Adam Pankratz: David Eby’s addiction to giving away public land in secret

Read the original at National Post ↗
Cite

Sarkonak, J. (2026, October 17). Adam Pankratz: David Eby’s addiction to giving away public land in secret. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/adam-pankratz-david-ebys-addiction-to-giving-away-public-land-in-secret

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

National Post · collected 2026-10-17 · by Jamie Sarkonak analysis

Quick Summary

Adam Pankratz criticizes B.C. Premier David Eby for secretly planning to give away 400 parcels of public land to First Nations without any public input or consultation. Documents reveal that two weeks before the province’s snap election, the government committed to altering the Forest Act but did not disclose this change to the public, requiring those who saw the documents to sign non-disclosure agreements. Pankratz argues that Eby's pattern of secrecy and deceit regarding land deals is undemocratic and undermines public trust in governance.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 17, 2026, BC NDP Premier David Eby is defending his government's actions after reports emerged about a secret plan to transfer 400 parcels of Crown land to First Nations without public consultation. Documents obtained by Northern Beat reveal the NDP was also planning to change the Forest Act two weeks before calling B.C.’s snap election, limiting how much forestry companies could be compensated for tenure loss on those lands. Critics like Conservative candidate Scott McInnis argue that such secrecy is disturbing and lacks transparency. Eby’s government claims the transfers reflect existing treaties and are aimed at reducing costs for taxpayers while advancing reconciliation efforts mandated by DRIPA (Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act). However, this lack of public disclosure has raised concerns among voters about potential conflicts and misuse of power regarding provincial land management.

Written for “BC NDP Land Deal Controversy” on 2026-10-18, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 BC NDP Land Deal Controversy
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Global News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 30 📰 publisher trust 63
“Both articles discuss the same secret land deal involving BC NDP government negotiations to transfer Crown land to First Nations, based on confidential documents obtained by Northern Beat.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
2 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

National Post · 971 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jamie Sarkonak
21 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Barely two weeks before America’s crucial midterm elections, Black voters could very well emerge as the unanticipated kingmakers in key state races nationwide.
🔮 They also show that two weeks prior to the calling of B.C.’s snap election, the government committed to changing the province’s Forest Act to limit how much forestry companies could be compensated for tenure loss.
🔮 His lagging poll numbers may as well have been written on his face.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · Amy Hamm: David Eby’s failure of an election debate
🔮 You’d think a municipal ward with the name “Toronto Centre” would be the last electoral district to turn its back on a left-wing incumbent.
🔮 He said he couldn’t comprehend a situation where you would choke a woman and ask her if it was that bad.
🔮 “I should have understood that supporting people who come forward about sexual violence does not require, and cannot justify, acting in ways that may lead others to conclude that unproven allegations are true or failing to give the person accused a fair opportunity to be heard and considered.”
🔮 No one is questioning historical inquiry, but using public money to draw a line from “colonial land policies” to today’s private landowners and business operators amounts to a political campaign that will have consequences.
🔮 Which, if you think about it, might as well strike out the entire Criminal Code.
🔮 If passed, the bill would make numerous changes to federal laws that determine whether or not infrastructure gets built.
🔮 Altogether, the judge found that the woman’s moral culpability was reduced to the point of deserving a “culturally grounded, rehabilitative disposition rather than a lengthy penitentiary term that would only deepen the dislocation of a young Māori mother far from her child and her community.”
Also by Jamie Sarkonak
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 21 articles by Jamie Sarkonak →

Topics

B.C. Crown Eby First Nations NDP

Subjects

B.C. ORG · 8× Eby PERSON · 7× First Nations NORP · 5× NDP ORG · 3× Crown ORG · 2× David Eby PERSON · 2× Haida NORP · 2× British Columbia GPE · 1× Rob Shaw PERSON · 1× the Northern Beat ORG · 1×

Narrative

Given that it’s committed to the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA), which aims to align provincial law with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), B.C. residents should be seriously concerned about what else the government is doing with public land.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-17
🔮 They also show that two weeks prior to the calling of B.C.’s snap election, the government committed to changing the province’s Forest Act to limit how much forestry companies could be compensated for tenure loss.
2026-10-17 · National Post
Adam Pankratz: David Eby’s addiction to giving away public land in secret · assertive framing

Claims (30 extracted, 2 hedged)

