Trump and the court: If he wins, he's happy. When he loses, he ridicules justices he appointed

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-15 · by Lindsay Whitehurst The Associated Press
Read the original at Toronto Star ↗

Summary

President Donald Trump has reacted strongly to recent Supreme Court decisions, both praising and sharply criticizing the court based on outcomes favorable or unfavorable to him. After the court rejected his administration’s restrictions on mail ballots, Trump criticized the justices he appointed who voted against him. The article highlights that while Trump has celebrated victories such as the ability to fire independent agency heads and proceed with redistricting efforts, he has been notably critical of losses concerning tariffs and birthright citizenship.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-15, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
3%
1 of 30 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Correction & hedging signals
61.8
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
unclustered
not grouped into a story yet
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.35 for article 12076 (high confidence, 6 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-15

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 19 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A describes the immediate rejection of Trump's bid by a US appeals court, while Article B discusses Trump's reaction to this and potentially other court decisions regarding mail-in voting restrictions.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 40% hedged 2 of 5 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A describes a second judge blocking Trump's voting restrictions, while Article B focuses on Trump's reaction to the Supreme Court rejecting his administration’s planned restrictions.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 13% hedged 3 of 23 📰 publisher trust 92
“Article A covers a First Circuit Court's refusal to stay an injunction, while Article B discusses Trump's reaction to losing at the Supreme Court regarding mail-in voting.”

Publisher

Toronto Star · 768 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-09-04
Orca Corrects Q3 Quarterly Dividend Announcement

Who wrote this

Lindsay Whitehurst The Associated Press
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 None of the three justices wrote about their rationale for joining the majority opinion, though Justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated he might see things differently if the election wasn’t coming up so quickly.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Nothing else under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Congress Republican WASHINGTON the Department of Education the U.S. Supreme Court

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 10× Brett Kavanaugh PERSON · 1× Clarence Thomas PERSON · 1× Congress ORG · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Republican NORP · 1× Samuel Alito PERSON · 1× WASHINGTON GPE · 1× the Department of Education ORG · 1× the U.S. Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

On Monday, the court rejected his administration’s planned restrictions on mail ballots for the midterm elections and by the morning on Tuesday, Trump took to social media to denigrate the decision and the justices he had appointed who rejected Trump’s argument.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 None of the three justices wrote about their rationale for joining the majority opinion, though Justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated he might see things differently if the election wasn’t coming up so quickly.

Claims (30 extracted, 1 hedged)

President Donald Trump has taken his wins, and more notably his losses, at the U.S. Supreme Court quite personally. asserted
Trump → take → Court
It is a court he shaped with three nominees during his first term and he has frequently expressed admiration when the court rules his way, only to turn sharply critical when it delivers him a defeat. asserted
it → shape → defeat
On Monday, the court rejected his administration’s planned restrictions on mail ballots for the midterm elections and by the morning on Tuesday, Trump took to social media to denigrate the decision and the justices he had appointed who rejected Trump’s argument. asserted
who → reject → argument
None of the three justices wrote about their rationale for joining the majority opinion, though Justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated he might see things differently if the election wasn’t coming up so quickly. uncertain
election → write → things
Of the nine-member court, only Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito fully agreed with the administration. asserted
Thomas → agree → administration
Trump’s rebuke also resurfaced his frustration over losses on tariffs and birthright citizenship — two other issues where the conservative majority court has checked the power of the Republican president. asserted
court → resurface → president
The court has let Trump move ahead with much of his agenda The justices have handed the president nearly two dozen victories in emergency appeals, often lifting lower court orders that had blocked key aspects of his boundary-testing second-term agenda. asserted
that → let → agenda
While technically temporary, those decisions have largely allowed his administration to push ahead with his crackdown on immigration, ban on transgender people serving in the military and dismantling of the Department of Education. asserted
administration → allow → Education
He also got significantly more power over federal regulatory agencies that Congress had created to operate independently when the court found presidents can fire those leaders at will. asserted
presidents → get → will
Another ruling that weakened the Voting Rights Act allowed his call for redistricting for partisan advantage to proceed. asserted
call → weaken → advantage
Those decisions, though, achieved longtime goals of the conservative legal movement. asserted
decisions → achieve → movement
“They’re the kind of cases that, for the most part, it doesn’t matter what administration would have brought them, the court would have come out the same place,” said Erin Murphy, an appellate attorney who clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts. asserted
who → ’re → Roberts
She spoke at a Tuesday panel at Georgetown Law’s Supreme Court Institute. asserted
She → speak → Institute
Trump also has been dealt high-profile losses asserted
Trump → deal → losses
Trump’s record has been more mixed, though, in cases where the court has gotten a full briefing and heard arguments. asserted
court → get → arguments
The justices struck down his far-reaching tariffs on nearly every other country, his restrictions on birthright citizenship and put the brakes on his push to fire a member of the Federal Reserve Board. asserted
justices → strike → Board
His administration is still pursuing those goals in new ways, but for Trump the losses have rankled. asserted
losses → pursue → Trump
On Tuesday, he assailed the justices “for shockingly bad rulings that are of such magnitude that it won’t be easily possible for our Country to recover or heal.” asserted
Country → assail → magnitude
He referenced his own role in appointing three of the nine justices, writing that “these are not the people I interviewed to serve on the United States Supreme Court.” asserted
I → reference → Court
The missive came after a high-profile loss on the emergency docket: the high court’s rejection of his proposed restrictions on mail ballots before the fast-approaching midterm elections. asserted
missive → come → elections
Trump has long targeted mail voting even while using it himself, falsely blaming it for his 2020 election loss despite a lack of evidence of fraud. asserted
Trump → target → fraud
“I think it’s certainly right that this is not a MAGA court. asserted
this → think → ?
The court is asserting its independence from the president,” said Don Verrilli, a former Solicitor General under President Barack Obama, also speaking at Georgetown. asserted
Verrilli → assert → Georgetown
The justices have twice rejected Trump-backed cases ahead of the midterms The mail ballots decision was the second time in as many weeks that the court rejected a Trump-backed appeal related to the election. asserted
court → reject → election
The high court also refused to allow Missouri to use new elections maps redrawn at Trump’s urging to help Republicans gain an extra seat in the U.S. House. asserted
Republicans → refuse → House
The high court’s majority didn’t explain either decision in detail, as is typical on their emergency docket. asserted
majority → explain → docket
But taken together, the decision seems to signal an unwillingness to intervene in election litigation before the pivotal November contests. asserted
decision → take → contests
“My guess is there’s a robust majority that doesn’t want to be the decision maker allowing the chaos to happen,” said attorney Roman Martinez, another former Roberts clerk who frequently argues before the court. asserted
who → ’ → court
The court will likely end up being drawn into election litigation again, though, before or after the votes are cast. asserted
votes → end → litigation
“As the rest of this electoral cycle unfolds, I think there is going to be a lot of turbulence around these issues,” Verrilli said. asserted
Verrilli → unfold → issues
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support