Photo via CBC News

Q&A: Elections Alberta explains why the referendum took so long to count

Read the original at CBC News ↗
Cite

Pasiuk, E. R. (2026, October 27). Q&A: Elections Alberta explains why the referendum took so long to count. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/elections-alberta-referendum-counting-vote-9.7398212?cmp=rss

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

CBC News · collected 2026-10-27 · by Emily Rae Pasiuk

Quick Summary

Elections Alberta spokesperson Michelle Gurney explained on CBC's Edmonton AM why the recent Alberta referendum ballot count took longer than expected. Over 20 million ballots were counted, surpassing any previous Canadian electoral event. Despite meeting the deadline for most polling stations within 48 hours, procedural errors at around seven voting places caused delays by combining ballot boxes from different areas instead of counting them separately as required by law. This necessitated sorting and correcting ballots afterward, prolonging the unofficial count process.
Written by AI on 2026-10-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 27, 2026, Elections Alberta has completed the unofficial count of over 20 million ballots cast in an historic referendum a week earlier in Alberta, Canada. Michelle Gurney, a spokesperson for Elections Alberta, told CBC that this is more ballots than any previous electoral event in Canadian history. Albertans supported proposals in questions 1 to 5 regarding immigration and services for non-permanent residents but rejected questions 6 to 9 dealing with constitutional issues. Around 75% of voters chose to remain in Canada on the critical question of separation. The prolonged ballot counting process was due to the sheer volume of votes, making it a significant logistical challenge.

Written for “Elections Alberta Referendum Count Delay Explanation” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Elections Alberta Referendum Count Delay Explanation
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 33 claims Outlet record 74/100
Toronto Star
Outlet record 64/100
“Article A describes a cartoon illustrating voter rejection of separation, while Article B is an explanation from Elections Alberta regarding why the referendum took so long to count.”
Global News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 8 claims Outlet record 63/100
“Article A discusses the delay and process of counting ballots for the referendum, while Article B focuses on voter turnout for the entire referendum.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 28 claims Outlet record 74/100
“While both articles discuss results from an Alberta referendum, they describe different aspects: Article A focuses on the rural-urban divide in voting patterns, while Article B explains why counting took so long and summarizes overall results.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the referendum: Article A focuses on the delay in counting and overall results, while Article B specifically reports on voter turnout for the separation question.”
CBC News
Hedges 10 of 46 claims Outlet record 74/100
“While both articles discuss the Alberta referendum, Article A focuses on the implications and questions raised by the referendum results, whereas Article B specifically addresses why the counting of ballots took so long.”
CBC News
Hedges 4 of 96 claims Outlet record 74/100
“Article A discusses the reactions of supporters of Alberta independence after the referendum, while Article B focuses on explaining why the counting of ballots took so long.”
CBC News
Hedges 4 of 57 claims Outlet record 74/100
“Article A discusses the overall counting process and results of the referendum, while Article B focuses on the urban-rural divide in Alberta's referendum results.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 60 claims Outlet record 74/100
“Article A describes the results and reactions to the referendum, while Article B explains why the counting process took so long.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 33 claims Outlet record 52/100
“Article A reports on the results and implications of a referendum, while Article B provides an explanation for why counting the referendum ballots took so long.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
47
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
2 of 47 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
74/100
CBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBC News · 1758 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Emily Rae Pasiuk
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 So, if you voted in person, you likely recall going into the voting area, the voting station, and you could see a number of different sets of 10 ballot boxes.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Alberta Albertans CBC Canada Elections Alberta

Subjects

Elections Alberta ORG · 6× Michelle Gurney PERSON · 3× Albertans NORP · 2× CBC ORG · 2× Alberta GPE · 1× Canada GPE · 1× Canadian NORP · 1× Dallas Stoesz PERSON · 1× Edmonton AM ORG · 1× Tara McCarthy PERSON · 1×

Narrative

More than 20 million ballots were counted, Michelle Gurney tells CBC It's been just over a week since Alberta voted in an historic referendum. The results saw Albertans support the proposals in questions 1 to 5, which focused on immigration and access to services for non-permanent residents, and reject question 6 to 9, which dealt with constitutional issues.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-30
🔮 So, if you voted in person, you likely recall going into the voting area, the voting station, and you could see a number of different sets of 10 ballot boxes.

