U.S. midterms could be the country's most expensive elections yet. To what end?

Read the original at CBC News ↗
Cite

Gollom, M. (2026, October 29). U.S. midterms could be the country's most expensive elections yet. To what end? CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/u-s-2026-midterms-money-9.7399429?cmp=rss

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

CBC News · collected 2026-10-29 · by Mark Gollom

Quick Summary

The 2026 U.S. midterm elections are projected to be the most expensive in history, with spending expected to reach $11.6 billion US according to AdImpact, surpassing previous records of $8.9 billion during the 2022 midterms and $11.2 billion during the 2024 presidential cycle. This increase is attributed to a "relentless rise of the mega donor" since the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision in 2010, which allowed unlimited independent spending by outside groups like super PACs. Notably, Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico alone is projected to have raised $146 million US, with combined ad spending between him and his opponent Ken Paxton topping $500 million US, potentially setting a new record for the most expensive U.S. Senate contest ever.
Written by AI on 2026-10-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The 2026 U.S. midterm elections are expected to be the country's most expensive, with spending reaching $11.6 billion US according to AdImpact, surpassing previous records of $8.9 billion in 2022 and $11.2 billion during the 2024 presidential cycle. Republican-leaning donors have contributed $1.7 billion, compared to $832 million from Democratic-leaning givers, with outside groups like super PACs playing a significant role. In Texas, for example, groups backing Republican Ken Paxton have spent about $239 million, more than five times the spending by Democratic-aligned groups supporting James Talarico. The combined ad spending in the Senate race between Talarico and Paxton has already topped $500 million US, making it potentially the most expensive U.S. Senate contest ever.

Written for “U.S. Midterm Elections Spending” on 2026-10-29, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence medium
Leaning: leans left for article 114065 (medium confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-10-29

Story

📰 U.S. Midterm Elections Spending
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles discuss high spending in the 2026 U.S. midterm elections, they refer to different timeframes and aspects of the election cycle.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 1 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles discuss high spending in the 2026 U.S. midterms, they describe different aspects of the overall trend: Article A focuses on the total election cycle expenditure record, while Article B details specific House races.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles discuss record-breaking spending for midterm elections, they report on different stages of the election cycle and do not describe a single specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss the overall trend of increasing spending in U.S. elections but do not focus on the exact same incident or data point.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 2 of 36 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Both articles discuss expensive U.S. midterm elections, but describe different aspects of the trend and do not specify the same exact incident or timeframe.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
51
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
9 of 51 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
CBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBC News · 751 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Mark Gollom
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Election cycle has featured 'relentless rise of the mega donor,' political science prof says The 2026 U.S. midterm elections are shaping up to be the most expensive elections in the country's history. This election cycle will reach $11.6 billion US in spending, according to AdImpact, an advertising intelligence company that analyzes political advertising.
🔮 Report says order to restrict Ukraine access to Starlink came from the White House Earlier this week, Ukrainian officials said they had lost some access to Starshield, the military-grade version of Starlink, the satellite communications system operated by Elon Musk's SpaceX. Musk, CEO of SpaceX, denied any involvement in restricting Ukraine's access, saying that decision would be up to the U.S. government. Meanwhile, on Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump denied he was involved in the decision to restrict access and said he didn't think Musk was involved either.
🔮 Starlink restrictions may hamper Ukraine's war effort.
🔮 "So it makes total sense if you attack Yandex, that automated traffic online would go down," he said.
🔮 Why Elon Musk waded into the separatism debate Prime minister, premiers rejected Musk's calls for provinces to separate from Canada When Elon Musk called for Quebec, Alberta and Saskatchewan to separate from Canada earlier this week, it may have been nothing more than the trillionaire engaging in some anti-Canadian trolling.
🔮 How AI could usher in a 'new scientific golden age' — if it doesn't kill us all first Some scientists express concern government regulation could hamper important progress
🔮 "If we try to look at the new defence agreement compared to the old defence agreement, I would characterize it as a moderate improvement for the U.S.," Mikkel Runge Olesen, a senior researcher at the Danish Institute of International Studies, told CBC News.
🔮 This story refers to sexual assault allegations and may affect those who have experienced sexual violence or know someone affected by it.
Also by Mark Gollom
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Mark Gollom →

Topics

AdImpact Democratic Republican Senate U.S.

Subjects

Democratic NORP · 7× Republican NORP · 5× Senate ORG · 4× U.S. GPE · 3× Heerwig PERSON · 2× House ORG · 2× Texas GPE · 2× AdImpact ORG · 1× Canadian NORP · 1× Liberal NORP · 1×

Narrative

While Republicans lag in candidate donations, they have a significant advantage when it come to money from outside groups like super PACs. Republican-leaning donors gave $1.7 billion US, compared with $832 million US from Democratic-leaning givers, per Washington Post calculations. In Texas, for example, groups backing Paxton have spent about $239 million US, more than five times the money spent by the largest Democratic-aligned groups, Reuters reported.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-29
🔮 Election cycle has featured 'relentless rise of the mega donor,' political science prof says The 2026 U.S. midterm elections are shaping up to be the most expensive elections in the country's history. This election cycle will reach $11.6 billion US in spending, according to AdImpact, an advertising intelligence company that analyzes political advertising.

