Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit

Read the original at ABC News (US) ↗
Cite

Mallin, A. (2026, October 27). Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit. ABC News (US). https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-appears-skeptical-dojs-legal-maneuvering-alaska-lawsuit/story?id=137590192

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

ABC News (US) · collected 2026-10-27 · by Alexander Mallin

Quick Summary

District Judge Sharon Gleason expressed skepticism about the Justice Department's last-minute lawsuit attempting to block certification of Alaska’s Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan narrowly loses. The judge highlighted that the DOJ initiated legal action on October 22, 2026, weeks after voting began and nearly four months after the Alaska Supreme Court included Sullivan on the ballot. Republicans claim another candidate with a similar name is causing voter confusion to draw votes away from Sullivan.
Written by AI on 2026-10-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Alaska to prevent certification of the state’s Senate race results unless Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan wins, arguing that Democratic candidate Mary Peltola's campaign would benefit from confusion caused by another candidate named Dan J. Sullivan Jr. running independently. The DOJ claims this second Dan Sullivan intentionally entered the race to mislead voters and reduce support for the incumbent, a charge denied by both Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. and his supporters. Republican Senator Adam Schiff criticized the DOJ’s intervention as inappropriate federal overreach, while Alaskan judge Sharon Gleason expressed skepticism about the timing and legality of the lawsuit, noting that state courts had already ruled in favor of including all candidates on the ballot. Despite this, U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the action, stating it aims to remedy a situation where voters might be misled by having two candidates with similar names. The case highlights tensions over federal versus state authority in election oversight and ongoing debates about voter confusion and its impact on electoral outcomes.

Written for “DOJ SuestoBlockAlaskaSenateResults” on 2026-10-29, grounded in this article and the 17 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 110023 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-10-29

Story

📰 DOJ SuestoBlockAlaskaSenateResults
Politics · 18 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
TIME
Hedges 8 of 57 claims Outlet record 59/100
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A describes the filing of a federal lawsuit by the Trump Justice Department, while Article B reports on Judge Sharon Gleason's skepticism regarding the lawsuit after it has been filed.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
BBC News
Hedges 6 of 19 claims Outlet record 69/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 16 of 66 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes the filing of a lawsuit by the DOJ, while Article B reports on a judge's reaction to and skepticism about this lawsuit.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 1 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the initial filing of a lawsuit by the DOJ, while Article B reports on a court's reaction and skepticism towards that lawsuit, indicating different stages of the same broader issue but not the same specific incident.”
NBC News
Hedges 2 of 22 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on the filing of a motion by Democrats to dismiss the Trump administration's lawsuit, while Article B discusses the judge's skepticism regarding the DOJ's legal strategy in the same case but from a different phase (the judge's first order).”
NPR
Hedges 5 of 27 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on the U.S. Attorney General defending the DOJ lawsuit, while Article B discusses a judge's skepticism of the legal maneuvering in the same case, indicating these are separate but related events.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the Justice Department's attempt to block certification of Alaska Senate race, while Article B reports on a judge's skepticism regarding this legal maneuvering in court proceedings.”
Global News
Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 63/100
“The articles describe different stages of the legal process: Article A discusses a legal expert's reaction to the DOJ lawsuit, while Article B describes the judge's skepticism about the lawsuit during initial proceedings.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
10
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 10 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
ABC News (US)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
18
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (US) · 1226 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alexander Mallin
16 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 "Never before in American history has the federal government, on the eve of an election, sought to coerce a state and local government to abandon their own Constitutional elections procedures and bend to the will of the Executive Branch," U.S .District Judge David Carter wrote in his Wednesday order.
🔮 Bill Essayli, a controversial Trump-installed leader of the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Central District of California, argued in the hearing that the administration was simply pushing for the state to be in compliance with federal law barring non-citizens from casting votes. But state officials and other legal advocates opposing the DOJ lawsuit countered that the litigation violated longstanding Constitutional principles mandating that states have control over their elections -- and could have chaotic consequences for the state in tabulating final vote counts in the weeks ahead.
🔮 I'm frustrated that I got it in the middle of the night, but I'm much more concerned that it's filed on the public record." The assistant U.S. attorney in the hearing, John Borchert, struggled repeatedly as Faruqui asked him to explain the government's conduct, which the judge said was unlike any case he had ever seen in the history of D.C.'s district court. Faruqui ultimately granted the request from Flores' and Benavides' attorneys to strike the amended complaint from the docket and said he would continue Tuesday's hearing to determine whether prosecutors established probable cause in their initial complaint filed last week. "Why today on this one case have you changed the entire history of how you charge cases?" Faruqui asked of Borchert.
🔮 She could not immediately be reached for comment on Tuesday.
🔮 "The United States seeks a court order to prevent Defendants from certifying the result of the November 2026 United States Senate election if '(1) [Dan S.] Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for [Dan S.] Sullivan and Alaska's rank-choice process played out accordingly, [Dan S.] Sullivan would have won the election.'"
🔮 During a press conference on Monday, Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter attracted some scrutiny when he acknowledged that the administration's list likely included errors, and that "there may be some names on there who it turns out ultimately are citizens.
🔮 In a follow-up post resharing the letter, Trump wrote "They will all go to jail for a long period of time!!!"
🔮 Former special counsel Jack Smith is set to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday to defend his two criminal investigations of President Donald Trump amid growing calls from Republicans that Smith himself face prosecution by Trump's Justice Department.
🔮 The 2 1/2-hour hearing was heart wrenching as family members of the 13 service members killed in the 2021 attack took to the podium to tearfully plead for Judge Trenga to sentence Sharifullah to the maximum prison time of 20 years behind bars. "No justice will be enough to mend my broken heart," said Paula Knauss, the mother of U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Ryan Knauss.
🔮 Judge indicates Trump's pressure campaign could permanently sink Reflecting Pool vandalism case Asked whether prosecutors were investigating Hearn, they said they weren't.
Also by Alexander Mallin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 16 articles by Alexander Mallin →

