Photo via New York Post

Alaska’s bizarre Senate doppelganger marks a new low for Democratic dirty tricks

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Lowry, R. (2026, October 28). Alaska’s bizarre Senate doppelganger marks a new low for Democratic dirty tricks. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/28/opinion/alaskas-senate-doppelganger-marks-a-new-low-for-democratic-dirty-tricks/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-28 · by Rich Lowry

Quick Summary

Alaska's Senate election includes two candidates named Dan Sullivan: Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan and an unrelated candidate seen as a Democratic tactic to split votes. The Justice Department has filed a lawsuit against this scenario but is unlikely to succeed, raising concerns about Alaska’s electoral system that features jungle primaries and ranked-choice voting. This system allowed the impostor Sullivan to qualify for the general election with minimal support, highlighting potential pitfalls of such electoral reforms.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 31, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice is investigating potential voter confusion in Alaska's Senate race due to the presence of two candidates named Dan Sullivan: incumbent Republican Senator Dan S. Sullivan and a lesser-known retired teacher, Dan J. Sullivan, who was recruited by Democratic operatives. The DOJ seeks a court order to isolate certain ballots to investigate this issue further. The FBI has also begun contacting donors to Dan J. Sullivan's campaign, including one donor in his hometown of Flint who gave $500 over the summer. This investigation follows reports that Mary Peltola’s campaign and senior Democratic officials were involved in a secret effort to recruit a "decoy" candidate with the same name as Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan to confuse voters and potentially sway the election, which could determine control of the Senate.

Written for “FBI Investigates Dan Sullivan Senate Race” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 118 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 112879: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 FBI Investigates Dan Sullivan Senate Race
Crime & Law · 119 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 28% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
Hedges 6 of 19 claims Outlet record 68/100
TIME
Hedges 8 of 57 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 40 claims Outlet record 61/100
Fox News
Hedges 3 of 36 claims Outlet record 69/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 6 of 48 claims Outlet record 60/100
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 67/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 17 claims Outlet record 95/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
25
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
28%
7 of 25 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
119
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15592 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Rich Lowry
10 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 President Donald Trump says the Iran war will end “soon,” a promise he’s been making most of this year.
🔮 One would seem plenty, but Alaska is going to the polls with two “Dan Sullivans” on the ballot — one the sitting Republican US senator in a nip-and-tuck battle to save his seat, and the other a random guy whose only discernible purpose in the race is to divert precious votes from the real Dan Sullivan.
🔮 Now, El-Sayed could say that none of this has anything to do with him, since his biological mother didn’t raise him, and that his mother made a mistake in working for the Brotherhood.
🔮 It started as demonstrations against underfunded schools and have morphed into a red-green campaign of mayhem ranging much more widely. Palestinian flags and the slogan “Free Palestine” are ubiquitous.
🔮 Trump’s standing will have much to do with whether such a thing happens.
🔮 Winston Churchill said that “wars are not won by evacuations” — and sometimes, he might have added, they are simply embarrassing.
🔮 Richard Nixon, who never stopped trying to rehabilitate his reputation, would be delighted to know his defenders have had some posthumous success in his behalf.
🔮 In 2026, his tariff policy may help tank Republicans in the midterms.
🔮 Jones, who achieved notoriety for her role as an editor of the paper’s “1619 Project,” believed that putting her daughter in rotten elementary and middle-school schools would strike a blow for racial equity.
Also by Rich Lowry
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by Rich Lowry →

Topics

Alaska Democrats Republican The Justice Department US Senate

Subjects

Sullivan PERSON · 10× Republican NORP · 6× Alaska GPE · 4× Dan Sullivan PERSON · 3× Dan Sullivans PERSON · 3× Democrat NORP · 3× Democratic NORP · 2× Democrats NORP · 1× The Justice Department ORG · 1× US Senate ORG · 1×

Narrative

One would seem plenty, but Alaska is going to the polls with two “Dan Sullivans” on the ballot — one the sitting Republican US senator in a nip-and-tuck battle to save his seat, and the other a random guy whose only discernible purpose in the race is to divert precious votes from the real Dan Sullivan.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 One would seem plenty, but Alaska is going to the polls with two “Dan Sullivans” on the ballot — one the sitting Republican US senator in a nip-and-tuck battle to save his seat, and the other a random guy whose only discernible purpose in the race is to divert precious votes from the real Dan Sullivan.

