Judge Sutton on "The Three Faces of American Constitutional Law"

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Adler, J. H. (2026, September 13). Judge Sutton on "The Three Faces of American Constitutional Law". Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/12/judge-sutton-on-the-three-faces-of-american-constitutional-law/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-13 · by Jonathan H. Adler

Quick Summary

Jeffrey Sutton, Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, gave the annual Sumner Canary Memorial Lecture at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, focusing on the role of state constitutional law in influencing federal constitutional law. He also discussed the Supreme Court's handling of cases related to President Trump's policies during his most recent term, noting that despite losing several times, it indicated independence from political influence rather than pure partisanship.
Written by AI on 2026-09-13, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Wednesday, Jeffrey Sutton, Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, gave the annual Sumner Canary Memorial Lecture at Case Western Reserve University School of Law in Cleveland, Ohio. The lecture titled "The Three Faces of American Constitutional Law" highlighted state constitutional law's influence on federal constitutional law and discussed the Supreme Court's decisions during Donald Trump’s presidency. Sutton noted that despite a conservative majority on the court, the administration lost several significant cases. He expressed pride in his profession due to this outcome, suggesting the court's independence from presidential directives, even under Republican control.

Written for “Constitutional Law Debate” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Constitutional Law Debate
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-13 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 984 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jonathan H. Adler
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The winner will receive an award plaque and be recognized at the section's program at the AALS annual meeting in January 2027.
🔮 Contributions to the symposium are: - Elizabeth Corey, Fusion: Power Is Not the Last Word; - Richard Morrison, What Fusion Will We Build; - Paul Mueller, Recovering Fusionism; - Veronique de Rugy, Fusionism and the Moral Prerequisites of Citizenship; - Paul Seaton, The Bifurcated Fusionist Regime. For more on the book, and why Fusionism remains relevant today, you can also check out this interview with Slade by James Patterson on Law & Liberty.
2026-10-11 · assertive framing · Fusionism in the Twenty-First Century
🔮 It seems to suggest that the claims made by the petitioners (and their allies) about the potentially catastrophic effects on the oil and gas industry of an adverse ruling in Suncor may have convinced Justice Alito that he needed to recuse, even though he does not own stock in any of the companies that are part of the case.
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent This morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, in which fossil fuel energy companies are asking the Supreme Court to conclude that all state-law-based tort suits over damages allegedly caused by climate change are preempted.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · Unpacking the Suncor Oral Argument
🔮 That may seem a contradiction: The justice often publicly portrayed as unyielding and inflexible is, behind the scenes, the conservative who is uniquely adept at finding common ground on the most divisive issues.
🔮 On Monday the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Suncor Energy v. Boulder County.
🔮 Greg Stohr of Bloomberg reports on an interview with Justice Alito explaining the justice's last-minute decision to recuse in Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, the major climate change preemption case the Supreme Court will hear on Monday.
🔮 In 2025, after twenty-five years at Case Western Reserve University, I moved to William & Mary.
🔮 One week from today, the Supreme Court will open its term with oral argument in Suncor Energy v. Boulder County.
2026-09-28 · mixed framing · As Suncor Approaches, Justice Alito Recuses
🔮 Zycher's claim here that "in the context of Section 202(a), 'cause or contribute significantly' is replaced with 'reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare'" is simply wrong, as a moment's review of the relevant statutory text would have demonstrated.
Also by Jonathan H. Adler
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Jonathan H. Adler →

Topics

Republican the Case Western Reserve University School of Law the Sixth Circuit the Supreme Court's the U.S. Court of Appeals

Subjects

Sutton PERSON · 5× Republican NORP · 3× Canary PERSON · 2× Jeffrey Sutton PERSON · 1× The Volokh PERSON · 1× Trump Administration ORG · 1× the Case Western Reserve University School of Law ORG · 1× the Sixth Circuit ORG · 1× the Supreme Court's ORG · 1× the U.S. Court of Appeals ORG · 1×

Narrative

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent This past Wednesday, Jeffrey Sutton, Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, delivered the annual Sumner Canary Memorial Lecture at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law on "The Three Faces of American Constitutional Law."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-13
🔮 It "makes me proud to be a lawyer and proud to be a judge," Sutton said, because he can "guarantee" the administration would've won the cases it lost if those matters were put to the Republican-controlled Congress.
2026-09-13 · Reason
Judge Sutton on "The Three Faces of American Constitutional Law" · assertive framing

Claims (14 extracted, 0 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent This past Wednesday, Jeffrey Sutton, Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, delivered the annual Sumner Canary Memorial Lecture at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law on "The Three Faces of American Constitutional Law." asserted
Sutton → deliver → Law
The lecture drew upon some of Judge Sutton's scholarship and writing on the significance of state constitutional law, and how that can influence federal constitutional law. asserted
that → draw → law
During his remarks, Judge Sutton also discussed the Supreme Court's most recent term, and its handling of challenges to Trump Administration policies. asserted
Sutton → discuss → policies
This portion of his remarks were covered by Bloomberg: asserted
portion → cover → Bloomberg
The US Supreme Court's record on cases involving Donald Trump shows the conservative supermajority isn't in lockstep with the Republican president, the Sixth Circuit's outgoing chief judge said. asserted
judge → involve → president
Sutton . . . called the court's last term "so remarkable" in the face of a president exercising a "fairly aggressive" amount of power. asserted
Sutton → call → power
He noted the administration lost several times at the court. asserted
administration → note → court
It "makes me proud to be a lawyer and proud to be a judge," Sutton said, because he can "guarantee" the administration would've won the cases it lost if those matters were put to the Republican-controlled Congress. asserted
matters → make → Congress
"The insight is, well, whatever these Republican appointees are doing, you can't call it pure politics, because if it was pure politics, they would act just like the Republican Congress," the judge said. asserted
judge → do → Congress
"There's something judges are doing, even in this moment where we're skeptical of the Supreme Court, skeptical of federal judges, maybe state judges. asserted
we → be → judges
They're still doing something that you have to call different from party and elected politics," Sutton added. asserted
Sutton → do → politics
As longtime readers know, I was a member of the CWRU law faculty for twenty-five years and, during much of that time (2008-2025), I curated the Canary lecture series. asserted
I → know → series
It is good to see the tradition continues. asserted
tradition → see → ?
Prior Canary lectures are indexed here. asserted
lectures → index → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support