Trump's Iran strategy: Could this become a forever war?

Read the original at Deutsche Welle ↗
Cite

Noll, A. (2026, September 4). Trump's Iran strategy: Could this become a forever war? Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/en/trump-s-iran-strategy-could-this-become-a-forever-war/a-78875030?maca=en-rss-en-world-4025-rdf

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Deutsche Welle · collected 2026-09-04 · by Andreas Noll

Quick Summary

US President Donald Trump has described the next phase of the Iran war, saying the US will continue to attack targets such as air defense sites and radar systems. The goal is to prevent Iran from rebuilding its military capabilities in the Strait of Hormuz through a strategy called "mowing the grass," which involves regular strikes to reduce enemy capabilities without trying to defeat them completely. According to US Central Command, the past few months' successes in reducing Iranian sea mines and military capabilities will not last as Tehran continues to repair or procure new equipment. This could lead to an ongoing low-intensity conflict, according to experts like Mona Yacoubian of the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-04, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The Trump administration announced an arrangement with Venezuela last week that would see the US gain control over 65 billion barrels worth of oil fields, representing about one-fifth of Venezuela’s total reserves. This deal includes a 35 percent stake for the Pentagon in North American Blue Energy Partners (NABEP), a firm led by Venezuelan businessman Alejandro Betancourt, who was previously under U.S. money-laundering investigation. The State Department also gets preferential rights to buy 20% of NABEP’s oil at cost and first refusal for the remaining 80 percent.

Venezuela’s acting president Delcy Rodriguez claims this agreement will bring much-needed foreign investment to her country's struggling oil industry, but many in Venezuela view her as illegitimate after the U.S. military captured former President Nicolás Maduro earlier this year. Opposition leader María Corina Machado has criticized the deal, arguing that Venezuela’s natural resources belong to its people rather than "an illegitimate regime."

The arrangement raises concerns among Venezuelan opposition figures who fear it could bolster the authoritarian government's control and undermine democratic progress in the country.

Written for “US Venezuela Oil Deal” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 127 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Venezuela Oil Deal
Politics · 128 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 22% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles report on a recent wave of US strikes against Iran, with Trump commenting on the events”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 29 of 197 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles report on US military strikes against Iran targets on September 4, 2026, with similar descriptions of the targets destroyed.”
TIME
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 14% hedged 7 of 50 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe the same US strikes on Iran that occurred on Tuesday (according to Article A) and 'a renewed burst of hostilities this week' (according to Article B), with similar details about the targets being attacked.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 17% hedged 1 of 6
“Both articles report on the US attacking several targets in Iran on Tuesday, according to CENTCOM.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 6% hedged 1 of 17 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe the US attacks on targets in Iran, including air defense sites and radar systems, which occurred after the Iranians attempted to rebuild their radar equipment”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 10% hedged 3 of 30 📰 publisher trust 71
“Both articles describe US attacks on Iran and Iranian response, referencing the same timeframe and targets”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 21 📰 publisher trust 71
“Although both articles mention US strikes on Iran, they provide different details about the targets and timing of the attacks”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 15 of 162 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A mentions attacks on US forces in Kuwait and UAE, while Article B mentions targets destroyed in Iran”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 40% hedged 12 of 30 📰 publisher trust 71
“Article A describes a specific US strike on Iran, while Article B mentions 'clashes resumed this week' without specifying what those clashes are about”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Centre further right than this 🔴 100% hedged 2 of 2 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on US attacks on Iran, with Article A describing the targets destroyed and Article B mentioning a possible upcoming attack on Pickaxe Mountain”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
45
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
22%
10 of 45 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
95/100
Deutsche Welle's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
128
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-04 · source text last changed 2026-09-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Deutsche Welle · 494 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Andreas Noll
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Two rounds of voting had been anticipated, but the 46-year-old son of philosopher and essayist Andre Glucksmann triumphed in the first round with a convincing 66% of the vote and will be the Socialist candidate in France's 2027 presidential election.
🔮 However, it remains to be seen whether that strategy will pay off.
🔮 Initial decisions, along with funding and a timetable, are expected to be announced this month.
2026-10-06 · assertive framing · France’s conundrum: How to cut spending amid protests
🔮 The president will appear on both nights, putting him even more prominently in the spotlight than the Republican candidates who will actually be on the ballot for the Senate and House of Representatives in November.
🔮 Her son, Matthew Caruana Galizia, said it was a "terrible decision by the jurors that our country may never recover from."
🔮 US President Donald Trump has given a fairly clear description of what the next phase of the Iran war could look like.
🔮 A 6-kilometer-long (3.7-mile) pipeline linking to an additional water source is expected to bring more stability.
Also by Andreas Noll
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Andreas Noll →

Topics

American CENTCOM Iran Iranian Israeli

Subjects

Iran GPE · 8× Tehran GPE · 5× American NORP · 4× Iranian NORP · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Washington GPE · 3× CENTCOM ORG · 2× Israeli NORP · 2× Yacoubian PERSON · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1×

Narrative

If the president accepts Iran rebuilding its military strength around the Strait of Hormuz, he risks renewed attacks on shipping and disruption of one of the world's most important energy routes.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-04
🔮 US President Donald Trump has given a fairly clear description of what the next phase of the Iran war could look like.
2026-09-04 · Deutsche Welle
Trump's Iran strategy: Could this become a forever war? · mixed framing

