Blaming Trump for your debt? What the Federal Reserve data really exposes

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Washington Examiner · collected 2026-10-08 · by Perry V. Kalajian

Quick Summary

The article examines claims that President Donald Trump's policies negatively impacted the U.S. economy and led to affordability issues. It uses Federal Reserve data on household debt service payments (HDPI) as a percentage of disposable personal income to argue against these claims. The HDPI rose from 9.05% in Q1 2021 during Joe Biden’s ascension to office, reaching 11.10% by the end of his term and stabilizing at 11.11% under Trump's second presidency. Similarly, consumer debt service payments increased from 4.29% in Q1 2021 to 5.34% in Q1 2025 before slightly decreasing to 5.28% in Q2 2026. The article also notes that inflation, as measured by the consumer price index (CPI), peaked at 9.1% in June 2022 and averaged around 5% during Biden’s tenure but was largely driven by energy prices under Trump's second term.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-08, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As midterm elections approach, critics on the Left blame former President Donald Trump's policies for negatively impacting the U.S. economy and causing affordability issues. However, data from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve reveals a different story. The Household Debt Payment to Income (HDPI) ratio, which measures household debt service payments as a percentage of disposable personal income, was 9.05% in the first quarter of 2021 when Joe Biden took office and rose sharply during his tenure to reach 11.10% by the first quarter of 2025, marking the end of Biden's term and Trump’s second inauguration. Since then, under Trump’s second presidency, this ratio has remained steady at around 11.11% in the second quarter of 2026, suggesting that economic conditions have not worsened further despite the change in administration.

Written for “Federal Reserve Debt DataExposed” on 2026-10-08, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 65680 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-08

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
13%
3 of 23 hedged
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Correction & hedging signals
72.4
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-10-08 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Federal Reserve Debt DataExposed
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 43 📰 publisher trust 63
“The articles discuss different aspects of the economy and do not describe the same specific incident or data point.”
The Independent
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 29 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles discuss different aspects of economic dissatisfaction under Trump's presidency without describing the same specific incident or interview.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 34 📰 publisher trust 74
“The articles discuss different aspects of the national debt crisis without describing the same specific incident or occurrence.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles discuss different aspects related to Trump's economic policies but do not describe the same specific incident or poll.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 8 of 82 📰 publisher trust 72
“The articles discuss different aspects related to President Trump's economic policies but describe distinct narratives rather than the same specific incident.”

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 2262 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)
2026-10-03
Tennessee’s prison chief resigns after failed Christa Pike execution, Bill Lee says
2026-10-03
Alito says there’s no perfect time to retire while confirming he will reconsider next year
2026-10-01
Christa Pike was set to be the first woman to be executed in Tennessee in 200 years before botched attempts: What to know

Who wrote this

Perry V. Kalajian
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In January 2021 the CPI was 1.4%, climbed to 9.1% in June 2022, before falling in January 2025 to 3%, then rising to 4.2% in May 2026, prior to moving downward to 3.4% in August 2026.
🔮 Faced with this fossil fuel disadvantage, it is easy to see how China’s propaganda machine might want to support those promoting the position that climate change is real, with such action providing the dual benefit of supporting China’s sales of climate change-related products globally, while hurting the U.S. Also, China is locked in a battle with the U.S. for worldwide artificial intelligence supremacy.
Also by Perry V. Kalajian
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

CPI Iran U.S. the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve the White House

Subjects

Biden PERSON · 7× Trump PERSON · 6× U.S. GPE · 3× Iran GPE · 2× Barack Obama PERSON · 1× CPI ORG · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Joe Biden PERSON · 1× the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve ORG · 1× the White House ORG · 1×

Narrative

The more refined consumer debt service payments (the total scheduled payments covering both principal and interest on revolving debt such as credit cards and non-revolving consumer loans like auto and student loans, but excluding residential mortgages and home equity loans) as a percent of disposable personal income calculation is consistent with the HDPI results standing at 4.29% in the first quarter of 2021, then rising to 5.34% in the first quarter of 2025, before actually dropping slightly to 5.28% in the second quarter of 2026.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-08
🔮 In January 2021 the CPI was 1.4%, climbed to 9.1% in June 2022, before falling in January 2025 to 3%, then rising to 4.2% in May 2026, prior to moving downward to 3.4% in August 2026.
2026-10-08 · Washington Examiner
Blaming Trump for your debt? What the Federal Reserve data really exposes · assertive framing

Claims (23 extracted, 3 hedged)

