Is the U.S. and China's mutual distrust the biggest risk as AI evolves?

CBS News · collected 2026-09-16 · by Frank Andrews
Read the original at CBS News ↗

Summary

Experts warn that mutual distrust between the U.S. and China could exacerbate risks associated with advancing artificial intelligence (AI). Both countries acknowledge the need for regulation but face political hurdles in cooperation; for instance, American lawmakers are reluctant to pass AI regulations, fearing it would put the U.S. at a disadvantage against China's technological advancements. Meanwhile, Chinese leaders have expressed concerns about losing control of AI and are exploring collaborative efforts on safety measures.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
25
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
24%
6 of 25 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
77.1
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

As concerns mount over the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), experts warn that mutual distrust between the U.S. and China could pose a significant risk to global stability. This tension was highlighted during a summit where President Trump discussed the idea of establishing "guardrails" on AI with Chinese President Xi, but no concrete progress was reported by analysts at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Both countries acknowledge the need for regulation; however, cooperation remains elusive due to underlying geopolitical tensions. Notably, Chinese firms are increasingly voicing support for stricter oversight, as illustrated by the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in Shanghai, which aligns with growing international consensus on the need to control AI advancement before it becomes uncontrollable.

Written for “AI And US-China Relations” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but none of the 3 quote(s) it offered could be found in the article text, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 13960: no verified evidence · logged 2026-09-16

Story

📰 AI And US-China Relations
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 24% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
South China Morning Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles discuss mutual distrust between US and China but cover different topics and contexts, one focusing on a panel discussion at Xiangshan Forum while the other discusses risks related to AI evolution.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 77
“The articles discuss related topics about concerns regarding the AI race between the U.S. and China but describe different discussions or points in time.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss related topics about AI development and tensions between the US and China, but they describe different specific events and analyses rather than a single occurrence.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 5 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss related topics but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 36 📰 publisher trust 58
“The articles discuss similar themes but do not describe the same specific incident or time frame.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 32% hedged 12 of 37 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A describes Sam Altman's specific warning on X about AI risks, while Article B discusses broader analyst views on mutual distrust between the U.S. and China in the context of AI evolution.”
Al Jazeera · 0.85 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 15% hedged 8 of 55 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles discuss related concerns about AI development but appear to cover different timeframes and perspectives on the issue.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 13% hedged 3 of 23 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss similar themes around AI risks and US-China relations but describe different perspectives and events, not a single specific incident.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 29 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles discuss related themes of distrust between the US and China regarding AI development, but describe different aspects and timeframes.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 16% hedged 6 of 37 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss similar themes but describe different aspects and times, with Article A focusing on China's dismissal of warnings about AI development on a specific date and Article B discussing broader expert concerns about mutual distrust between the U.S. and China regarding AI.”

Publisher

CBS News · 515 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-14
The AI bubble is leaking air, some economists say. Should investors worry?
2026-08-24
Sean Grayson, convicted in killing of Sonya Massey, dies in prison, attorney says

Who wrote this

Frank Andrews
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 As fears grow that the race for AI supremacy could be hurtling us all toward a grim fate not unlike the apocalyptic plot line of the Terminator movies, analysts tell CBS News that mutual distrust between the U.S. and China, as much as the technology itself, could lead humanity "off a cliff."
🔮 The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the war could cost more per month for as long as it goes on.
🔮 Mr. Trump claimed on Sunday that the war with Iran will end "right after the midterms," adding that "gasoline is going to drop like a rock."
🔮 If confirmed, the move would make it easier for the Houthis to target ships transiting the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a crucial waterway for Saudi Arabian oil exports.
🔮 Security forces are pursuing those responsible, with further details expected to be released, according to Tasnim.
🔮 China says U.S. "sanctions and pressure" on Iran won't work China said on Friday that U.S. "sanctions and pressure" wouldn't resolve the Middle East conflict, after Washington urged governments including Beijing to join efforts to isolate Iran's economy. "Sanctions and pressure will not help resolve the issue," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian told reporters at a news briefing, calling on "all relevant parties to take responsible measures and resolve the problem through political and diplomatic means."
🔮 - President Trump on Wednesday announced a "crushing economic operation" on Iran, one he said would amount to "economic warfare."
🔮 - He also called Iran's leadership "unbelievably duplicitous" after Tehran said it had no plans to hold direct talks with Washington, despite his claim that negotiations would start Monday and that a "deal is imminent."
Also by Frank Andrews
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Frank Andrews →

Topics

Anthropic CBS News China Chinese U.S.

Subjects

U.S. GPE · 11× China GPE · 10× CBS News ORG · 4× Chinese NORP · 4× Anthropic ORG · 3× Wang PERSON · 3× American NORP · 2× Leia Wang PERSON · 1× OpenAI ORG · 1× the Carnegie Endowment for Peace ORG · 1×

Narrative

President Trump acknowledged discussing the notion of "guardrails" on AI development with Xi, but in an analysis of the summit, the Center for Strategic and International Studies said "there was little indication of meaningful progress on the core disputes," and it noted that the White House did not confirm any new dialogue with Beijing on the topic.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
🔮 As fears grow that the race for AI supremacy could be hurtling us all toward a grim fate not unlike the apocalyptic plot line of the Terminator movies, analysts tell CBS News that mutual distrust between the U.S. and China, as much as the technology itself, could lead humanity "off a cliff."

