‘The Law Should Be Shutting Them Down’: Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Others Speak at TIME100 AI Impact Dinner

TIME · collected 2026-09-15 · by Io Dodds
Read the original at TIME ↗

Summary

At the TIME100 AI Impact Dinner in San Francisco, actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt called for the government to shut down major AI companies until they can prove their products are safe, drawing applause from the audience. Gordon-Levitt, one of the 100 most influential people in AI according to the 2026 TIME100 AI list, cited recent cyberattacks and warnings from AI employees about potential risks as reasons for stronger regulation. He criticized politicians for not acting boldly due to financial ties with tech companies, which spent over $83 million on federal elections in 2025 alone.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-15, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
38
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
16%
6 of 38 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
94.7
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

At the third annual TIME100 AI Impact Dinner in San Francisco on Monday, actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt called for the U.S. government to shut down big AI companies until they can prove their products are safe. Speaking as one of 100 influential figures named in the 2026 TIME100 AI list, Gordon-Levitt argued that car and construction companies follow laws to ensure safety, and similarly, AI makers must be regulated to prevent potential harm. His remarks drew enthusiastic applause from the audience at San Francisco’s Asian Art Museum, highlighting growing concerns about the unchecked development of AI technologies.

Written for “AI Impact Debate” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but 4 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 1 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 9834: no verified evidence · logged 2026-09-15

Story

📰 AI Impact Debate
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 16% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss AI concerns but describe different events: one is a warning about rapid development, while the other reports on a speech at an AI Impact Dinner.”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 32 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles cover different perspectives on AI regulation but do not describe the same specific incident or happening.”

Publisher

TIME · 183 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Io Dodds
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Artificial intelligence could flatten your company hierarchy, improve global agriculture, and give you the perfect vacation.
🔮 He said AI companies’ leaders and employees had publicly admitted their products were dangerous and could not be controlled — a reference, perhaps, to July’s cyberattack by a “swarm” of rogue OpenAI agents as well as multiple recent statements from current and former Anthropic employees warning that AI could end all human life.
More on this subject from Io Dodds

Topics

500 Days of Summer San Francisco San Francisco’s TIME100 AI Impact Dinner U.S.

Subjects

Gordon-Levitt PERSON · 3× U.S. GPE · 3× Boyer PERSON · 2× Anthropic ORG · 1× Asian Art Museum ORG · 1× Gordon-Levitt’s PERSON · 1× Joseph Gordon-Levitt PERSON · 1× San Francisco GPE · 1× San Francisco’s GPE · 1× the New York Times ORG · 1×

Narrative

Those teachings inspired her to start building robots to teach Anishinaabemowin, the native language of the Great Lakes region’s Anishinaabe people that was almost wiped out by U.S. residential schools and is now estimated to have fewer than 1,000 fluent speakers.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 He said AI companies’ leaders and employees had publicly admitted their products were dangerous and could not be controlled — a reference, perhaps, to July’s cyberattack by a “swarm” of rogue OpenAI agents as well as multiple recent statements from current and former Anthropic employees warning that AI could end all human life.

Claims (38 extracted, 6 hedged)

