Why Donald Trump won in 2024

Read the original at Noahpinion ↗
Noahpinion · collected 2026-10-11 · by Noah Smith commentary

Quick Summary

This article, written as an opinion piece, argues why Donald Trump won the 2024 election despite his failures on various issues. The author suggests Trump's strategy was to create minor controversies to distract from his governance problems and polarize voters along party lines rather than issue-based divisions. With Trump winning every swing state and gaining a majority of the popular vote, the piece reflects on previous analyses of Democratic failings that contributed to Trump’s victory, emphasizing the importance of introspection for Democrats before it becomes too late due to potential shifts in political power dynamics.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-11, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In 2024, Donald Trump won the presidential election despite his presidency being seen as a failure by many. He struggled with issues like inflation and the Iran War, leading to declining approval ratings. To divert attention from these failures, Trump created minor controversies such as renaming artificial intelligence "artificial superintelligence" or claiming he should have won the Nobel Peace Prize. However, these attempts to polarize Republicans against Democrats did not succeed in improving his image; instead, they highlighted his tendency toward crass and self-serving behavior. Some progressive economists who downplayed inflation risks during Joe Biden's presidency are now criticized for their electoral miscalculation. Trump is expected to face a tough midterm election and may become a lame duck president, issuing more grandiose executive orders while dealing with Congressional investigations.

Written for “Trump Wins Election 2024” on 2026-10-11, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 71704 (high confidence, 4 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-11

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
566
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
6%
35 of 566 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly left
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Correction & hedging signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-10-11 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Trump Wins Election 2024
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 8 of 82 📰 publisher trust 72
“The articles discuss different time periods of Trump's presidency and campaign strategies, not the same specific incident.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 12
“The articles discuss different periods and aspects of Trump's political impact, rather than a single specific incident.”
How to Beat Trump’s Noise Machine different event · 90%
TIME
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 4% hedged 3 of 68 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles discuss different aspects of President Trump's presidency and do not refer to the same specific incident or time.”

Publisher

Noahpinion · 38 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Noah Smith
32 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The trick will probably fail, just as Trump’s promise to give every American $5000 for voting Republican backfired.
2026-10-11 · assertive framing · Why Donald Trump won in 2024
🔮 Right now I can’t even think of what an appropriate comparison would be.
2026-10-09 · assertive framing · Maybe the Rapture is already here
🔮 In 1998 he famously wrote: The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in ‘Metcalfe’s law’—which states that the number of potential connections in a network is proportional to the square of the number of participants—becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other!
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · What the AI boom is doing for Americans
🔮 I wrote one of them back in May:
2026-10-03 · assertive framing · The second Trump presidency is a world-historic failure
🔮 Earlier this year, Americans were mostly concerned that AI would take their jobs.
2026-10-01 · assertive framing · Roundup #89: It isn’t X, it’s Y
🔮 Back in the early 2000s, as far as I could tell, pretty much nobody in the world cared about what some dorky hoodie-wearing computer programmers were up to on a Saturday night in SF.
2026-09-25 · assertive framing · Four eras of San Francisco tech culture
🔮 Democrats' decision to formalize land acknowledgments in their party meetings could haunt their candidates more than they realize…
2026-09-24 · assertive framing · No, you are not on Indigenous land
🔮 Part of that involved thinking a lot about the future of artificial intelligence, and a lot of the tech people who would end up working at AI companies — especially Anthropic — were very influenced by those discussions.
2026-09-22 · assertive framing · The problem(s) with utilitarianism
🔮 In the Long Telegram, Kennan laid out a theory of how Soviet power could be defeated.
2026-09-20 · assertive framing · How we can beat China
🔮 There are five main groups of people opposing the slowdown: The Trump administration, which is worried that an AI slowdown might also slow down economic growth Investors who think a slowdown might hurt their bottom line Libertarians and techno-optimists who think regulating technological progress is bad on principle China hawks who worry that a slowdown would let China take the lead in the AI race Progressives who spent the last few years telling themselves that AI doesn’t work, that AI is a huge economic bubble, and so on, and who now can’t bring themselves to admit that yes, the techbros actually built something that works. This is a strange alliance indeed.
2026-09-18 · assertive framing · Roundup #88: Is it time to panic yet?
Also by Noah Smith
Maybe the Rapture is already here
2026-10-09 · Noahpinion
Roundup #89: It isn’t X, it’s Y
2026-10-01 · Noahpinion
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 32 articles by Noah Smith →

Topics

American Democrats GOP Republican the Iran War

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 16× Democrats NORP · 7× GOP ORG · 3× Hispanic NORP · 3× Republican NORP · 3× American NORP · 2× Republicans NORP · 2× Biden PERSON · 1× Congressional NORP · 1× Donald Trump’s PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Some progressive economics commentators — I will not name names, because I’m trying to be a less confrontational blogger these days — also consistently downplayed the risks of inflation and extolled the many benefits of full employment during Biden’s tenure in office.9 In retrospect, whether or not this was a good move from a moral standpoint, it looks like a big mistake from an electoral standpoint.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-11
🔮 The trick will probably fail, just as Trump’s promise to give every American $5000 for voting Republican backfired.
2026-10-11 · Noahpinion
Why Donald Trump won in 2024 · assertive framing

Claims (566 extracted, 35 hedged)

