The Aporia
Mallin, A. (2026, October 27). Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit. ABC News (US). https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-appears-skeptical-dojs-legal-maneuvering-alaska-lawsuit/story?id=137590192
Mallin, Alexander. “Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit.” ABC News (US), 27 Oct. 2026, https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-appears-skeptical-dojs-legal-maneuvering-alaska-lawsuit/story?id=137590192.
Mallin, Alexander. “Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit.” ABC News (US), October 27, 2026. https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-appears-skeptical-dojs-legal-maneuvering-alaska-lawsuit/story?id=137590192.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Alaska to prevent certification of the state’s Senate race results unless Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan wins, arguing that Democratic candidate Mary Peltola's campaign would benefit from confusion caused by another candidate named Dan J. Sullivan Jr. running independently. The DOJ claims this second Dan Sullivan intentionally entered the race to mislead voters and reduce support for the incumbent, a charge denied by both Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. and his supporters. Republican Senator Adam Schiff criticized the DOJ’s intervention as inappropriate federal overreach, while Alaskan judge Sharon Gleason expressed skepticism about the timing and legality of the lawsuit, noting that state courts had already ruled in favor of including all candidates on the ballot. Despite this, U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the action, stating it aims to remedy a situation where voters might be misled by having two candidates with similar names. The case highlights tensions over federal versus state authority in election oversight and ongoing debates about voter confusion and its impact on electoral outcomes.
Judge Sharon Gleason noted the last-minute nature of DOJ's actions.