US appeals court sceptical of Trump’s lawsuit over California voter rolls

Read the original at Al Jazeera ↗
Cite

Al Jazeera Staff. (2026, October 26). US appeals court sceptical of Trump’s lawsuit over California voter rolls. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/26/us-appeals-court-sceptical-of-trumps-lawsuit-over-california-voter-rolls?traffic_source=rss

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Al Jazeera · collected 2026-10-26 · by Al Jazeera Staff

Quick Summary

A United States appeals court panel expressed skepticism about the Department of Justice’s lawsuit against California, which aims to invalidate mail-in ballots deemed likely to go to non-citizens. During a rare weekend oral argument, Circuit Judge Mark Bennett questioned the legal basis for the federal government to intervene in state election administration under the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The case is part of the Trump administration's broader efforts to address alleged voter fraud ahead of the November 3 midterm elections; it claims California received a list of 20,000 suspected non-citizen voters from the federal government.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 26, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit expressed skepticism about the Trump administration's lawsuit against California, which seeks to force state officials to set aside over 20,000 mail-in ballots allegedly cast by noncitizens. The Justice Department filed the suit on October 15th after demanding that California review a list of suspected noncitizen voters within 48 hours; Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan did not comply with this deadline. Acting Deputy Attorney General R. T. Quintieri warned local officials about legal consequences if they count disputed ballots, while President Donald Trump vowed jail time for election officials who do so. However, the appeals court questioned the timing and constitutionality of the federal government's demand to intervene in state-administered elections. Circuit Judge Mark Bennett suggested that such intervention would conflict with the U.S. Constitution’s Elections Clause, which grants states primary authority over election administration. The panel will issue a decision as soon as possible following Sunday's oral arguments.

Written for “Justice Department Sues California Over Voting Rights” on 2026-10-26, grounded in this article and the 28 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 107006 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-26

Story

📰 Justice Department Sues California Over Voting Rights
Politics · 29 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 4 of 27 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles describe the identical real-world event, a panel of federal appellate judges questioning the Justice Department's demand to set aside California mail ballots on Sunday, with skepticism from two out of three judges.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles describe different legal actions and court proceedings related to voter rolls, not the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A reports on the initial lawsuit filed by Democrats against the Trump administration, while Article B describes a subsequent court hearing and skepticism expressed by an appeals court regarding the DOJ's lawsuit against California.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 21% hedged 4 of 19 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different legal actions: one involves a federal judge ruling against door-to-door DHS operations, while the other involves an appeals court considering a lawsuit over California voter rolls.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 12% hedged 2 of 17 📰 publisher trust 70
“Article A describes Democrats suing the Trump administration over election pressure, while Article B reports on a US appeals court's skepticism regarding a DOJ lawsuit against California specifically.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10 📰 publisher trust 70
“The articles describe different legal proceedings and timelines involving separate judicial decisions regarding Trump's administration actions against California over noncitizen voting, not a single identical incident.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 14% hedged 3 of 22 📰 publisher trust 69
“The articles describe different stages of a legal battle: one about DOJ letters demanding ballot verification, and another about an appeals court's skepticism regarding the lawsuit.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 13% hedged 4 of 30 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different stages of the legal battle, with Article A reporting on DOJ demands and letters sent to California counties, while Article B discusses a US appeals court's skepticism regarding the DOJ lawsuit against California.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 18 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a warning and demand from the DOJ, while Article B reports on an appeals court's reaction to a lawsuit related to voter rolls, indicating different stages of legal proceedings.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 21% hedged 8 of 38 📰 publisher trust 64
“Article A describes election officials' reaction to DOJ demands for voter information, while Article B reports on a US appeals court's skepticism regarding a lawsuit by the DOJ against California.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
2 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
Al Jazeera's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
29
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Al Jazeera · 4027 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Al Jazeera Staff
701 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Data from the DRC’s Ministry of Health indicate that more than 9,800 cases, including more than 4,700 deaths, have been recorded since the start of the outbreak in May, making it the deadliest Ebola outbreak in the country’s history.
🔮 Circuit Judge Mark Bennett said on Sunday that the three-judge panel would issue a decision as soon as possible, following a rare weekend oral argument.
🔮 She will now face former caretaker Prime Minister Andrey Gyurov, who scored between 31 and 33.5 percent, in a second round on November 1.
🔮 Inside the Alaska Senate race During the November 3 midterm elections, citizens in Alaska will vote in one of the country’s closest Senate races, which will help decide whether Republicans maintain their majority in the chamber.
🔮 President William Ruto offered condolences on Sunday and ordered inspections of vehicles used for public transport.
🔮 Recommended Stories list of 2 items- list 1 of 2Serbia votes in election pitting longtime leader against student movement - list 2 of 2Serbia votes as student-led bloc challenges longtime leader Vucic The vote will determine whether Vucic’s Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), which has governed since 2012, can retain power against a movement born from nationwide anticorruption protests.
🔮 - list 2 of 4Bayern say coach Kompany ‘stable’ in hospital but will be out for weeks - list 3 of 4Ronaldinho’s comeback with Ravenna at 46 set for next month at Forli - list 4 of 4Lionel Messi receives top Spanish award in recognition of social work Months after the confederation accused Infantino of a “fundamental breach of trust” over the abandoned FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) proposal, Sheikh Salman told the congress that Asia was now united behind Infantino.
🔮 - list 3 of 3Bangladesh per capita GDP forecast to outstrip India’s: What does it mean?
🔮 Netanyahu on Friday said that blockchain-based cryptocurrency is the solution to bypass the mounting economic sanctions that would keep the country out of the international financial system.
🔮 At 14, he travelled hundreds of kilometres from his home in Galli village to seek work in the north, where gold mines dot the landscape, so he could feed his siblings and keep them in school.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Al Jazeera Staff
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 701 articles by Al Jazeera Staff →

