‘Same, Lindsay’ isn’t empathy: The Clancy mistrial exposed our culture’s moral rot

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-12 · by Caroline Woods
Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗

Summary

This opinion piece critiques the public's reaction to Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial in Duxbury, Massachusetts, where she admitted to killing her three children in January 2023. The author argues that despite one juror upholding justice by not finding her insane, cultural trends have vilified the victims and placed undue sympathy on Clancy due to perceived mental health issues. The piece questions whether this compassion would extend to similar cases involving men or non-human animals and emphasizes that recognizing mental illness does not negate criminal responsibility.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-12, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
50
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
6%
3 of 50 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher trust
96.2
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
78
Crime & Law
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-12 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

The murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, 36, nears its conclusion after five weeks of proceedings at Plymouth Superior Court in Massachusetts. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented testimony from over 80 witnesses, including mental health professionals who debated Clancy’s state of mind when she killed her three young children—5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan—in January 2023.

Clancy pleaded not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, arguing that postpartum psychosis made her unable to understand the wrongfulness of her actions. However, FBI psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff testified against this claim, suggesting Clancy had control over her actions and did not act under auditory hallucinations. Closing arguments are scheduled for Thursday, with jurors set to deliberate on charges including first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, or a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity.

Outside the courtroom, hundreds of supporters, mostly women, have gathered in solidarity with Clancy, highlighting systemic failures in maternal health care and support systems.

Written for “Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial” on 2026-09-12, grounded in this article and the 77 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 8284: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-09-12

Story

📰 Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial
Crime & Law · 78 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 8% hedged 3 of 40 📰 publisher trust 58
“Both articles discuss Lindsay Clancy's mistrial due to a juror's holdout.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 40% hedged 14 of 35 📰 publisher trust 58
“The articles discuss different aspects of Lindsay Clancy's legal situation - Article A discusses leveraging a civil settlement from her criminal case, while Article B critiques societal reactions to her mistrial.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 27 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses the legal proceedings and aftermath of Lindsay Clancy's mistrial, while Article B offers a commentary on the cultural implications of the trial and the actions of the lone holdout juror.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 17% hedged 5 of 29 📰 publisher trust 60
“While both articles discuss the Lindsay Clancy mistrial, Article A focuses on jury members' statements about failing to reach a verdict, while Article B provides commentary and opinion on the cultural implications of the trial.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects of Lindsay Clancy's mistrial but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 3 of 22 📰 publisher trust 95
“While both articles discuss Lindsay Clancy's trial, Article A reports on her lawyer asking for a not guilty verdict following a mistrial, whereas Article B is an opinion piece discussing the moral implications of the lone juror who prevented acquittal.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 21 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles cover different aspects of the Lindsay Clancy trial; Article A discusses a defense attorney's response to criticism from Jonathan Turley, while Article B critiques media coverage and comments on the role of the lone holdout juror.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 31 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A describes a juror's reaction after the mistrial, while Article B provides an opinion piece about the trial and its cultural implications.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 12 📰 publisher trust 58
“Article A focuses on a juror's perspective of the trial and the reason for the hung jury, while Article B provides an opinionated commentary on the cultural implications of the mistrial.”

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 159 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Caroline Woods
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Would these same women be crying in solidarity with Clancy or demanding justice?
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Duxbury Massachusetts

Subjects

Clancy PERSON · 13× Lindsay PERSON · 3× Callan PERSON · 2× Cora PERSON · 2× Dawson PERSON · 2× Christina Riggs PERSON · 1× Duxbury GPE · 1× Lindsay Clancy’s PERSON · 1× Massachusetts GPE · 1× Timothy Jones Jr. PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Culture has made Clancy the victim instead of her children Somewhere along the way, Clancy’s children shifted from being the prime victims in this case to Clancy gaining the sole victim card. What hardly any of these mothers talk about are the actual victims: Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-12
🔮 Would these same women be crying in solidarity with Clancy or demanding justice?

