Photo via New York Post

California’s Prop. 3 tax on top earners holds strong days before election, new poll shows

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Khan, Z. (2026, October 29). California’s Prop. 3 tax on top earners holds strong days before election, new poll shows. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/29/us-news/californias-prop-3-tax-on-top-earners-holds-strong-days-before-election-new-poll-shows/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-29 · by Zain Khan

Quick Summary

A new poll shows that California voters are likely to approve Proposition 3, which would make permanent a tax on individuals earning more than $371,000 annually. The Public Policy Institute of California survey indicates that 58% of likely voters support Prop. 3, while 40% oppose it. Major funding for the yes campaign comes from the California Teachers Association, which has contributed $58.3 million, accounting for 87% of total campaign funds. Opponents argue that extending these taxes could harm the state's competitiveness and point to current high income tax rates in California as reasons to let the temporary measures expire on schedule.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 29, 2026, a new poll shows that 58% of likely voters in California support Proposition 3, which would make permanent the state’s tax on top earners with incomes over $371,000 per year. This measure first became effective in 2012 as a temporary initiative and was renewed in 2016. The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) survey indicates that majorities across various demographics support the proposition, including individuals earning less than $40,000, renters, and those aged 18 to 34. However, opposition is strong among Republicans. Notably, the California Teachers Association has invested $58.3 million in campaigning for Prop. 3, citing potential severe cuts to public education funding if it fails.

Written for “California Proposition 3 Polls” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high 3 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 115785 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 California Proposition 3 Polls
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different propositions (Proposition 40 vs Proposition 3) regarding taxation policies in California, indicating separate events.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Centre further right than this Hedges 1 of 4 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different propositions: Proposition 40 (wealth tax on billionaires) and Proposition 3 (making temporary taxes on top earners permanent).”
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different propositions: one focuses on Proposition 3 regarding top earners' taxes, while the other mentions multiple propositions but does not focus specifically on Proposition 3.”
Reason
Hedges 2 of 46 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses billionaires paying back their 'debt' to society through taxes and challenges the justification for wealth taxes, while Article B reports on a poll regarding Proposition 3, which aims to make permanent existing tax rates on high earners. These articles cover different aspects of taxation but do not describe the same specific event.”
TIME
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 5 of 61 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different propositions: Proposition 40 regarding a billionaire wealth tax and Proposition 3 about making permanent taxes on top earners.”
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 9 of 84 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different propositions (Prop. 3 and Prop. 40) concerning taxes on high earners, indicating separate events.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
3 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15525 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Zain Khan
66 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Proposition 3 would make permanent the tax rates on individuals earning more than $371,000 a year.
🔮 “I think in general we will need more standardized and AI-proof measures of everything, both in college admissions and once students are enrolled at university,” he said.
🔮 Whether the exam was online or in person predicted students’ final scores better than how they had done earlier in the course.
🔮 The idyllic imagery then gives way to Hilton’s depiction of California under Becerra, with the ad claiming that gas prices would climb to $8 a gallon and families would struggle to afford driving.
🔮 The professor suggested that universities might not immediately adapt to the rapid advances in artificial intelligence, pointing to the resistance to change that often characterizes academic institutions.
🔮 At the center of the fight is a Nov. 3 election that could upend the Beverly Hills Unified School District board, where Democrats Jackie Kruger and Kim Lifschitz are challenging incumbent board President Judy Manouchehri and the conservative majority they oppose.
🔮 Every family deserves the peace of mind that their child will return home safely at the end of each school day.” On Sept. 30, Xavier jumped to his death amid claims he was bullied at school.
🔮 She also remembered a man on top of her, close enough that she could feel his breath on her face.
🔮 The pricey private school has also produced NFL stars, including New York Giants linebacker Kayvon Thibodeaux, Seattle Seahawks running back Zach Charbonnet and Indianapolis Colts wide receiver Michael Pittman Jr., as well as softball standout Maya Brady, niece of NFL legend Tom Brady.
🔮 The state now sends students who might thrive by first going to the community colleges to UC campuses where they are unprepared for a serious academic environment,” Hass told the Post.
Also by Zain Khan
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 66 articles by Zain Khan →

Topics

California PPIC Prop. 3 Proposition 3 Public Policy Institute of California

Subjects

California GPE · 3× Kline PERSON · 2× CTA ORG · 1× David Kline PERSON · 1× Democrats NORP · 1× PPIC ORG · 1× Public Policy Institute of California ORG · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× The California Teachers Association ORG · 1× independents NORP · 1×

Narrative

“Failing to pass Prop. 3 and extend this funding would mean an immediate 15% cut to funding for public schools and community colleges, with one in every six educators potentially losing their jobs,” the union said in a statement.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 Proposition 3 would make permanent the tax rates on individuals earning more than $371,000 a year.

