Leader of Jewish Greens calls for Zack Polanski to resign

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
The Guardian · collected 2026-10-09 · by Peter Walker Senior political correspondent

Quick Summary

Vivien Lichtenstein, leader of the Jewish Greens, has demanded that Zack Polanski resign as Green Party leader due to his handling of recent controversial policies. The pressure on Polanski comes after he missed a vote at the party conference where new policies equating Zionism with racism and calling for Israel’s abolition were adopted. Lichtenstein criticizes Polanski's absence during the debate, suggesting he should have participated remotely, and questions his claims of working closely with Jewish members of the party.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-09, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The leader of the Jewish Greens, Vivien Lichtenstein, has demanded that Zack Polanski step down over a new policy adopted by the party at their recent conference. This policy equates Zionism with racism and calls for the abolition of the state of Israel, replacing it with a single Palestinian state. The pressure on Polanski to address the controversy within the Green Party intensified after Caroline Lucas, former leader and first MP of the Greens, criticized him for his absence during the debate and vote that led to the policy's approval.

Polanski was campaigning in the Holborn and St Pancras byelection at the time of the conference vote and ended up finishing second to Labour. He later claimed he would have voted against the motion if present but did not contest the decision made by the party members. The new policy further strained relations within the Green Party, with some members like Lichtenstein considering quitting over the divisive stance on Israel.

Written for “Jewish Greens Leadership Controversy” on 2026-10-09, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 2 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 68138: no verified evidence · logged 2026-10-09

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
0%
0 of 23 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
68.5
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-10-09 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Jewish Greens Leadership Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 13% hedged 4 of 31 📰 publisher trust 68
“The articles describe different stages of the same broader issue, but not the same specific incident: one is about Zack Polanski being banned from Israel after a conference vote, and the other is about internal pressure for him to resign over the same policy.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 6 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A describes the UK Green Party voting to define Zionism as racism, while Article B covers reactions and calls for resignation following that decision, indicating a different but related event.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 31 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A discusses Polanski's reaction to his electoral defeat, while Article B reports on calls for him to resign due to internal party issues. These are different but related events.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 31 📰 publisher trust 67
“The articles describe different aspects of a broader political situation involving Zack Polanski's leadership, with Article A focusing on his reaction to an electoral defeat and Article B reporting calls for him to resign due to a controversial policy.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 72
“The articles discuss different aspects of the same policy debate, but describe distinct incidents: one questioning Polanski's stance and another calling for his resignation.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 6 of 56 📰 publisher trust 64
“While both articles discuss the controversial 'Zionism is Racism' motion passed by the Greens, they describe different aspects of the ongoing situation: Article A reports on the vote and its immediate aftermath, while Article B covers a later reaction from within the party calling for Polanski's resignation.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 17 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A describes the actual voting on the 'Zionism is racism' motion, while Article B discusses reactions to the policy after it was passed, including calls for Polanski's resignation.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 9% hedged 2 of 22 📰 publisher trust 72
“Article A describes the adoption of a motion at a conference, while Article B reports on reactions to that decision after it has been made.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 36 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A reports on the vote and policy decision, while Article B discusses reactions to the policy decision after it has been made.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 13% hedged 3 of 23 📰 publisher trust 64
“While both articles discuss the fallout from the controversial 'Zionism is Racism' policy at the Green Party conference, they describe different aspects and timeframes of the event.”

Publisher

The Guardian · 1561 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)
2026-10-03
Tennessee’s top prison official resigning after botched execution of Christa Pike
2026-10-01
Tennessee governor suspends all executions after Christa Pike’s lethal injections fail
2026-09-28
Extra 1,000 prison beds announced in NSW as union warns against arresting ‘our way out of domestic violence’
2026-09-05
Australia’s housing prices are trending down. See which suburbs have had the biggest falls

Who wrote this

Peter Walker Senior political correspondent
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In post-byelection interviews, Polanski said he would have voted against the motion had he attended.
🔮 A low turnout of 38.7% and Abdi-Wali’s numerically modest 3,364 majority that resulted might not appear the greatest endorsement of the government, but it is also likely to have been in part due to the widespread assumption that Labour would win.
🔮 Justifying the Conservatives’ decision to scrap the target of the UK reaching net zero emissions by 2050, introduced under Theresa May, the document says that estimates of how much this would cost the economy “have varied enormously”.
🔮 Failure to win the seat by a reasonable margin could end his honeymoon period and bring renewed doubts about Labour’s ability to protect inner-city seats from the Greens, who won several London councils in May’s local elections. Holborn and St Pancras could be promising ground for the Greens, with a young and diverse population that includes many students.
🔮 It would involve a doubling of the defence budget in nominal terms from £70bn in 2026 to £151bn in 2035, according to the Transition Security Project, a research centre which was spun out of Common Wealth, a thinktank with close links to Andy Burnham.
🔮 The head of the Jewish Greens has said she may leave the party after it voted to adopt a policy that equates Zionism with racism and calls for Israel to be replaced by a single Palestinian state.
🔮 The forthcoming Conservative conference will be, almost everyone in the party agrees, notably more upbeat and unified than last year.
🔮 The Conservatives have unveiled a proposed £700m childcare giveaway for high earners ahead of their annual conference, saying they would end the “cliff edge” where free entitlement ends at salaries above £100,000.
🔮 Some Jewish members have said privately they fear it will be difficult for them to remain in the party if the policy passes.
🔮 Speaking to the media at the end of the Labour party conference in Liverpool, Burnham said he could not give any more details amid a police investigation, but that Iran was believed to be involved.
Also by Peter Walker Senior political correspondent
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Peter Walker Senior political correspondent →

