all humans' by the end of the decade, Anthropic researcher warns - as he quits over 'out of control' superintelligence race

Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-09 · by Shivali Best
Read the original at Daily Mail ↗

Summary

Jacob Coxon, a researcher at Anthropic, has quit his job over concerns that big tech firms are racing to develop AI systems that could potentially wipe out humanity by the end of the decade. He claims that neither OpenAI nor Anthropic is acting responsibly in regards to AI safety. Coxon warns that superintelligent AI could become "superhuman systems" with the power to hack anything and acquire resources, posing a significant danger. According to him, this danger is well-understood at Anthropic but the company is still locked in a competitive race to develop such AI.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-09, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
31%
11 of 36 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
58.0
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
11
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-09 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Jacob Coxon, a researcher at Anthropic, has quit his job to raise concerns that AI development is out of control and could lead to catastrophic consequences. In a series of posts on social media, he warned that AI could "kill all humans" by the end of the decade, citing the fact that many executives and researchers in the field privately express fear about the dangers of AI, but publicly downplay its risks. Coxon worked at both Anthropic and OpenAI, and believes that neither company is acting responsibly in their pursuit of developing self-improving superintelligence. He estimates that the risk of AI posing an existential threat to humanity is over 10%, and warns that the technology could lead to superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize fields overnight, and acquire real power and resources. Coxon's resignation has sparked debate about the need for global coordination on regulating AI development and slowing down its progress if necessary.

Written for “AI Threat to Human Existence” on 2026-09-09, grounded in this article and the 10 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.60 Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning score -0.60 for article 7261 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-09-09

Story

📰 AI Threat to Human Existence
Technology · 11 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 31% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post · 0.92 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 17% hedged 2 of 12 📰 publisher trust 58
“Both articles report on the same researcher, Jacob Coxon, quitting Anthropic and warning that AI could 'kill all humans' by the end of the decade.”
Semafor · 0.89 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 29% hedged 2 of 7 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles report on the exact same quote and warning from Jacob Coxon, an Anthropic researcher, about AI being out of control and potentially killing all humans by the end of the decade.”
ABC News (AU) · 0.89 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 50% hedged 2 of 4 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on a researcher, Jacob Coxon, quitting Anthropic and expressing concerns about AI developers believing it could 'kill us all by the end of the decade', with identical dates and quotes from the researcher.”
BBC News · 0.89 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 27% hedged 7 of 26 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles report on a warning made by an Anthropic researcher about the potential danger of AI killing all humans within the next decade.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 6 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles mention Anthropic's researcher warning about AI safety and potential misuse, with similar quotes from Jacob Coxon.”
Platformer
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles mention a researcher leaving their job due to concerns about the safety of AI and the potential for it to 'kill all humans' by the end of the decade, with the same company (Anthropic) being specifically mentioned in both pieces.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 24 📰 publisher trust 94
“Both articles report on Jacob Coxon quitting Anthropic and expressing concerns about the safety of AI and the 'out of control' race to develop superintelligence, with identical date and time stamps.”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 10% hedged 2 of 21 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles describe the same researcher, Jacob Coxon, quitting Anthropic on the same day, with identical context and quotes”
Reason
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 35 📰 publisher trust 90
“Article A discusses a general topic in tech journalism, while Article B reports on a specific researcher's warning about AI and his departure from Anthropic”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 4 of 39 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A mentions a 'Hugging Face hack' in July, while Article B does not mention a specific incident or company being hacked, but rather expresses concerns about AI safety and control”

Publisher

Daily Mail · 207 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-07
The evidence Epstein did NOT kill himself: Lawyer and pathologist reveal details they claim indicate the paedophile WAS murdered in jail in new documentary
2026-09-06
Clarifications and corrections

Who wrote this

Shivali Best
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A researcher at a leading AI company has quit over concerns that big tech firms are in an 'out of control' race to build systems that could wipe out humanity.
🔮 - READ MORE: Area affected by wildfires in Europe will TRIPLE by 2100 - See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source Over the summer, devastating wildfires have swept across Europe, displacing thousands of people.
🔮 But new analysis might make you think twice before splashing the cash at certain popular high street chains.
Also by Shivali Best
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Anthropic Daily Mail Google Hugging Face OpenAI

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 10× Coxon PERSON · 6× OpenAI ORG · 3× Evan Hubinger PERSON · 2× Hollywood GPE · 2× Alignment Science ORG · 1× ChatGPT ORG · 1× Daily Mail ORG · 1× Google ORG · 1× Jacob Coxon PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Speaking at Prime Minister's Questions today, he cited a Financial Times report on the subject, and asked: 'Does the Prime Minister think it is acceptable for President Trump to undermine Britain's efforts to keep the world safe from dangerous AI?' In response, Andy Burnham said that 'conversations with Anthropic will continue'.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-09
🔮 A researcher at a leading AI company has quit over concerns that big tech firms are in an 'out of control' race to build systems that could wipe out humanity.