Claims (32 extracted, 3 hedged)

California voters appear ready to make the state’s “temporary” tax on top earners permanent, even as support for a first-in-the-nation billionaire wealth tax collapses, according to a new poll released less than a week before Election Day. uncertain
support → appear → Day
Proposition 3 would make permanent the tax rates on individuals earning more than $371,000 a year. asserted
rates → make → 371,000
Voters first approved them in 2012 as a temporary measure and extended them in 2016. asserted
Voters → approve → 2016
Fifty-eight percent of likely voters said they would vote yes after reading the ballot title and label, according to the Public Policy Institute of California survey. uncertain
they → say → survey
Four in 10 said they would vote no. asserted
they → say → ?
That support has not changed. asserted
support → change → ?
PPIC’s September survey found the same split, 58% yes and 40% no. asserted
survey → find → split
Most Democrats and independents back the measure, while most Republicans oppose it. asserted
Republicans → back → it
Support is strongest among likely voters earning less than $40,000 (77%), those aged 18 to 34 (73%) and renters (69%). asserted
Support → earn → 40,000
Majorities in every region support Prop. 3, but the Central Valley is close to evenly split, with 51% yes and 48% no. asserted
Valley → support → %
One of the largest teachers union has bankrolled the yes campaign. asserted
One → bankroll → campaign
The California Teachers Association has poured $58.3 million into the campaign for Prop. 3, which helps fund public schools and community colleges. asserted
which → pour → schools
The union’s contributions make up 87% of the Yes on 3 campaign’s funding. asserted
contributions → make → funding
CTA warned of steep cuts if the measure fails. asserted
measure → warn → cuts
“Failing to pass Prop. 3 and extend this funding would mean an immediate 15% cut to funding for public schools and community colleges, with one in every six educators potentially losing their jobs,” the union said in a statement. asserted
union → pass → statement
“Prop. 3 will not raise taxes on anyone – it extends the current tax applied to couples earning more than $740,000 a year.” asserted
it → raise → 740,000
Opponents admit they are outgunned. asserted
they → admit → ?
David Kline, vice president of communications and research at the California Taxpayers Association, said the “yes” side’s huge spending made the fight “an uphill battle.” asserted
fight → say → Association
He said he hopes voters will reject what he called an unnecessary tax increase that would drive up the cost of living. asserted
that → say → living
“One of the biggest problems with Prop. 3 is that it would put a tax increase in the California Constitution five years in advance — taking effect in 2031, when the state’s finances could be dramatically different than they are today,” Kline told the California Post. uncertain
Kline → put → Post
“Voters should leave their options open and monitor how their existing tax dollars are being spent, not rush into a premature tax increase that makes our state less competitive,” he added. asserted
he → leave → increase
Kline said the rates were sold as temporary taxes to address a fiscal emergency, and that emergency is over. asserted
emergency → say → emergency
He pointed to big gains in state revenue and record school spending as reasons to let the taxes expire on schedule. asserted
taxes → point → schedule
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association urged a no vote in its voter guide. asserted
Association → urge → guide
It said the 2012 tax was pitched as temporary “for the schools” and that this measure would make it permanent. asserted
it → say → schools
“California has the highest income tax rates in the nation, and every year the state has a bigger budget and a higher cost of living to show for it. asserted
state → have → it
Sonja Shaw, the Republican-backed candidate running to be California’s superintendent of public instruction, told the Post her answer is “Heck no.” asserted
answer → back → Post
“We are in the middle of a serious crisis in this state as it relates to cost of living. asserted
it → relate → living
Families are struggling,” Shaw said. asserted
Shaw → struggle → ?
“Now is not the time to raise taxes. asserted
time → raise → taxes
We need actual accountability and better spending discipline, not a deeper slush fund for Sacramento insiders.” asserted
We → need → insiders
Election Day is Nov. 3, with hundergrds of 100,00s of mail-in ballos alredady ebing processed. asserted
hundergrds → mail → ballos
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support