As we approach the midterm elections, many on the Left have accused President Donald Trump of policy decisions and actions that have negatively affected the U.S. economy and led to affordability issues for voters. asserted
that → approach → voters
The relationship between debt and income is an indicator of economic health and affects affordability. asserted
relationship → affect → affordability
The calculation of household debt service payments (the total required principal and interest payments made on outstanding mortgage and consumer debt) as a percentage of disposable personal income quantifies the effect of both debt and income on households. asserted
calculation → make → households
According to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, in the first quarter of 2021, the period in which Joe Biden ascended to the presidency, the HDPI stood at 9.05% and then rose precipitously during Biden’s term in the White House to 11.10% in the first quarter of 2025, which marked the end of Biden’s tenure in office and the period in which Trump was sworn in as president for the second time. uncertain
Trump → accord → time
The HDPI number so far during the second Trump presidency has remained relatively flat standing at 11.11% in the second quarter of 2026, the most recent number available covering the impact of any tariffs and early months of the U.S. conflict with Iran. asserted
number → remain → Iran
The HDPI indicates most of the increase in the impact of debt relative to income felt currently by households is largely attributable to the policies and actions of Biden and not the strategies and measures of Trump. asserted
most → indicate → Trump
The more refined consumer debt service payments (the total scheduled payments covering both principal and interest on revolving debt such as credit cards and non-revolving consumer loans like auto and student loans, but excluding residential mortgages and home equity loans) as a percent of disposable personal income calculation is consistent with the HDPI results standing at 4.29% in the first quarter of 2021, then rising to 5.34% in the first quarter of 2025, before actually dropping slightly to 5.28% in the second quarter of 2026. asserted
results → schedule → 2026
Again, supporting the conclusion that any debt increase to consumers are attributable to Biden and not Trump. asserted
increase → support → Biden
A look at the inflation rate as measured by the consumer price index (which tracks the price changes for a market basket of goods and services) tells us more. asserted
which → measure → more
In January 2021 the CPI was 1.4%, climbed to 9.1% in June 2022, before falling in January 2025 to 3%, then rising to 4.2% in May 2026, prior to moving downward to 3.4% in August 2026. uncertain
CPI → climb → August
The rise in CPI under Trump from January 2025 to August 2026 is largely attributable to the CPI component category of energy (on an overall basis) coming in at 16.3% for the year ending August 2026 (with no element area outside of energy contributing more than 3.6%). asserted
area → come → %
The negative impact of energy on CPI is further supported by the significantly lower core consumer price index (which tracks the price changes for a market basket of goods and services, excluding food and energy) number of only 2.4% in August 2026. asserted
which → support → August
The spike in energy prices is a direct result of the anticipated short-term U.S. conflict with Iran (largely brought about by the past failures in policies and actions of the administrations of Barack Obama and Biden), with energy prices certain to drop with the cessation of hostilities. asserted
spike → bring → hostilities
Clearly, with no month under Trump even close to the yearly average of nearly 5% under Biden, the only reasonable conclusion is that the price increases complained about are due to the residual effects of Biden’s policies and measures and are overwhelmingly attributable to Biden. asserted
increases → complain → Biden
Looking at the HDPI, CDPI, and CPI together is informative. asserted
Looking → look → HDPI
Since the calculation of HDPI and CDPI are relatively consistent and flat since Trump took office, both debt and income are generally in lockstep. asserted
debt → take → lockstep
If the economy was negatively affecting affordability for individuals you would expect to see an increase in debt relative to income as was the case during Biden’s term in office. asserted
case → affect → office
The predominantly energy-induced increase in CPI caused by the U.S. conflict with Iran is modest when viewed from a macro perspective and is probably having only a moderate effect on affordability. asserted
increase → induce → affordability
With the average weekly wage growth in the United States at 3.7% as of August 2026 outpacing inflation as measured by the CPI of 3.4% for August 2026, the diminished affordability argument becomes even harder to make. asserted
argument → outpace → August
The U.S. economy is in much better shape under Trump than the Left and their shills in the media would have you believe with their overblown claims as to decreased affordability. uncertain
you → have → affordability
With major stock indices hitting multiple record-high levels, corporate earnings continuing strongly in an upwardly direction, increased corporate capital investment, enhanced direct investment by foreign corporations in the U.S., low unemployment, more people working in America than at any other time in its history, and a record-low poverty rate being just a few of the many positive economic achievements of the Trump administration, Republicans have plenty to tout. asserted
Republicans → hit → plenty
The Left’s negative reporting on the Trump economy is nothing more than political posturing to influence the midterm elections. asserted
reporting → influence → elections
Republicans must do a better job of messaging the success of the Trump economy to voters. asserted
Republicans → do → voters
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support