9th Circuit questions DOJ demand to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Boone, R. (2026, October 26). 9th Circuit questions DOJ demand to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/world/united-states/9th-circuit-questions-doj-demand-to-set-aside-20-000-california-mail-ballots/article_f95d6f0e-1f28-59b2-bc07-7d066f51eb93.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-10-26 · by Rebecca Boone

Quick Summary

Federal judges on Sunday questioned the Justice Department's demand to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots due to potential non-citizenship concerns. The panel, including two Trump appointees and one Biden appointee, expressed skepticism about the lawsuit brought by the administration in mid-October. They debated whether the federal government has jurisdiction over voter eligibility checks and if such demands violate state authority under the Tenth Amendment.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 26, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit expressed skepticism about the Trump administration's lawsuit against California, which seeks to force state officials to set aside over 20,000 mail-in ballots allegedly cast by noncitizens. The Justice Department filed the suit on October 15th after demanding that California review a list of suspected noncitizen voters within 48 hours; Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan did not comply with this deadline. Acting Deputy Attorney General R. T. Quintieri warned local officials about legal consequences if they count disputed ballots, while President Donald Trump vowed jail time for election officials who do so. However, the appeals court questioned the timing and constitutionality of the federal government's demand to intervene in state-administered elections. Circuit Judge Mark Bennett suggested that such intervention would conflict with the U.S. Constitution’s Elections Clause, which grants states primary authority over election administration. The panel will issue a decision as soon as possible following Sunday's oral arguments.

Written for “Justice Department Sues California Over Voting Rights” on 2026-10-26, grounded in this article and the 28 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Justice Department Sues California Over Voting Rights
Politics · 29 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 9% hedged 2 of 23 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles describe the identical real-world event, a panel of federal appellate judges questioning the Justice Department's demand to set aside California mail ballots on Sunday, with skepticism from two out of three judges.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 28 📰 publisher trust 67
“The articles describe different legal actions by federal courts regarding California's immigration and voting laws.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles describe different legal actions taken by the Trump administration regarding election integrity and voter eligibility; Article A discusses a lawsuit against attempts to undermine state authority, while Article B focuses on a challenge to set aside mail ballots in California.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different legal actions: one is about Democrats filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration over efforts to remove illegal registrants, while the other is about a federal appeals court questioning the DOJ's demand that California set aside mail ballots of suspected non-citizens.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 1 of 10 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles describe the Trump administration's lawsuit and appeal against California over suspected noncitizen voters, specifically mentioning a federal list of more than 20,000 people and arguments presented to the 9th Circuit Court.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 14% hedged 3 of 22 📰 publisher trust 69
“Article A describes DOJ sending letters demanding California officials set aside ballots, while Article B reports on a court hearing questioning the legality of that demand.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 18 📰 publisher trust 95
“The first article reports on the DOJ's warning and letters sent to California counties, while the second describes a court hearing questioning the DOJ's demand regarding mail ballots. These are different stages of related actions but not the same specific incident.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 21% hedged 8 of 38 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles describe the Justice Department's demand for California election officials to sequester ballots suspected of being cast by noncitizens, and both mention the involvement of federal judges questioning the legality and timing of this action.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 25% hedged 5 of 20 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A reports on warnings and fears by LA’s top federal prosecutor about noncitizen voting in California elections, while Article B discusses a court hearing questioning the Justice Department's demand to set aside ballots.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 13% hedged 4 of 30 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A describes the DOJ's initial demand to set aside ballots, while Article B covers a subsequent legal challenge by a federal court questioning this demand.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
4 of 27 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
29
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 9885 article(s) · 27 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 27 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Rebecca Boone
13 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A panel of federal appellate judges on Sunday questioned the timing, constitutionality and authority of the Justice Department’s demand that California election officials set aside thousands of mail ballots from people the federal government suspects may not be citizens.
🔮 Tennessee execution team members failed multiple times to establish working IV lines in Christa Pike’s arms before her attempted execution and warned that some of her veins may have ruptured, or “blown,” before she was injected with pentobarbital, her attorney wrote in a court document filed Thursday.
🔮 Issuing a preliminary injunction at ABC’s request would mean “allowing them to sidestep” the path that Congress has set up for regulatory action appeals, Georgiev-Remmel said.
🔮 Despite contingency plans, executions are still botched at times Idaho called off the execution of Thomas Eugene Creech in 2024 after execution team members could not place a viable IV after eight attempts.
🔮 I feel like I handled it as well as I could."
🔮 I feel like I handled it as well as I could.”
🔮 There will likely be another round of court filings and legal arguments over the next several days before the judge decides whether to issue a longer-lasting ruling called a preliminary injunction.
🔮 There will likely be another round of court filings and legal arguments over the next several days before the judge decides whether to issue a longer-lasting ruling called a preliminary injunction.
🔮 Camp Mystic faces a criminal investigation that could include manslaughter or negligent homicide charges in the deaths of 27 girls amid devastating flooding in Texas last year, court documents show.
🔮 An investigation into the circumstances will be conducted by the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board.
Also by Rebecca Boone
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 13 articles by Rebecca Boone →

