Photo via TIME

8 Senate Races the Forecasters Can’t Agree On

Read the original at TIME ↗
Cite

Arrieta-Kenna, R. (2026, November 3). 8 Senate Races the Forecasters Can’t Agree On. TIME. https://time.com/article/2026/11/03/us-election-midterms-forecasters-analysis-senate-race-ratings/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

TIME · collected 2026-11-03 · by Ruairí Arrieta-Kenna

Quick Summary

TIME analyzes eight U.S. Senate races where election forecasters disagree on likely outcomes for November 3rd. The article identifies these races as crucial for Democrats aiming to control the Senate and includes states like Alaska, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Ohio, South Carolina, and Texas. The analysis compares ratings from ten reputable forecasting sources, highlighting discrepancies in predictions that could significantly impact election results.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As voters head to the polls for the November 3 Senate elections, eight key races remain too close for all experts to predict with certainty. According to a TIME analysis examining ratings from ten reputable election forecasters, these contested seats are in Alaska, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Ohio, South Carolina, and Texas. Democrats would need to win at least four of these uncertain races to gain control of the Senate. In Alaska specifically, Democrat Mary Peltola faces Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan; while four out of ten forecasters lean Democratic, the remaining six consider it a toss-up race.

Written for “Senate Race Uncertainties” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Senate Race Uncertainties
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
Hedges 3 of 44 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different types of races (House vs Senate) with distinct sets of races and outcomes.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses Nate Silver's updated prediction model for the midterm elections, while Article B analyzes discrepancies among multiple forecasters on specific Senate races.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 2 of 2 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Senate races; one focuses on a recent poll showing late deciders favoring Republicans, while the other analyzes forecasters' ratings for close races.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and sets of Senate races, not a single specific event.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Senate races on Election Day but do not describe the exact same specific incident or time frame.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss Senate race forecasts but focus on different aspects and do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 21 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different polls and analyses with varying races and forecasters, not a single specific election incident.”
Los Angeles Times
Hedges 21 of 48 claims Outlet record 95/100
“While both articles discuss the 2026 midterm elections and mention Senate races, they focus on different aspects: Article A discusses general House and Senate outcomes, while Article B specifically analyzes uncertain Senate race predictions.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
29
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 29 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
59/100
TIME's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

TIME · 805 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ruairí Arrieta-Kenna
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A TIME analysis of race ratings by 10 reputable election forecasters found that of the 35 U.S. Senate seats up for election on Nov. 3, eight are not rated unanimously in favor of one party.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · 8 Senate Races the Forecasters Can’t Agree On
🔮 Most election forecasters broadly agree on the direction of this year’s 435 U.S. House elections.
Also by Ruairí Arrieta-Kenna
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

CPR Democrat Democratic Republican SCB

Subjects

Democratic NORP · 15× Republican NORP · 15× Democrat NORP · 6× SCB ORG · 6× CPR ORG · 5× FNPR ORG · 5× DDHQ ORG · 4× FPO ORG · 4× RWH ORG · 4× Democrats NORP · 3×

Narrative

Nine of those are rated safely or solidly Democratic by all 10 forecasters: John Hickenlooper in Colorado, Chris Coons in Delaware, Juliana Stratton in Illinois, Ed Markey in Massachusetts, Cory Booker in New Jersey, Ben Ray Luján in New Mexico, Jeff Merkley in Oregon, Jack Reed in Rhode Island, and Mark Warner in Virginia.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 A TIME analysis of race ratings by 10 reputable election forecasters found that of the 35 U.S. Senate seats up for election on Nov. 3, eight are not rated unanimously in favor of one party.
2026-11-03 · TIME
8 Senate Races the Forecasters Can’t Agree On · assertive framing

Claims (29 extracted, 0 hedged)

