The United States Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit seeking to delay certification of Alaska’s Senate election result if Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan narrowly loses to Democrat Mary Peltola in the November 3 midterms.
asserted
Sullivan → file → midterms
Another candidate named Dan Sullivan is also on the ballot.
asserted
candidate → name → ballot
listIn a lawsuit filed on Thursday, the department argued that the second Sullivan, a retired teacher who registered as a Republican, is deliberately trying to confuse voters.
asserted
who → file → voters
Alaska’s Supreme Court has already ruled that both candidates may remain on the ballot.
uncertain
candidates → rule → ballot
So who are the two Dan Sullivans, and what could the lawsuit mean for the election?
uncertain
lawsuit → mean → election
What is happening in Alaska’s US Senate race?
asserted
What → happen → race
Senator Sullivan is seeking a third six-year term in the race against Peltola, a former congresswoman who became the first Alaska Native elected to the US House of Representatives in 2022.
asserted
who → seek → 2022
Alaska has traditionally voted Republican in presidential elections.
asserted
Alaska → vote → elections
President Donald Trump won the state by roughly 13 percentage points in 2024, but this year’s Senate race appears more competitive.
asserted
race → win → 2024
In August’s primary, Peltola received 49.5 percent of the vote, compared with about 41 percent for Senator Sullivan.
asserted
Peltola → receive → Sullivan
Two other candidates advanced to the November 3 election: Daniel J Sullivan Jr and Gerald Heikes.
asserted
candidates → advance → election
Dan S Sullivan was first elected to the US Senate in 2014 and was re-elected in 2020.
asserted
Sullivan → elect → 2020
He previously served as Alaska’s attorney general and commissioner of natural resources.
asserted
He → serve → resources
His entry into the race this year prompted accusations from Republicans that he was trying to confuse voters, something he has denied.
asserted
he → prompt → something
Alaska election officials initially disqualified him, but the state’s courts overturned the decision.
asserted
courts → disqualify → decision
In June, the Alaska Supreme Court allowed him to remain on the ballot.
asserted
him → allow → ballot
The ballot identifies the incumbent as “Sullivan, Dan S (Registered Republican) Incumbent” and the other candidate as “Sullivan, Daniel J Jr” without a party designation, even though he has registered as a Republican.
asserted
he → identify → Republican
Glenn Wright, a political science professor at the University of Alaska Southeast, told Al Jazeera that voters should have no problem recognising each candidate.
asserted
voters → tell → candidate
“The ballots are super, super, super clear about who the incumbent Dan Sullivan is,” he said.
asserted
he → say → ?
But Forrest Nabors, chairman of the political science department at the University of Alaska Anchorage, said the similar names could still affect the result.
uncertain
names → say → result
“It could swing the election if the election is close and the margin of voters who intend to re-elect the senator are confused and accidentally vote for the other candidate named Sullivan,” he told Al Jazeera.
uncertain
he → swing → Jazeera
Why has the Justice Department filed a lawsuit?
asserted
Department → file → lawsuit
The Justice Department sued Alaska in federal court on Thursday, arguing that having two candidates with similar names could mislead voters.
uncertain
having → sue → voters
It wants the state to be prevented from certifying the result if the Republican senator loses by fewer votes than his namesake receives, pending an investigation into possible voter confusion and whether voters mistakenly supported the wrong Sullivan.
asserted
voters → want → Sullivan
The lawsuit cited the National Voter Registration Act, a federal law governing voter registration.
asserted
lawsuit → cite → registration
Nabors described the Justice Department’s intervention as “unusual” but said there could be circumstances in which federal action is justified.
uncertain
action → describe → which
“It’s perhaps not unreasonable,” he said, adding that federal intervention could be justified when an election is administered unfairly.
uncertain
election → ’ → ?
“Whether voters are confused and erroneously vote or not is a question that is hard to measure,” he added.
asserted
he → confuse → ?
Wright questioned the basis of the lawsuit at all, however.
asserted
Wright → question → lawsuit
“The legal filing is either, you know, a filing in bad faith, or it’s a filing that misunderstands the way that Alaska’s election system operates,” he said.
asserted
he → know → way
How does Alaska’s ranked-choice voting system work?
asserted
system → rank → ?
Unlike most US states, Alaska allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference rather than voting for just one.
asserted
voters → allow → one
The four candidates with the most votes in the primary advance to the general election, regardless of party.
asserted
candidates → advance → party
If nobody wins more than 50 percent of the first-choice votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated.
asserted
candidate → win → votes
Their votes are transferred to the next-ranked candidates still in the race.
asserted
votes → transfer → race
This continues until two candidates remain, and the one with the most votes wins.
asserted
one → continue → votes
Wright said the system helps prevent candidates with a smaller support base from splitting the vote.
asserted
system → say → vote
“It’s supposed to eliminate the spoiler effect,” he explained.
asserted
he → suppose → effect
For example, if a voter mistakenly chooses Daniel J Sullivan Jr but ranks the incumbent second, their vote could eventually transfer to the senator.
uncertain
vote → choose → senator
“The system is actually designed to cope with this sort of a thing,” Wright said.
asserted
Wright → design → thing
…and 26 more, not listed.