Photo via The Guardian

Labor accused of throwing creatives ‘under the bus’ with proposal to ease copyright protections for AI giants

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Cassidy, C., & Ittimani, L. (2026, September 15). Labor accused of throwing creatives ‘under the bus’ with proposal to ease copyright protections for AI giants. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/sep/16/pocock-says-labor-easing-copyright-protections-for-ai-datacentre-investment-would-throw-creatives-under-the-bus

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-15 · by Caitlin Cassidy, Luca Ittimani

Quick Summary

The Albanese government is considering a proposal to ease Australian copyright protections for AI companies like OpenAI, which claim that current laws hinder their ability to train models locally. Independent Senator David Pocock has criticized these proposals, arguing they would prioritize tech giants' interests over individual creators and small content producers by default granting AI firms access to Australians’ online material unless rights holders actively opt out—a burden he deems impractical for many. The government maintains it aims to balance economic opportunities with national interests but faces criticism for potentially undermining existing copyright protections.
Written by AI on 2026-09-16, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese proposed a deal to lure US-based AI giants like Anthropic and OpenAI to invest billions in Australia by offering them open access to Australian content for training their models. This move aims to break the impasse caused by strict Australian copyright laws, which pose legal risks to these companies due to potential lawsuits from international rights holders. The government is considering a plan where AI firms would be allowed to use any online material unless creators specifically opt out, aiming to attract significant tech investments that could boost Australia’s economy similarly to how the mining boom did previously. However, ACT independent senator David Pocock criticized this proposal, arguing it prioritizes AI companies over Australian creatives and could undermine copyright protections for everyday Australians. This debate highlights the tension between fostering technological growth and protecting creative industries’ rights under existing legal frameworks.