Topics

California Justice Department U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals the Justice Department’s

Subjects

California GPE · 6× Trump PERSON · 3× Bennett PERSON · 2× Donnelly PERSON · 2× Los Angeles County GPE · 2× Waxman PERSON · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ORG · 1× the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ORG · 1× the Justice Department’s ORG · 1×

Narrative

Assistant Registrar-Recorder Monica Flores said in a court filing that the sample included canceled or inactive registrations, individuals with no voting history and voters who appeared to have been born in the United States, which the filing notes “is strong evidence of citizenship.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-26
🔮 A panel of federal appellate judges on Sunday questioned the timing, constitutionality and authority of the Justice Department’s demand that California election officials set aside thousands of mail ballots from people the federal government suspects may not be citizens.

Claims (27 extracted, 4 hedged)

A panel of federal appellate judges on Sunday questioned the timing, constitutionality and authority of the Justice Department’s demand that California election officials set aside thousands of mail ballots from people the federal government suspects may not be citizens. uncertain
government → question → people
During rare weekend arguments, two of the three judges on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals appeared skeptical of a lawsuit brought by President Donald Trump’s administration in mid-October. asserted
two → appear → October
The lawsuit accuses California officials of failing to meet a 48-hour deadline to review 20,000 names the administration flagged as likely noncitizens on the state’s voter rolls. asserted
administration → accuse → rolls
The administration asked a federal judge to require the state to withhold counting those ballots until the voters’ immigration status could be verified. uncertain
status → ask → ballots
The district judge scheduled a hearing for Oct. 27, days after the case was assigned, but the federal government appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, seeking an expedited decision. asserted
government → schedule → decision
Justice Department attorney Matthew Donnelly told the panel that California is causing irreparable harm “by allowing noncitizens to vote in violation of their own state laws. asserted
noncitizens → tell → laws
The Trump administration has made efforts to identify noncitizen voters a priority this year, even though noncitizen voting is exceptionally rare. asserted
voting → make → voters
Circuit Judge Mark Bennett, a Trump appointee, questioned whether the appellate court even has jurisdiction to hear the case even before a ruling by the lower court. asserted
court → question → court
Donnelly argued that the schedule set by the lower court judge was too slow and effectively a denial of the government’s request, as state elections officials process thousands of mail ballots every day. asserted
officials → argue → ballots
Judge Gabriel Sanchez, appointed by former President Joe Biden, questioned whether the federal government was violating the Tenth Amendment, essentially commandeering the state to enforce a federal law that makes it a misdemeanor for a noncitizen to vote. asserted
noncitizen → appoint → law
The federal government is simply asking California to enforce their own law, which also bans noncitizens from voting, Donnelly said. asserted
Donnelly → ask → noncitizens
He argued the state’s refusal to comply with the federal request to set aside the ballots for review was “frustrating the purpose” of the federal law against noncitizen voting. asserted
refusal → argue → voting
The Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution gives state legislatures the power to set the time, place and manner of congressional elections, Bennett said. asserted
Bennett → give → elections
The executive branch may be “unhappy with what they’re doing, and doesn’t like the manner,” Bennett said, but under the Election Clause the state has the right to determine those issues — including how it sorts out any noncitizen voters. uncertain
it → do → voters
Attorney Seth Waxman, representing Los Angeles County Clerk Dean Logan, said the federal government’s list was unreliable and that segregating the ballots for a review process would effectively disenfranchise thousands of eligible voters. asserted
segregating → represent → voters
Even if election staffers spent just three minutes checking each of the expected 2.75 million mail ballots against the government’s list, the process would take 140,000 man-hours, Waxman said — or about 16 years of working time. asserted
Waxman → spend → time
Waxman cited a review of 200 records from the Trump administration’s list conducted by Los Angeles County staffers. asserted
Waxman → cite → staffers
Assistant Registrar-Recorder Monica Flores said in a court filing that the sample included canceled or inactive registrations, individuals with no voting history and voters who appeared to have been born in the United States, which the filing notes “is strong evidence of citizenship.” asserted
filing → say → citizenship
If the administration disagrees with how California runs its elections, it can ask Congress to change that process, said attorney Sam Siegel, representing California Secretary of State Shirley Weber. asserted
Siegel → disagree → Weber
The federal government has provided no credible evidence to support its suspicions, said Siegal. asserted
Siegal → provide → suspicions
“It has no basis in law or in fact,” he told the panel. asserted
he → have → panel
“We just dispute the premise that noncitizens are voting.” asserted
noncitizens → dispute → premise
But Judge Patrick Bumatay, who was appointed by Trump, said everyone has an interest in ensuring that only eligible citizens vote. asserted
citizens → appoint → interest
He suggested that granting the administration’s request for an emergency order could provide clarity. uncertain
granting → suggest → clarity
“Without an injunction, you will never know” if that is happening, Bumatay told Seigel. asserted
Bumatay → know → Seigel
Bennett said the panel would try to issue a ruling as quickly as possible. asserted
panel → say → ruling
Boone reported from Boise, Idaho. asserted
Boone → report → Boise
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support