Photo via South China Morning Post

DeepSeek AI engineer slams Anthropic, OpenAI over ‘pacing’ calls, invokes Nazi Germany

Read the original at South China Morning Post ↗
Cite

Lee, C. M. (2026, September 15). DeepSeek AI engineer slams Anthropic, OpenAI over ‘pacing’ calls, invokes Nazi Germany. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/tech/article/3367605/deepseek-ai-engineer-slams-anthropic-openai-over-pacing-calls-invokes-nazi-germany?utm_source=rss_feed

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

South China Morning Post · collected 2026-09-15 · by Chong Ming Lee

Quick Summary

Liu Shengyu, an engineer at DeepSeek AI, criticized companies like Anthropic and OpenAI for not making their cutting-edge artificial intelligence technology open-source and affordable. In a social media post on Monday, Liu expressed concerns that these firms' closed-source approaches could lead to monopolies over advanced AI technologies, including AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), which he views as potentially dangerous if controlled by just a few entities.
Written by AI on 2026-09-16, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Liu Shengyu, an engineer at DeepSeek and developer of their V4.1 models, criticized Anthropic and OpenAI for not making advanced AI "open and affordable" on Monday. Liu accused the companies of having a closed-source approach compared to DeepSeek’s open-source model philosophy. He expressed particular concern about Anthropic potentially mastering AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), invoking historical analogies to suggest caution regarding rapid technological advancements, drawing comparisons to Nazi Germany. This debate underscores growing tensions over AI development pace and governance amidst rising safety concerns.

Written for “AI Ethics Debate” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Ethics Debate
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The AI safety vibe shift Different event
Platformer
Hedges 10 of 67 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI safety concerns and company practices, not the same specific incident.”
NBC News
Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI safety and development, with Article A covering general warnings from researchers and Article B focusing on a specific engineer's criticism of certain companies.”
CBS News
Hedges 10 of 37 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different individuals and their opinions on AI, not the same specific incident.”
ABC News (US)
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different incidents involving distinct figures and organizations, not the same specific occurrence.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different events: one focuses on China's warning about AI risks and rejection of US calls to slow development, while the other reports on a DeepSeek engineer criticizing Anthropic and OpenAI over AI advancement pacing.”
New York Post
Hedges 12 of 37 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events - one is OpenAI's Sam Altman warning about AI risks, while the other is a DeepSeek engineer criticizing Anthropic and OpenAI over their approach to AI development.”
The AI Tipping Point Different event
TIME
Hedges 41 of 170 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles describe two different individuals criticizing AI companies, not the same specific incident.”
Silver Bulletin
Hedges 23 of 227 claims
“The articles discuss different topics and do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses a DeepSeek AI engineer's criticism of Anthropic and OpenAI, while Article B reports on OpenAI introducing new measures for tracking model misalignment. These are different specific events.”
South China Morning Post
Hedges 2 of 3 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI industry dynamics: one focuses on an engineer's criticism and safety concerns, while the other reports financial performance comparisons.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
3
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 3 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
South China Morning Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

South China Morning Post · 3502 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Chong Ming Lee
12 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 Managing digital workers As businesses race to build AI workforces, supervising them is becoming the next big challenge When artificial intelligence agents first arrived, they came with a tantalising promise: autonomous “digital workers” that would finally free humans from corporate drudgery.
🔮 If the claims are true, Beijing’s main concern would not be intellectual property theft or model copying, but data security, says one analyst Did Chinese AI companies secretly tap US models to close the technology gap?
🔮 One Hong Kong-based user posted on the “r/claude” subreddit that they received an email from Anthropic’s safeguards team citing “suspicious signals” associated with their account, which would be revoked for usage policy violations.
🔮 The acquisition, expected to close by the end of this year, would integrate World Labs’ research team and spatial-intelligence model expertise into AMD, according to an announcement on Monday.
Also by Chong Ming Lee
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 12 articles by Chong Ming Lee →

Topics

Anthropic DeepSeek Germany Nazi OpenAI

Subjects

DeepSeek ORG · 3× Anthropic ORG · 2× OpenAI ORG · 2× Germany GPE · 1× Liu Shengyu PERSON · 1× Nazi NORP · 1×

Narrative

Heated rhetoric highlights tensions over how quickly artificial intelligence should advance and who should shape its future amid mounting safety concerns Liu Shengyu, a DeepSeek engineer behind the company’s V4.1 models, said he did not trust Anthropic or OpenAI to make cutting-edge AI “open and affordable”, contrasting their closed-source approach with DeepSeek’s embrace of open-source models. “I especially don’t want Anthropic to master the most advanced artificial intelligence or AGI,” he wrote in a social media post on Monday.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
2026-09-16 · South China Morning Post
DeepSeek AI engineer slams Anthropic, OpenAI over ‘pacing’ calls, invokes Nazi Germany · assertive framing

Claims (3 extracted, 0 hedged)

DeepSeek AI engineer slams Anthropic, OpenAI over ‘pacing’ calls, invokes Nazi Germany asserted
engineer → slam → Germany
Heated rhetoric highlights tensions over how quickly artificial intelligence should advance and who should shape its future amid mounting safety concerns Liu Shengyu, a DeepSeek engineer behind the company’s V4.1 models, said he did not trust Anthropic or OpenAI to make cutting-edge AI “open and affordable”, contrasting their closed-source approach with DeepSeek’s embrace of open-source models. “I especially don’t want Anthropic to master the most advanced artificial intelligence or AGI,” he wrote in a social media post on Monday. asserted
he → highlight → Monday
AGI broadly refers to AI systems that match or surpass human-level intelligence. asserted
that → refer → intelligence
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support