Written for “AI Copyright Debate” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Copyright Debate
Politics · 3 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 4 of 29 claims Outlet record 61/100
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 33 claims Outlet record 68/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 15 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and copyright issues without describing the same specific incident.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 1 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI companies' use of creative works, with Article A focusing on proposed changes to Australian copyright laws and concerns from Senator Pocock, while Article B discusses internal debates within Microsoft and OpenAI about the potential impact on the publishing industry.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 111 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related issues regarding OpenAI's concerns about Australian copyright laws but describe different stages or aspects of negotiations and reactions, not a single identical incident.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 29 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the same broader issue but describe distinct meetings and interactions.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 43 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss related issues but refer to different meetings and discussions involving various stakeholders over a period of time, not the same specific incident.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 12 of 115 claims Outlet record 61/100
“While both articles discuss similar concerns about AI companies accessing Australian creatives' works, they describe different aspects of the debate and are not clearly reporting on the exact same incident or meeting.”
CBS News
Hedges 2 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles mention OpenAI's interactions with lawmakers regarding AI regulation, they describe different aspects of those interactions (one about audits and one about copyright protections).”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 7 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and copyright, with Article B focusing on a specific meeting between OpenAI and Labor ministers about Australian copyright laws, while Article A covers broader consensus or lack thereof in Congress.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 34 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · source text last changed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2765 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Caitlin Cassidy
9 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 He has held it on a safe margin for three decades, and has spoken of its high representation of live music, theatre and artist spaces with pride. But now, as Labor considers giving AI companies unrestricted access to Australian creatives’ works by default as it pursues a compromise with US tech giants, locals are reacting with dismay.
🔮 On Thursday he was charged with being armed in a way that may cause fear, making unlawful threats and cannabis possession.
🔮 But the AFP and Victoria police insist they had no intelligence to suggest 43-year-old Brendan Nugent would go on to allegedly drive a Toyota LandCruiser into the independent MP Helen Haines in a targeted attack.
🔮 Following the Bondi beach terror attack, the state government introduced new legislation to undertake Australia’s biggest gun buyback in 30 years, with the scheme set to begin on 2 November this year.
🔮 At a Sydney shopping centre on a balmy Sunday evening, hundreds of people gathered to watch a concert that, according to its host, Richard Wilkins, would set a new livestreaming record for Australian cinemas.
🔮 Burke said 100 new compliance officers would be hired to round up overstayers, and an additional 250 beds would be freed, as well as potentially repurposing a 100-bed quarantine facility in Victoria.
🔮 The independent senator David Pocock said the compromise would throw protections for creatives and copyright holders “under the bus” in pursuit of datacentre funding.
🔮 On Tuesday evening, Canterbury-Bankstown voted overwhelmingly in favour of banning the tech at its pools, with its mayor, Bilal El-Hayek, describing them as “pervert glasses”.
Also by Caitlin Cassidy
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 9 articles by Caitlin Cassidy →
Luca Ittimani
13 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Smaller loans made with bigger deposits would make repayments even more affordable compared with rents.
🔮 Jewish Australians will mark the third anniversary of the 7 October attacks on Wednesday as Labor state governments condemn pro-Palestinian vigils to be held the same day.
🔮 Housing prices would have to fall roughly 10% to offset a 1 percentage point increase in interest rates and no suburbs have reached that threshold. However, Trucchio said dwellings on the cheaper end of the market had garnered more interest as first home buyers regained confidence.
🔮 The widely expected fourth increase to the cash rate this year will add to repayment costs for millions of mortgage holders across the country.
🔮 Australia’s key interest rate is expected to hit its highest level since 2011, drag down house prices and add more than $100 to typical monthly mortgage repayments.
🔮 Travellers will be able to fly between Sydney and New York in just 18 hours from mid-2028 when Qantas launches its second ultra long-haul route, cutting at least three hours from the travel time.
🔮 Patty Kinnersly, chief executive of advocacy group Our Watch, said the unexpected ads in the article could distress victim-survivors and “make light” of the violence they have faced.
🔮 The Reserve Bank governor said AI could be a bubble and there was no evidence it is making the economy more efficient, as the Albanese government claims the technology will solve Australia’s economic malaise.
🔮 The defence establishment told the inquiry that cutting the companies out could be catastrophic.
🔮 The farming lobby’s claim that immigration rule changes will increase food prices for households is wrong, Tony Burke has said, describing moves to speed up processing of backpacker visas as a positive step for agriculture.
Also by Luca Ittimani
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 13 articles by Luca Ittimani →

Topics

Albanese Australia Australian Australians Labor

Subjects

Australians NORP · 4× Australia GPE · 3× Australian NORP · 3× Labor ORG · 2× OpenAI ORG · 2× Pocock PERSON · 2× Albanese NORP · 1× Ayres PERSON · 1× David Pocock PERSON · 1× Senate ORG · 1×

Narrative

The deputy prime minister Richard Marles, said the federal government was “working at a pace” to respond to the issue of copyright, and maintained that the opportunity to work with US tech giants was a “significant moment for the country”.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
🔮 The independent senator David Pocock said the compromise would throw protections for creatives and copyright holders “under the bus” in pursuit of datacentre funding.

Claims (34 extracted, 1 hedged)