Claims (47 extracted, 2 hedged)

Elections Alberta explains why the referendum took so long to count asserted
referendum → explain → ?
More than 20 million ballots were counted, Michelle Gurney tells CBC It's been just over a week since Alberta voted in an historic referendum. The results saw Albertans support the proposals in questions 1 to 5, which focused on immigration and access to services for non-permanent residents, and reject question 6 to 9, which dealt with constitutional issues. asserted
which → count → issues
Question 10, the big ticket separation referendum question, saw around 75 per cent of Albertans vote to remain in Canada. asserted
cent → see → Canada
Elections Alberta said more than 20 million ballots were counted in the days following the vote. asserted
ballots → say → vote
The agency says that's more than any electoral event in Canadian history, including federal elections. asserted
that → say → elections
Michelle Gurney is a spokesperson with Elections Alberta, and she joined Tara McCarthy Tuesday on Edmonton AM to talk about the count. asserted
she → join → count
This interview has been edited for length and clarity. asserted
interview → edit → length
How successful was Elections Alberta in handling this referendum and the the vote counting process? asserted
Alberta → handle → referendum
We were able to report that we completed the unofficial count on Sunday. asserted
we → report → Sunday
The numbers were actually completed at around 9:14 p.m. on Saturday night. asserted
numbers → complete → night
The good news is, in all of the voting places that followed the correct procedures, we were finished the counts in those locations within 48 hours. asserted
we → follow → hours
The special ballots took a little longer and that was really due to that very high volume. asserted
that → take → volume
And we finished those, I'd say almost 24 hours after the deadline, around 10:40 p.m Thursday, Oct. 22. asserted
I → finish → p.m
So, feeling good now as we move into this next phase, which is the really important stage of going from the unofficial to the official results. asserted
which → feel → results
Now, as you say, the initial 48-hour deadline to report unofficial results wasn't met. asserted
deadline → say → results
You mentioned procedural errors and that happened at some polling stations. asserted
that → mention → stations
What do you mean by that? asserted
you → mean → that
Yes, and I'll try to simplify this as much as I can: The legislation requires that we report the ballots by voting area as opposed to voting place. asserted
we → try → area
So, if you voted in person, you likely recall going into the voting area, the voting station, and you could see a number of different sets of 10 ballot boxes. uncertain
you → vote → boxes
And so we must report based on each set of ballot boxes and those are assigned by voting area. asserted
those → report → area
We had a few voting places — around seven — that they actually combined their ballot boxes. asserted
they → have → boxes
So, as opposed to using the 10 for each area, they use 10 for their whole voting place. asserted
they → oppose → place
What that meant is when they took those ballots out of those secure boxes, then there was a lot of work to do to sort the ballots by signature of the election officers who were assigned to each of the voting areas. asserted
who → mean → areas
So that caused a significant delay and a big logistical job in making those corrections there, and in two places, it simply wasn't possible to then separate the ballots because of the high volume. asserted
it → cause → volume
From left to right, Elections Alberta spokesperson Michelle Gurney, deputy chief electoral officer Dallas Stoesz, and director of elections operations Jennifer Maskoske answer reporters' questions at Elections Alberta's west Edmonton warehouse on Sept. 3, 2026. asserted
Gurney → answer → Sept.
How did that even happen? asserted
that → happen → ?
People not understanding the procedure? asserted
People → understand → procedure
It's hard to know because I haven't spoken directly with anybody in those areas. asserted
I → know → areas
I can tell you that, in more than 80 areas, electoral divisions, we didn't have any issues. asserted
we → tell → issues
We do train the teams to be able to do this work in this way and to very specifically follow the legislation. asserted
We → train → legislation
It's hard to know why some folks combine those ballot boxes. asserted
folks → know → boxes
I think people are just looking for efficiency. asserted
people → think → efficiency
But again, I can't speak for them, but because we have to report by voting area, by voting place, that's what we consider a procedural error. asserted
we → speak → what
We know that Elections Alberta didn't reach the number of people it wanted for a workforce for this referendum. asserted
it → know → referendum
How did that impact the vote counting process and even the process beforehand? asserted
that → impact → process
We were talking about how big the federal election is and that we counted more ballots in Alberta than you do at the federal election, and they have around 211,000 workers for that event. asserted
they → talk → event
We were striving for 60,000, which is similar to what they they just had in Quebec. asserted
they → strive → Quebec
So, 47,000, you know, this is Alberta. asserted
this → know → ?
We know how efficient we are here … we were aiming to get the work done within the legislative timeline, which is what we're always trying to do. asserted
we → know → what
And you know, I think these procedural errors are really what caused us to miss the deadline in a few areas. asserted
us → know → areas
…and 7 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support