A chef who consumed alcohol while working at a high-end Sydney restaurant will receive more than $11,000 in compensation after the national fair work umpire ruled his dismissal was harsh, unjust and unreasonable.
asserted
dismissal → consume → compensation
Michiaki Miyazaki, who trained in a three-star Michelin restaurant in Kyoto, was employed by Sydney Omakase Pty Ltd as head chef of Besuto, an upmarket restaurant located in Circular Quay and founded by restaurateur Joel Best.
asserted
who → train → Best
Miyazaki had known Best for 20 years, spent time together with him socially, and had been invited to work in his restaurant, relocating from Japan to Sydney for the job in 2023.
asserted
Miyazaki → know → 2023
Miyazaki was earning $40,000 a year in wages, but Best also paid for his accommodation at a rate of $700 a week, flights to Japan twice a year and a gym membership.
asserted
Best → earn → Japan
The accommodation deduction for a person on Miyazaki’s pay is usually limited to about $250 a week.
asserted
deduction → limit → 250
The case highlights the complexity of dismissing employees for alcohol consumption in some workplace contexts, and problems that can arise from unconventional pay arrangements and personal relationships.
asserted
that → highlight → arrangements
While there was no dispute that Miyazaki consumed alcohol at work, Fair Work Commission deputy president Judith Wright said arrangements between the two men blurred lines between their professional and personal relationships.
asserted
arrangements → be → relationships
“In most employment relationships, [consuming alcohol at work] would be regarded as misconduct justifying dismissal,” she said.
asserted
she → consume → dismissal
“However, in this case, the matter is complicated by Miyazaki’s friendship with Best and the practice of drinking sake with customers in the restaurant.
asserted
matter → complicate → restaurant
“Miyazaki may well have thought that as long as he could fulfil his role as head chef, practices such as drinking at work would be tolerated because of their friendship, even if this was not acceptable in other workplaces.”
uncertain
this → think → workplaces
Wright also said it was possible drinking at work as an omakase chef was acceptable in Miyazaki’s home country, making it important to clearly outline expectations in a formal document, which the restaurant did not do.
asserted
restaurant → say → which
Best said he sacked the chef due to ongoing conduct and performance issues after repeated discussions, warnings and opportunities for improvement, and claimed Miyazaki had consumed four to five bottles of alcohol a week without authorisation.
asserted
Miyazaki → say → authorisation
However, Wright found she could not exclude the possibility that Miyazaki was permitted to consume alcohol after work given the “rather unusual remuneration arrangements” between them.
uncertain
Miyazaki → find → them
The chef’s gross weekly pay was also below the relevant award rate and his annual leave accumulated at his weekly wage rather than the entire rate including his accommodation allowance.
asserted
leave → accumulate → allowance
“Given these discrepancies and [the unusual pay arrangements] it is possible that Best also paid Miyazaki ‘in kind’ by permitting him to consume alcohol supplied by Sydney Omakase after work,” Wright said.
asserted
Wright → give → work
The commission concluded there was insufficient evidence that Miyazaki had breached a direction to stop drinking at work, that he was intoxicated at work or that he had consumed alcohol belonging to the restaurant without authorisation.
asserted
he → conclude → authorisation
“If there were issues with Miyazaki’s performance, I would have expected Sydney Omakase to receive complaints from customers and other staff,” Wright said.
asserted
Wright → be → customers
“There was no evidence that such complaints were ever received.”
asserted
complaints → be → ?
Wright also noted there was no evidence of written warnings, and that Best admitted some of the alleged verbal warnings had been given in informal settings such as a sauna.
asserted
some → note → sauna
Wright said Miyazaki’s alleged misconduct was not the reason for his sacking, the dismissal was procedurally unfair and that the chef experienced financial hardship because he had been dismissed without notice, had his statutory entitlements withheld, was evicted from his home and required to vacate the property he lived in within five days.
asserted
he → say → days
“These actions left Miyazaki without a home or any money, and were likely to offend both residential tenancies legislation and the Fair Work Act,” Wright said.
asserted
Wright → leave → legislation
The commission concluded Miyazaki was likely dismissed because he could not confirm to Best that he had the passion to continue as head chef: a reason that falls short of “serious misconduct”.
uncertain
that → conclude → misconduct
The commission ordered compensation for the chef of $11,753.84, which amounts to eight weeks of pay.
asserted
which → order → pay
The Aporia
