Photo via Fox News

AI 'doomers' risk kneecapping US vs China, but ex-Pentagon vet says both extremes miss the mark

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Creitz, C. (2026, September 16). AI 'doomers' risk kneecapping US vs China, but ex-Pentagon vet says both extremes miss the mark. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ai-doomers-risk-kneecapping-us-vs-china-ex-pentagon-vet-says-both-extremes-miss-mark

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-09-16 · by Charles Creitz

Quick Summary

A former Pentagon official warns that excessive regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) could harm U.S. competitiveness against China while benefiting large tech firms at the expense of smaller startups. Will Thibeau, who previously worked for both Palantir and the Pentagon, tells Fox News Digital that stringent AI regulations proposed by some "doomers" are overblown and could hinder innovation and economic growth. He advocates for a balanced approach that addresses specific risks without stifling technological advancement or giving China an upper hand in the global AI race.
Written by AI on 2026-09-16, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Will Thibeau, a former Pentagon AI official and ex-employee of Palantir Technologies, warned in an interview with Fox News Digital that excessive regulation driven by "AI doomerism" could harm American competitiveness against China and benefit established tech giants over smaller startups. Thibeau argued for aggressive advancement at the cutting edge of AI technology while addressing specific risks rather than adopting a laissez-faire or overly restrictive approach. He dismissed fears of rogue AI as a hoax, similar to President Donald Trump’s stance on climate change concerns. The former Army Ranger emphasized that the potential economic benefits and stakes of losing the AI race to China are too significant to allow doomerism to dictate public policy.

Written for “AI Debate In US China Relations” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Debate In US China Relations
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles mention President Trump's dismissal of AI concerns as a hoax, they describe different aspects of the situation: Article A focuses on Trump's original statement, while Article B discusses reactions and context following that statement.”
NBC News
Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles mention Trump's dismissal of AI dangers, they describe different aspects and times within a broader topic.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 7 of 69 claims
“While both articles discuss AI-related concerns and mentions similar figures like Anthropic, they describe different aspects of a broader topic rather than the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 24 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A focuses on Anthropic's CEO attempting to change his public stance regarding AI regulation, while Article B discusses broader concerns about 'doomer' AI regulation and includes comments from a former Pentagon official.”
The Hindu
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI policy and diplomacy between the U.S. and China, not a single identical incident.”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss related themes but describe different events: one focuses on a former Pentagon official's warning about AI regulation, while the other covers a conference featuring Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon discussing AI concerns.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 10 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI policy and public messaging, with Article A focusing on warnings about potential risks and regulatory extremes, while Article B discusses a pro-AI meme campaign by the Trump administration.”
CBS News
Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on AI risks from distinct sources and dates.”
BBC News
Hedges 3 of 19 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on AI risks but describe separate events and interviews.”
Fox News
Hedges 2 of 49 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss similar topics related to AI but describe different occurrences with distinct viewpoints and timing.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
3 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
69/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6160 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Charles Creitz
39 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Fox News will deliver live results, race calls and around-the-clock coverage as voters decide control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections.
🔮 President Donald Trump' s push to oust Rep. Ilhan Omar amid allegations of immigration fraud could trigger a constitutional fight, with legal experts telling Fox News Digital that a landmark Supreme Court case involving another entrenched Democrat may not stand in Republicans’ way.
🔮 "This would have never happened if we didn't have ranked-choice voting," Dunleavy told Fox News Digital.
🔮 "While some may try to write this off as just how politics works now, ballot-stacking should have no place in our electoral process," Murkowski said.
🔮 "DOJ's election monitors will be engaging in the same routine monitoring we've done for decades."
🔮 "Defendants’ argument that [Constitution] Article II bars Congress from regulating the removal of AUSAs (assistant U.S. attorneys) flies in the face of nearly two centuries of Supreme Court precedent," Judge Jesse Furman wrote, adding that accepting the administration's argument would "unsettle the very equilibrium established by this nation's constitutional system." A DOJ spokesperson told Fox News Digital the department disagreed with the decision and will appeal it in "due course."
🔮 Schiff drew a comparison to Trump's efforts to challenge the 2020 presidential election, arguing that senior Justice Department officials at the time, including Attorney General William Barr refused to support efforts to overturn the results — while accusing current DOJ leadership of being willing to go further. "This time, with [Attorney General Todd] Blanche, they are all in on this disgraceful campaign," Schiff said, predicting the case in the Last Frontier has "no chance of succeeding."
🔮 The federal raid on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Washington, D.C., home prompted warnings Wednesday from a conservative watchdog leader that more revelations could be coming, as the Minnesota Democrat faces separate investigations involving her immigration records and financial disclosures.
🔮 Second Amendment advocates argue additional gun restrictions would not have stopped the killer and could make it harder for armed civilians like Giamanco to intervene.
🔮 The heated exchange prompted moderators to call for decorum and warn that microphones could be shut off if the candidates continued interrupting one another.
Also by Charles Creitz
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 39 articles by Charles Creitz →

Topics

China Fox News Digital Palantir Technologies Pentagon U.S.

