Premiers keeping cards close on constitutional changes pitched in Alberta referendum

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-27 · by Jack Farrell The Canadian Press

Quick Summary

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith plans to hold a referendum on October 19 where Albertans will vote on four major constitutional reforms. These proposals include abolishing the Senate, allowing Alberta to appoint its own judges, opting out of federal programs without losing funding, and giving provincial laws precedence over federal ones in jurisdictional disputes. Smith’s government acknowledges that some changes would require national consensus under the 7/50 rule. When asked about their stance on these reforms, other Canadian premiers have generally declined to comment or stated they will wait for Alberta's referendum results before offering opinions.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-27, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is proposing four major constitutional reforms in a referendum set for October 19. These include abolishing the Senate, allowing Alberta to appoint its own judges, opting out of federal programs without losing funding, and giving provincial laws precedence over federal laws in disputes. However, Smith’s counterparts across Canada are remaining silent on their stance towards these changes. A professor at Mount Royal University suggests that due to the lack of attention given by Smith and the significant work required to implement such reforms, no concrete actions will likely follow after the referendum. Notably, abolishing the Senate would require unanimous support from all provinces and territories as well as the Senate itself, making it highly unlikely to succeed.

Written for “Alberta Constitutional Changes Refere…” on 2026-10-05, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
11%
5 of 44 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
63.3
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Narrative spread
2
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-27 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Alberta Constitutional Changes Refere…
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Global News · 0.97 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 5 of 43 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles report on Canadian premiers remaining silent about their stances on Danielle Smith's proposed constitutional reforms in Alberta, scheduled for a referendum on Oct. 19.”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 5 of 46 📰 publisher trust 77
“The articles discuss different aspects of the upcoming referendum in Alberta: one focuses on other premiers' stances on constitutional changes, while the other reports on a poll about Albertans' views on immigration and undecided voters.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 63
“The articles describe different events: one is about premiers' stances on constitutional changes in Alberta, while the other is an energy and economic discussion hosted by Enserva with Premier Smith and Doug Ford.”
Global News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 17% hedged 6 of 36 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different aspects of Canadian unity and constitutional changes in Alberta, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 17% hedged 6 of 35 📰 publisher trust 63
“Article A discusses voter behavior and concerns leading up to the referendum, while Article B focuses on other premiers' responses to Premier Smith's proposals for constitutional changes.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 35 📰 publisher trust 63
“Article A discusses Premier Smith's constitutional changes referendum, while Article B covers Doug Ford's visit to Calgary to urge Albertans to remain in Canada.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 63
“While both articles discuss the upcoming referendum in Alberta, they are reporting on different aspects and timeframes of the event.”
Global News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 14% hedged 6 of 42 📰 publisher trust 64
“While both articles discuss an upcoming referendum in Alberta, they cover different aspects: Article A focuses on voter turnout and polling results, while Article B discusses how other premiers are responding to the proposed constitutional changes. They do not describe the same specific incident.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 10% hedged 3 of 30 📰 publisher trust 63
“Article A discusses Albertans voting on various questions related to immigration and Confederation, while Article B focuses on other premiers' reactions to Premier Smith's proposals being put to a vote in Alberta.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 17% hedged 5 of 30 📰 publisher trust 51
“Article A discusses Premier Smith's proposal for health premiums for temporary residents, while Article B focuses on other premiers' reactions to constitutional changes proposed in Alberta's upcoming referendum.”

Publisher

Toronto Star · 5200 article(s) · 17 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 17 correction(s)
2026-10-03
Tennessee's prisons chief is resigning after failed execution of Christa Pike
2026-09-28
Organizations call for Action to End the Deaths of Indigenous People in Custody
2026-09-27
Police memorial recognizes six officers killed in the line of duty in 2026
2026-09-27
UPDATE: WSP to host Power & Energy-focused investor event virtually only
2026-09-26
News Clarification for Sept. 27
2026-09-26
Former federal public servant seeks better pensions for injured workers
2026-09-25
News Corrections for Sept. 25
2026-09-25
She has not been charged. But the Project South allegations have branded her with a 'scarlet letter'
2026-09-24
Correction
2026-09-23
MULTIMEDIA UPDATE: Smith+Nephew launches the new EVOS™ PELVIC Plating System at the 2026 Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) Annual Meeting, expanding the EVOS Plating Platform for pelvic and acetabular fracture management
2026-09-22
Costa Rican man complained of lack of care for diabetes before his death in ICE custody, family says
2026-09-22
Judges' grilling of accused men leads to sex assault and dangerous driving cases being overturned
2026-09-20
Jura Energy Corporation Provides Clarification Regarding Media Reports Concerning Its Petroleum Rights in Pakistan
2026-09-19
New details emerge about Toronto's guns-for-hire and the 'crash-out mission" that sparked the Project South investigation
2026-09-17
UPDATE: Osisko Critical Minerals Corporation Announces C$100 Million Private Placement of Special Warrants
2026-09-17
Alabama set to execute man for pawn shop killings months after his nitrogen gas execution blocked
2026-09-04
Orca Corrects Q3 Quarterly Dividend Announcement