Amid projections of a Democratic blue wave, as voters head to the polls, several pivotal races are too close for all the experts to comfortably predict. asserted
experts → head → polls
A TIME analysis of race ratings by 10 reputable election forecasters found that of the 35 U.S. Senate seats up for election on Nov. 3, eight are not rated unanimously in favor of one party. asserted
eight → find → party
And Democrats would have to win at least four of them, assuming other results go as expected, to take control of the upper chamber of Congress. asserted
results → have → Congress
The analysis examined ratings from Cook Political Report (CPR), Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ), FiftyPlusOne (FPO), Fox News Power Rankings (FNPR), Inside Elections (IE), Race to the WH (RWH), Sabato’s Crystal Ball (SCB), Silver Bulletin’s FLIPR Deluxe model (SB), Split Ticket (ST), and The Economist (TE). asserted
analysis → examine → WH
In Alaska, four forecasters—DDHQ, FPO, SCB, and ST—rate the race between Democratic former Rep. Mary Peltola and Republican incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan as leaning Democratic, while the remaining six call it a toss-up. asserted
six → rate → it
(TE uses the term “uncertain,” which this analysis treats as the equivalent of a toss-up rating.) asserted
analysis → use → rating
In Iowa, different forecasters can see the race between Republican Rep. Ashley Hinson and Democrat Josh Turek going different directions. asserted
race → see → directions
RWH rates it as Tilt Democratic, while SCB says it leans Republican, and TE rates it Likely Republican. asserted
TE → rat → it
The other seven forecasters call the race a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → call → race
In Kansas, where Democrat Adam Hamilton is challenging Republican incumbent Sen. Roger Marshall, four forecasters—FPO, SCB, SB, and ST, say the race leans Democratic. asserted
race → challenge → Democratic
The other six forecasters call it a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → call → it
In Maine, seven forecasters favor Democrat Troy Jackson over Republican incumbent Sen. Susan Collins, rating the race either Lean or Likely Democratic. asserted
forecasters → favor → race
CPR, IE, and FNPR call it a toss-up. asserted
CPR → call → it
In Michigan, only FNPR rates the race between Democrat Abdul El-Sayed and Republican Mike Rogers as a toss-up. asserted
FNPR → rat → up
IE says it tilts Democratic; CPR and SCB say it leans Democratic; and the rest all rate it Likely Democratic. asserted
rest → say → it
In Ohio, where Democratic former Sen. Sherrod Brown is challenging Republican incumbent Sen. Jon Husted, seven forecasters favor Brown—rating the race either Tilt or Lean Democratic— while CPR, DDHQ, and TE call it a toss-up. asserted
CPR → challenge → it
In South Carolina, FNPR and RWH say the race between Republican Sen. Darline Graham and Democrat Annie Andrews is a toss-up, while eight forecasters favor Graham keeping the seat she filled after her brother’s passing. asserted
she → say → passing
IE says it tilts Republican, TE rates the race Likely Republican, and the other six all say it leans Republican. asserted
it → say → Republican
In Texas, seven forecasters favor Democrat James Talarico over Republican Ken Paxton. asserted
forecasters → favor → Paxton
IE rates the race as Tilt Democratic; DDHQ, FPO, RWH, and SCB say it leans Democratic; and SB and ST rate the race Likely Democratic. asserted
SB → rat → race
CPR, FNPR, and TE call it a toss-up. asserted
CPR → call → it
Of the remaining 27 Senate races, 13 are unanimously rated in favor of Democrats. asserted
13 → remain → Democrats
Nine of those are rated safely or solidly Democratic by all 10 forecasters: John Hickenlooper in Colorado, Chris Coons in Delaware, Juliana Stratton in Illinois, Ed Markey in Massachusetts, Cory Booker in New Jersey, Ben Ray Luján in New Mexico, Jeff Merkley in Oregon, Jack Reed in Rhode Island, and Mark Warner in Virginia. asserted
Nine → rat → Virginia
Another four Democrats—Jon Ossoff in Georgia, Peggy Flanagan in Minnesota, Chris Pappas in New Hampshire, and Roy Cooper in North Carolina—are unanimously favored, although not every forecaster rates their races as safe or solid. asserted
forecaster → favor → races
The other 14 races are unanimously rated in favor of Republicans. asserted
races → rat → Republicans
Seven are rated safely or solidly Republican by all 10 forecasters: Barry Moore in Alabama, Tom Cotton in Arkansas, Jim Risch in Idaho, Kevin Hern in Oklahoma, Bill Hagerty in Tennessee, Shelley Moore Capito in West Virginia, and Harriet Hageman in Wyoming. asserted
Seven → rat → Wyoming
In seven more, all 10 forecasters favor the Republican candidate—Ashley Moody in Florida, Andy Barr in Kentucky, Julia Letlow in Louisiana, Cindy Hyde-Smith in Mississippi, Kurt Alme in Montana, Pete Ricketts in Nebraska, and Mike Rounds in South Dakota—though not all rate the contests as safe or solid. asserted
all → favor → contests
TIME’s analysis reflects the forecasters’ ratings as of 7 a.m. ET, Nov. 3. asserted
analysis → reflect → ET
Ratings describe the forecasters’ assessments of each race based on polling and fundamental assumptions, but they are not guaranteed outcomes. asserted
they → describe → outcomes
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support