Jamie Sarkonak: ‘It got insane,’ Galloway recounts years living in Kafkaesque nightmare

Read the original at National Post ↗
National Post · collected 2026-10-08 · by Jamie Sarkonak analysis

Quick Summary

Steven Galloway, a former UBC professor and author, is currently testifying in his defamation trial, denying sexual assault allegations made by his former paramour, identified only as A.B., due to a publication ban. In court on Wednesday, Galloway stated that the alleged incident where he choked A.B. on his boat never occurred, arguing it was physically impossible and contradicted their history of consensual affairs from 2011 to 2013. The retired judge who investigated these allegations in 2016 found them unsubstantiated based on a balance of probabilities. Galloway’s lawyer is permitted to present his version of events despite A.B.’s decision not to argue the truthfulness of her claims during this defamation trial.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-08, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Steven Galloway, a bestselling Canadian author and former University of British Columbia (UBC) professor, is testifying in a defamation trial against four defendants who he claims falsely accused him of sexual assault. On day one, Katie Wagner, his wife, testified that upon learning about the accusations in late 2015 while at an event in Ohio, Galloway was hospitalized on a 72-hour suicide watch due to severe distress. In court testimony, Galloway acknowledged having a two-year affair with student "A.B." but said he believed their relationship ended amicably and expressed shock when she filed a sexual harassment complaint nearly three years later. He stated the allegations were "absolutely" false and that he only learned of specific details after his suspension from UBC in November 2015, which led to significant public backlash affecting his career and reputation.

Written for “Galloway Defamation Trial” on 2026-10-08, grounded in this article and the 4 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 65263 · logged 2026-10-08

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
60
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
7%
4 of 60 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Correction & hedging signals
59.8
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
5
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-10-08 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Galloway Defamation Trial
Politics · 5 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 33 📰 publisher trust 51
“Both articles describe Steven Galloway's testimony in court on the same day regarding the defamation case involving sexual assault allegations.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 63
“Article A discusses a court decision granting anonymity to a defendant in Steven Galloway's defamation case, while Article B focuses on Galloway's testimony during his trial regarding the alleged sexual assaults.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 17% hedged 5 of 30 📰 publisher trust 51
“While both articles are related to Steven Galloway's defamation trial, they describe different aspects of the proceedings: one focuses on a former defendant's apology before the trial starts, while the other covers Galloway's testimony during the trial.”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 26 📰 publisher trust 77
“While both articles discuss Steven Galloway's testimony in a defamation trial related to sexual assault allegations, they describe different aspects of his testimony and do not appear to cover the exact same specific incident.”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 27 📰 publisher trust 77
“Article A describes testimony from Day 1 of Steven Galloway's defamation trial by his wife, while Article B reports on Galloway's own testimony on a different day recounting the alleged events.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 63
“Article A discusses an apology from one of Galloway's accusers before a defamation trial starts, while Article B covers testimony during the defamation trial itself.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10 📰 publisher trust 51
“The articles refer to different parts of the defamation trial; Article A is about the accuser's decision not to testify at the start of the trial, while Article B reports on Galloway's testimony later in the same trial.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 27 📰 publisher trust 51
“The articles describe different days of testimony in the same trial but cover distinct statements and events.”

Publisher

National Post · 750 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-29
Chris Selley: If we’d prefer drug-free prisons to ‘safe snorting,’ we need a system rethink
2026-09-27
Corrections Canada to distribute items for ‘safe snorting’ in federal prisons

Who wrote this

Jamie Sarkonak
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 He said he couldn’t comprehend a situation where you would choke a woman and ask her if it was that bad.
🔮 “I should have understood that supporting people who come forward about sexual violence does not require, and cannot justify, acting in ways that may lead others to conclude that unproven allegations are true or failing to give the person accused a fair opportunity to be heard and considered.”
🔮 No one is questioning historical inquiry, but using public money to draw a line from “colonial land policies” to today’s private landowners and business operators amounts to a political campaign that will have consequences.
🔮 Which, if you think about it, might as well strike out the entire Criminal Code.
🔮 If passed, the bill would make numerous changes to federal laws that determine whether or not infrastructure gets built.
🔮 Altogether, the judge found that the woman’s moral culpability was reduced to the point of deserving a “culturally grounded, rehabilitative disposition rather than a lengthy penitentiary term that would only deepen the dislocation of a young Māori mother far from her child and her community.”
🔮 I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000.”
🔮 “What we are looking and will begin discussion for is a unique alliance with the European Union, between Canada and the European Union.”
🔮 The impact was so brutal that Desjardins couldn’t survive her injuries; Nepoose, however, lived.
🔮 For political observers, the Toronto mayoral election has been going on for months.
Also by Jamie Sarkonak
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Jamie Sarkonak →

Topics

A.B. Canada UBC the B.C. Supreme Court

Subjects

Galloway PERSON · 15× A.B. PERSON · 8× Canada GPE · 1× Neela Sharma PERSON · 1× Steven Galloway PERSON · 1× UBC ORG · 1× the B.C. Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

In 2016, when a “tsunami of vitriol and hatred” engulfed the signatories of an open letter urging that Galloway be treated fairly, he released an apology through counsel for his conduct despite the retired judge’s finding that he had not committed sexual assault.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-08
🔮 He said he couldn’t comprehend a situation where you would choke a woman and ask her if it was that bad.