Who wrote this

Jack Farrell The Canadian Press
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Smith’s four proposals, three of which would likely require the support of seven legislatures representing over half of Canada’s population (known as the 7/50 rule) and Parliament to implement, are among 10 questions she’s putting to Albertans on Oct. 19.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Nothing else under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Alberta Albertans Canada Confederation Senate

Subjects

Alberta GPE · 7× Smith PERSON · 7× Canada GPE · 6× Albertans NORP · 5× Ottawa ORG · 4× Confederation ORG · 3× Senate ORG · 3× Nunavut GPE · 2× Parliament ORG · 2× Yukon GPE · 2×

Narrative

“She’s not really talking about the Constitutional questions,” Bratt said in an interview, pointing to recent speeches the premier has made. “It’s immigrants who are the scapegoats and the villains here.” Bratt, a professor at Mount Royal University, said the lack of attention Smith has given the constitutional proposals, combined with the amount of work needed to actually move the issues forward, means he doesn’t think she will act after Oct. 19.
framing: assertive · carried by 2 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-27
🔮 Smith’s four proposals, three of which would likely require the support of seven legislatures representing over half of Canada’s population (known as the 7/50 rule) and Parliament to implement, are among 10 questions she’s putting to Albertans on Oct. 19.

Claims (44 extracted, 5 hedged)

