Photo via The Guardian

The situation in Iran is dangerously escalating – but whatever you do, don’t call it a war | Arwa Mahdawi

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Mahdawi, A. (2026, September 15). The situation in Iran is dangerously escalating – but whatever you do, don’t call it a war | Arwa Mahdawi. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/sep/14/iran-war-trump-semantics

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-15 · by Arwa Mahdawi

Quick Summary

Columnist Arwa Mahdawi discusses the U.S.'s involvement in Iran, which has escalated recently but is not officially labeled as war by government officials. Despite this, significant military actions have occurred, such as missile strikes causing civilian casualties, including the death of 150 people, mostly children, and a recent bombing that killed four people, one being a child. The article highlights inconsistencies in how these events are characterized by U.S. officials compared to their impact on the ground, questioning whether this conflict should be considered a war given its significant human and financial costs.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In recent days, tensions in Iran have escalated dangerously, prompting questions about the nature of the conflict. Despite this, US President Donald Trump, who vowed not to send Americans into "stupid foreign wars," maintains that what's happening in Iran is not a war. Government officials like JD Vance support this stance by arguing there’s no active shooting and thus no war. However, these claims are undermined by recent US military actions such as missile strikes on Iranian civilian targets, including a wedding where at least four people were killed and an elementary school massacre in March that left 150 dead, mostly children. These events raise serious questions about the legality and morality of US actions in Iran, with critics suggesting they could be classified as war crimes.

Written for “Iran Situation Escalating” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Iran Situation Escalating
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
TIME
Hedges 11 of 44 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses Trump's comments about ending the U.S. and Israel's war with Iran immediately after midterm elections, while Article B critiques how the situation in Iran is escalating but argues it shouldn't be called a war.”
The Independent
Hedges 2 of 51 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Iran-US situation without clearly referring to the exact same incident or timeframe.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 22 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the situation regarding the US and Iran, with Article A focusing on the Republican midterm convention and how little attention was given to the conflict in Iran, while Article B discusses the reluctance to label the ongoing conflict as a war.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 8 of 53 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses the escalation of a situation in Iran without calling it a war, while Article B refers to a war against Iran that began in February and its impact on clean energy development.”
Times of India
Hedges 2 of 25 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles refer to different points in time with regard to the Iran situation, with Article A discussing an earlier escalation and Article B focusing on Trump's recent consideration of further action.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the situation in Iran, with Article A focusing on the president's stance and definitions regarding involvement, while Article B reports on a poll about US voter opposition to the conflict.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the situation involving Iran and related conflicts, not a single specific incident.”
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related events and perspectives on the Iran situation but describe different moments in time with distinct statements from JD Vance.”
BBC News
Hedges 4 of 33 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Iran situation under Trump's presidency and do not refer to the same specific incident or time.”
ABC News (US)
Hedges 0 of 7 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss similar themes of escalating tensions with Iran but reference different sources and contexts.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
8 of 44 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1869 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Arwa Mahdawi
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Some people would be thrilled for their spouse to be in the spotlight, but I’m not sure that’s the case with Donald.
🔮 Imagine if a female athlete said changing diapers wasn’t her job: the rightwing pitchforks would be instantly out for her.
🔮 As all that was happening, Usha picked up Death Comes for the Archbishop by Willa Cather.
🔮 You may be familiar with rule 34 of the internet, which states that if something exists or can be imagined, there will almost certainly be online porn of it.
🔮 “If you had a trigger-happy cop, or somebody had done the wrong thing, somebody could have ended up dead,” Giuffra said.
🔮 While the president may hawk bibles as a side hustle, he is not exactly devout; he serves only mammon.
🔮 This downgrading of pathogen surveillance didn’t cause the Cyclospora outbreak, but it might have made it harder for health authorities to respond to it.
🔮 In an interview with Politico published on Monday, Hope declared: “If we do lose the midterms and [Trump] is impeached again, I will be walking the halls of Congress in support of that impeachment.”
🔮 Trust me, he keeps saying, everything will get better after the midterms.
🔮 We’re now approaching month seven of a war against Iran that Donald Trump repeatedly assured us would be over in a matter of weeks.
Also by Arwa Mahdawi
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Arwa Mahdawi →

Topics

American Iran Iranian Pennsylvania the New York Times

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 7× Congress ORG · 5× Iran GPE · 4× Vance PERSON · 3× American NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Iranian NORP · 1× JD Vance PERSON · 1× Pennsylvania GPE · 1× the New York Times ORG · 1×

Narrative

But, as the historian and foreign relations expert Fredrik Logevall noted in an interview with the Harvard Kennedy School: “What’s extraordinary about President Trump in the current context is that he has not really bothered to even consult with Congress, never mind seek the approval of Congress.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 “I will not send you to fight and die in stupid foreign wars that never end,” Donald Trump promised a crowd in Pennsylvania in 2024.