For governments, it is said that what ultimately brings you down isn’t the scandal, it’s the cover-up. asserted
it → say → you
Voters and the public can forgive a mistake, but the real killer is secrecy or the perception that the government is purposefully keeping information hidden when it is finally and inevitably revealed. asserted
it → forgive → information
It is in this light that we must see Thursday’s revelation that B.C. Premier David Eby’s government is once again planning secret Crown land giveaways to First Nations with no public input or consultation. asserted
government → see → input
Documents obtained by the Northern Beat and veteran political reporter Rob Shaw expose a plan to hand over 400 parcels of public land to First Nations. asserted
Documents → obtain → Nations
They also show that two weeks prior to the calling of B.C.’s snap election, the government committed to changing the province’s Forest Act to limit how much forestry companies could be compensated for tenure loss. uncertain
companies → show → loss
The public was completely in the dark about this, and anyone who saw the documents had to sign non-disclosure agreements to keep the information quiet during the election. asserted
who → see → election
It is another outrageous abuse of power in dealing with public land by Eby’s government. asserted
It → deal → government
Whether you ultimately believe that this is sound policy or not is really beside the point; the salient matter is that in its First Nations land dealings, the only consistent pattern to emerge from Eby’s NDP government is one of deceit, cover-up and obfuscation. asserted
pattern → believe → deceit
The pattern on land deals is now well established. asserted
pattern → establish → deals
In 2024, Eby’s government was caught red-handed trying to secretly amend B.C.’s Land Act, which is the main piece of legislation governing the administration, use and disposition of Crown land in British Columbia. asserted
which → catch → Columbia
The secret proposed changes would have allowed the government to grant shared decision-making authority over B.C. public lands to the province’s First Nations. asserted
government → propose → Nations
That is a profoundly undemocratic move and, when found out, Eby ultimately scrapped the Land Act amendments due to public pressure. asserted
Eby → find → pressure
He did not give up, however and then proceeded by much more surreptitious means. asserted
He → give → means
In early 2025, a few months after B.C.’s 2024 general election, it came to light that prior to the election, the Eby government had agreed to a land transfer with the Shíshálh Nation. asserted
government → come → Nation
The deal, which transferred $104 million and six square kilometres of public land to the nation, was so secret that even the local NDP candidate Randene Neill was unaware of it. asserted
candidate → transfer → it
Neill would go on to become B.C.’s minister for water, land and resource stewardship, a role in which dealing with First Nations is of paramount importance. asserted
dealing → go → importance
Later in 2025, the Eby government reached a deal with the Haida which recognized Aboriginal title to the entirety of the Haida Gwaii archipelago. asserted
which → reach → archipelago
The only way the public found out about that deal was because the Haida announced it on their website. asserted
Haida → find → website
David Eby and his government never informed the public until forced to admit the deal was done and later blamed an internal communications error. asserted
deal → inform → error
The truth is that when it comes to any dealings with B.C. First Nations, the NDP government has proven over and over that it simply cannot be taken at its word. asserted
it → come → word
Given that it’s committed to the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA), which aims to align provincial law with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), B.C. residents should be seriously concerned about what else the government is doing with public land. asserted
government → give → land
This land belongs to all British Columbians, but Eby clearly doesn’t see it that way. asserted
it → belong → Columbians
Article 26, for example, states that, “Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired. asserted
they → state → which
That is to say, if an Indigenous group claims a territory, they own it and all its resources. uncertain
they → say → it
This is the driving mentality behind the most recent land giveaways, which strip B.C. forestry companies of their rights and limit government compensation for the rug pull. asserted
which → drive → pull
Perhaps the saddest part of all this is that while the blame for the never-ending secrecy and obfuscation lies squarely with Eby and his government, some of the public anger will inevitably be directed at First Nations. asserted
some → end → Nations
The lack of transparency serves neither the public nor the First Nations whom Eby would tell you he’s acting in partnership with. asserted
he → serve → partnership
Last night at the B.C. election debate, Eby attacked Conservative leader Lorne Doerkson for his plan to repeal DRIPA if elected. asserted
Eby → attack → DRIPA
The latest secret deal that has come to light makes it clear that if anything, Doerkson didn’t push the issue hard enough. asserted
Doerkson → come → issue
British Columbians must wonder what else in their province is being signed away without their input or knowledge. asserted
what → wonder → input
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support