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s counterparts across the country are keeping their cards close to their chest on where they stand on the major constitutional reforms Smith is sending to a provincewide vote next month. asserted
Smith → keep → vote
Smith’s four proposals, three of which would likely require the support of seven legislatures representing over half of Canada’s population (known as the 7/50 rule) and Parliament to implement, are among 10 questions she’s putting to Albertans on Oct. 19. asserted
she → require → Oct.
Her ideas, in brief, are: to abolish the Senate; let Alberta, not Ottawa, pick provincial King’s Bench and Court of Appeal judges; allow Alberta to opt out of federal programs without losing the associated funding; and to give provincial laws standing over Ottawa’s when jurisdictional disputes occur. asserted
disputes → abolish → Ottawa
Smith’s government concedes on its referendum website that abolishing the Senate, which would require unanimous cross-country support and the support of the Senate itself, is going to be a non-starter for other political leaders. asserted
which → concede → leaders
But the premier’s office says there’s support for the other proposals and that “targeted” amendments to Canada’s legal and administrative spine are more likely to become reality, which is why it wants a mandate from Albertans to proceed. asserted
mandate → say → Albertans
“Provinces across the country are tired of federal overreach and want more authority within Confederation, not less,” said Ryan Fournier, a communications adviser to Smith. asserted
Fournier → want → Smith
“We believe this conversation is a vital step towards a fairer Confederation.” asserted
conversation → believe → Confederation
The Canadian Press reached out to premiers across the country to ask whether they supported Smith’s proposals, but many did not respond to repeated requests. asserted
many → reach → requests
Some, such as Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe’s office, said they wouldn’t be commenting, and those who did respond didn’t answer directly. asserted
who → say → office
“This is a matter for Albertans to consider through their referendum process,” said a spokesperson for Northwest Territories Premier R.J. Simpson. asserted
spokesperson → consider → Simpson
Nunavut Premier John Main said the territory is be closely monitoring the results of the referendum. asserted
territory → say → referendum
“Like Alberta, Nunavut is rich in resources that benefit the rest of Canada and the world, and we need external supports to bring those resources to market,” Main said. asserted
Main → benefit → market
“We intend to make our mark in partnership with other governments and private industry, and support measures that build a stronger Canada.” asserted
that → intend → Canada
Yukon Premier Currie Dixon said he looked forward to “hearing what Albertans have to say” when it comes to the Constitution, but didn’t offer an opinion. asserted
it → say → opinion
He did, however, voice his support for Alberta remaining in Canada, referring to the headlining question on succession. asserted
Alberta → voice → succession
“While I know Albertans have a number of grievances with the federal government, it’s my hope that Alberta will continue to stay in Confederation,” Dixon said. asserted
Dixon → know → Confederation
“Canada, including the Yukon, would be negatively affected if Alberta were to leave.” While they may not be saying so now, one constitutional law expert said Smith’s office is correct in saying there could be enough support from other provincial governments to take two of the proposals beyond the ballot — having provinces pick provincial judges and opting out of federal programs without financial punishment. uncertain
provinces → include → punishment
“It’s extra provincial power. asserted
It → ’ → ?
Why wouldn’t they want it?” said Gerard Kennedy, a constitutional law professor at the University of Alberta. asserted
Kennedy → want → Alberta
“To me, the big problem is going to be getting the federal Parliament to agree, because the federal government would have to be agreeing to reduce its own power for nothing in return.” asserted
government → go → return
Smith, Moe, Ontario Premier Doug Ford and former Quebec premier François Legault penned a letter to Ottawa in March asking that all provincial Appeal Court and Superior Court judges be appointed from a pre-approved list submitted by the provinces. asserted
judges → pen → provinces
Federal Justice Minister Sean Fraser quickly shut the issue down, saying Ottawa wasn’t considering changes to the judicial appointment process. asserted
Ottawa → shut → process
He pointed to the advisory committees set up across the country that review and advise on judicial applications to say that provinces already have input, since each government appoints some of the committee’s members. asserted
government → point → members
Kennedy said the proposal about giving provincial laws paramountcy over federal laws probably won’t go anywhere, adding that there was no federation in the world with that setup. asserted
proposal → say → setup
He said regardless of the support that may exist, Alberta could be opening a can of worms if it makes serious efforts at working with other provinces. uncertain
it → say → provinces
“The problem if you open up constitutional negotiations is that some other provinces are going to have their pet projects and they’ll say, ‘well, we won’t agree to amend the Constitution on terms favorable to Alberta unless they’re also amended on terms that are favorable to New Brunswick or Quebec,’” he said. asserted
he → open → Brunswick
“And then you end up having a package and too many provinces won’t like some part of the package and then it doesn’t get through.” asserted
it → end → package
He said there’s a third way Alberta could try to amend the Constitution. uncertain
Alberta → say → Constitution
Some changes can be made with only the support of Parliament and the province that is being affected by the amendment. asserted
that → make → amendment
An example was in 2001, when the Constitution was amended to change the name of Newfoundland to Newfoundland and Labrador. asserted
Constitution → amend → Newfoundland
Alberta could try to go that route, Kennedy said, but the effort would likely end up in court, as granting the province special privileges others don’t have would go against the presumption that all provinces are treated equally. uncertain
provinces → try → presumption
Despite the premier and her office hinting that they’re committed to lobbying other provinces should the four proposals get majority approval on Oct. 19, some doubt Smith is willing to put in the effort. asserted
Smith → hint → effort
Smith framed her referendum questions as presenting Albertans with a plan to better the province’s standing within Confederation so that voters don’t resort to separatism. asserted
voters → frame → separatism
She’s also blamed federal immigration policy for Alberta’s overburdened health and education systems. asserted
She → blame → systems
Calgary-based political scientist Duane Bratt said the constitutional questions feel like an afterthought for the referendum. asserted
questions → base → referendum
Bratt said he’d feel differently if the questions were a bigger part of the premier’s messaging or the government’s $4-million ad campaign, which he said are far more focused on Smith’s five immigration proposals that are also on the ballot. asserted
that → say → ballot
“She’s not really talking about the Constitutional questions,” Bratt said in an interview, pointing to recent speeches the premier has made. “It’s immigrants who are the scapegoats and the villains here.” Bratt, a professor at Mount Royal University, said the lack of attention Smith has given the constitutional proposals, combined with the amount of work needed to actually move the issues forward, means he doesn’t think she will act after Oct. 19. asserted
she → talk → Oct.
Is their energy (on) building pipelines, restructuring the health-care system, or constitutional change? asserted
energy → build → system
Because I don’t think they could do all of that.” uncertain
they → think → that
Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said this week that he thinks Smith is only trying to find new enemies to blame for Alberta getting a raw deal. asserted
Alberta → say → deal
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support