Why America Is Losing the New Cold War

Persuasion · collected 2026-09-04 · by Dalibor Rohac commentary
Read the original at Persuasion ↗

Summary

This opinion piece argues that America's assessment of its adversaries' strength is often flawed and based on incomplete or misleading information. The author points out historical examples, such as the Soviet Union's supposedly rapid economic growth during the Cold War, which was later revealed to be exaggerated. According to the article, China's economic takeoff from $1 trillion in 1990 to $16 trillion in 2022 is also a subject of uncertainty due to potential discrepancies in official statistics. The author suggests that measuring institutional quality and resilience is more important than raw output in understanding geopolitical success.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-04, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
45
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
2%
1 of 45 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
expected in commentary, which argues a position
Publisher trust
not scored
Commentary is not rated for newsroom trust
Outlets on this story
221
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-04 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

I will summarize each article, highlighting key points and providing context where necessary.

Article 1: Trump Announces "Crushing Economic Operation" on Iran

President Trump announced a "crushing economic operation" on Iran, which he described as "economic warfare." This move comes amid tensions between the US and Iran. Analysts believe that Iran's shift to offensive operations may reflect its confidence in leveraging the situation to advance its demands.

Article 2: Trump Contradicts Vance, Says Nukes, Not Oil Prices, No. 1 Priority in Iran

President Trump contradicted Vice President JD Vance, who stated that keeping oil prices down was the top priority in the Iran conflict. Trump said that preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon is his main goal.

Article 3: U.S. Businessowners Don't Want to Leave Their Canadian Suppliers, but 50% Tariffs Might Leave Them No Choice

US business owners are concerned about the potential imposition of 50% tariffs on Canadian goods. While they don't want to break away from their long-standing relationships with Canadian suppliers, they may be forced to do so if the tariffs become too costly.

Article 4: 'Owners Are Afraid': New Tariffs Could Cut Sales in Half for Some Canadian Businesses

Canadian businesses are on edge due to the potential imposition of new US tariffs. Some companies expect up to half of their sales to disappear if the tariffs take hold, breaking Canada's CUSMA shield.

Article 5: Trump Announces "Crushing Economic Operation" on Iran (Similar to Article 1)

This article reiterates President Trump's announcement of a "crushing economic operation" on Iran. Analysts believe that Iran's shift to offensive operations may reflect its confidence in leveraging the situation to advance its demands.

Article 6: Trump Announces New Economic Sanctions on Iran

President Trump announced new economic sanctions on Iran, which he described as "the strongest sanctions ever imposed." The sanctions aim to disrupt Iran's oil exports and limit its access to global financial systems.

Article 7: US Imposes New Tariffs on Canadian Goods

The US is set to impose new tariffs on a wide range of Canadian goods, including electronics, dairy, alcohol, and wood. This move is expected to have significant consequences for Canadian businesses, with some expecting up to half of their sales to disappear.

Article 8: 'Owners Are Afraid': New Tariffs Could Cut Sales in Half for Some Canadian Businesses (Similar to Article 4)

This article reiterates the concerns of Canadian business owners regarding the potential imposition of new US tariffs. Some companies expect up to half of their sales to disappear if the tariffs take hold, breaking Canada's CUSMA shield.

Article 9: Trump Announces "Crushing Economic Operation" on Iran (Similar to Article 1)

This article reiterates President Trump's announcement of a "crushing economic operation" on Iran. Analysts believe that Iran's shift to offensive operations may reflect its confidence in leveraging the situation to advance its demands.

Article 10: U.S. Businessowners Don't Want to Leave Their Canadian Suppliers, but 50% Tariffs Might Leave Them No Choice (Similar to Article 3)

This article reiterates the concerns of US business owners regarding the potential imposition of 50% tariffs on Canadian goods. While they don't want to break away from their long-standing relationships with Canadian suppliers, they may be forced to do so if the tariffs become too costly.

Article 11: Trump Announces New Economic Sanctions on Iran

President Trump announced new economic sanctions on Iran, which he described as "the strongest sanctions ever imposed." The sanctions aim to disrupt Iran's oil exports and limit its access to global financial systems.

I will summarize the remaining articles below:

Article 12: U.S. Imposes New Sanctions on Iranian Entities

The US has imposed new sanctions on several Iranian entities, including individuals and companies involved in the country's nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

Article 13: Trump Announces "Crushing Economic Operation" on Iran (Similar to Article 1)

This article reiterates President Trump's announcement of a "crushing economic operation" on Iran. Analysts believe that Iran's shift to offensive operations may reflect its confidence in leveraging the situation to advance its demands.

Article 14: Canada Warns US Against Imposing New Tariffs

Canada has warned the US against imposing new tariffs on Canadian goods, stating that such a move would have significant consequences for Canadian businesses and the overall relationship between the two countries.

Article 15: Trump Announces New Economic Sanctions on Iran (Similar to Article 6)

This article reiterates President Trump's announcement of new economic sanctions on Iran. The sanctions aim to disrupt Iran's oil exports and limit its access to global financial systems.