Claims (25 extracted, 6 hedged)

As fears grow that the race for AI supremacy could be hurtling us all toward a grim fate not unlike the apocalyptic plot line of the Terminator movies, analysts tell CBS News that mutual distrust between the U.S. and China, as much as the technology itself, could lead humanity "off a cliff." uncertain
distrust → grow → cliff
The long-term fear among experts like the Anthropic researcher whose a week ago, is that superintelligence — a theoretical AI agent smarter than any person — could start to see humans as rivals for essential resources, endangering our survival. uncertain
superintelligence → start → survival
The bosses of major U.S. AI firms OpenAI and Anthropic have now called for a slowing of AI development, to "pace the frontier." asserted
bosses → call → frontier
China, the other major hub of work to push that frontier alongside Silicon Valley, has had its own warnings. asserted
China → push → warnings
A team of U.S. researchers last week used AI to expose a flaw in China's "app for everything" WeChat, which is used by more than 800 million people in the country. asserted
which → use → country
Many Chinese firms agree with the growing consensus that AI must be regulated, according to Leia Wang, non-resident scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for Peace, who mentioned the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in Shanghai as an example of a "highly reputable body" working on AI safety. uncertain
who → agree → safety
Yi Zeng, the dean of the Beijing Institute of AI Safety and Governance, wrote in a research paper shared with CBS News that "the catastrophic risks posed by AI, and the hidden danger of human extinction, are growing by the day." asserted
risks → write → day
Britain's King Charles III is to convene a meeting in Scotland on Thursday of industry leaders to discuss "whether a shared set of principles can be developed" to guide the future development and use of AI. asserted
set → convene → AI
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, whose firm is among those attending the conference, said in April that it was essential that U.S. and Chinese researchers "are actually talking." This bilateral coordination by industry leaders "is glaringly missing because of our current attitude about China as an adversary," he said. asserted
he → attend → adversary
A group of Democratic U.S. lawmakers have called on House Speaker Mike Johnson to to get legislation passed on .Johnson said Sunday, however, that rushing regulations into law would mean the U.S. "will lose the race to China, and that is a threat to every single American." asserted
that → call → American
Republican Senator Ted Cruz said last week that "if there are American killer robots than Chinese killer robots." , I'd rather they beOn Monday, President Trump dismissed warnings of an AI threat as a "sick conspiracy," adding in his Truth Social post that "the only one that is happy about it is China. asserted
that → say → it
WHOEVER WINS AI, WINS!" asserted
WHOEVER → win → AI
"It's not that the U.S. government doesn't think AI is risky," Wang told CBS News, but that when it comes to U.S. leaders' "China-facing AI thoughts, the number one concern is technological competition." asserted
concern → think → thoughts
China's leaders have made some overtures toward collaboration on AI safety. asserted
leaders → make → safety
In June, President Xi Jinping explicitly warned of the dangers of a "loss of control" of the technology. asserted
Jinping → warn → technology
A month later he said countries must work together to "ensure that AI is always under human control. asserted
AI → say → control
" But like many senior U.S. officials, China's government has rejected calls to slow the pace of development, viewing the concept as an effort by the U.S. "to assert its technological dominance," said Wang. asserted
Wang → reject → dominance
After Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said the U.S. and its global partners should collaborate "to keep democracies' AI lead over autocracies as large as possible, to give us the breathing room we need in order to pace effectively," China's Foreign Ministry said Monday that "narratives of threat … serve only to disrupt the process of global AI governance." Competition and mutual suspicion between the world's two biggest economies may come as little surprise, but Wang told CBS News that reducing the "AI safety conversation into a technological competition conversation" was "the most unhelpful framing," given the risks involved. In a February essay entitled "Who will save the world from a U.S.-China AI arms race?," National University of Singapore lecturer Alex Capri, an expert in trade and technology, wrote that the two countries "face a prisoner's dilemma … both would be safer with restraint, yet each accelerates development to avoid falling victim to the other. uncertain
each → say → other
" Ways forward "A coordinated slowdown or grand international agreement might not be the right frame to engage Chinese firms and the government," Kwan Yee Ng, Head of International Governance at Concordia AI, an AI safety consultancy based in Beijing, told CBS News. uncertain
Ng → way → News
She added, however, that "there are many things the two countries can work on." That "low-hanging fruit," according to Ng, includes sharing cybersecurity best practices, coordinating to avoid any misuse of AI by terrorist groups or agents seeking to cause economic turmoil, and opening up low-level government talks to share granular technical information. Matt Sheehan, a colleague and fellow researcher of Wang's at the Carnegie Endowment, argues that another approach is "AI safety in parallel," which would see the two countries "move forward on parallel tracks, each advancing the technology and also acting to reduce the risks because they believe it is essential to their own national security — regardless of what the other does." An existential moment China's government said after a May that the leaders had "agreed to hold dialogue between the two governments" on AI. uncertain
leaders → add → AI
President Trump acknowledged discussing the notion of "guardrails" on AI development with Xi, but in an analysis of the summit, the Center for Strategic and International Studies said "there was little indication of meaningful progress on the core disputes," and it noted that the White House did not confirm any new dialogue with Beijing on the topic. asserted
House → acknowledge → topic
Mr. Trump is due to meet with Xi again in Washington on Sept. 24, and they are expected to discuss AI security. asserted
they → meet → security
The hope among many analysts, however faint, is that the growing urgency of concern over unbridled AI advancement, despite Mr. Trump's rejection of the worries, will push the leaders to back coordination on some level. " asserted
urgency → grow → level
It's like, here's the big concern over here," said Wang, referring to the existential AI fears, "and then they're fighting about this thing — and it's gonna drive us off a cliff. asserted
it → say → cliff
" "The choices our generation makes will determine whether and how human civilization survives and develops," added Zeng. asserted
Zeng → make → ?
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support