Claims (44 extracted, 8 hedged)

“I will not send you to fight and die in stupid foreign wars that never end,” Donald Trump promised a crowd in Pennsylvania in 2024. asserted
Trump → send → 2024
While the disastrous conflict in Iran, which has escalated in recent days, may make it seem like the president has reneged on that promise, that’s inaccurate. uncertain
that → escalate → promise
It would be wrong to say that the president has dragged the US into yet another disastrous forever war in the Middle East because, as government officials keep insisting, what’s happening in Iran isn’t actually a war. asserted
happening → say → Iran
“I wouldn’t call it a war,” JD Vance told reporters early this month, for example, after being asked whether the fighting in Iran might be over by the November midterms. uncertain
fighting → call → midterms
Earlier this month, a US missile strike hit a wedding at a private home in southern Iran, killing at least four people, including a four-year-old child and a 16-year-old. asserted
strike → hit → child
That’s fairly restrained compared to the massacre in March when a US precision-guided missile hit an elementary school in Iran, killing 150 people, including 120 children, but it’s still something I would personally file under “possible war crimes”. asserted
I → ’ → crimes
But not only does the Trump administration keep insisting this isn’t a real war, they’re also adamant there aren’t any real crimes being committed: the vice-president would like to stress that you shouldn’t believe your eyes or ears when it comes to the civilian deaths being reported. asserted
it → keep → deaths
Despite a weapons expert and a visual analysis by the New York Times concluding that the bomb that hit the wedding party in a residential area of the country was American, Vance has a hunch the whole thing might have been made up by some untrustworthy brown people. uncertain
thing → conclude → people
“The Iranian state media has not been a very good scribe about what’s happened in the conflict thus far,” Vance said at that same press briefing, in relation to the wedding massacre. asserted
Vance → happen → massacre
“So I’m extremely skeptical of this. asserted
I → ’m → this
The vice-president may be skeptical, but I’m confused. uncertain
I → ’m → ?
Trump himself has called it a war on several occasions. asserted
Trump → call → occasions
Last Wednesday, for example, he said: “The war is going to end immediately after the election.” asserted
war → say → election
However, rather confusing matters, he also recently suggested he agreed with Vance that it wasn’t a full-fledged war. uncertain
it → confuse → Vance
“I call it a military conflict because it’s small potatoes for us,” Trump said last month. asserted
Trump → call → us
Those are some very expensive potatoes: the not-a-war already has a price tag of tens of billions. asserted
war → have → billions
Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has roughly estimated that it has cost the typical US household $1,200. asserted
it → estimate → 1,200
And then of course there’s the human cost: the thousands of lives that have been lost. asserted
that → ’ → lives
What we call this “military conflict” isn’t just semantics, it matters greatly. asserted
it → call → What
Not least because the constitution is very clear that a president can’t unilaterally start an official war on a whim; only Congress has the power to declare a war. asserted
Congress → start → war
Trump isn’t the first president to launch major military action without going to Congress for a declaration: Harry Truman classified the Korean conflict as a “police action” to bypass Congress and presidents since have engaged in similar semantic sleights-of-hand. asserted
classified → launch → hand
But, as the historian and foreign relations expert Fredrik Logevall noted in an interview with the Harvard Kennedy School: “What’s extraordinary about President Trump in the current context is that he has not really bothered to even consult with Congress, never mind seek the approval of Congress.” asserted
he → note → Congress
In other words, he’s acting like a dictator. asserted
he → act → dictator
Trump, to be fair, has been clear that he’s exploiting the Truman Playbook. asserted
he → exploit → Playbook
“I won’t use the word ‘war’ because they say if you use the word ‘war,’ that’s maybe not a good thing to do,” Trump said at a fundraising dinner in March. asserted
Trump → use → March
“They don’t like the word ‘war’ because you’re supposed to get approval. asserted
you → like → approval
So, I’ll use the word ‘military operation’, which is really what it is. asserted
it → use → word
It’s a military decimation.” asserted
It → ’ → ?
Avoiding a formal declaration of war might also help the US government bypass certain “wartime” obligations to its service members and their families. uncertain
government → avoid → members
Libby Klinner, the widow of an airman killed in combat operations against Iran in March, recently posted on Instagram that she wasn’t receiving certain benefits because the US wasn’t technically at war. asserted
US → kill → war
“The Air Force recently told me that because we haven’t officially declared war, my kids and I aren’t eligible for some benefits,” Klinner wrote. asserted
Klinner → tell → benefits
“So not only was my husband killed in a war he never wanted to participate in, but now the benefits we’re left with are being dictated by semantics and public perceptions.” asserted
we → kill → semantics
After this post went viral, it seems the government has stepped in smooth things over. asserted
government → go → things
Vance recently said the administration would ensure Klinner receives “what she is entitled to.” asserted
she → say → what
He added: “We will certainly work that on the back end.” asserted
We → add → end
The government might be able to fix Klinner’s benefits, but they’re going to have a hard time remedying the economic and political damage this not-a-war is inflicting. uncertain
war → fix → damage
Trump’s popularity is plummeting, and a majority of Americans are fed up with this “small potatoes” conflict that has been going on for six months and making everyday life more dangerous and expensive. asserted
life → plummet → months
According to an estimate from Brown University last week, the conflict has cost Americans $100bn in extra energy costs. uncertain
conflict → accord → costs
That bill is going up by $1m every two minutes. asserted
bill → go → m
This week oil prices also climbed over $100 a barrel for the first time since July. asserted
prices → climb → July
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support