Open Thread 446

Astral Codex Ten · collected 2026-08-18 · by Scott Alexander commentary
Read the original at Astral Codex Ten ↗

Summary

The article is an open thread where users can post about anything, ask questions, or discuss various topics related to ACX (Accelerated Climate Science). The section on comments of the week features discussions with FutureSearch founder Dan Schwarz and Frikgeek on forecasting and chess engine handicapping. There are also updates on a successfully defeated anti-animal-welfare law, a charity's incubation round for farmed animal welfare, and a $250K bet won by the author on the COVID-19 origins theory. Additionally, there is new information released about AI hacking incidents at OpenAI and Meta.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-20, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
0%
0 of 23 hedged
Leaning
not scored
needs a local LLM pass
Publisher trust
not scored
Commentary is not rated for newsroom trust
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-08-20 · source text last changed 2026-08-20 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Boston ACX meetup group will be having their annual voter-guide-making meeting on Sunday, August 16. The group has been working to create voter guides for local elections, helping people make informed decisions at the ballot box. This comes after a successful effort in opposing the "Save Our Bacon Act", an anti-animal-welfare law that was defeated thanks to public opposition. Charity Entrepreneurship is also launching an incubation round dedicated to farmed animal welfare charities, which they claim is a good time to start one due to expected new funding opportunities.

Written for “Open Thread 446” on 2026-08-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 996 · logged 2026-08-25

Story

📰 Open Thread 446
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Open Thread 447 different event · 100%
Astral Codex Ten · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 7
“The articles are dated the same but describe different open threads with distinct content and comments”
Open Thread 445 different event · 100%
Astral Codex Ten · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 14
“Article A mentions 'Open Thread 446' and thanks people who opposed the 'Save Our Bacon Act', while Article B mentions 'Open Thread 445' and discusses a correction on a previous links post and an AI safety organization, with no mention of the same specific incident or event”
Astral Codex Ten · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 2 of 22
Astral Codex Ten · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 8

Publisher

Astral Codex Ten · 25 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected

Commentary. The three signals behind a trust score all measure a newsroom's record with its own reporting, so they are not computed for this source. How trust is scored.

No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Scott Alexander
25 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 [This is one of the finalists in the 2026 book review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done.
🔮 This year’s survey will probably take 30 - 45 minutes.
2026-08-27 · assertive framing · Take The 2026 ACX Survey
🔮 It’s not necessarily wrong to deprioritize a topic because it vaguely reminds you of something that you have negative affect toward, but I would prefer these people admit they’re dismissing/ignoring it rather than claim to be engaging with it.
🔮 I don’t know, but he may have misinterpreted my original tweet as saying income doesn’t matter at all, in which case this data functions as an effective rebuttal.
2026-08-25 · assertive framing · Re: Re: Re: Pritchard On Liberal Happiness
🔮 [This is one of the finalists in the 2026 book review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done.
🔮 Matt says his highest priority colleges that don’t have an organizer yet are MIT, Claremont, Northwestern, Carnegie Mellon, Amherst, Notre Dame, Duke, CalTech, Georgetown, UCLA, Dartmouth, Vanderbilt, Harvard, NYU, Williams, GWU, American University, Rutgers, and UNC Chapel Hill.
2026-08-24 · assertive framing · Open Thread 448
🔮 We (ACX and an effective altruist organization called Nest who are sponsoring this) will give you free advertising and cover your costs.
2026-08-21 · assertive framing · College EA Meetups Everywhere: Call For Organizers
🔮 I remember when arguments about AI were things like “Sure, if you could magically get billions of dollars of compute, and magically scale AI up a thousand times, and magically get rid of hallucinations…” and the whole implausibility hinged on the word “magic”!
🔮 On average, commenters will end up spotting evidence that around two or three of the links in each links post are wrong or misleading.
2026-08-19 · assertive framing · Links For July 2026 (Part 2)
🔮 There are many reasons to believe in such assistance: Napoleon’s rise from Corsican nobody to Emperor and would-be world conqueror was a bizarre deviation from the usual pattern of history.
2026-08-19 · assertive framing · Why I'm Staying Out Of The Substack Religion Debate
More on this subject from Scott Alexander
Open Thread 448
2026-08-24 · Astral Codex Ten · 100% similar
Open Thread 449
2026-08-31 · Astral Codex Ten · 100% similar
Open Thread 447
2026-08-18 · Astral Codex Ten · 100% similar
Open Thread 445
2026-08-18 · Astral Codex Ten · 100% similar
All 25 articles by Scott Alexander →

