Latest & Breaking News on Fox News
· collected 2026-08-28 · by Charles Creitz
A former White House deputy counsel, Gene Hamilton, is saying that following a Supreme Court ruling, federal agencies can now move forward with parts of President Trump's election-integrity order, which includes new ballot-mail standards and efforts involving state citizenship lists. The court's majority rejected a challenge from opposing states who claimed harm could come from the order. Hamilton notes that the states must show a concrete or imminent injury to challenge executive action in this area, rather than relying on predictions of future harm. The next phase of Trump's effort to change mail-in-voting is expected to be implemented soon, with USPS having already finalized its ballot-mail rule requiring standardized envelopes and tracking barcodes.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-28,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
Here's a summary of the real-world news story:
What happened: The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to move forward with its plan to restrict mail-in voting, despite opposition from Democratic-led states and election officials. This decision allows the administration to implement new rules for mail ballot delivery, which would require states to use specific formatting for mail ballot envelopes and an electronic system to track ballots.
Why it matters: The ruling has sparked concerns about potential chaos in the upcoming midterm elections, as many voters rely on mail-in voting. California and other Democratic-led states have vowed to sue again to block the Trump administration's plan, which they argue is an attempt to restrict voting rights.
Key players
- President Donald Trump
- Supreme Court justices (who allowed the administration's plan to move forward)
- Gavin Newsom, Governor of California (who plans to sue again to block the Trump administration's plan)
- Election officials and experts who warn about potential chaos in the elections
Timeline: The Supreme Court made its decision on Monday, allowing the Trump administration's plan to move forward. Democratic-led states have since filed a fresh lawsuit to block the US Postal Service from carrying out the plan.
Written for “Trump's Mail-In Ballot Restrictions” on 2026-08-31,
grounded in this article and the 14 other(s) covering the same event.
The next phase of President Donald Trump’s effort to change America’s mail-in-voting system is taking shape after the Supreme Court issued a largely favorable ruling for the White House in a challenge to Trump's mail-in ballot restrictions.
asserted
Court → change → restrictions
Former White House deputy counsel Gene Hamilton said federal agencies such as the Postal Service can now move forward with parts of Trump’s election-integrity order, including new ballot-mail standards and efforts involving state citizenship lists, as opposing states wait to see which concrete federal actions could form the basis of new lawsuits.
uncertain
actions → say → lawsuits
"It’s really interesting what the court did [and] it’s actually exactly what you would expect the court to do," Hamilton told Fox News Digital.
asserted
Hamilton → ’ → Digital
Hamilton said that when Trump directed USPS, DHS and DOJ to prepare for the new protocols, several states immediately claimed harm, but the court’s majority rejected their challenge.
asserted
majority → say → challenge
Originally, a Boston federal judge agreed with them, but the Supreme Court effectively said "you can’t enjoin [the feds] from thinking" — in Hamilton’s words — because no action had taken place yet.
asserted
action → agree → place
"It reminds the American people … just because something might happen in the future [it] doesn't mean that you're actually harmed today, and that's really the crux of what the court did."
uncertain
court → remind → what
Hamilton quipped that if the states challenging the order were proven right — and the possibility of future harm were enough to obtain a legal stay — his organization would "have a field day across the country" trying to head off new policies he and his clients oppose.
asserted
he → quip → policies
In that regard, he added that the district judge ultimately overruled by the Supreme Court made an "egregious" misread of Article III powers and essentially said states can dictate which cases the attorney general and DOJ try to prosecute.
asserted
general → add → cases
He emphasized that the legal landscape could change quickly once Trump’s actions get underway, but said states challenging executive action must show a concrete or sufficiently imminent injury rather than rely on predictions about what agencies might eventually do.
uncertain
agencies → emphasize → what
Besides USPS, Trump’s order directs DHS to compile and provide states with lists of adult U.S. citizens, while DOJ was told to prioritize investigations and potential prosecutions involving ballots issued to ineligible voters.
asserted
DOJ → direct → voters
"Let’s see what the departments and agencies actually do.
asserted
departments → see → what
Well, let's see what they say they're going to do," Hamilton told Fox News Digital, as new concrete federal rules will come next.
asserted
rules → see → Digital
The clock is ticking to implement the plan and respond to further legal challenges as states distribute mail ballots progressively earlier than in past decades.
asserted
states → tick → decades
USPS first proposed its ballot-mail rule in June and has since finalized it, requiring standardized ballot envelopes and unique tracking barcodes while directing states to use a federal portal to identify voters receiving mailed federal ballots.
asserted
USPS → propose → ballots
States that fail to comply could see outbound federal ballot mail refused or returned.
uncertain
mail → fail → ?
But the agency signaled at the time that it won’t implement the rule for the midterms unless the litigation is resolved.
asserted
litigation → signal → midterms
A separate injunction obtained in litigation by the League of Women Voters currently blocks USPS from implementing the rule.
asserted
injunction → obtain → rule
"Why wouldn't you take steps like getting a list of eligible voters, like asking the USPS to use standard mail security measures that they use for other things," Hamilton commented.
asserted
Hamilton → take → things
Asked which provisions of Trump’s order the administration plans to implement following the ruling, when those actions would begin and how states would be directed to comply, the White House did not provide specifics.
asserted
House → ask → specifics
"These are commonsense measures that protect the security of mail-in ballots and ensure only Americans are electing American leaders.
asserted
Americans → protect → leaders
This administration will continue to lawfully enact the agenda President Trump was elected on — which includes the safety and security of our elections," White House spokeswoman Lauren Bis told Fox News Digital.
asserted
Bis → continue → Digital
California Attorney General Rob Bonta — who led the plaintiffs from 23 states along with Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro — criticized the Supreme Court for letting Trump "try to make it harder for Americans to vote.
asserted
Americans → lead → Court
"
Shapiro was listed separately because Pennsylvania Republican Attorney General David Sunday had not signed the state onto the suit.
asserted
Sunday → list → suit
"Not so fast," the potential 2028 presidential candidate said in a statement.
asserted
candidate → say → statement
"Donald Trump does not run elections here in Pennsylvania — or in any state."
asserted
Trump → run → state
"[The] SCOTUS decision does not deal with the substance of Trump’s unconstitutional Executive Order and does not mean his illegal attempt to restrict mail-in voting will go forward."
On Wednesday, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes responded to the ruling, declaring, "Over my dead body is that rule going to go into effect.
asserted
rule → deal → effect
We are going to fight this tooth and nail in the courts."
asserted
We → go → courts
Bonta pledged to continue the fight and noted that Obama-appointed Judge Indira Talwani of Boston had originally sided with the plaintiffs.
asserted
Talwani → pledge → plaintiffs
Hamilton predicted such disputes would produce another round of litigation as agencies make their next moves.
asserted
agencies → predict → moves
"We have to get through the arbitrage of lower court proceedings, and I'm sure there's going to be a lot more fighting to come," he said.
asserted
he → have → proceedings
Shapiro echoed the plaintiffs’ opposition to the ruling, tweeting:
"We’ll see the Trump Administration in court."
asserted
We → echo → court
Fox News Digital's Hannah Brennan and Melissa Chrise contributed to this report.
asserted
Brennan → contribute → report
