Photo via BBC News

US midterms campaign 'shattering' spending records to be most expensive ever

Read the original at BBC News ↗
Cite

Horton, J. (2026, November 2). US midterms campaign 'shattering' spending records to be most expensive ever. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqkgk64z7p58o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

BBC News · collected 2026-11-02 · by Jake Horton

Quick Summary

The US midterms campaign is projected to be the most expensive on record, with total spending expected to reach nearly $12 billion, according to Open Secrets. This exceeds the 2022 midterm election costs by about 30%, driven largely by Super Political Action Committees (Super PACs). Elon Musk leads individual donors, having spent almost half a billion dollars primarily in Texas, backing Republican candidates through his America PAC and other channels.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The 2026 U.S. midterm elections are projected to be the most expensive in history, with total spending reaching nearly $12 billion according to OpenSecrets and AdImpact. This surpasses the previous records of $8.9 billion set in 2022 midterms and $11.2 billion during the 2024 presidential cycle. The surge is largely driven by outside political groups, particularly Super PACs, with Republican-leaning donors contributing $1.7 billion, compared to $832 million from Democratic donors. Notably, Texas’s Senate race between James Talarico and Ken Paxton has already topped $500 million in ad spending, on track to be the costliest U.S. Senate contest ever. Additionally, figures like Elon Musk are playing a significant role, with Musk alone having spent almost half a billion dollars backing Republican candidates.

Written for “US Midterms Campaign Spending Records” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 3 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 124120 · logged 2026-11-03

Story

📰 US Midterms Campaign Spending Records
Politics · 4 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 9 of 51 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 49 claims Outlet record 66/100
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 18 of 96 claims Outlet record 69/100
TIME
Hedges 13 of 58 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterm election's expense and funding sources rather than reporting on a single specific incident.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 5 claims
“While both articles discuss Elon Musk's spending in the US midterms, Article A covers the overall record-breaking campaign spending with a focus on Super PACs and outside groups, whereas Article B specifically details Musk's personal $474 million donation to Republican candidates.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 1 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss overall trends and high spending for midterms but refer to different sources (AdImpact vs Open Secrets) with varying specifics, indicating they are likely summarizing general trends rather than the same specific incident.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 6 of 36 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss Elon Musk's significant donations to Republicans during the midterms, they cover different aspects of the overall spending and do not focus on the exact same specific incident or time frame.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 3 of 25 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss Elon Musk's significant political spending during the US midterms, they cover different aspects of the broader topic and do not specifically describe the same incident or outcome.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 39 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the US midterm elections; Article A focuses on key races and issues, while Article B specifically addresses the record-breaking campaign spending.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 6 of 52 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss general trends and funding in midterm elections but do not focus on the exact same incident or moment.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
5 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
68/100
BBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
4
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

BBC News · 4944 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jake Horton
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 - Published The US midterms campaign is set to be the most expensive on record - with the total cost projected to reach nearly $12bn (£9bn), according to Open Secrets, an independent organisation that tracks campaign finance. Most of the spending is driven by outside political groups - known as Super Political Action Committees (Super Pacs) - pouring large sums of money into some key races ahead of election day on 3 November.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

FEC Open Secrets Republican Super Pacs Super Political Action Committees

Subjects

Republican NORP · 4× FEC ORG · 3× Open Secrets ORG · 3× Texas GPE · 3× Democratic NORP · 2× Musk PERSON · 2× Senate ORG · 2× Elon Musk PERSON · 1× Super Pacs ORG · 1× Super Political Action Committees ORG · 1×

Narrative

"Crypto companies have also been very active this cycle, with Ripple and Coinbase combining to give $63 million to fund Super Pacs promoting the crypto industry's interests," says Brendan J Glavin of Open Secrets.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 - Published The US midterms campaign is set to be the most expensive on record - with the total cost projected to reach nearly $12bn (£9bn), according to Open Secrets, an independent organisation that tracks campaign finance. Most of the spending is driven by outside political groups - known as Super Political Action Committees (Super Pacs) - pouring large sums of money into some key races ahead of election day on 3 November.