Topics

California Republican United States the Department of Justice the Elections Clause

Subjects

California GPE · 10× Trump PERSON · 8× Bennett PERSON · 2× Justice Department ORG · 2× Republican NORP · 2× 3US GPE · 1× ICE ORG · 1× Mark Bennett PERSON · 1× United States GPE · 1× the Department of Justice ORG · 1×

Narrative

Recommended Stories list of 3 items- list 1 of 3Trump administration sues California over noncitizens on voter rolls - list 2 of 3US judge blocks federal operations seeking to identify non-citizen voters - list 3 of 3Will ICE agents play a role in the 2026 US midterm elections?
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-26
🔮 Circuit Judge Mark Bennett said on Sunday that the three-judge panel would issue a decision as soon as possible, following a rare weekend oral argument.

Claims (23 extracted, 2 hedged)

A United States appeals court has expressed doubt over the Department of Justice’s lawsuit against California, which seeks to force the state to throw out mail-in ballots it has deemed likely to go to non-citizens. asserted
it → express → citizens
Circuit Judge Mark Bennett said on Sunday that the three-judge panel would issue a decision as soon as possible, following a rare weekend oral argument. asserted
panel → say → argument
Recommended Stories list of 3 items- list 1 of 3Trump administration sues California over noncitizens on voter rolls - list 2 of 3US judge blocks federal operations seeking to identify non-citizen voters - list 3 of 3Will ICE agents play a role in the 2026 US midterm elections? asserted
agents → sue → elections
But Bennett, an appointee of Republican President Donald Trump, voiced concern that the lawsuit would not hold up to scrutiny. asserted
lawsuit → voice → scrutiny
He pointed to the Elections Clause in the US Constitution, which allows states — not the federal government — to administer elections. asserted
states → point → elections
“It seems to me that you want us to issue an injunction that is entirely inconsistent with the law that the California legislature has adopted pursuant to the Elections Clause,” Bennett told Justice Department lawyer Matthew Donnelly. asserted
Bennett → seem → Donnelly
“How can we do that?” asserted
we → do → that
The case is part of a larger effort under the right-wing Trump administration to crack down on alleged non-citizen voting ahead of the crucial November 3 midterm elections. asserted
case → crack → elections
On October 15, less than three weeks before the midterm races, the Justice Department issued a complaint targeting California, a left-wing stronghold. asserted
Department → issue → California
It asked the federal court system to set aside thousands of mail-in ballots that the government says were sent to “likely non-citizens”. asserted
government → ask → citizens
The lawsuit indicates the Trump administration sent California officials a list of 20,000 names it believes are not eligible to vote, based on citizenship. asserted
it → indicate → citizenship
Trump has often pushed the discredited claim that the Democratic Party is benefiting from widespread voting by non-citizens. uncertain
Party → push → citizens
Earlier this year, Trump denounced the state’s primaries after right-wing candidates like Los Angeles mayoral hopeful Spencer Pratt felt short of his expectations. asserted
candidates → denounce → expectations
“There’s BIG cheating by the Dumocrats in California,” he wrote on social media at the time. asserted
he → ’s → time
He then announced that the state would be under investigation from the US attorney’s office. asserted
state → announce → office
Trump’s efforts have caused alarm, with critics accusing him of seeking to dampen voter turnout through intimidation and confusion. asserted
critics → cause → intimidation
The midterms will decide which party controls the US Congress, as well as key state and local positions. asserted
party → decide → Congress
Polls, however, predict steep odds for Republican candidates, given Trump’s souring approval ratings and dissatisfaction with issues like the cost of living and the US-Israeli war against Iran. asserted
Polls → predict → Iran
Voting rights advocates have warned that the Trump administration has not publicly revealed how it has compiled its list of non-citizen voters, and whistleblower reports have cast doubt on the accuracy of such lists. asserted
reports → warn → lists
In response to the October 15 lawsuit, California has countered that it has strong safeguards to prevent non-citizens from voting. asserted
it → counter → citizens
It also said that the Justice Department’s claims are based on dubious data. uncertain
claims → say → data
“This is a sad, desperate attempt by Trump to use his politicized Justice Department to try to suppress California voters just three weeks before Election Day,” California Governor Gavin Newsom said in a statement earlier this month. asserted
Newsom → use → statement
“We will continue to carry out free and fair elections in the Golden State — and call out this authoritarian as he tries every play in the dictator’s playbook.” asserted
he → continue → playbook
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support