Claims (25 extracted, 7 hedged)

How many “Dan Sullivans” does one election need? asserted
election → need → Sullivans
One would seem plenty, but Alaska is going to the polls with two “Dan Sullivans” on the ballot — one the sitting Republican US senator in a nip-and-tuck battle to save his seat, and the other a random guy whose only discernible purpose in the race is to divert precious votes from the real Dan Sullivan. asserted
purpose → seem → Sullivan
The Justice Department has filed a lawsuit seeking a preemptive order blocking certification of the election should the presence of the faux Sullivan affect the outcome. asserted
presence → file → outcome
Democrats and the commentariat have condemned this as an effort to overturn the election before it happens, but the suit is going nowhere (no judge is likely to issue such an order, and the complaint doesn’t name a substantive statutory provision that’s been violated). asserted
that → condemn → provision
This doesn’t change the fact, though, that the second Sullivan is a clear and present danger to voter intent in a crucial US Senate race — and that the Alaska electoral system is a travesty. asserted
system → change → race
Several years ago, the state adopted fashionable changes to how it votes, ditching the commonsensical and tried-and-true in favor of the novel and complex. asserted
it → adopt → novel
It moved to a so-called jungle primary where the four highest vote-getters advance to the general election regardless of party. asserted
getters → move → party
And it instituted a ranked-choice system in the general: If no candidate finishes with a majority of the vote, the support for the candidate (or candidates) with the fewest votes is redistributed until someone gets over the top. asserted
someone → institute → top
This new system is, in part, an object lesson in the folly of changing electoral rules to benefit one candidate. asserted
system → change → candidate
The architects of the changes, which narrowly passed by referendum in 2020, hoped to help independent-minded Republican Lisa Murkowski. She was an iffy proposition in Republican primaries but could prevail with crossover votes in the general, making the new primary system ideal for her. uncertain
system → pass → her
She is truly ensconced now, so mission accomplished. asserted
She → ensconce → ?
But the jungle primary let the fake Sullivan qualify for the general with just 2.5% of the vote. asserted
Sullivan → let → vote
If there had been a Republican primary, Dan Sullivan the senator would have trounced Dan Sullivan the poseur. asserted
Sullivan → trounce → Sullivan
Yes, the other Sullivan could have qualified for the general by running as an independent, but that would have required gathering signatures — in other words, some effort besides getting leftover votes meant for the real Sullivan. uncertain
that → qualify → Sullivan
Such contests take from parties the responsibility for choosing their candidates, and they create the possibility of perverse outcomes. asserted
they → take → outcomes
In California earlier this year, it seemed that the jungle primary might— thanks to a splintered Democratic field — advance two Republican candidates and no Democrat in the heavily blue state’s gubernatorial race. uncertain
primary → seem → race
In Alaska, it might mitigate the effect of the second Sullivan if confused voters make both the Sullivans their top choices. uncertain
Sullivans → mitigate → Sullivan
But if a voter makes the wrong Sullivan his top choice and selects the Democrat, Mary Peltola, in second place, the erroneous Sullivan vote will be reallocated to the Democrat. asserted
vote → make → Democrat
Ranked-choice voting is convoluted, and it leads to delays in counting and perhaps lead changes during the count that seem arbitrary. asserted
that → rank → count
There’s nothing to recommend it over traditional first-past-the-post voting that lends itself to clear, comprehensible results, and — in competent states — rapid vote counts. asserted
that → ’ → states
As for the second Sullivan, he says that no one put him up to running, even though everything about his candidacy is consistent with a dirty trick. asserted
everything → say → trick
He’s a Democratic voter who sought to run as a Republican. asserted
who → ’ → Republican
Initially, according to Alaska’s director of elections, he wanted to be on the ballot as “Dan S. Sullivan” — the senator’s middle initial, not his own. And his campaign website has the same look as Sen. Sullivan’s. uncertain
website → accord → Sullivan
The DOJ lawsuit may be meritless, but it does raise awareness around the outrage of the two Dan Sullivans. uncertain
it → raise → Sullivans
A Senate race upon which control of the body possibly depends shouldn’t be swayed by an incumbent senator’s unwelcome doppelganger. uncertain
control → depend → doppelganger
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support