The Albanese government is considering giving AI companies access to Australian creatives’ works by default as it pursues a compromise with US tech giants. asserted
it → consider → giants
The proposals were revealed as senior personnel from OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, met with Labor ministers and warned that Australia’s copyright laws were preventing the company from training models locally. asserted
laws → reveal → models
The independent senator David Pocock said the compromise would throw protections for creatives and copyright holders “under the bus” in pursuit of datacentre funding. asserted
compromise → say → funding
“It would mean putting AI companies’ interests over everyday Australians, giving AI companies access to all Australians’ content, unless they opt out,” Pocock said on Tuesday. asserted
Pocock → mean → Tuesday
“The burden should not fall on Australians to defend the rights they already hold over content they create and own and invest in.” asserted
they → fall → content
The proposals were contained in a document Pocock described as screenshots of government’s consultation proposals, tabled in the Senate on Tuesday and titled “AI on Australian Terms”. asserted
Pocock → contain → Terms
AI companies have sought to train their models on content and data online but cannot do so using Australian content due to local copyright rules. asserted
companies → seek → rules
The document raises as a key issue the vast number of small individual creators of online content, for which voluntary deals with AI companies “is not realistic/possible”. asserted
deals → raise → companies
It suggests requiring rights holders “digitally protect” their material if they do not want AI models trained on it – a proposal rights holders say is not feasible. uncertain
holders → suggest → proposal
Under one option it proposes, AI companies would gain the right to access and train models on any unprotected online material as long as they made deals with enough businesses. asserted
they → propose → businesses
Under another, AI companies would do deals with creatives’ rights holder organisations that give the access rights even if the content were made by someone who was not a member of the organisation that won the deal. asserted
that → do → deal
A licence to access one category of material, such as music or text, would be extended to cover the many different small creators within that industry. asserted
licence → access → industry
Labor’s industry minister, Tim Ayres, had on Monday said the government’s forthcoming AI rules would “in no way” involve a reduction in copyright protection. asserted
rules → say → protection
The deputy prime minister Richard Marles, said the federal government was “working at a pace” to respond to the issue of copyright, and maintained that the opportunity to work with US tech giants was a “significant moment for the country”. asserted
opportunity → say → country
“The opportunity for Australia economically is enormous in collaborating with frontier companies … and having frontier training occur in Australia,” he told the ABC’s 7.30 program on Tuesday evening. asserted
he → collaborate → evening
“We want to see this opportunity come to the country [but] it needs to come on terms which are in our national interests.” asserted
which → want → interests
Marles confirmed that the federal government had spoken with tech companies in San Francisco in the past fortnight on the issue, adding: “I think this can be done.” asserted
this → confirm → issue
Before the revelations on Tuesday afternoon, the Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the suggestions of a copyright compromise were “abhorrent”. asserted
suggestions → say → compromise
“Every Australian deserves to get paid for the work that they make and the work that they do,” Hanson-Young said. asserted
Young → deserve → that
“A weakening of the copyright laws letting big tech take the work of Australians for free, not have to pay for it, for their own profit.” asserted
tech → let → profit
Musicians, writers and artists lobbied against weaker copyright laws this year after reports that AI companies were offering $50bn datacentre investments in exchange. asserted
companies → lobby → exchange
The attorney general, Michelle Rowland, is running the government’s consultation with affected organisations. asserted
general → run → organisations
A spokesperson for Rowland on Tuesday said the government would ensure any future copyright changes delivered “meaningful control and fair compensation”. asserted
changes → say → control
OpenAI’s vice-president for global policy, Ann O’Leary, met ministers and officials this week as the company considers investing in Australia. asserted
company → meet → Australia
In an interview with The Australian newspaper about the prospect of training models here, O’Leary said: “Our company isn’t ready to have that conversation if we can’t get through the gating problem of the copyright barriers.” asserted
we → train → barriers
The newspaper reported the comments as an “ultimatum” that sought to “strong-arm” the government. asserted
that → report → government
Marles said the newspaper was “overstating” the comments. asserted
newspaper → say → comments
OpenAI has asked the paper to correct its headline and article. asserted
OpenAI → ask → headline
Andrew Charlton, the assistant technology minister, told News24 on Tuesday he hadn’t seen any ultimatum and he would reject one if it were issued. asserted
it → tell → one
“We want to support Australian artists,” Charlton said. asserted
Charlton → want → artists
“We want to give them control over their work. asserted
We → want → work
We want to make sure they’re compensated, if they choose to have it used. asserted
it → want → ?
“We’re not compromising them or trading them off. asserted
We → compromise → them
So if we lose some datacentres over this, so be it.” asserted
it → lose → this
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support