Federal Court Allows Libel-by-AI Claim (Brought by Protagonist of Apple TV's Black Bird Series) to Go Forward

Reason · collected 2026-09-14 · by Eugene Volokh
Read the original at Reason ↗

Summary

Judge Thomas Durkin has allowed Jimmy Keene's libel lawsuit against Google to proceed after AI-generated summaries falsely claimed he was serving life sentences for murder and drug trafficking. These false statements appeared in response to searches about his net worth and whether he was still alive, contradicting the facts of his case where he served time as an FBI informant and had his conviction expunged. Keene's suit focuses on Google’s failure to correct these inaccuracies despite complaints, while Google contends that standard disclaimers indicate AI-generated summaries are not factual assertions but starting points for further research. The court ruled in favor of Keene, accepting the allegations as true at this stage without considering Google’s disclaimer argument.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
58
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
22%
13 of 58 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Correction & hedging signals
91.4
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

In 2023, there have been 9 libel-by-AI cases initiated against tech giants like Google LLC and OpenAI. As of now, 6 of these cases are still ongoing. Notable among them is Starbuck v. Google (Del. Super.) and LTL LED, LLC v. Google LLC (Minn. Dist.), where motions to dismiss were denied, allowing the cases to proceed further. Another significant case is Keene v. Google LLC (N.D. Ill.), involving author Jimmy Keene, who alleges that Google's AI repeatedly published false overviews about him from May 24 to June 27, 2025, stating he was serving life sentences for multiple crimes and drug trafficking, despite his conviction being expunged years ago. This case is significant as it highlights the potential legal repercussions of misinformation spread by AI technologies.

Written for “Libel by AI Cases” on 2026-09-14, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 9222 · logged 2026-09-14

Story

📰 Libel by AI Cases
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 22% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The 9 Libel-by-AI Cases in the U.S. Since 2023 (6 Still Going Forward) same event · 95%
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 33% hedged 1 of 3 📰 publisher trust 91
“Both articles discuss the federal court decision in Keene v. Google LLC, where Judge Thomas Durkin allowed the libel-by-AI claim to go forward.”

Publisher

Reason · 116 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-09-05
Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
46 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Keene alleged that, from May 24 to June 27, 2025, at least four Google "AI Overviews" said false things about him: - Keene was "serving a life sentence without parole for multiple convictions." - He was "serving a life sentence without parole for the murders of three women." - He "was convicted of drug trafficking."
2026-09-14 · mixed framing · Federal Court Allows Libel-by-AI Claim (Brought by Protagonist of Apple TV's Black Bird Series) to Go Forward
🔮 affirming a police department's "redact[ing] officers' names from certain training certificates" released in response to a Right-to-Know Law request for a police department's "287(g) agreement" with ICE: Section 708(b)(1)(ii) of the RTKL exempts from disclosure a record that "would be reasonably likely to result in a substantial and demonstrable risk of physical harm to or the personal security of an individual."
2026-09-14 · assertive framing · Police Department May Decline to Release Names of Officers Trained by ICE
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent An excerpt from the long opinion today in Lewis-Williams v. S.F. Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist., decided by Judge Ryan Nelson, joined by Judges Johnnie Rawlinson and Bridget Bade: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District seeks to overturn a jury verdict of $7,824,580 to six former employees for Title VII violations for failure to accommodate their sincere religious objections to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
2026-09-12 · assertive framing · Court Upholds $7.85M Verdict for Employees Fired for Refusing to Get COVID-19 Vaccine
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent I much enjoyed participating in this, and I expect many of our readers will much enjoy listening to it.
2026-09-11 · assertive framing · Geof Stone and I on "The State of Free Speech in 2026" (from the National Constitution Center)
🔮 [Nor do they] offer … facts that would suggest inevitable or likely exposure to the curriculum (or its harmful effects)….
2026-09-08 · mixed framing · "Jewish, Zionist" Teachers' and Parents' Lawsuit Over Allegedly Anti-Capitalist and Anti-Zionist School Curriculum Can Be Refiled, Ninth Circuit Rules
🔮 The court concluded that "The Big Board's refusal to comply with the orders was not expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment," so not renewing his license based solely on such refusal would have been constitutional:
2026-09-08 · assertive framing · Was D.C. Bar's Liquor License Denied Partly Based on Owner's Speech Criticizing Anti-Masking/Vax-Proof Requirement Speech?
🔮 Lambert … falsely stated that the Plaintiffs had conflicts of interest with her clients and/or her firm, that she would sue the Plaintiffs if they were to be engaged in these relationships, and implicitly that she would take legal action against the relationships themselves if they were to hire Plaintiffs.
2026-09-08 · mixed framing · Forensic Election Fraud Analysts Allege Defendants Defamed Them as "Retaliation for Plaintiffs' Refusal to Report False Findings of Election Fraud"
🔮 The court concluded that, even "assuming arguendo that there's a fair chance that the press defendants have violated the federal and state trade secrets provisions," the First Amendment would preclude the TRO:
2026-09-06 · assertive framing · Judge's Opinion Denying TRO Against Arkansas Democrat-Gazette as to Publishing of Data Center Plans
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent From the docket this morning; for more on the case, see here and here (the latter item notes the sealing, and expresses the now-realized hope that "the motion will be unsealed at some point soon"): Via email, Plaintiff has informed the Court that it will not be pursuing preliminary injunctive relief….
2026-09-06 · assertive framing · Brief Update on the Entergy / Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Matter
🔮 Perhaps most analogously to alienation of affections, if Alan breaches his contract with Betty, and Cathy encouraged him to breach it, she will in many situations be liable for intentional interference with contract.
2026-09-06 · assertive framing · Alienation of Affections as Complicity
More on this subject from Eugene Volokh
"Incredulity" That "Competent Law Firm Representing One of the Largest Financial Institution[s] in the World" Filed Brief with AI Hallucinations
2026-09-04 · Reason · 73% similar
The 9 Libel-by-AI Cases in the U.S. Since 2023 (6 Still Going Forward)
2026-09-14 · Reason · 72% similar
Prosecution for Forging Court Order, Purportedly from Chief Justice Roberts
2026-08-28 · Reason · 69% similar
Open Thread
2026-09-14 · Reason · 66% similar
All 46 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