Everyone except the die-hard faithful now realizes that Donald Trump’s second presidency is a colossal failure. asserted
presidency → realize → faithful
The president is doing his best to gin up symbolic, minor controversies in order to activate negative polarization and distract from his spectacular failures on inflation, the Iran War, corruption, racial harmony, and so on. asserted
president → do → inflation
These include demanding that artificial intelligence be renamed “artificial superintelligence”, bellowing that he should have won the Nobel Peace Prize, and conducting an execution on live TV. asserted
he → include → TV
The goal is to get Republicans fighting Democrats over these controversies, in order to trick everyone into focusing on how much they hate the other team instead of how much they hate Trump. asserted
they → get → Trump
The trick will probably fail, just as Trump’s promise to give every American $5000 for voting Republican backfired. asserted
promise → fail → Republican
All of these little tempests-in-teapots simply reinforce what a cruel, selfish, petty buffoon Trump is. asserted
Trump → reinforce → teapots
And Trump’s approval rating just drifts lower and lower: asserted
rating → drift → ?
Trump will probably lose the midterms, and become a lame duck president, spamming increasingly grandiose, unworkable executive orders while battling a stream of Congressional investigations. asserted
Trump → lose → investigations
That means the window is closing on my ability to force Democrats to reckon with their failures during the Biden years. asserted
window → mean → years
If and when Trump loses a national election, there will be far less pressure for soul-searching on the left. asserted
Trump → lose → left
And once the GOP is no longer in control of all three branches of government, the Democrats will be able to influence actual policy instead of sitting around rebuilding their brand. asserted
Democrats → influence → brand
So before that happens, I want to summon the last fading scraps of the self-reflection that Democrats and progressives were briefly forced into after Trump thumped Kamala Harris two years ago. asserted
Trump → happen → Harris
When Trump won, I wrote four blog posts trying to explain where the Democrats had gone wrong: asserted
Democrats → win → posts
So today I’m going to repost all four parts of my election post-mortem, so that the progressives and Democrats among my readers can take one final moment to reflect on how not to enable the rise of authoritarian rightist leaders in future election cycles. asserted
progressives → go → cycles
Identity politics isn’t working asserted
politics → work → ?
I’ve made no secret of the fact that I think Trump is a terrible choice for America, but there’s no denying that the American people have made their choice. asserted
people → make → choice
Trump is currently projected to win every single swing state. asserted
Trump → project → state
He outperformed his 2020 performance in every single county in the country. asserted
He → outperform → country
He’s projected to win a solid majority of the popular vote — the first time a Republican has done so since 2004. asserted
Republican → project → 2004
I still don’t like the Electoral College as an institution, but you can’t blame it for this result like you could for 2016. uncertain
you → like → result
In fact, Trump’s victory was part of a more general Republican landslide — the GOP took the Senate and improved its majority in the House. asserted
GOP → take → House
A map of political shifts between 2020 and 2024 shows almost solid red. asserted
map → show → red
I suppose a small silver lining here is that we won’t have to spend the next two months enduring waves of “Stop the Steal” election denials, lawsuits, and threats to repeat January 6th. asserted
we → suppose → 6th
Democracy delivered Trump a victory, and so Trump has little incentive to attack democracy. asserted
Trump → deliver → democracy
In fact, that silver lining might extend to the long term too. uncertain
lining → extend → term
Trump and the GOP won because nonwhite voters and working-class voters — traditional Democratic constituencies — shifted his way. asserted
voters → win → ?
Dems still won Hispanic, Black, and Asian voters overall, but their margins fell significantly from previous elections, while actually improving with White voters: In fact, exit polls show Trump winning a solid majority of Hispanic men! asserted
Trump → win → men
Over at Matt Yglesias’ blog, Jed Kolko shows that heavily Hispanic areas swung harder toward Trump than any other parts of the country: asserted
areas → show → country
Ronald Reagan’s prophecy that Latinos would become Republicans is coming to pass. asserted
Latinos → become → ?
Income has realigned as well. asserted
Income → realign → ?
Democrats are now the party of the educated upper middle and wealthy class, but have lost their appeal to the middle and working classes: asserted
Democrats → lose → classes
This largely destroys the narrative that nonwhite immigration will demographically drown White Americans under a tide of imported minority votes. asserted
immigration → destroy → votes
In fact, it vindicates my guest poster Wally Nowinski, who observed that high-turnout elections like this one now help Republicans, because marginal voters — working-class Americans and Hispanic Americans — now lean to the right: asserted
voters → vindicate → right
At some point, Republicans are going to realize this, and hopefully become less anxious about America’s racial future. asserted
Republicans → go → future
Hopefully they will also realize that any attempt to make voting harder actually hurts them in the future, because the impact would fall disproportionately on their own base. asserted
impact → realize → base
I expect these realizations to take some time to sink in, but ultimately their effect could be very salutary for American democracy. uncertain
effect → expect → democracy
In the days of Nixon and Reagan, Republicans never worried about democracy itself — it was obviously on their side. asserted
it → worry → side
Even in 2004, Republicans could tell themselves that we lived in a “center-right nation”. uncertain
we → tell → nation
Now, Trump’s victory, powered by lower-income Americans and Hispanic men, will hopefully convince the GOP that democracy is still a game they can win. asserted
they → power → GOP
A democracy needs both major parties to believe they can win via persuasion rather than by organized resistance, and 2024 showed that Republicans can still do that — even if the method of persuasion is one that I personally wish hadn’t worked so well. asserted
I → need → persuasion
…and 526 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support