Subjects

Thibeau PERSON · 5× U.S. GPE · 4× China GPE · 3× Fox News Digital ORG · 3× Pentagon ORG · 2× Republicans NORP · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Palantir ORG · 1× Palantir Technologies ORG · 1× Will Thibeau PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Thibeau’s position is not that Washington should take a hands-off approach to AI, but that the U.S. should race aggressively at the frontier while narrowly addressing concrete risks — threading the needle between denying China an advantage and preventing regulations backed by today’s leading AI firms from entrenching a "duopoly" at the expense of new American innovators. "We must maintain an edge at the frontier, so our economy has the license on the first benefits of artificial intelligence.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
🔮 "Doomer"-driven AI regulation could kneecap the U.S. against China while helping tech giants lock in their lead over smaller startups, a former Pentagon AI official who also worked for AI company Palantir Technologies told Fox News Digital.

Claims (23 extracted, 3 hedged)

"Doomer"-driven AI regulation could kneecap the U.S. against China while helping tech giants lock in their lead over smaller startups, a former Pentagon AI official who also worked for AI company Palantir Technologies told Fox News Digital. uncertain
who → kneecap → Digital
The warning follows the resignation of an Anthropic researcher who said increasingly powerful AI could threaten humanity, while President Donald Trump called fears of rogue AI a "hoax" and compared those advancing such warnings to climate-change alarmists whose predictions, he argued, haven't come true. uncertain
he → follow → alarmists
"The notion that I think the president and I share is that we should let the race play out, that the risk of global extinction is not real, it is in fact a hoax," Will Thibeau, a former Palantir deployment strategist who later worked in the Pentagon’s Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office told Fox News Digital. asserted
who → think → Digital
"The stakes of losing to China, of losing the opportunity to transform our economy, are so high that we shouldn't let 'doomerism' define public policy," the retired Army Ranger added. asserted
Ranger → lose → policy
Thibeau’s position is not that Washington should take a hands-off approach to AI, but that the U.S. should race aggressively at the frontier while narrowly addressing concrete risks — threading the needle between denying China an advantage and preventing regulations backed by today’s leading AI firms from entrenching a "duopoly" at the expense of new American innovators. "We must maintain an edge at the frontier, so our economy has the license on the first benefits of artificial intelligence. asserted
economy → take → intelligence
Enhanced manufacturing capabilities, enhanced processing power, decision-making in financial markets," he said, disputing the idea that Beijing will not race full bore because the technology could countervail the CCP’s grip by incidentally empowering civilians. uncertain
technology → say → civilians
"Artificial intelligence has the potential to redefine our economy and transform the country for the good," Thibeau said, while rejecting both predictions that it will make life "unrecognizable" and that it poses an uncontrollable "extinction" risk. asserted
it → have → risk
Those "hyperventilating" over either extreme, he argued, miss the "clearly defined middle path" for AI development. asserted
he → hyperventilate → development
Thibeau said some of AI’s most important applications are military, where it can process battlefield data quickly enough to give U.S. forces an advantage while helping preserve civilian life. asserted
it → say → life
"I’m very bullish, if you will, on how artificial intelligence can be applied for the military," he said. asserted
he → ’m → military
While Thibeau said fears of "drone swarms run amok" are not realistic, he acknowledged AI carries real risks that policymakers should address without allowing those concerns to justify sweeping rules that slow U.S. development or undermine its military edge. asserted
that → say → edge
The larger danger, he argued, is that leading AI firms can absorb regulations that smaller newcomers cannot. asserted
newcomers → argue → regulations
"There is a duopoly, perhaps a triopoly if you include Google," Thibeau said, naming Anthropic and OpenAI as the two companies clearly in the lead. " asserted
Thibeau → be → lead
They want to slow the game so they can use their built-in advantages and their current lead to solidify this market dominance… to make it harder for new entrants to rise the market chain [and capture] the regulatory incentives of the government." asserted
entrants → want → government
Fox News Digital reached out to all three firms for comment. asserted
Digital → reach → comment
Anthropic policy documents outline concerns about biological risks, cyber risks, loss of control and the automation of research and development while also underlining that regulations must "protect innovation." In terms of government oversight, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., told reporters Tuesday that AI should be the rare time for bipartisan collaboration on regulation. asserted
AI → outline → regulation
"If there's ever a time for Republicans to break from their blinded allegiance to Trump, it is now. asserted
it → be → Trump
The world is in danger and Republicans are on the sidelines sucking their thumbs," the Senate Minority Leader claimed. asserted
Leader → suck → thumbs
Former Vice President Kamala Harris added in a statement that AI is "advancing at an alarming speed," and signaled she sides with the Big Tech firms calling for pacing the "frontier" — which Thibeau warned about. "A slowdown is critical in order to ensure AI serves the public interest," she said in part of a lengthy statement. asserted
she → add → statement
Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said guardrails are necessary for the AI sphere but that Congress should not respond with a heavy hand. asserted
Congress → say → hand
"We have to put up some guardrails, some safety measures in place to ensure that AI doesn’t run away .... asserted
AI → have → place
But at the same time, we’ve got to make sure that we don’t lose our edge in the global competition on this with China," he told NBC News. asserted
he → get → News
"It’s got to be done right, safely [and] wisely," he said. asserted
he → get → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support