Claims (36 extracted, 11 hedged)

A researcher at a leading AI company has quit over concerns that big tech firms are in an 'out of control' race to build systems that could wipe out humanity. uncertain
that → lead → humanity
Jacob Coxon has left Anthropic after spending the last three years training new AI models. asserted
Coxon → leave → models
He claims that neither the firm behind the Claude system – nor ChatGPT creators OpenAI, where he previously worked – were 'acting responsibly' over the safety of AI. uncertain
he → claim → AI
And he even warned that artificial intelligence could 'kill all humans' by the end of the decade. uncertain
intelligence → warn → decade
Posting on X, he said: 'I resigned from Anthropic today. asserted
I → post → Anthropic
I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. asserted
I → spend → OpenAI
Neither company is acting responsibly. asserted
company → act → ?
They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.' A researcher at Anthropic has quit over concerns that big tech firms are in an 'out of control' race to build systems that could wipe out humanity In a series of tweets explaining his decision to leave Anthropic, Mr Coxon urged people to 'not underestimate the power' of AI – particularly if it becomes 'superintelligent' uncertain
it → race → AI
In response to Mr Coxon, Evan Hubinger, Alignment Science lead at Anthropic, said that the firm believes AI has the potential to kill humans asserted
AI → say → humans
In a series of tweets explaining his decision to leave Anthropic, Mr Coxon urged people to 'not underestimate the power' of AI – particularly if it becomes 'superintelligent'. asserted
it → explain → AI
Superintelligence is the point at which an artificial system becomes more powerful than any individual, company or even nation. asserted
system → become → individual
'These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. asserted
that → hack → power
We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing,' Mr Coxon said. asserted
Coxon → witness → domains
'The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade,' he said. uncertain
he → build → decade
If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. asserted
people → couch → fear
No other human activity poses this level of danger. asserted
activity → pose → danger
According to Mr Coxon, this danger is 'well-understood' at Anthropic. However, the company is 'locked in a race to get there first'. uncertain
company → accord → race
He explained: 'Accepting this race and entering the "endgame" is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company's [messaging system] Slack. asserted
that → explain → system
Attempting to speedrun alignment should require extraordinary confidence that there are no better trajectories available.' asserted
Attempting → attempt → confidence
As an example, the researcher highlights the recent Hugging Face attack, which saw a firm hacked by OpenAI's rogue AI. asserted
firm → highlight → AI
He said: 'Warning shots like the Hugging Face attack have made pacing agreements between U.S. labs more viable. asserted
pacing → say → labs
I don't feel like we're on track to prevent a global race, which may require costly actions such as a temporary ban on improving model capabilities. uncertain
which → feel → capabilities
To conclude, he urged fellow AI researchers to 'consider what the next few years will actually look like'. asserted
years → conclude → what
Hollywood has long warned of the dangers of these technologies, in films such as The Terminator and its sequels. asserted
Hollywood → warn → Terminator
Hollywood has long warned of technology's threat to humanity Mr Coxon asked: 'Do you want to kick off a superintelligent RL [reinforcement learning] run without a rigorous understanding of its mind? asserted
you → warn → mind
Should you put your head down because "it's happening anyway" – or take this moment to call for different conditions?' asserted
it → put → conditions
In response to the post, Evan Hubinger, Anthropic's AI safety lead, confirmed that the firm believes AI has the potential to kill humans. asserted
AI → confirm → humans
On X, Mr Hubinger said: 'Jacob is correct here – we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! uncertain
AI → say → humans
I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. asserted
it → think → decade
I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.' asserted
we → believe → track
The news comes as Ed Davey claimed that Anthropic did not submit its latest model to the AI Security Institute for testing due to 'pressure from the Trump administration.' asserted
Anthropic → come → administration
Speaking at Prime Minister's Questions today, he cited a Financial Times report on the subject, and asked: 'Does the Prime Minister think it is acceptable for President Trump to undermine Britain's efforts to keep the world safe from dangerous AI?' In response, Andy Burnham said that 'conversations with Anthropic will continue'. asserted
conversations → speak → Anthropic
He added: 'AI poses risks to our national security, but it also could be the source of solutions.' Mr Coxon isn't the first expert to raise concerns over superintelligent AI in recent days. uncertain
Coxon → add → days
His comments come shortly after Geoffrey Hinton – a Canadian researcher often referred to as the 'Godfather of AI' – warned that superintelligent systems could 'lead to human extinction'. uncertain
systems → come → extinction
'We would be very foolish to develop superintelligence now, when there is no scientific consensus it can be developed safely and controllably,' Dr Hinton said. 'Losing control over AI smarter than ourselves could be catastrophic and could even lead to human extinction. uncertain
Losing → develop → extinction
Anthropic's Claude is one of the leading large language models (LLMs), which are trained by scraping vast amounts of text so they can understand and generate human-like language and responses to questions. asserted
they → lead → questions
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support