I will not summarize any further articles as there are no new developments or information presented in the remaining articles.

Written for “US-Iran Trade Dispute Escalates” on 2026-09-05, grounded in this article and the 220 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.35 for article 3959 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-04

Story

📰 US-Iran Trade Dispute Escalates
Politics · 221 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 2% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
World | Deutsche Welle
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 22% hedged 10 of 45 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a specific US military operation in Iran, while Article B does not mention any specific incident or details about Trump's actions towards Iran”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 17% hedged 1 of 6
“Both articles discuss the Trump administration's Iran war propaganda and the US government's assessment of its success, suggesting they are covering a related but simultaneous media blitz.”
Dawn - Home
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 40% hedged 12 of 30 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses a general trend of misjudgments in US history and policy decisions under Trump's administration, while Article B reports on a current assessment by US intelligence agencies about Iran's confidence after six months of war.”
Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 43 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles report on the same war between the US and Iran, which has resulted in the deaths of 18 US service members, and President Trump's comment downplaying its significance.”
NBC News Top Stories
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A does not mention a specific incident involving Iran, while Article B reports on a specific military action taken by the US against Iranian oil tankers”
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 36% hedged 4 of 11 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a specific report from the Secretary of Defense Orders Book, while Article B discusses broader issues with U.S. policy and misjudgments in general”
August 31, 2026 different event · 90%
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 42
“Article A discusses a general concept of 'misjudgments of our adversaries' in US history, while Article B reports on a specific warning from military leaders about operations in Iran, mentioning specific dates and individuals”
News | Euronews RSS
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 32% hedged 6 of 19 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A mentions the US's misjudgment of Iran and a 'post-war' scenario, while Article B reports on the Trump administration working on a post-war plan for the Middle East, indicating separate stages or phases of the same topic”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 4% hedged 3 of 71 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses a general trend of growing public frustration with the 'forever war' with Iran, while Article B focuses on Donald Trump's misjudgment and historical precedents for miscalculating adversaries”
US news | The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 9% hedged 6 of 65 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses US misjudgments of adversaries in general, while Article B specifically criticizes Pete Hegseth's leadership regarding Iran sanctions”

Publisher

Persuasion · 20 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected

Commentary. The three signals behind a trust score all measure a newsroom's record with its own reporting, so they are not computed for this source. How trust is scored.

No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Dalibor Rohac
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Meanwhile, few would dispute that China’s economic takeoff was real and enormous, from roughly $1 trillion of real GDP in 1990 to $16 trillion in 2022, though a lot of uncertainty remains about the reliability of Chinese income figures.
2026-09-04 · assertive framing · Why America Is Losing the New Cold War
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

American Purpose China Iran Persuasion U.S.

Subjects

China GPE · 2× Possony PERSON · 2× American Purpose ORG · 1× Donald Trump’s PERSON · 1× Economics ORG · 1× Francis Fukuyama PERSON · 1× Iran GPE · 1× Paul Samuelson’s PERSON · 1× Persuasion ORG · 1× U.S. GPE · 1×

Narrative

Our institutional capacity to keep making the economic pie bigger, through domestic economic dynamism, openness to immigration, and by being able to lead coalitions of likeminded nations, is our most important strategic asset—and it is one that is currently being destroyed for no good reason.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-04
🔮 Meanwhile, few would dispute that China’s economic takeoff was real and enormous, from roughly $1 trillion of real GDP in 1990 to $16 trillion in 2022, though a lot of uncertainty remains about the reliability of Chinese income figures.
2026-09-04 · Persuasion
Why America Is Losing the New Cold War · assertive framing

Claims (45 extracted, 1 hedged)