FBI Google Keene N.D. Wikipedia

Subjects

Keene PERSON · 13× Google ORG · 10× Wikipedia ORG · 3× FBI ORG · 2× Jimmy Keene PERSON · 2× LLM ORG · 2× Google LLC ORG · 1× Ill. GPE · 1× N.D. GPE · 1× Thomas Durkin PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Keene further alleges that Google repeatedly acknowledged and apologized for the false AI Overviews appearing on its platform, thereby admitting awareness of their existence, yet continued to permit their publication with actual knowledge of their falsity or at minimum reckless disregard for their truth.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
🔮 Keene alleged that, from May 24 to June 27, 2025, at least four Google "AI Overviews" said false things about him: - Keene was "serving a life sentence without parole for multiple convictions." - He was "serving a life sentence without parole for the murders of three women." - He "was convicted of drug trafficking."
2026-09-14 · Reason
Federal Court Allows Libel-by-AI Claim (Brought by Protagonist of Apple TV's Black Bird Series) to Go Forward · mixed framing

Claims (58 extracted, 13 hedged)

In 1997, he pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute drugs and was sentenced to ten years in prison. asserted
he → plead → prison
In exchange for a pardon, Keene agreed to work with the FBI as a prison informant to help gather evidence against suspected serial killer Larry Hall. asserted
Keene → agree → Hall
Hall was ultimately convicted, and Keene's conviction was expunged. asserted
conviction → convict → ?
Keene published a memoir recounting this experience that was subsequently adapted into an Apple TV miniseries titled "Black Bird." asserted
that → publish → miniseries
Keene alleged that, from May 24 to June 27, 2025, at least four Google "AI Overviews" said false things about him: - Keene was "serving a life sentence without parole for multiple convictions." - He was "serving a life sentence without parole for the murders of three women." - He "was convicted of drug trafficking." uncertain
He → allege → trafficking
- He was "serving a life sentence without parole in Butner, North Carolina." asserted
He → serve → Butner
Each AI Overview cited a Wikipedia page as the source of the information and provided a link to that page. asserted
Overview → cite → page
However, the Wikipedia page did not contain the false statements in the AI Overviews. asserted
page → contain → Overviews
AI Overviews 1 and 2 were seen by various family members, friends, and acquaintances. asserted
Overviews → see → members
Keene complained to Google about the false statements on three occasions: May 27, 2025, May 31, 2025, and after June 27, 2025. uncertain
Keene → complain → June
Google allegedly apologized to Keene after each complaint and deemed the statements errors made by its Artificial Intelligence. uncertain
statements → apologize → Intelligence
Keene sued, and the court allowed the case to go forward as to AI Overviews 1, 2, and 4 (with one minor procedural twist as to AI Overview 4 that I'll mention below). asserted
I → sue → that
The court held that Keene had sufficiently alleged that an ordinary reader would have understood the statements as factual assertions: asserted
reader → hold → assertions
First, Google argues that its standard disclaimer indicates that AI Overviews are merely "starting points" using rapidly evolving technology and not statements of fact. asserted
Overviews → argue → fact
According to Google, a disclaimer appears along with all AI Overviews warning that AI Overviews "may include mistakes." uncertain
Overviews → accord → mistakes
However, the disclaimer Google references is not identified in the Complaint nor included in the attached exhibits. asserted
Google → reference → exhibits
Indeed, Keene maintains that additional "test" Google searches conducted by his counsel did not include any such disclaimer. asserted
searches → maintain → disclaimer
Whether or not a disclaimer was present is a factual dispute not to be determined at this stage. asserted
was → determine → stage
In ruling on a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all well-pleaded facts as true and draw all reasonable inferences in Keene's favor. asserted
Court → rule → favor
Therefore, the Court's analysis proceeds without consideration of an alleged disclaimer. asserted
analysis → proceed → disclaimer
Second, Google argues that users could easily verify that the AI Overviews contain false information based on the linked Wikipedia article or other search results. uncertain
