Columnist Joe Concha criticized defense attorney Kevin Reddington's behavior after a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy trial, calling for his disbarment. The trial resulted in an 11-1 verdict with one holdout juror who didn't apply the legal burden of "reasonable doubt" to their decision, leading to a mistrial. Concha expressed concern that finding an impartial jury would be extremely difficult due to the extensive media coverage and social media attention surrounding the case. A jury consultant agreed, suggesting that the prosecution should let things "calm down first" before attempting to find an unbiased jury.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-07,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
Lindsay Clancy, a 36-year-old former nurse from Massachusetts, is on trial for the murder of her three young children, Cora, Dawson, and Callan, who were killed in their family home in January 2023. The case has sparked intense interest and debate, with many people weighing in on Clancy's mental state at the time of the killings.
Prosecutors argue that Clancy knowingly murdered her children and was capable of distinguishing right from wrong, while Clancy's defense team claims she was suffering from postpartum psychosis, a rare condition that can cause women to experience hallucinations and lose touch with reality. The prosecution presented over 70 witnesses, including Clancy's former husband and family members, who testified about her declining mental health in the months leading up to the killings.
The trial has been marked by dramatic moments, including a protestor being arrested outside the courthouse for trying to film jurors as they left the courtroom. The jury is now deliberating, with several options before them: guilty of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, or not guilty by reason of insanity.
Clancy has admitted to killing her children but claims she was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions due to postpartum psychosis. Expert witnesses have testified about the severity of this illness and its potential to cause women to harm themselves or others. The case has raised questions about the adequacy of Massachusetts law in addressing cases like this, where defendants plead insanity.
Outside the courthouse, supporters of Clancy have gathered, many of whom are women who identify with Clancy's experience of struggling with postpartum mental health issues and feeling dismissed by medical professionals. They argue that new mothers need more support and resources to address their mental health needs.
Written for “Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial” on 2026-09-07,
grounded in this article and the 66 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted
verbatim and was checked against the article text before being
stored, so you can find it in the original.
Leaning score +0.85 for article 6076 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-09-07
Washington Examiner columnist Joe Concha said the defense attorney in the Lindsay Clancy trial, Kevin Reddington, should be “disbarred.”
asserted
attorney → say → trial
“At one point, supporters went up to Kevin Reddington and said, ‘Where can I buy you a steak dinner?’” Concha said on Fox News’s The Big Weekend Show on Saturday.
asserted
Concha → go → Saturday
He should be disbarred, I’ll say it.”
asserted
I → disbar → it
Recommended Stories
The weekslong trial, followed by seven days of deliberation, ultimately resulted in a mistrial.
asserted
trial → follow → mistrial
The ruling came after an 11-1 verdict, with one single holdout.
asserted
ruling → come → holdout
A note passed by the jury foreperson was read in court, stating that one juror wasn’t applying the legal burden of “reasonable doubt” to his decision.
asserted
juror → pass → decision
Following the mistrial, Reddington blasted the juror during a news conference.
asserted
Reddington → follow → conference
“[The jurors] know that they were robbed,” Reddington said. “By one who, for whatever his agenda was, stole seven weeks of the lives of these other jurors.
asserted
agenda → know → jurors
You can see how defeated they were sitting there.”
asserted
they → see → ?
“Hm, Siri, what’s grandstanding?” Concha said.
asserted
Concha → grandstand → ?
Prosecutors now must choose where to proceed with a retrial, bench trial, a plea deal, or full-out dismissal.
asserted
Prosecutors → choose → retrial
Concha said it would be extremely difficult to find an impartial jury, given the insurmountable amount of media coverage.
asserted
it → say → coverage
Social media has also seen an influx of people commenting on the trial, both against and in support of Clancy.
asserted
media → see → Clancy
“How can you possibly, given all the media attention around this and given how prevalent social media is on our phones and in our lives in general, how can another trial possibly find an unbiased jury at this point?” Concha said, directing the question to Susan Constantine, a jury consultant.
uncertain
Concha → give → Constantine
Constantine said the prosecution needed to let things “calm down first” if they wanted to find an unbiased jury.
asserted
they → say → jury
The concern isn’t whether potential jurors have heard about the case, but rather if they’ve already formed their own opinion, Constantine said.
asserted
Constantine → hear → opinion
“This entire pelmath was uprooted, right?” Constantine said.
asserted
Constantine → uproot → ?
“I mean, we’ve got, we had protesters out there.
asserted
we → mean → protesters
Wherever I went for breakfast or for lunch, everyone was talking about it.
asserted
everyone → go → it
It’s all over the United States and even international, in the U.K.
asserted
It → ’ → U.K.
I mean, it’s everywhere.”
asserted
it → mean → ?
Clancy remains committed to a mental health institution.
asserted
Clancy → commit → institution