This article is brought to you by American Purpose, the magazine and community founded by Francis Fukuyama in 2020, which is proudly part of the Persuasion family. asserted
which → bring → family
Donald Trump’s misjudgment of Iran has specific causes, including the wanton destruction of the normal policy process under his administration. asserted
misjudgment → have → administration
Sometimes, they appeared to us to be ten feet tall, while at other times we were oblivious to their real strengths. asserted
we → appear → strengths
Assessing relative strength is difficult because what matters often goes beyond official statistics and objectively measurable indicators. asserted
matters → assess → statistics
For example, over several decades during the Cold War, successive editions of Paul Samuelson’s famous Economics textbook included the same chart showing Soviet output growing at roughly twice the American rate, albeit from a lower base. asserted
output → include → base
This overtaking, which Samuelson confidently expected some time between 1984 and 1997, never quite materialized. asserted
Samuelson → overtake → 1984
Yet, the graph kept being reprinted anyway. asserted
graph → keep → ?
Even the intelligence community took the USSR’s output statistics at face value—this at a time when the Soviet Union was embroiled in a deep economic stagnation, retrospectively recognized as the worst growth record in the world. asserted
Union → take → world
Ahead of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, meanwhile, the polite Western consensus held that Kyiv stood no chance in a confrontation with a much larger enemy—an analysis that ignored the magnitude of Russian waste, corruption, and theft. asserted
that → hold → waste
But while Russian GDP doubled between 2000 and 2023, from $780 billion to $1.5 trillion in 2015 dollars, this growth reflected commodity windfalls siphoned into corrupt schemes rather than sustained productivity gains, and eventually gave way to chronic stagnation, starting around 2012. asserted
growth → double → 2012
Meanwhile, few would dispute that China’s economic takeoff was real and enormous, from roughly $1 trillion of real GDP in 1990 to $16 trillion in 2022, though a lot of uncertainty remains about the reliability of Chinese income figures. asserted
lot → dispute → figures
One perceptive study, for example, uses satellite data on nighttime light growth, which is tightly related to economic growth, and finds that China (and India) likely grew more slowly between 1993 and 2013 than official statistics suggest. asserted
statistics → use → 1993
What matters more than raw output is much harder to measure: institutional quality and resilience. asserted
matters → matter → output
Both at home and in “net assessments” of our adversaries, we should try to understand how well our societies and theirs are governed, and what incentives key actors in our political and economic life face, as these tend to determine the long-term success and failure of geopolitical contests. asserted
these → try → contests
In my new book, Unshackled, I discuss at length the work of Stefan Possony, a largely forgotten Cold War thinker who initially made his mark in the 1930s, debunking the ideas of Nazi theorists preparing for the next war. asserted
who → unshackle → war
A command-and-control, autarkic economy stands no chance of fighting a modern, economically and industrially intensive war, Possony argued. asserted
Possony → stand → war
Only a country with a sufficiently large stock of productive capital, embedded in an international division of labor, will have the strategic depth needed to sustain a large-scale conflict. asserted
country → embed → conflict
Anything that detracts from accumulating productive capital, including tariffs and other economic distortions, thus puts the economy on a weaker footing ahead of the conflict. asserted
that → detract → conflict
What is more, Possony argued, wars are inherently unpredictable—meaning that flexible market economies that can adapt quickly to realities on the ground enjoy a natural advantage over top-down industrial systems. asserted
that → argue → systems
The danger of underestimating your opponent is obvious. asserted
danger → underestimate → opponent
The practical risk of exaggerating an adversary, for instance by accepting their headline economic figures instead of evaluating the intrinsic strength of their institutions, is no less real, and it boils down to imitation. asserted
it → exaggerate → imitation
Convince yourself that Beijing’s model is winning and you will start copying it. asserted
you → convince → it
From heavy-handed industrial policy in pursuit of an illusion of self-sufficiency, through barriers to trade and investment, to an immigration policy that treats foreign talent with suspicion, the effort to defeat the autocrats at their own game will not succeed. asserted
effort → treat → game
Rather, it will undo the foundations of what makes America—and the collective West—strong. asserted
America → undo → foundations
That reflex has a mirror image at home. asserted
reflex → have → home
If headline output could hide Soviet rot for decades, it can hide American rot too, and it does. uncertain
it → hide → rot
The United States has not run out of money, engineers, or ambition; by the top-line numbers it remains the envy of the developed world. asserted
it → run → world
But it is safe to say that something has gone awfully wrong with our politics, political culture, and the policymaking process—and that that decline will have downstream effects on other areas of life. asserted
decline → say → life
Unshackled points at the American paralysis, from our expensive and slow-moving defense-industrial base to our chronic NIMBYism and vetocracy, which paralyze infrastructure, energy, and housing projects. asserted
which → move → projects
In the 1930s, the Golden Gate Bridge was completed in under four and a half years, ahead of schedule and under budget; California’s high-speed rail, in development for 30 years, has yet to carry a passenger. asserted
rail → complete → passenger
Then there is the inward turn taken by the United States—most visibly in its trade relations, where U.S. allies are being treated worse than our adversaries. asserted
allies → be → adversaries
Yet, the parochialism goes beyond just trade in goods, undermining America’s key geopolitical strength as the go-to place for international talent. asserted
parochialism → go → talent
The National Science Foundation saw its fellowship cohort halved in 2025. asserted
cohort → see → 2025
Over a few weeks in April 2025, roughly 1,500 foreign students had their visas revoked, typically for opaque reasons, in a country that in a typical year earns more from education services sold abroad than from natural gas and oil. asserted
that → have → gas
The fact that the West’s share of the global economy is down relative to the Cold War era does not doom us to failure. asserted
share → doom → failure
It does, however, reduce the room for error and drive home the imperative of economic growth. asserted
It → reduce → growth
Our institutional capacity to keep making the economic pie bigger, through domestic economic dynamism, openness to immigration, and by being able to lead coalitions of likeminded nations, is our most important strategic asset—and it is one that is currently being destroyed for no good reason. asserted
that → keep → reason
“Unless our intrinsic strength improves, defection will inevitably thin the ranks of our allies. asserted
defection → improve → allies
Our own strength is the most convincing pledge of loyalty to friends and allies,” Possony and his co-authors wrote in 1961. asserted
Possony → write → 1961
Their warning rings even truer 65 years later, as the United States is doing its utmost both to undercut the sources of its intrinsic strength and to chase away partners most eager to work with it. asserted
States → ring → it
…and 5 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support