Overviews → argue → article
But Google's cited cases do not support that merely linking to a source with correct information vitiates defamation…. asserted
linking → cite → defamation
Google also cites Walters v. Openai, L.L.C. (Ga. Super. 2025), in which a journalist asked ChatGPT, an AI large language model ("LLM"), to summarize a legal document. asserted
journalist → cite → document
The journalist intentionally sought out an LLM, had prior experiences when the LLM provided him "flat-out fictional responses," assented to an acknowledgement that responses may include "incorrect Output," reviewed multiple disclaimers regarding the potential for information that could be "misleading" or "inaccurate," and received responses stating that the LLM could not provide the desired information. uncertain
LLM → seek → information
The court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant in part because a reasonable reader in the journalist's position "could not have concluded that the challenged ChatGPT output communicated 'actual facts.' uncertain
output → grant → facts
From the perspective of an ordinary user, asking an AI LLM to generate work product and receiving numerous indicia of falsity is different from a basic Google search. asserted
asking → ask → search
In Google's own words, a Google search is meant to "connect a user most efficiently to relevant and reliable information." asserted
search → mean → information
Although Google has now developed its own built-in AI LLM to "enhance" a search by summarizing information, an ordinary user searching "Jimmy Keene net worth" on Google is seeking factual information, not AI work product. asserted
user → develop → information
Only after a user read the linked Wikipedia article would any contradiction become apparent, but without reason to question the AI Overviews, many ordinary users would not conduct that further research. asserted
users → read → research
Google asserts that AI Overviews are just the "starting point" for users to "dig deeper." asserted
users → assert → ?
To the contrary, factual statements with citations to outside sources provide contextual support that the AI Overviews are summarizing objectively verifiable facts contained therein and additional research is not required. " asserted
research → provide → facts
If it is plain that the speaker is expressing a subjective view, an interpretation, a theory, conjecture, or surmise, rather than claiming to be in possession of objectively verifiable facts, the statement is not actionable." asserted
statement → express → facts
By pointing out that the statements in the AI Overviews are objectively verifiable, Google concedes the very point it is arguing against—the statements are facts…. asserted
statements → point → point
Keene didn't dispute that he was "a limited public figure regarding commentary on his own life's story," which meant that he had to adequately allege "actual malice," which is to say knowing or reckless disregard of falsity. asserted
which → dispute → falsity
But the court said this requirement was satisfied: asserted
requirement → say → ?
Probative evidence of recklessness includes a publisher's knowledge of serious factual inconsistencies, as well as the failure to investigate or independently verify disputed or questionable factual assertions. asserted
evidence → include → assertions
Keene contends that he has sufficiently pled actual malice because he directly notified Google on three occasions that it was publishing false information about him. asserted
it → contend → him
Despite this notice, Google continued to publish similar defamatory statements through at least late June 2025. asserted
Google → continue → June
Keene further alleges that Google repeatedly acknowledged and apologized for the false AI Overviews appearing on its platform, thereby admitting awareness of their existence, yet continued to permit their publication with actual knowledge of their falsity or at minimum reckless disregard for their truth. asserted
Overviews → allege → truth
Google argues that Keene has not adequately pled actual malice because Keene's allegations are conclusory and he does not allege that he informed the individuals at Google responsible for publishing the AI Overviews about their alleged falsity. asserted
he → argue → falsity
…and 18 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support
Terms · Privacy · beta v2.0.0
Articles to 14 Sep 2026