Claims (28 extracted, 5 hedged)

- Published The US midterms campaign is set to be the most expensive on record - with the total cost projected to reach nearly $12bn (£9bn), according to Open Secrets, an independent organisation that tracks campaign finance. Most of the spending is driven by outside political groups - known as Super Political Action Committees (Super Pacs) - pouring large sums of money into some key races ahead of election day on 3 November. uncertain
Most → publish → November
The top individual donor is billionaire businessman Elon Musk, who has spent almost half a billion dollars backing Republican candidates, particularly in Texas where many of his companies are based. asserted
many → spend → companies
BBC Verify has looked into the figures and where the money was spent. asserted
money → look → figures
How much has been spent? asserted
much → spend → ?
There are rules on how much people, parties and political action committees (Pacs) can give directly to candidates. asserted
people → be → candidates
But Super Pacs can accept unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, labour unions, and other political committees. asserted
Pacs → accept → individuals
They can't give that money directly to candidates but they can spend it supporting them indirectly. asserted
they → give → them
According to the latest Federal Election Commission, external (FEC) filings which run to mid-October, more than $9.5bn had been spent in this midterms cycle. Pacs and Super Pacs make up more than half of that - at about $5.5bn - with their spending in the last couple of months almost doubling. Candidates, parties and outside groups have to report their spending to the FEC, but the full totals won't be available until after the midterm elections. However, Open Secrets has projected the total will be $11.9bn based on trends in past cycles. uncertain
total → accord → cycles
This would be about 30% more than what was spent during the last midterm elections in 2022. asserted
what → spend → 2022
Which donors have spent the most? asserted
donors → spend → most
The top 40 donors gave $2.4bn up until 14 October, according to the liberal-leaning think tank Brennan Center for Justice, external, which is a record high for that point in a midterms cycle. uncertain
which → give → cycle
"Spending in the 2026 midterms is shattering records, with more of the money coming from the wealthiest donors and groups this election," says Michael Beckel, a US campaign finance expert. asserted
Beckel → spend → donors
As well as individuals, organisations can also give to Pacs. asserted
organisations → give → Pacs
For example, Geosor Corp and Fund for Policy Reform, both founded by the billionaire financier George Soros, have given a combined $102m to liberal groups. asserted
Corp → found → groups
Aside from Soros, former New York City mayor and businessman Michael Bloomberg has been the biggest Democratic donor, giving more than $60m. Several billionaires including Jeff Yass, who runs one of the world's largest trading firms, and Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein, the owners of a US business supply company, have given over $100m this campaign to Republican causes, according to FEC filings. uncertain
who → give → filings
But Musk has given by far the most of any individual, donating almost half a billion dollars as of October. asserted
Musk → give → October
Musk has given most of this to a Super Pac he set up in 2024 called America PAC, as well as to the Republican-aligned Senate Leadership Fund. asserted
he → give → Fund
Most of his money has been spent on the Texas Senate race, supporting Republican candidate Ken Paxton, who is running against Democratic candidate James Talarico. asserted
who → spend → Talarico
America PAC's investments in the Texas race total more than $45m. asserted
investments → total → 45
It has also invested around $10m into both of the Senate races in Michigan and Ohio. asserted
It → invest → Michigan
"Crypto companies have also been very active this cycle, with Ripple and Coinbase combining to give $63 million to fund Super Pacs promoting the crypto industry's interests," says Brendan J Glavin of Open Secrets. asserted
Glavin → combine → Secrets
What has the money been spent on? asserted
money → spend → What
Campaigns and political groups spend money trying to reach voters in a variety of ways - including hiring staff to do on-the-ground voter outreach and hosting campaign events like rallies. asserted
Campaigns → spend → rallies
They also spend money to conduct internal polling. asserted
They → spend → polling
However, the majority of funds are spent on advertising - especially on TV. asserted
majority → spend → TV
In this cycle, $11.15bn has been spent on advertising up until the end of October, according to ad tracking firm AdImpact, external. uncertain
11.15bn → spend → AdImpact
"Traditional broadcast television remains the top beneficiary of advertising expenditures, though expenditures on digital ads continue to increase," says Beckel. asserted
Beckel → remain → ads
Similarly to Musk's spending, AdImpact tracked that most of the money has been spent on advertising in the Senate races in Michigan, Texas and Ohio, followed by Iowa and Maine. asserted
most → track → Iowa
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support