Prosecution for Forging Court Order, Purportedly from Chief Justice Roberts

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, August 28). Prosecution for Forging Court Order, Purportedly from Chief Justice Roberts. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/08/27/prosecution-for-forging-court-order-purportedly-from-chief-justice-roberts/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-08-28 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

A law professor named Culver is facing prosecution for allegedly forging a court order attributed to Chief Justice Roberts, as well as impersonating several other high-ranking officials. According to reports from Bloomberg News, the forged document was filed in a court case. The article does not provide specific details on when or where this incident occurred.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In April 2023, Bloomberg News reported that Jordan Culver, accused of forging a court order purportedly from Chief Justice John Roberts to obtain classified information, also impersonated an NSA agent, a Supreme Court Special Master, and "the Director of Tailored Access Operations ('TAO')", which is not recognized as an actual NSA division. The forged documents were filed in a docket, attempting to gain access to sensitive materials related to a case involving surveillance activities by the National Security Agency (NSA). This incident highlights concerns over the security and integrity of legal proceedings and classified information handling within U.S. courts.

Written for “Forgery Case Against Chief Justice” on 2026-10-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Forgery Case Against Chief Justice
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 13% hedged 10 of 75 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles mention different legal cases and events involving protests and court orders, with no clear connection between them.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
3
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 3 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
94/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 43 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
145 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 [Under Pennsylvania precedent,] [A] court may prohibit a parent from advocating religious beliefs, which, if acted upon, would constitute a crime.
🔮 Even in First Amendment cases, where the facial-challenge bar is lower than it otherwise might be, the plaintiff [in a facial challenge] must show that "a substantial number of [the law's] applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep."
🔮 Officers who violate the law may be criminally prosecuted by the State.
🔮 The standard for the granting of Pseudonym status can be found in Practice Book § 11–20A(h)(1) which provides in pertinent part: "Pseudonyms may be used in place of the name of a party or parties only with the prior approval of the judicial authority and only if the judicial authority concludes that such order is necessary to preserve an interest which is determined to override the public's interest in knowing the name of the party or parties.
🔮 It would hold up only if websites have an inherent expressive value that differs from the expressive value inherent in all books.
🔮 While any one of FirstBank's services to Epstein may be claimed to be "routine" (though in many instances even that is suspicious), together, the complaint alleges that FirstBank was deeply enmeshed in Epstein's misconduct for its own financial benefit….
🔮 We hold that some predicate crimes (like Bost's conviction for terroristic threats) demonstrate a prima facie risk of physical violence from misusing guns and that those convicted of such crimes may presumptively be disarmed based on those convictions alone….
🔮 However, when it came to Pride events, the newsroom was deviating from its typical editorial review process, and many reporters were beginning to go cover stories about Pride festivals as soon as they heard that the event was taking place—without discussing with the rest of the newsroom whether the story ought to be covered, whether it was duplicative of another story that had recently aired, or whether some unique aspect of the story could be explored in a way that highlighted the story's overall newsworthiness.
🔮 The Court will grant that motion as well, finding that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed not only on their due process claim, but also on their two First Amendment claims.
🔮 But if you submit exclusively to us before that, we will give you an answer within 14 days; and then if you'd like to have it published quickly, we can publish it in within a few months, if it's sufficiently clean and cite-checked by your research assistant.
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-10-16 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 145 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Bloomberg News NSA Supreme Court

Subjects

Bloomberg News ORG · 1× Culver PERSON · 1× Jordan Fischer PERSON · 1× NSA ORG · 1× Supreme Court ORG · 1× Volokh PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Culver is also accused of impersonating an NSA agent, a Supreme Court Special Master, and "the Director of Tailored Access Operations ('TAO'), a purported intelligence agency."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-28

Claims (3 extracted, 0 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent Bloomberg News (Jordan Fischer) seems to have broken the story. asserted
News → seem → story
Culver is also accused of impersonating an NSA agent, a Supreme Court Special Master, and "the Director of Tailored Access Operations ('TAO'), a purported intelligence agency." asserted
Culver → accuse → Operations
Here are the docket entries that apparently reflect the filing of the purported Chief Justice order: asserted
that → reflect → order
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support