Claims (51 extracted, 9 hedged)

Election cycle has featured 'relentless rise of the mega donor,' political science prof says The 2026 U.S. midterm elections are shaping up to be the most expensive elections in the country's history. This election cycle will reach $11.6 billion US in spending, according to AdImpact, an advertising intelligence company that analyzes political advertising. uncertain
that → feature → advertising
That would surpass the midterm record set in 2022 at $8.9 billion US and the $11.2 billion US spent during the 2024 presidential cycle. asserted
That → surpass → cycle
To put things in a Canadian context, Liberal and Conservative parties in total raised $95 million US in 2024 and 2025, per Elections Canada. asserted
parties → put → Canada
Meanwhile, Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico alone is projected to have raised $146 million U.S. Indeed, combined ad spending in the Senate race between Talarico and Ken Paxton, the state's Republican attorney general, has topped $500 million US, according to ad-tracking data — on pace to become the most expensive U.S. Senate contest ever. uncertain
spending → project → pace
Just how much will campaign money play a role in determining who wins? asserted
who → play → role
As with everything, costs have gone up, making election-related expenses, primarily advertising, higher than in previous campaigns. But since the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision opened the door to unlimited independent spending in federal elections, spending has increased exponentially. asserted
spending → go → elections
Jen Heerwig, an associate professor of sociology at Stony Brook University who researches the political contributions of American corporate elites, said there are a number of highly competitive midterm races in which outside groups have stepped in to supplement candidate spending. asserted
groups → research → spending
That means groups like super PACs (political action committees) have become increasingly important vehicles for election spending, she said. asserted
she → mean → spending
Super PACs, unlike traditional candidate committees or regular PACs, can accept donations of unlimited size, Heerwig said, such as the hundreds of millions Elon Musk is pouring intoRepublican-aligned super PACs. asserted
Musk → accept → PACs
"And now we're seeing these groups spend alongside candidate campaigns in record-shattering amounts." asserted
groups → see → amounts
The "relentless rise of the mega donor" is one of the main stories of these midterm elections, said Henrik Schatzinger, a political science professor and director of the the Center for Politics and the People at Wisconsin-based Ripon College. asserted
Schatzinger → say → College
In 2014, to be one of the Top 40 donors, one would have to have contributed at least $2.3 million US as an individual, Schatzinger said, asserted
Schatzinger → have → individual
In this election, he said, one would have to spend at least $25 million US. asserted
one → say → US
Which party is raising the most money? asserted
party → raise → money
When it comes to money raised by individual candidates in the House and Senate races, Democratic candidates are far outraising their Republican political opponents. asserted
candidates → come → opponents
That's money that goes specifically to the candidate that they can control. asserted
they → go → that
According to the U.S. Federal Election Commission, Democratic candidates have raised more than $906 million US for these midterms. uncertain
candidates → accord → midterms
Republican candidates lag behind with more than $420 million US raised. asserted
US → lag → ?
Of the money raised by Senate candidates, the Top 10 were all Democratic contenders. asserted
Top → raise → candidates
And across the 10 battleground Senate races, the Democratic campaigns raised more than five times as much as the Republican ones, according to Politico. uncertain
campaigns → raise → Politico
While Republicans lag in candidate donations, they have a significant advantage when it come to money from outside groups like super PACs. Republican-leaning donors gave $1.7 billion US, compared with $832 million US from Democratic-leaning givers, per Washington Post calculations. In Texas, for example, groups backing Paxton have spent about $239 million US, more than five times the money spent by the largest Democratic-aligned groups, Reuters reported. asserted
Reuters → lag → groups
Four of the five top donors were Republican, the Post found, with the largest individual political donor being Musk, pouring in $446 million US of his own money. asserted
donor → find → money
The largest individual political donor has been Elon Musk, pouring $446 million US of his own money into the 2026 midterms. asserted
donor → pour → midterms
"The Republicans are kind of the party of billionaires and the Democrats are the party of millionaires," said Alex Keena, associate professor of political science at Virginia Commonwealth University, in Richmond, Va., who researches campaign financing. asserted
who → say → financing
"That's the state of American politics right now." Does that give Republicans an advantage? asserted
that → give → advantage
Even though outside groups are giving Republicans the fundraising edge, that won't necessarily translate to votes, say some observers. asserted
observers → give → votes
Heerwig said she's skeptical that super PAC spending will be as effective as candidate spending. asserted
spending → say → spending
And the amount Democratic candidates are raising from individual donors, compared to Republicans suggests far more grassroots enthusiasm for the Democrats. uncertain
candidates → raise → Democrats
"At the end of the day, there are only a handful of billionaires who will cast ballots but millions of small-dollar donors," Heerwig said. asserted
Heerwig → be → donors
Schatzinger echoed that this election shows there's more energy among the small donor Democrat base than there is among the Republican base. asserted
election → echo → base
"I think that's probably a better indicator of where this election is headed as opposed to just looking at a couple of mega donors who are putting in hundreds of millions of dollars." asserted
who → think → dollars
Is this money well spent? asserted
money → spend → ?
According to AdImpact, broadcast television remains the dominant force in political advertising, with an estimated $5.6 billion US being spent by the campaigns. uncertain
US → accord → campaigns
Digital spending across Facebook, Google, Snapchat and X is estimated to be around $1.6 billion US. asserted
X → estimate → Facebook
But Keena, the academic who researches campaign financing, questioned how much any of this spending will make a difference. " asserted
any → research → difference
My read of the evidence is that it's not really going to affect the outcome of the race." asserted
it → go → race
In Texas, Republicans have poured millions into negative ads against Talarico. asserted
Republicans → pour → Talarico
Yet polls suggest the race remains extremely tight — Talarico possibly has a small lead in a state that hasn't had a Democratic senator in more than 30 years. uncertain
that → suggest → years
These midterm races will decide who controls U.S. Congress for the rest of Trump's presidency The Democrats are surging as the U.S. midterms near. asserted
midterms → decide → presidency
Here's the data that has Trump's Republicans spooked Keena questioned how many voters are being reached by broadcast TV commercials. asserted
voters → have → commercials
…and 11 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support