Big AI companies should be “shut down” by the U.S. government until they can prove that their products are safe, actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt said on Monday. asserted
Levitt → shut → Monday
In a toast at the third annual TIME100 AI Impact Dinner in San Francisco, the Inception and 500 Days of Summer star told guests that today’s AI makers have lost control of their creations and must be regulated to prevent potential harm. asserted
makers → tell → harm
“Why are cars safe to drive? asserted
cars → drive → ?
Why are houses safe to live in? asserted
houses → live → ?
It’s because car companies and construction companies ... they have to follow laws. asserted
they → ’ → laws
And if they don’t, then the law can come and shut those companies down,” Gordon-Levitt said. asserted
Levitt → do → companies
“So let’s just be clear here: today’s AI companies are operating in such a way that the law should be shutting them down.” asserted
law → let → them
Gordon-Levitt was one of 100 leaders, innovators, storytellers, and activists named in the 2026 TIME100 AI list, which highlights the year’s most influential people in AI. asserted
which → name → AI
His remarks drew loud clapping, whoops, and cheers from many people in the audience, who gathered at San Francisco’s Asian Art Museum on Monday night to celebrate the 2026 honorees. asserted
who → draw → honorees
He said AI companies’ leaders and employees had publicly admitted their products were dangerous and could not be controlled — a reference, perhaps, to July’s cyberattack by a “swarm” of rogue OpenAI agents as well as multiple recent statements from current and former Anthropic employees warning that AI could end all human life. uncertain
AI → say → life
“To me, that’s pretty obvious that’s the time the law should step in,” Gordon-Levitt said. asserted
Levitt → ’ → me
But, he went on, U.S. politicians had been “timid” and failed to act — perhaps, he alleged, because they were taking money from “some of the guys in this room.” asserted
they → go → room
(AI companies, allies, and executives spent at least $83 million on federal elections in 2025 and are set to spend even more this year, according to the New York Times.) uncertain
companies → spend → Times
He called for Americans not to vote in November's midterms for any politician who stands for "anything less than strong regulation, now." asserted
who → call → regulation
Other toasts highlighted the positive potential of AI, as well as its dangers. asserted
toasts → highlight → AI
The first was by Danielle Boyer, a 25-year-old indigenous American inventor and activist who is using AI to help preserve her people’s endangered language. asserted
who → use → language
“My grandmother once told me that no decision belongs only to the moment in which we make it,” Boyer said. asserted
Boyer → tell → it
“Long after we’re gone, someone we will never meet may still be living with what we chose to do today.” uncertain
we → go → what
She described her community’s “seven generations” principle: draw inspiration and support from the seven generations before you, and act for the benefit of the seven generations after you. asserted
She → describe → you
Those teachings inspired her to start building robots to teach Anishinaabemowin, the native language of the Great Lakes region’s Anishinaabe people that was almost wiped out by U.S. residential schools and is now estimated to have fewer than 1,000 fluent speakers. asserted
that → inspire → speakers
“The decisions we make about artificial intelligence today will outlive every person in this room. asserted
we → make → room
That’s crazy, right? asserted
That → ’ → ?
” Boyer said. asserted
Boyer → say → ?
“So let’s build things the right way. asserted
’s → let → things
Let’s build so that seven generations from now, our descendants can look back at this moment and thank us, rather than have to recover from us asserted
descendants → build → us
The final toast came from Suchi Saria, a Johns Hopkins computer scientist and the founder of Bayesian Health who has spent years studying how routinely-collected clinical data and vital signs could help spot an ailing patient before human clinicians notice the problem. uncertain
clinicians → come → problem
“Hospitalized patients can quietly become critically ill from respiratory failure, internal bleeding, kidney failure, dangerous heart rhythms, and many other causes,” she said. asserted
she → hospitalize → failure
Saria saw that firsthand in 2017, when her family in India called to tell her that her nephew was critically ill with sepsis. asserted
nephew → see → sepsis
“We knew the signals were there. asserted
signals → know → ?
We had published the science,” she told the guests on Monday. asserted
she → publish → Monday
“And yet, when it mattered to my own family, there was nothing I could offer them. uncertain
I → matter → them
The science had not yet become a system. asserted
science → become → ?
My nephew died within a few days.” asserted
nephew → die → days
Saria’s voice audibly cracked, and there was a moment of silence. asserted
voice → crack → silence
When she spoke again, she described Bayesian Health’s progress on using AI to catch sepsis early — resulting in a 20 percent drop in mortality, the company claims, when clinicians act promptly on the system’s warnings. uncertain
clinicians → speak → warnings
It is not even discovery,” she said. asserted
she → say → ?
“It is turning insight into action early enough to change what happens to a patient.” asserted
what → turn → patient
The TIME100 Impact Dinner: Leaders Shaping the Future of AI was presented by Deloitte, Booking.com, and Cognizant. asserted
Dinner → shape → Deloitte
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support