Claims (45 extracted, 10 hedged)

US President Donald Trump has given a fairly clear description of what the next phase of the Iran war could look like. uncertain
phase → give → war
The Iranians had tried to rebuild their radar equipment, Trump stated after the most recent wave of US strikes. asserted
Trump → try → strikes
"We waited until it was almost built, and then we hit it," he said. asserted
he → wait → it
On Tuesday, American forces once again attacked several targets in Iran. asserted
forces → attack → Iran
According to US Central Command (CENTCOM), the targets destroyed included "air defense sites, radar systems, maritime assets and facilities, mine laying capabilities, and communications sites." 'Mowing the grass' uncertain
targets → accord → grass
Iran responded by firing rockets and drones at US facilities in the region. asserted
Iran → respond → region
With this, the war moved on to what CENTCOM had indicated just a few days earlier could be the strategy for the next phase. uncertain
CENTCOM → move → phase
According to the news portal Axios, it was considering limited strikes, at regular intervals if necessary, to prevent Iran from reconstituting its military capabilities in the Strait of Hormuz. uncertain
it → accord → Hormuz
An American government representative used a concept from Israeli security policy to describe this idea: He called it "mowing the grass." asserted
He → use → grass
The metaphor refers to a strategy that doesn't even attempt to promise that an opponent will be defeated once and for all. asserted
opponent → refer → all
It is enough to regularly reduce the enemy's military capabilities to the point where the threat remains manageable. asserted
threat → reduce → point
When the grass grows back, you "mow" it again. asserted
you → grow → it
Applied to the situation in Iran, this would mean the US keeping an eye on which military capabilities the enemy is reconstituting, and attacking once it crosses a certain threshold. asserted
it → apply → threshold
Successes that won't last In the past few months, the US has scored some military successes. asserted
US → last → successes
US forces have significantly reduced Iran's military capabilities in the Strait of Hormuz, and have begun clearing Iranian sea mines. asserted
forces → reduce → mines
However, these successes will not last. asserted
successes → last → ?
Tehran is repairing or procuring new radar installations, anti-aircraft positions and anti-ship missiles. asserted
Tehran → repair → installations
US bombs could certainly destroy important Iranian positions with targeted strikes. uncertain
bombs → destroy → strikes
But the knowledge and the industrial basis of Iranian military technology would remain. asserted
knowledge → remain → technology
Reconstruction can therefore be delayed, but not prevented. asserted
Reconstruction → delay → ?
The US will repeatedly be confronted with the same choice: whether to accept that Tehran is regaining its capabilities, or to attack again and destroy them. asserted
Tehran → confront → them
Mona Yacoubian, director of the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, warned as early as April that this development could lead to an "enduring low-intensity conflict punctuated by more intensive interventions." Trump's belligerent warnings The fact that the strategy of "mowing the grass" is reaching its limits is also because it was never designed for a war with a state. uncertain
it → warn → state
Israel developed the strategy to combat non-state actors like Hamas. asserted
Israel → develop → Hamas
However, as Yacoubian pointed out in her article, the Israeli academics who initially coined the term warned that if the opponent had "statist characteristics and/or more powerful capabilities, 'mowing the grass' might become an outdated military strategy." uncertain
mowing → point → grass
The US needs to keep the strait reliably open. asserted
US → need → strait
Iran, on the other hand, only needs to make people believe that the passage remains dangerous. asserted
passage → need → hand
In this way, even a significantly weakened opponent can impose substantial costs on Washington. asserted
opponent → weaken → Washington
Another problem for the US is that, while Washington can determine the intensity of its own attacks, it has no control over Tehran's response. asserted
it → determine → response
This week, Trump warned Tehran not to launch a retaliatory strike, threatening that Iran would be "totally wiped out as a country" if it did. asserted
it → warn → country
Nonetheless, the regime in Tehran immediately fired missiles against American facilities in the region. asserted
regime → fire → region
Jordan alone reported 13 ballistic missiles in its airspace, 10 of which it was able to intercept. asserted
it → report → which
But Yacoubian believes that repeated American attacks carry a far greater risk. asserted
attacks → believe → risk
She warns that they may lead Tehran to conclude that "pursuit of a nuclear weapon" is the only way to achieve "lasting deterrence." uncertain
pursuit → warn → deterrence
This suggests that, by attacking Iran, the US and Israel could actually accelerate the precise development they sought to bring under control. uncertain
they → suggest → control
From Washington's perspective, the alternatives available to Trump don't look much better. asserted
alternatives → look → Trump
If the president accepts Iran rebuilding its military strength around the Strait of Hormuz, he risks renewed attacks on shipping and disruption of one of the world's most important energy routes. asserted
he → accept → routes
The consequences for the global economy are well known. asserted
consequences → know → economy
In spite of the upheaval and repeated negotiations, a political agreement between Washington and Tehran has so far failed because of apparently insurmountable differences. asserted
agreement → repeat → differences
For Trump, "mowing the grass" has domestic appeal, in spite of the uncertainty it brings to foreign policy. asserted
it → mow → policy
The US president would be able to avoid occupation, nation building and deploying large numbers of American ground troops. asserted
president → avoid → troops
…and 5 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support