The Guardian
· collected 2026-09-15 · by Luca Ittimani and Caitlin Cassidy
The Albanese government is considering giving AI companies access to Australian creatives’ works by default as it pursues a compromise with US tech giants.
asserted
it → consider → giants
The proposals were revealed as senior personnel from OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, met with Labor ministers and warned that Australia’s copyright laws were preventing the company from training models locally.
asserted
laws → reveal → models
The independent senator David Pocock said the compromise would throw protections for creatives and copyright holders “under the bus” in pursuit of datacentre funding.
asserted
compromise → say → funding
“It would mean putting AI companies’ interests over everyday Australians, giving AI companies access to all Australians’ content, unless they opt out,” Pocock said on Tuesday.
asserted
Pocock → mean → Tuesday
“The burden should not fall on Australians to defend the rights they already hold over content they create and own and invest in.”
asserted
they → fall → content
The proposals were contained in a document Pocock described as screenshots of government’s consultation proposals, tabled in the Senate on Tuesday and titled “AI on Australian Terms”.
asserted
Pocock → contain → Terms
AI companies have sought to train their models on content and data online but cannot do so using Australian content due to local copyright rules.
asserted
companies → seek → rules
The document raises as a key issue the vast number of small individual creators of online content, for which voluntary deals with AI companies “is not realistic/possible”.
asserted
deals → raise → companies
It suggests requiring rights holders “digitally protect” their material if they do not want AI models trained on it – a proposal rights holders say is not feasible.
uncertain
holders → suggest → proposal
Under one option it proposes, AI companies would gain the right to access and train models on any unprotected online material as long as they made deals with enough businesses.
asserted
they → propose → businesses
Under another, AI companies would do deals with creatives’ rights holder organisations that give the access rights even if the content were made by someone who was not a member of the organisation that won the deal.
asserted
that → do → deal
A licence to access one category of material, such as music or text, would be extended to cover the many different small creators within that industry.
asserted
licence → access → industry
Labor’s industry minister, Tim Ayres, had on Monday said the government’s forthcoming AI rules would “in no way” involve a reduction in copyright protection.
asserted
rules → say → protection
The deputy prime minister Richard Marles, said the federal government was “working at a pace” to respond to the issue of copyright, and maintained that the opportunity to work with US tech giants was a “significant moment for the country”.
asserted
opportunity → say → country
“The opportunity for Australia economically is enormous in collaborating with frontier companies … and having frontier training occur in Australia,” he told the ABC’s 7.30 program on Tuesday evening.
asserted
he → collaborate → evening
“We want to see this opportunity come to the country [but] it needs to come on terms which are in our national interests.”
asserted
which → want → interests
Marles confirmed that the federal government had spoken with tech companies in San Francisco in the past fortnight on the issue, adding: “I think this can be done.”
asserted
this → confirm → issue
Before the revelations on Tuesday afternoon, the Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the suggestions of a copyright compromise were “abhorrent”.
asserted
suggestions → say → compromise
“Every Australian deserves to get paid for the work that they make and the work that they do,” Hanson-Young said.
asserted
Young → deserve → that
“A weakening of the copyright laws letting big tech take the work of Australians for free, not have to pay for it, for their own profit.”
asserted
tech → let → profit
Musicians, writers and artists lobbied against weaker copyright laws this year after reports that AI companies were offering $50bn datacentre investments in exchange.
asserted
companies → lobby → exchange
The attorney general, Michelle Rowland, is running the government’s consultation with affected organisations.
asserted
general → run → organisations
A spokesperson for Rowland on Tuesday said the government would ensure any future copyright changes delivered “meaningful control and fair compensation”.
asserted
changes → say → control
OpenAI’s vice-president for global policy, Ann O’Leary, met ministers and officials this week as the company considers investing in Australia.
asserted
company → meet → Australia
In an interview with The Australian newspaper about the prospect of training models here, O’Leary said: “Our company isn’t ready to have that conversation if we can’t get through the gating problem of the copyright barriers.”
asserted
we → train → barriers
The newspaper reported the comments as an “ultimatum” that sought to “strong-arm” the government.
asserted
that → report → government
Marles said the newspaper was “overstating” the comments.
asserted
newspaper → say → comments
OpenAI has asked the paper to correct its headline and article.
asserted
OpenAI → ask → headline
Andrew Charlton, the assistant technology minister, told News24 on Tuesday he hadn’t seen any ultimatum and he would reject one if it were issued.
asserted
it → tell → one
“We want to support Australian artists,” Charlton said.
asserted
Charlton → want → artists
“We want to give them control over their work.
asserted
We → want → work
We want to make sure they’re compensated, if they choose to have it used.
asserted
it → want → ?
“We’re not compromising them or trading them off.
asserted
We → compromise → them
So if we lose some datacentres over this, so be it.”
asserted
it → lose → this
The Aporia