Topics

Green Greens Israel Jewish Zionism

Subjects

Polanski PERSON · 9× Greens ORG · 5× Jewish NORP · 4× Lucas PERSON · 3× Zionism ORG · 3× Green NORP · 2× Israel GPE · 2× Lichtenstein PERSON · 2× Palestinian NORP · 2× the Green party ORG · 2×

Narrative

The leader of the Jewish Greens has called for Zack Polanski to step down as pressure increases on the Green leader to acknowledge anger within the party over a new policy that equates Zionism with racism and calls for the state of Israel to be abolished.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-09
🔮 In post-byelection interviews, Polanski said he would have voted against the motion had he attended.
2026-10-09 · The Guardian
Leader of Jewish Greens calls for Zack Polanski to resign · assertive framing

Claims (23 extracted, 0 hedged)

The leader of the Jewish Greens has called for Zack Polanski to step down as pressure increases on the Green leader to acknowledge anger within the party over a new policy that equates Zionism with racism and calls for the state of Israel to be abolished. asserted
state → call → Israel
The comments by Vivien Lichtenstein come after Caroline Lucas, the Greens’ former leader and first MP, criticised Polanski for a lack of leadership in missing the debate and vote at the weekend that resulted in the policy being passed. asserted
policy → come → weekend
Lichtenstein had said she was considering quitting the Green party of England and Wales following the vote at the party conference to adopt the policy, which states that Zionism is racism and calls for Israel to be replaced by a single Palestinian state. asserted
Israel → say → state
Polanski was not at the conference on Sunday when the motion was debated; instead he was campaigning in the Holborn and St Pancras byelection, in which he finished second to Labour. asserted
he → debate → Labour
In post-byelection interviews, Polanski said he would have voted against the motion had he attended. asserted
he → say → motion
Two amendments he supported, including one that called for a two-state solution rather than a single Palestinian state, were voted down. asserted
that → support → solution
Lichtenstein, speaking to Times Radio, said that even though Polanski was campaigning, he should have spoken and voted for the amendments online, which was an option. asserted
which → speak → amendments
“He should have done that. asserted
He → do → that
And I think that was a big mistake on his part.” asserted
that → think → part
She said she was surprised to hear Polanski say he had been working with Jewish members of the party, adding: “I don’t know which Jewish members of the party he’s been working with. asserted
he → say → party
Asked if Polanski should continue in his role, she replied: “No, I think he should resign.” asserted
he → ask → role
Lucas, who remains one of the Greens’ best-known and popular figures, said on Thursday that Polanski “should have been there and he should have voted”. asserted
he → remain → Thursday
Speaking to Newsnight, before the byelection result, she said: “I would have hoped that he would have really been a very strong critic of this motion, because the motion was flawed from top to bottom in my view. asserted
motion → speak → view
It’s dangerous, it’s divisive, it tries to have a singular definition of Zionism when we know that there are many.” asserted
we → ’ → Zionism
Asked if Polansksi should stand down, Lucas did not definitively say he should remain as leader: “I think let’s just see what happens in the … coming days and weeks. asserted
what → ask → days
“Obviously he has been completely taken up with this byelection. asserted
he → take → byelection
I want him to speak now about what’s happened. asserted
what → want → ?
I want him to show the leadership that was frankly missing on Sunday. asserted
that → want → Sunday
I think the jury is out about whether or not he will do that, but I very much hope he will. asserted
he → think → that
Jonathan Bartley, who was formerly the Green co-leader with Lucas, and is now a councillor in Lambeth, south London, called on Polanski to “put his hands up” and apologise. asserted
who → call → hands
“I think [the policy vote] was a failure of leadership from Zack and there is a certain toxicity now from the Green party,” he told the BBC. asserted
he → think → BBC
However, they are re- asserted
they → re → ?
elected every two years, meaning Polanski, who took over in September 2025, will have to go before party members again in less than a year. asserted
who → elect → year
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support