Claims (50 extracted, 3 hedged)

Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial was thrust into the national spotlight after she took the lives of her three precious children in their Duxbury, Massachusetts home in January 2023. asserted
she → thrust → January
The only thing standing between Clancy — who admitted to killing her children — and an acquittal by reason of insanity was one lone juror, one person who represented what’s left of justice, common sense, a heart, and sanity in our culture. asserted
what → stand → culture
He held the line and represents what’s left of a just and moral society. asserted
what → hold → society
Three jurors have now gone on TV to talk about Clancy’s case, and one actually said the lone male holdout “had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.” asserted
Lindsay → go → children
Little do they know how much they’re helping the prosecution’s case. asserted
they → know → case
The fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children was not some inconvenient detail he needed to “get off.” asserted
he → kill → children
Digging into this murder trial has made my stomach churn. asserted
stomach → dig → trial
As a mother with children around the same ages as Clancy’s were when she allegedly murdered them, this case shakes me to my core. uncertain
case → murder → core
Culture has made Clancy the victim instead of her children Somewhere along the way, Clancy’s children shifted from being the prime victims in this case to Clancy gaining the sole victim card. What hardly any of these mothers talk about are the actual victims: Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. asserted
talk → make → mothers
Her children had to experience the very person who gave them life take it away in the very place they should have felt safest. asserted
they → have → place
What I believe lies at the root of this twisted support is a culture centered on self-absorption, where an adult’s pain and mental state erase the violent harm they have inflicted on others. asserted
they → believe → others
Compassion has become distorted when it is placed at Clancy’s feet rather than the children she strangled to death. asserted
she → become → death
What if a man had committed these killings? asserted
man → commit → killings
What if she strangled puppies instead of her own children? asserted
she → strangle → puppies
Would these same women be crying in solidarity with Clancy or demanding justice? asserted
women → cry → justice
The viral “Same, Lindsay” movement transformed Clancy from the woman who killed three children into a symbol of overwhelmed motherhood, while Cora, Dawson, and Callan were pushed to the margins. asserted
Cora → transform → margins
Even in my own social media circles, I’ve watched women rush to absolve Clancy of moral responsibility because of her mental health, but that’s not the same thing as being legally insane. asserted
that → watch → health
Five days before the killings, Clancy was Googling terms like “hallucinations” and “psychosis,” yet the doctors treating her before the killings did not observe psychosis. asserted
doctors → google → psychosis
If she was self-aware enough to Google those terms, why didn’t she tell her husband, doctor, nanny, or anyone else that she thought she was dangerous? asserted
she → google → husband
Timothy Jones Jr. claimed schizophrenia, brain injury, depression, and voices telling him his children would be better off in heaven. asserted
children → claim → heaven
His jury still rejected insanity and convicted him. asserted
jury → reject → him
Christina Riggs killed her two children and argued severe mental illness. asserted
Riggs → kill → illness
Her jury rejected that defense, too. asserted
jury → reject → defense
Those cases show that mental illness does not automatically erase criminal responsibility. asserted
illness → show → responsibility
Clancy also sent her husband out, checked the drive time, and killed the children while he was gone. asserted
he → send → children
Yet, 10 jurors were reportedly ready to find her not criminally responsible. uncertain
her → find → ?
That shows just how far gone our culture has become. asserted
culture → show → ?
We’ve confused compassion with exoneration and mental illness with insanity. asserted
We → confuse → insanity
Someone can be deeply mentally ill and still know right from wrong. asserted
Someone → know → wrong
The mistrial should not turn postpartum suffering into a blanket excuse for violence The insanity defense is not supposed to mean motherhood was unbearably hard. asserted
motherhood → turn → violence
Therefore, Clancy cannot be held responsible. asserted
Clancy → hold → ?
But that is essentially how droves of women online have distorted the case. asserted
droves → distort → case
Women have filmed themselves crying on bathroom floors beside wandering toddlers, screaming into cameras, throwing ice cubes, and declaring “same.” asserted
themselves → film → same
They are communicating something darker: motherhood is agonizing, we understand how you could reach this point and kill your children slowly and methodically. uncertain
you → communicate → children
There is an enormous moral difference between admitting motherhood can bring out the worst in you and publicly identifying with a woman who strangled all her children. asserted
who → be → children
There is something deeply morally warped about mothers publicly same-ing with an alleged mass murderer. asserted
mothers → be → murderer
Life has gotten too easy, our standards too posh, and now anything truly hard, including raising children, is treated as unbearable. asserted
anything → get → children
Women used to raise far larger families with a fraction of the conveniences we have today. asserted
we → use → conveniences
Even in the 1950s, women averaged well over three children without grocery delivery services, endless childcare products, or other modern labor-saving technology. asserted
women → average → services
Clancy had support from her husband and family, childcare help, financial means, extensive medical care, and time away from her job as a labor and delivery nurse. asserted
Clancy → have → nurse
…and 10 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support