Photo via ABC News (AU)

Government documents reveal AI could train on data without paying creators

Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗
Cite

Wilson, C. (2026, September 15). Government documents reveal AI could train on data without paying creators. ABC News (AU). https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-15/ai-companies-train-on-creator-work-documents-reveal/107154688

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-09-15 · by Cam Wilson

Quick Summary

Government documents reveal a proposed plan that would allow AI companies like OpenAI to train their models on online content without compensating the creators, provided these companies negotiate with enough rights holders. The proposal was part of consultations led by Australia's attorney-general's department aimed at reforming copyright laws to facilitate AI development in the country. Critics argue this plan prioritizes AI companies over Australian content creators, while supporters emphasize the need for balanced reforms that benefit both the tech industry and the broader community.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese proposed a deal to lure US-based AI giants like Anthropic and OpenAI to invest billions in Australia by offering them open access to Australian content for training their models. This move aims to break the impasse caused by strict Australian copyright laws, which pose legal risks to these companies due to potential lawsuits from international rights holders. The government is considering a plan where AI firms would be allowed to use any online material unless creators specifically opt out, aiming to attract significant tech investments that could boost Australia’s economy similarly to how the mining boom did previously. However, ACT independent senator David Pocock criticized this proposal, arguing it prioritizes AI companies over Australian creatives and could undermine copyright protections for everyday Australians. This debate highlights the tension between fostering technological growth and protecting creative industries’ rights under existing legal frameworks.

Written for “AI Copyright Debate” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Copyright Debate
Politics · 3 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 4 of 29 claims Outlet record 61/100
September 13, 2026 Different event
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 10 of 65 claims
“The articles describe different events: one about Dario Amodei's call for slowing down AI advancements, and another about proposed government reforms regarding AI training data.”
Persuasion
Hedges 22 of 113 claims
“The articles describe different topics related to AI, one about rogue AI agents committing crimes and the other about government documents regarding copyright law for AI training.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to AI, one about copyright law and data training without payment, and the other about criminal liability of AI agents.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 15 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and copyright issues but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 1 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related issues but describe different events: one is about proposed government reforms allowing AI companies to train on data without payment, while the other reports internal concerns at Microsoft and OpenAI over potential damage to the publishing industry.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles describe different events: one about proposed copyright reforms allowing AI training without payment to creators, and another about a lawsuit alleging an illegal agreement among AI companies to slow down development.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 5 of 53 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and education/copyright, rather than a single specific incident.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 29 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss related issues regarding copyright reform for AI but describe different occurrences in time and context.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
4 of 33 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
ABC News (AU)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 4461 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Cam Wilson
11 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The public broadcaster confirmed a "small number" of devices had been exposed but said so far it had not identified any impact from the attack discovered by researchers at The Citizen Lab. "The ABC is aware of the Citizen Lab report that describes exposure to advertising that may contain spyware.
2026-10-23 · assertive framing · ABC staff targeted in sophisticated cyber attack
🔮 These vulnerabilities would allow attackers to run their own code on affected servers without logging in, a major cybersecurity flaw that would allow unauthorised control to do anything from extracting user data to implanting other malware.
🔮 Father Paolo Benanti warned Australia that changes to copyright laws to allow AI training would be risky.
🔮 A top OpenAI executive flown to Australia to mop up after the company's Medicare statistics hack said he could not explain why Australians are among the world's most distrustful of AI.
🔮 It is a bruised OpenAI that is set to limp into the Australian political spotlight today.
🔮 OpenAI is conducting a months-long review of incidents and will continue to notify affected organisations on a rolling basis.
🔮 Amid questions around whether OpenAI will face legal consequences for its Medicare hack, a man who faced decades in jail for alleged cybercrimes says Australian law comes down harder on individuals than organisations.
🔮 It wants US social media companies excluded from digital duty of care laws, which would give Australians the option to opt out of algorithmic feeds.
🔮 AI companies could be legally required to report rogue incidents such as the hacking of another company, under a proposal from the Albanese government as part of its plans for new safety, environmental and industrial rules for the technology.
🔮 AI companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic would be allowed to train their models on online content without paying its creators as long as they struck deals with enough rights holders, under one copyright reform plan put forward in government documents seen by the ABC.
Also by Cam Wilson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 11 articles by Cam Wilson →

Topics

ABC Anthropic Australia Australians OpenAI

Subjects

Australia GPE · 3× ABC ORG · 2× Australian NORP · 2× Australians NORP · 2× Michelle Rowland PERSON · 2× OpenAI ORG · 2× ACT GPE · 1× Albanese PERSON · 1× Anthropic ORG · 1× David Pocock PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Uncertainty about the legality of training models this way has been a sticking point for the government's efforts to attract AI companies to make the major investments in Australia that would come with AI training efforts. ACT independent senator David Pocock pressed the government about its previously unrevealed plans in the Senate today. "This would be huge and mean that our legal system would protect AI companies first and Australians second.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 AI companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic would be allowed to train their models on online content without paying its creators as long as they struck deals with enough rights holders, under one copyright reform plan put forward in government documents seen by the ABC.
2026-09-15 · ABC News (AU)
Government documents reveal AI could train on data without paying creators · assertive framing

Claims (33 extracted, 4 hedged)

