It seems astonishing that anything quite so unified could grow from America’s famously polarised soil, but here we are, watching as such sworn enemies as Fox News and MS NOW stand in solidarity with each other, and against President Donald Trump’s latest attack on their craft.
uncertain
enemies → seem → craft
Each symbolises everything the other hates.
asserted
other → symbolise → everything
And yet this week, that was forgotten when Trump declared he was banning MS NOW, alongside CNN and Politico, from the White House, and deactivated their correspondents’ press passes.
asserted
he → forget → passes
Illegally so, it turned out, and a court has just ordered they be reinstated.
asserted
they → turn → ?
But in the meantime, Fox – alongside ABC, CBS and NBC – had boycotted Trump’s press conferences.
asserted
Fox → boycott → conferences
Suddenly, Trump found himself at risk of greatly reduced television coverage in a week of addressing the UN and hosting Xi Jinping.
asserted
Trump → find → Jinping
Already, we’ve seen his team forced to capture their own footage of Trump arriving heroically to open the new White House helipad, the kind of thing that news cameras would have filmed.
asserted
cameras → see → that
There he was, saying words no one could hear, exuding exactly no authority.
uncertain
one → say → authority
That sort of thing is unimaginable for someone like Trump, who loves and dominates television more than any president ever has.
asserted
president → love → television
He is famously fixed to Fox News.
asserted
He → fix → News
He appoints its anchors to high office.
asserted
He → appoint → office
In his first term, Trump staffers tried giving him briefings in the form of television packages because it was the best way to ensure he would pay attention.
asserted
he → try → attention
He amassed some US$4.6 billion ($6.5 billion) worth of free television coverage in the 2016 election campaign alone, about twice that of Hillary Clinton.
asserted
He → amass → Clinton
He has effectively lived with a television camera on him since.
asserted
He → live → him
A boycott of this kind hits Trump somewhere near where it hurts.
asserted
it → hit → Trump
I’ll admit to being surprised by these developments.
asserted
I → admit → developments
After all, Trump has berated the media for his whole premiership without provoking any solidaristic response.
asserted
Trump → berate → response
You’re familiar with the catchphrases: “the fake news media”, “the enemy of the people”, “corrupt” and “dishonest”.
asserted
You → ’re → people
He has attacked individual journalists as “human scum” and “low-life reporters” and told one to be “quiet, piggy”.
asserted
He → attack → one
He has even banned individual reporters from the Pentagon and White House, most notably CNN’s Jim Acosta in 2018.
asserted
He → ban → 2018
The difference this time was that he just went ahead and banned whole outlets.
asserted
he → go → outlets
That has two consequences.
asserted
That → have → consequences
First, it ends up costing the other outlets much more money because they often share footage, which allows them to operate with fewer resources.
asserted
them → end → resources
Cut two TV networks from the pool and you leave a big shortfall for the others to make up.
asserted
others → cut → shortfall
But second, Trump did so explicitly because their “cumulative stories” led him to regard them as unfavourable.
asserted
stories → do → them
And whatever you think of those outlets, or even of the media in general, that’s an enormous move.
asserted
that → think → media
To effectively demand favourable coverage in exchange for access is to undo the very concept of accountability.
asserted
demand → demand → accountability
Trump’s answer to this charge hits all the typically populist notes, but it also had a slip within it: “I don’t have to let them into my … into the people’s house.”
asserted
I → hit → house
Trump seems to regard access as his to give personally.
asserted
Trump → seem → his
Then he corrects, and asserts it on behalf of the people.
asserted
he → correct → people
By now, some of this should sound familiar to the Australian ear.
asserted
some → sound → ear
But she has taken the step of banning entire outlets from attending some of her press conferences.
asserted
she → take → conferences
In this case, it’s the ABC (for whom I am a radio host) and The Guardian, and on the Victorian hustings, occasionally, The Age.
asserted
I → ’ → hustings
“I answer to the people, not the media” declared Hanson in her National Press Club address in June.
asserted
Hanson → answer → June
Party director James Ashby said giving the ABC access would be like “going back to some domestic violence relationship” (Hanson’s views on such violence as a “two-way street” presumably don’t extend this far).
asserted
views → say → street
The ban is patchy and Barnaby Joyce certainly seems exempt from it.
asserted
Joyce → seem → it
But One Nation has pulled candidates from ABC slots where they were regulars until they joined the party.
asserted
they → pull → party
In short, Hanson has crossed a line the US media has decided not to accept.
asserted
media → cross → line
Might Australian journalists do the same?
uncertain
journalists → do → same
Could we see, for example, the Murdoch press – broadcast and print – stand on principle and say that if the ABC cannot attend a press conference, then they won’t either?
uncertain
they → see → conference
…and 14 more, not listed.