Claims (60 extracted, 4 hedged)

On Wednesday, author and former UBC professor Steven Galloway testified in court at his defamation trial that none of the sexual assaults alleged against him by his former paramour ever happened. asserted
none → testify → paramour
That woman, who can only be identified as A.B. due to a publication ban, told the retired judge tasked with investigating Galloway back in 2016 that the first sexual assault happened on his boat. asserted
assault → identify → boat
A.B. claimed that they were chatting and playing cards when Galloway suddenly tried to kiss her, and when she leaned away, he grabbed her neck tightly to the point where it was difficult to breathe, kissed her, and said, “That wasn’t so bad, was it?” asserted
it → claim → her
Recommended Videos Then, went the allegation, he grabbed her and threw her in the bunk space above; she somehow got down, disembarked, and, though she had no memory of it, ended up at her home. asserted
she → go → home
“That never happened,” Galloway told the B.C. Supreme Court. asserted
Galloway → happen → Court
“It’s hard to know how to dismantle (the allegation) because the entire story is fictional.” asserted
story → ’ → allegation
He said he couldn’t comprehend a situation where you would choke a woman and ask her if it was that bad. asserted
it → say → her
The story also didn’t make sense given the size and configuration of the boat’s bunk. asserted
story → make → bunk
“The idea that I could physically lift her up and throw her into such a space without causing major injury to a person is … just not possible,” he testified. uncertain
he → lift → person
Galloway and A.B. had a consensual affair from 2011 to 2013. asserted
Galloway → have → 2013
A.B. first accused him of sexual assault to the university in July 2013, but it wasn’t until 2015 that he — and the rest of Canada — became aware that such allegations existed. asserted
allegations → accuse → Canada
In a matter of days, Galloway’s career was destroyed. asserted
career → destroy → days
In 2018, Galloway filed a lawsuit against numerous defendants who repeated A.B.’s claims, as well as A.B. herself. uncertain
who → file → claims
Most defendants settled before the trial, which began Monday. asserted
which → settle → trial
In court, Galloway said that he hadn’t taken the boat out at all in March 2011, but there were instances where he and A.B. would use it, sometimes at her initiation. asserted
he → say → initiation
She would remark to him that it was a beautiful day to go sailing. asserted
it → remark → sailing
Galloway recalled that she had even asked to go sailing with him because, she told him, her husband’s violent brother was in town and she wanted a safe space. asserted
she → recall → space
The retired judge who investigated A.B.’s allegations in 2016 found that they were unsubstantiated, and that the sexual assault did not occur, based on a balance of probabilities. asserted
assault → investigate → probabilities
Now, A.B. will not be testifying to their truth at the ongoing defamation trial, nor will her lawyers be arguing the defence of truth. asserted
lawyers → testify → truth
It was on this basis that A.B.’s lawyer objected to Galloway’s testimony about his boat. asserted
lawyer → object → boat
The lawyer argued that because A.B. wasn’t going to argue that her allegations were true, and because the allegations made during the independent investigation weren’t the specific subject of the lawsuit, Galloway’s version of events was irrelevant to the court. asserted
version → argue → court
Justice Neela Sharma ruled against the objection and gave several reasons why A.B.’s lawyer was wrong in law. asserted
lawyer → rule → law
Galloway was thus free to speak to the second allegation against him, which arose from an end-of-semester party for the department that also occurred in March 2011. asserted
that → speak → March
A.B. claimed that Galloway had offered to drive her home, but they ended up at his office where she purportedly woke up, naked, to him attempting to force himself upon her. asserted
him → claim → her
“None of that happened,” Galloway testified in response. asserted
Galloway → happen → response
While he did recall having intercourse with her that night, there was no scene where she woke up on her back naked to an attempted sexual assault. asserted
she → recall → assault
On Tuesday, he testified that their relationship was entirely consensual and that she routinely sought him out for contact. asserted
she → testify → contact
Regarding the third sexual assault allegation, which was said to have occurred on May 5, 2011, Galloway testified that it was “entirely false.” uncertain
it → regard → May
Once again, A.B. claimed that she woke up naked in Galloway’s office — but this time, there was semen coming out of her vagina and her assailant was at his computer watching hockey. asserted
assailant → claim → hockey
Galloway told the court that “This is not a situation where there were two people in a room, and there was a disagreement about what happened” — rather, he was not in the room to begin with. asserted
he → tell → room
He was at Koerner’s Pub watching the Canucks game with a friend, and afterward attended a reading by another author who was visiting campus. asserted
who → watch → campus
As proof, Galloway’s lawyer presented the court with a text message chain starting at 6:41 p.m. (11 minutes after the game’s start time), in which Galloway’s friend wrote, “We are watching game at koerners if you’re early.” asserted
you → present → koerners
Galloway asked the friend to order him a burger and said he’d be there in 20 minutes. asserted
he → ask → minutes
Galloway added that he couldn’t stream games in his office in 2011. asserted
he → add → 2011
The rest of Galloway’s Wednesday testimony painted a picture of a Kafkaesque maze through university procedure and beyond. asserted
rest → paint → procedure
When it came to his initial suspension, it was “verdict first, trial second.” asserted
it → come → suspension
When the retired judge began her investigation into the allegations, in 2015 Galloway had to sign a confidentiality agreement: asserted
Galloway → retire → agreement
“I could agree to these terms of this investigation, or I could be terminated,” he said. uncertain
he → agree → investigation
He would be terminated anyway. asserted
He → terminate → ?
Throughout the investigation, his accuser’s name was omitted. asserted
name → omit → investigation
…and 20 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support