Topics

Alaska Alaskans DOJ Republican Senate

Subjects

Alaska GPE · 4× DOJ ORG · 3× Dan S.] Sullivan PERSON · 3× Alaskans NORP · 2× Dan Sullivan PERSON · 2× Daniel J. Sullivan PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Senate ORG · 2× Sharon Gleason PERSON · 2× United States GPE · 2×

Narrative

"The United States seeks a court order to prevent Defendants from certifying the result of the November 2026 United States Senate election if '(1) [Dan S.] Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for [Dan S.] Sullivan and Alaska's rank-choice process played out accordingly, [Dan S.] Sullivan would have won the election.'"
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-29
🔮 "The United States seeks a court order to prevent Defendants from certifying the result of the November 2026 United States Senate election if '(1) [Dan S.] Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for [Dan S.] Sullivan and Alaska's rank-choice process played out accordingly, [Dan S.] Sullivan would have won the election.'"
2026-10-29 · ABC News (US)
Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit · assertive framing

Claims (10 extracted, 0 hedged)

Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit District Judge Sharon Gleason noted the last-minute nature of DOJ's actions. asserted
Gleason → appear → actions
The federal judge handling the Justice Department's bid to block certification of Alaska's Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan narrowly loses signaled considerable skepticism of DOJ's legal strategy on Monday. asserted
Sullivan → handle → Monday
In her first order acknowledging the case, District Judge Sharon Gleason highlighted the last-minute nature of the government's actions, especially as Alaskans have already begun casting their ballots. " asserted
Alaskans → acknowledge → ballots
After Alaskans had already begun casting their ballots for the November 2026 election -- and nearly four months after the Alaska Supreme Court directed the Division of Elections to include Daniel J. Sullivan on the ballot for the upcoming United States Senate election -- the United States initiated this action on October 22, 2026," Gleason said. asserted
Gleason → begin → October
"The United States seeks a court order to prevent Defendants from certifying the result of the November 2026 United States Senate election if '(1) [Dan S.] Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for [Dan S.] Sullivan and Alaska's rank-choice process played out accordingly, [Dan S.] Sullivan would have won the election.'" asserted
Sullivan → seek → election
On Friday, President Donald Trump said that he had directed the Justice Department to preemptively file a lawsuit to try to block the certification of the crucial Alaska Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses, citing name confusion among the candidates. asserted
Sullivan → say → candidates
Republicans have alleged that candidate Dan J. Sullivan is running a sham campaign to purposefully confuse voters and draw votes away from incumbent Sen. Dan S. Sullivan based on their names being similar. asserted
names → allege → Sullivan
The district judge's order came in response to a rapid series of briefings from parties seeking to join the case and dismiss the lawsuit. asserted
order → come → lawsuit
Gleason said in her order on Monday that she intends to issue a ruling on a request for outside parties to join by Wednesday at 5 p.m. local time. asserted
parties → say → p.m.
She has yet to indicate whether she will hold a hearing. asserted
she → have → hearing
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support