AI companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic would be allowed to train their models on online content without paying its creators as long as they struck deals with enough rights holders, under one copyright reform plan put forward in government documents seen by the ABC. asserted
they → allow → ABC
The attorney-general's department made the proposal as part of consultations with rights-holders' groups earlier this month, which would make inclusion in AI training opt-out by default. asserted
inclusion → make → default
The revelation comes as the Albanese government tries to break a months-long gridlock over reforms to copyright law. asserted
government → come → law
AI models are typically trained on enormous amounts of data scraped from the internet, including copyrighted materials taken without their owners' permissions, to the chagrin of creative groups. asserted
models → train → groups
Uncertainty about the legality of training models this way has been a sticking point for the government's efforts to attract AI companies to make the major investments in Australia that would come with AI training efforts. ACT independent senator David Pocock pressed the government about its previously unrevealed plans in the Senate today. "This would be huge and mean that our legal system would protect AI companies first and Australians second. asserted
Australians → train → companies
The burden should not fall on Australians to defend the rights over content they hold, create and invest in," he said. asserted
he → fall → content
Senator Don Farrell said that he would need to consult with Attorney-General Michelle Rowland on the topic, but reiterated the government's stance against watering down copyright. "The government has taken a deep interest in artificial intelligence with a view to maximising the benefits that come from this new technology, but on the other hand making sure […] we get the best possible results for the Australian community," he said. asserted
he → say → community
A spokesperson for Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said the government was continuing to consult with creators, media organisations and AI companies on a range of options to ensure any future copyright changes deliver meaningful control and fair compensation. asserted
changes → say → control
OpenAI confirmed that it had been part of consultations about proposals. asserted
it → confirm → proposals
"We are committed to engaging constructively throughout this process with the government, creators and industry on an approach that is practical, sustainable and right for Australia," a spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → commit → Australia
Two proposals to pave way for AI training in Australia Slides of the confidential consultation, titled "AI on Australian Terms", seen by the ABC, revealed two options presented to rights-holder groups earlier this month. asserted
Slides → pave → groups
Both options would give copyright owners an opt-out if they wanted to keep their online material out of AI training without a licence. asserted
they → give → licence
The first proposal sets out two possible ways to pay copyright owners, in addition to voluntary deals with AI companies. asserted
proposal → set → companies
One would give AI companies legal permission to use "unprotected" — meaning content whose owners had not opted-out — online material for training as long as they had made payments to a central body and met other conditions. asserted
they → give → conditions
This body would distribute the money to registered copyright owners. asserted
body → distribute → owners
This first proposal would give the option for AI companies to get a license for training by directly doing deals with Australian collecting groups that represent copyright owners. asserted
that → give → owners
This would clear the way for companies to train on content from industries such as music or writing, including content that belongs to people who are not members of the groups who received payments. asserted
who → clear → payments
The alternative proposal put forward by the Attorney-General's Department would instead require AI companies to strike deals with a minimum number of companies for a minimum period before receiving legal permission to train on unprotected material online. asserted
proposal → put → material
These deals would be negotiated between the AI companies and the rights-holder companies, the slides say: "No additional $ would be payable to creators or rights holders beyond deals negotiated to achieve quota." asserted
$ → negotiate → quota
The slides also say the proposals include other protections, including penalties for ignoring opt-outs, "protections for Indigenous Cultural and intellectual Property", as well as transparency and audit requirements. asserted
proposals → say → Property
It would also require AI companies to make "best efforts" to ensure they were not training on pirated material. asserted
they → require → material
Material without those protections could be used even if it was covered by copyright. uncertain
it → use → copyright
The slides say the options would address AI companies' concerns about the "long tail": openly available online material for which striking voluntary deals is unrealistic or impossible. asserted
striking → say → deals
These options would "improve legal certainty for AI companies and bring advantage of AI training home for Australians" while also "upholding Prime Minister's commitment to a strong and vibrant Australian creative and media sector", the slides say. asserted
slides → improve → sector
Major AI companies say copyright is a hurdle to Australian investment OpenAI's vice president of global policy Ann O'Leary told The Australian that copyright settings were preventing the company from building an AI training centre in Australia. "We will not be able to build a … training centre here if the copyright law is as it exists," she said while on a trip to Australia. asserted
she → say → Australia
An OpenAI spokesperson told the ABC it had been taking part in consultation on the copyright reforms. asserted
it → tell → reforms
"Australia has enormous potential to benefit from AI, and we want to work for and with Australia to help realise Australia's AI ambitions. asserted
we → have → ambitions
This is truly a once-in-a-generation opportunity for Australia's economy and it's crucial the country gets this right," they said. asserted
they → get → economy
Anthropic had made similar advances to the federal government as early as April, according to a Treasury Freedom of Information (FOI) showing that it was preparing for discussion with the AI company that would say their investment was "contingent" on "clarity" on copyright law. uncertain
investment → make → law
That briefing said Anthropic could negotiate with larger copyright owners, but argued the "long tail" of smaller owners made identifying and buying licences difficult. uncertain
identifying → say → licences
Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles hosed down claims that OpenAI had delivered an ultimatum about copyright. uncertain
OpenAI → hose → copyright
"It's a historic opportunity for our nation, but we need to be doing it in a way which protects rights holders," Mr Marles told News24 earlier today. asserted
Marles → need → News24
Anthropic did not immediately respond to requests for comment. asserted
Anthropic → respond → comment
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support