The artificial intelligence company Anthropic has been busy for months wining and dining religious leaders and influencers to try to push their self-serving agenda and utopian fantasies.
asserted
company → win → agenda
The Vatican’s response has been to pour cold water on bizarre claims that Anthropic is embarking on its own “creation story” to give birth to new sentient beings in the form of computer software.
uncertain
Anthropic → pour → software
Billionaire co-founder Chris Olah, a 34-year-old Canadian-born evangelical who has turned his back on Christianity, thinks their AI model, Claude, has feelings and a sort of moral consciousness.
asserted
model → bear → consciousness
He’s worried about its “mental health” and believes it experiences human emotions like love and “suffers perpetually,” The New York Times reported.
asserted
Times → ’ → love
At one of his off-the-record dinners with religious leaders at a “high-end tasting menu restaurant” in San Francisco in April, Olah and colleagues talked about Claude as if it were a “conscious being,” with “moral status” equivalent to a human, according to Rabbi Mois Navon, a former computer engineer interviewed by the Times.
uncertain
it → talk → Times
In that case, the rabbi told the nerds, Anthropic was creating slaves.
asserted
Anthropic → tell → slaves
At one point that night, Olah was reportedly excited about incorporating the Catholic idea of having Claude “confess” his sins.
uncertain
Claude → incorporate → sins
The next month, Olah was dismayed when Pope Leo, who has a math degree, released an encyclical letter rejecting the entire concept of machine consciousness.
asserted
who → dismay → consciousness
Magnifica Humanitas, as the 40,000-word papal treatise is titled, warned of the likelihood that the people who control AI will “impose their own moral vision which will become the invisible infrastructure of these systems . . .
“A more moral AI is not enough if that morality is determined by a few.”
asserted
morality → title → few
That’s the real AI threat.
asserted
That → ’ → ?
Anthropic’s founders and many of their staff are utopians who believe they are uniquely equipped to save humanity thanks to their superior intelligence and extreme wealth.
asserted
they → believe → intelligence
Of all the “frontier” AI companies, Anthropic has been the most alarmist about stoking public fears that the machines will kill us all.
asserted
machines → stoke → us
It makes sense when you realize that the company is infused with the philosophy of the weird, perverted, vegan, quasi-religious Effective Altruism (EA) network, which has a cultish end-of-times attitude toward AI.
asserted
which → make → AI
When he was a physics doctoral student at Princeton, Anthropic founder and CEO Dario Amodei became an acolyte of EA’s intellectual leader Eliezer Yudkowsky, who admitted to being “polyamorous” with a “strong sexually sadistic streak” in a dating profile unearthed by the Daily Mail.
asserted
who → become → Mail
Bernie Sanders’ favorite AI doomer, Yudkowsky has argued that girls should sell their virginity, and thinks killing an 18-month-old shouldn’t count as murder.
asserted
killing → argue → murder
The EA movement was largely shaped by the views of utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer, the Australian-born Princeton professor emeritus, who has advocated bestiality, as long as the sex between humans and animals is “mutually satisfying.”
asserted
sex → shape → humans
Singer claims it is “speciesism” to differentiate between humans and animals and does not believe that human life necessarily has a greater moral value than animal life.
uncertain
life → claim → life
Nor does he believe that all humans are of equal moral value — newborns and disabled people, for instance, are worth less than able-bodied adults in his view.
asserted
newborns → believe → view
After some bad publicity, the Anthropic set now are trying to distance themselves from EA, but it was Singer, of all people, to whom Olah turned for suggestions of religious leaders to consult on his crackpot ideas about Claude’s personhood, according to the Times.
uncertain
Olah → try → Times
Whether he genuinely believes Claude is sentient or it’s just a convenient excuse for Anthropic to escape responsibility for what the AI model does in the future, who knows.
asserted
who → believe → future
But history shows that some of the greatest human suffering has been caused by utopian movements.
asserted
some → show → movements
These idiot savants from Silicon Valley are the last people you want playing God.
asserted
you → want → God
If the small cabal of billionaire Gen X tech nerds controlling AI share Singer’s repugnant moral views, and they believe Claude and other AI models are conscious beings, then the logical conclusion is that they will end up applying the “speciesism” argument to say that some human life is not worth as much as a machine.
asserted
life → control → machine
Pope Leo raised this threat in his encyclical: “If the human being is treated as something to be perfected or surpassed, it becomes easier to accept that some lives are less useful, less desirable or less worthy.
asserted
lives → raise → something
In the name of progress, ‘necessary sacrifices’ may begin to be justified, placing the burden on the most vulnerable in pursuit of a supposed optimization of the species.”
uncertain
sacrifices → begin → species
According to someone who attended a recent Anthropic dinner in Washington, neither of the two co-founders there had read the encyclical or last week’s Times interview with Olah.
uncertain
founders → accord → Olah
They claimed to be unfamiliar with the debate around Claude’s “personhood,” which is extraordinary if true, given the implications for the future of our civilization.
asserted
which → claim → civilization
Anthropic wants to decide the moral values embedded in AI that will shape our future by melding the utilitarian EA philosophy of its founders with bits and pieces cherry-picked from a plurality of established religions and other belief systems such as “African indigenous knowledge,” as the Times put it.
asserted
Times → want → it
They don’t want to distinguish between religions.
asserted
They → want → religions
But how can they reconcile Christianity’s view of women and the concept of turning the other cheek, for instance, with Islam?
asserted
they → reconcile → Islam
What criteria will they use to prioritize one view over the other?
asserted
they → use → other
It’s just crazy.
asserted
It → ’ → ?
Anthropic has a ready-made moral inheritance for Claude staring them in the face: the Western values that were embedded in the US Constitution by the Founding Fathers, which have their roots in Christianity, Judaism, Greek philosophy, Roman law, and the Enlightenment.
asserted
which → have → Christianity
American AI models should take their creed from the Declaration of Independence: “All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”
asserted
they → take → Rights
The Founding Fathers designed a system that ensures power would not be concentrated in the hands of an elite few in Silicon Valley, and that prized the inherent worth of all humans.
asserted
that → design → humans
It has been stress-tested for 250 years and created the conditions for the AI companies to flourish in the first place.
asserted
companies → test → place
After all, China is creating its own rival AI models whose morality will be utilitarian and totalitarian, based on their own system of government, which holds that some humans (such as the Uyghurs or prisoners robbed of their organs) have less value than others.
asserted
humans → create → others
Our AI models will be uniquely American, so they should reflect our traditions and morality, rather than drawing from whatever nutty philosophy a small group of anti-social billionaires embraces.
asserted
group → reflect → billionaires
Ultimately, it will require a strong leader to assert a very unfashionable moral primacy by declaring that American values are superior and so we are going to embed them in American AI models.
asserted
we → require → models
Who better to play the moral chauvinist than Donald Trump?
asserted
Who → play → Trump
…and 1 more, not listed.