Topics

ACX Boston Discord FutureSearch the “Save Our Bacon Act”

Subjects

ACX ORG · 2× Boston GPE · 1× Charity Entrepreneurship ORG · 1× Dan Schwarz PERSON · 1× Discord ORG · 1× Frikgeek PERSON · 1× FutureSearch ORG · 1× London GPE · 1× OpenAI ORG · 1× Peter Miller PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Although of course I’m happy to have won, I’ll admit that my bet was only partly on the merits of the COVID origins argument, and at least as much on the thesis that new and earth-shakingly decisive evidence on controversial events rarely comes out in the specific interval of 4-6 years after the event happened, and that people rarely change their mind for anything less than earth-shakingly decisive evidence.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-18
🔮 1: Comments of the week: FutureSearch founder Dan Schwarz on what the correlation between accuracy and time horizon tells us about the ceiling on forecasting, and Frikgeek on chess engine handicapping. 2:
2026-08-20 · Astral Codex Ten
Open Thread 446 · assertive framing

Claims (23 extracted, 0 hedged)

Post about anything you want, ask random questions, whatever. asserted
you → post → questions
ACX has an unofficial subreddit, Discord, and bulletin board, and in-person meetups around the world. asserted
ACX → have → world
Most content is free, some is subscriber only; you can subscribe here. asserted
you → subscribe → ?
1: Comments of the week: FutureSearch founder Dan Schwarz on what the correlation between accuracy and time horizon tells us about the ceiling on forecasting, and Frikgeek on chess engine handicapping. 2: asserted
correlation → tell → handicapping
Thanks to everyone who wrote or called your representatives to oppose the “Save Our Bacon Act” (anti-animal-welfare law). asserted
who → write → Act
The bill was successfully defeated. asserted
bill → defeat → ?
3: I continue to accept and signal-boost voter guides from local ACX meetups. asserted
I → continue → meetups
The Boston meetup group will be having their annual voter-guide-making meeting this Sunday, August 16. asserted
group → have → meeting
Charity Entrepreneurship, the self-proclaimed “Y Combinator for charities”, has asked me to signal-boost their latest incubation round, dedicated entirely to farmed animal welfare. asserted
Entrepreneurship → proclaim → welfare
They say it’s the “best time ever” to start an animal welfare charity (partly because of an expected tsunami of new funding), and that you don’t need any animal charity experience (and maybe “outsiders are especially valuable”). asserted
outsiders → say → experience
Costs are fully covered (stipends to cover cost of living; reimbursement for travel to London and SF; seed funding available at the end). asserted
Costs → cover → end
Applications close soon: learn more here. asserted
Applications → close → more
Two years ago, I wrote some pieces (1, 2) supporting a natural origins theory of COVID. asserted
I → write → COVID
I agreed to a bet with lab leak proponent(s), and although some of you were curious, I didn’t reveal the details because I didn’t want to bias resolution. asserted
I → agree → resolution
I can now reveal that the bet was about whether whatever new evidence came out over the ensuing two years would shift polls of superforecasters (who previously leaned natural origins) to favor lab leak. asserted
who → reveal → leak
The latest such poll came out recently, and they continued to favor natural origins at about the same rate as two years ago. asserted
they → come → rate
I won $250K. asserted
I → win → 250K.
Peter Miller also participated and won a similar amount. asserted
Miller → participate → amount
Our counterparty/counterparties prefer to remain anonymous. asserted
counterparties → prefer → ?
Although of course I’m happy to have won, I’ll admit that my bet was only partly on the merits of the COVID origins argument, and at least as much on the thesis that new and earth-shakingly decisive evidence on controversial events rarely comes out in the specific interval of 4-6 years after the event happened, and that people rarely change their mind for anything less than earth-shakingly decisive evidence. asserted
people → ’m → evidence
Everyone involved in the bet conducted themselves honorably, and I’m grateful to everyone who helped make it happen; if you were involved and forgot to respond to my email asking for permission to list your name, reply now and I’ll edit it in here. asserted
I → involve → it
new information released from OpenAI reveals that their rogue AIs created a secret message board to coordinate hacks among themselves. asserted
AIs → release → themselves
And Meta reports one of its AIs also went rogue and hacked a third-party company; Moonshot (Kimi) reports a sandbox escape. asserted
Moonshot → report → escape
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support