Story summary
On September 3, 2026, the Missouri Supreme Court unanimously blocked new congressional districts backed by President Donald Trump from being used in the November election and ordered a statewide vote on whether to uphold or reject them. This decision came after opponents submitted over 300,000 petition signatures seeking a referendum against the map. Republican Secretary of State Denny Hoskins rejected this petition but lost his appeal at the state’s highest court. Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway immediately appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that the decision has put the state into a constitutional crisis.
Republicans had hoped these new boundaries would help them win an additional seat and maintain their slim majority in the House during the midterms. However, with less than two months before the November elections, this ruling plunges Missouri’s congressional map into uncertainty. Democrats argue that democracy prevails as more than 305,000 Missourians demanded a say on who represents them in Congress.
The conflicting rulings from different courts mean candidates who won primaries under the new map will now face the general election using the old district lines unless voters approve the new districts during November’s referendum. This decision could have significant implications for control of the closely divided U.S. House of Representatives, with legal experts and prediction markets suggesting it is more likely than not that this ruling will be upheld by the Supreme Court.
Written for “Missouri Congressional Map争议” on 2026-09-12,
grounded in this article and the 8 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but all 2 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph
rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 7996: attributed speech only · logged 2026-09-11
The US supreme court again rejected a push backed by Donald Trump to overhaul Missouri’s congressional maps in an effort to hand Republicans an edge in November’s midterm elections.
asserted
court → reject → elections
Its latest ruling, after days of confusion, comes less than two months before the pivotal midterm elections in which control of the narrowly divided US House of Representatives could be determined by a handful of seats.
uncertain
control → come → seats
Following conflicting decisions that spanned four courts, Wednesday’s ruling appeared to set the stage for the state to use its old electoral maps this year.
asserted
state → follow → maps
The end result does not completely end confusion for Missouri’s voters, who cast ballots in primary elections using the new map, butwill vote in November on the older map.
asserted
who → end → map
“The state, the election apparatus, had no business going forward with the primaries under that bill, under that circumstance,” said David F Walbert, a storied voting rights attorney in Georgia, who has argued voting rights cases before the US supreme court.
asserted
who → have → court
“The problem that we’re dealing with today is 100% the result of the state machinery that created this.”
asserted
that → deal → this
At the behest of the president, Missouri’s Republican-dominated legislature redrew district lines last year to net one additional seat for Republicans in the US House of Representatives.
asserted
legislature → dominate → Representatives
The new maps carve up a district representing Kansas City, long held by Emanuel Cleaver, a Democrat.
asserted
maps → carve → Cleaver
After Missouri’s governor, Mike Kehoe, signed new congressional district boundaries into law in September 2025, the legislation faced immediate challenges, including a push by People Not Politicians, a campaign group, which gathered more than 300,000 signatures to force a statewide referendum on whether to keep or repeal the new map.
asserted
which → sign → map
But Missouri’s secretary of state, Denny Hoskins, a Republican, sought to use the new map anyway.
asserted
secretary → seek → map
The Missouri supreme court certified the referendum for the ballot on 3 September over Hoskins’s objections, ruling the new district lines would not take effect until 2027 – after the referendum vote – and that the 2025 redistricting did not comply with the law.
asserted
redistricting → certify → law
The legal argument over redistricting pitted Missouri’s court, which is “not exactly full of foreigners that are some kind of wild liberals from California or New York”, Walbert said, against state leaders auditioning for the president’s attention.
asserted
Walbert → pit → attention
The court’s unanimous decision speaks to the clarity of state law on referendums.
asserted
decision → speak → referendums
The law “suspends completely the effective date of the law that has been subjected to the referendum”, Walbert said.
asserted
Walbert → suspend → referendum
The state attorney general, Catherine Hanaway, also a Republican, immediately appealed this decision.
asserted
general → appeal → decision
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who oversees emergency hearings from the eighth circuit, refused to stay the Missouri supreme court ruling on Tuesday.
asserted
who → oversee → Tuesday
But federal district judge Stephen Clark made a ruling only minutes later, in a separate federal case, requiring Hoskins to use the new Republican-friendly map – compounding confusion over November’s elections.
asserted
Clark → make → elections
Hoskins then said he would follow Clark’s order, and a federal appeals court panel declined to block that order.
asserted
panel → say → order
On Thursday morning, Kavanaugh again ordered the state to comply with the Missouri supreme court ruling, blocking the new maps.
asserted
Kavanaugh → order → maps
“Today’s decision ensures Missouri voters will not be forced to vote under a gerrymandered map pushed through by the state legislature last year and then cynically imposed on voters by the secretary of state, in violation of the state constitution,” said Mark Gaber, senior director of redistricting at Campaign Legal Center.
asserted
Gaber → ensure → Center
“Voters deserve to have their voices heard and to have fair representation in Congress.
asserted
voices → deserve → Congress
The Missouri supreme court unanimously affirmed that principle, and now, so has the US supreme court.”
asserted
court → affirm → principle
The Missouri supreme court meanwhile ruled on Thursday afternoon that Hoskins, the secretary of state, had been in contempt of court after continuing to use new maps that the judges had ruled invalid.
asserted
judges → rule → maps
But chief justice W Brent Powell also noted that Hoskins had purged himself of the contempt after declaring that the order by Kavanaugh had ended the controversy over which map to use in November elections, and would direct local election officials to use the 2022 map.
asserted
order → note → map
