Trump lawyers ask Supreme Court to set aside 20,000 California ballots
asserted
lawyers → ask → ballots
-
- The court cases have put a spotlight on the state vs. federal divide in election law.
- The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 said voters may fill out a registration form by attesting under oath they are citizens.
uncertain
they → put → oath
On the day before the midterm election, Trump administration lawyers asked the Supreme Court to intervene and set aside ballots from 20,000 California voters who the administration says may not be citizens.
uncertain
administration → ask → voters
Solicitor Gen. D. John Sauer filed an emergency appeal on Monday.
asserted
Sauer → file → Monday
“The Court should issue a limited injunction directing California to stop commingling suspected illegal ballots with legal ones,” he wrote, “pending completion of the United States’ appeal to the 9th Circuit and further review in this Court.”
asserted
he → issue → Court
He said the court should require “California to segregate mail ballots from persons whom the United States has identified as likely non-citizens.
asserted
States → say → citizens
The court should also enter an administrative injunction to that effect while it considers this application.”
It’s not clear whether the court will see this as an emergency.
asserted
court → enter → emergency
The appeal goes first to Justice Elena Kagan.
asserted
appeal → go → Kagan
She could ask for a response from California, which would take days.
uncertain
which → ask → days
So far, the administration has lost before a federal judge in Los Angeles and twice at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.
asserted
administration → lose → Francisco
Those judges said that Trump’s lawyers were wrong on the Constitution and that their complaint came too late for this election.
asserted
complaint → say → election
In May, more than 23 million Californians were registered to vote, and the majority lean in favor of Democrats.
uncertain
majority → register → Democrats
But Trump claimed again last week “there are hundreds of thousands of bad ballots, bad votes, in California.
asserted
Trump → claim → California
Federal judges have repeatedly rejected the Trump administration’s efforts to wrest control over state voting processes and intimidate state and local elections officials.
asserted
judges → reject → officials
In mid-October, the Trump administration sued and said federal courts should require California and Los Angeles County to “set aside vote-by-mail ballots from persons identified by the federal government likely to be non-citizens.”
asserted
courts → sue → government
Federal law says that within 90 days of an election, officials may not “systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.”
uncertain
officials → say → voters
Separately, the Supreme Court also has repeatedly frowned on “late-breaking, court-ordered rule changes” involving elections.
asserted
Court → frown → elections
The California court cases have also put a spotlight on the state vs. federal divide in election law.
asserted
cases → put → law
Usually, federal laws are deemed to be the “supreme law” and override state laws that are in conflict.
asserted
that → deem → conflict
No one disputes U.S. prosecutors may bring criminal fraud charges against noncitizens who violate a federal law by registering with a state to vote and casting an illegal ballot.
uncertain
who → dispute → ballot
The Constitution says “the Times, Places and Manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives shall be prescribed in each state,” unless Congress acts by law to “alter” its regulations.
asserted
Congress → say → regulations
The 9th Circuit judges in Friday’s opinion said that “this clause expressly dictates which sovereign has the authority to prescribe the manner in which congressional elections are conducted.”
asserted
elections → say → which
“If the United States believes different procedures are necessary for vote-by-mail ballots, we believe it should take that suggestion to Congress, not the courts,” said Judges Mark J. Bennett, a Trump appointee, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, a Biden appointee.
asserted
Bennett → believe → Congress
Dissenting Judge Patrick J. Bumatay, a Trump appointee, called the administration’s proposal to separate the 20,000 ballots a “reasonable request” and a “modest remedy” for the problem of illegal voting.
asserted
Bumatay → dissent → voting
The majority cited a 2013 opinion written by the late Justice Antonin Scalia.
asserted
majority → cite → Scalia
“The Elections Clause functions as a default provision,” he wrote.
asserted
he → function → provision
“It invests the states with responsibility for the mechanics of congressional elections,” unless Congress adopts a different rule.
asserted
Congress → invest → rule
Scalia spoke for a 7-2 majority that rejected an Arizona law that required voters to show documentary proof of their citizenship when registering to vote.
asserted
that → speak → citizenship
In the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, Congress said voters may register to vote by filling out a form and attesting under oath they are citizens.
uncertain
they → say → oath
California does the same under state law.
asserted
California → do → law
Scalia said the federal voter registration law did not allow Arizona to adopt new and stricter rules.
asserted
Arizona → say → rules
In dissent, conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito said they would go farther to protect the states from federal interference in elections.
asserted
they → say → elections
“Given states’ exclusive authority to set voter qualifications and to determine whether those qualifications are met,” Thomas said the Arizona restriction should have been upheld.
asserted
restriction → give → qualifications
“The Constitution reserves for the States the power to decide who is qualified to vote in federal elections,” Alito added.
asserted
Alito → reserve → elections
Last month, Trump’s prosecutors brought fraud charges against 28 lawful immigrants in California who are alleged to have registered or voted in the past even though they are not citizens.
asserted
they → bring → past
They did so under a 1996 immigration law which made it “unlawful for any alien” to vote in a federal election.
asserted
alien → do → election
From NBC’s “Kornacki Cam” to CNN’s Sightline tool, networks are streaming the raw data behind their midterm election calls.
asserted
networks → stream → calls
The notion of segregating potentially suspect ballots is not a new issue for the Supreme Court.
asserted
notion → segregate → Court
In November 2020, Alito agreed with Pennsylvania state officials and said they should set aside late-arriving mail ballots to be counted separately.
asserted
they → agree → ballots
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, state election officials and the state Supreme Court agreed to waive part of the state’s law and allow for counting mail ballots that arrived up to three days late.
asserted
that → agree → ballots
…and 5 more, not listed.
The Aporia
