Trade talks remain frozen as Canadian countertariffs set for Tuesday

Read the original at The Globe and Mail ↗
Cite

Walsh, M. (2026, September 7). Trade talks remain frozen as Canadian countertariffs set for Tuesday. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-canadian-countertariffs-effect-tuesday-no-signs-talks-weekend/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Globe and Mail · collected 2026-09-07 · by Marieke Walsh

Quick Summary

Canadian officials have not held any formal talks with their US counterparts since trade negotiations broke down on August 21, and no new meetings are planned. Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is moving forward with plans to impose $28-billion worth of tariffs on US imports starting Tuesday at 12:01 a.m., in response to the Trump administration's 50-per-cent levies on Canadian goods. This move is intended to protect domestic markets and increase pressure on the US, but it may also harm some Canadian businesses that rely on imported materials from the US. The planned tariffs have already prompted the Trump administration to threaten retaliation if Canada goes ahead with its countertariff response.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

American tourism organizations have been aggressively trying to attract Canadian visitors back to the United States through various promotional campaigns since President Donald Trump returned to office and imposed tariffs on Canadian products, causing an informal boycott of travel to the US. Josh Loewen, a Vancouver marketing executive, notes that after Trump’s re-election, Canadian travel to the U.S. dropped dramatically due to the president's rhetoric about making Canada the 51st state and the ensuing trade war. Despite slight improvements in border crossings from May to July, recent escalations—such as the imposition of up to 50% import taxes by both countries—have renewed doubts about any recovery. Loewen believes current efforts to win back Canadian visitors are futile until a new U.S. president takes office and eases tensions between the two nations.

Written for “US Canada Trade War” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 55 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Canada Trade War
Politics · 56 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBC News
⚖️ Centre further right than this 🔴 100% hedged 1 of 1 📰 publisher trust 74
“Both articles report on the imminent imposition of Canadian counter-tariffs against US imports, effective Tuesday morning.”
National Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 32% hedged 8 of 25 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on the impending imposition of Canadian retaliatory tariffs on US imports set to take effect on Tuesday.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 16% hedged 14 of 89 📰 publisher trust 74
“Both articles describe the same trade dispute between Canada and the US, with a focus on the imposition of Canadian counter-tariffs on US imports effective Tuesday, as stated in both articles.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 53
“Both articles describe the imposition of Canadian countertariffs on $28-billion in U.S. imports effective Tuesday, with a specific focus on President Trump's trade war escalation.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 45 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles report on the implementation of Canadian tariffs against US imports, citing Tuesday as the effective date”
Morning Update: Adversity ahead same event · 100%
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 5% hedged 2 of 43 📰 publisher trust 53
“Both articles mention the same date (Tuesday) for Canada's countertariffs to take effect, and Article A provides context about the imposition of levies while Article B reports on the US response to it.”
TIME
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 6 of 41 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe the imposition of Canadian retaliatory tariffs on US imports, with identical details (time, date, amount, and products affected), indicating they are reporting on the same specific event.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 52 📰 publisher trust 69
“Article B is describing the effect of tariffs already mentioned in Article A, but provides additional context and details not present in Article A”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 31 📰 publisher trust 69
“Both articles report on the implementation of Canada's retaliatory tariffs against US imports on Tuesday”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 19 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles describe the imposition of Canadian retaliatory tariffs on US imports, with identical timing (effective at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday), and similar details about targeted products.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
3 of 34 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
53/100
The Globe and Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
56
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Globe and Mail · 869 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Marieke Walsh
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The policy will hit a range of products from steel and aluminum to textiles, stoves and hundreds of other goods.
🔮 On Mr. Trump’s new levies, he added, “Canada will match those tariffs dollar for dollar to protect our workers and businesses.”
2026-09-04 · assertive framing · Ottawa fires back after rejecting U.S. trade deal
🔮 Ontario Premier Doug Ford traded insults with U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday, while acknowledging he had told Prime Minister Mark Carney last week that his province would not support the now-aborted U.S. trade deal nor would it lift its ban on American booze at liquor stores.
Also by Marieke Walsh
Ottawa fires back after rejecting U.S. trade deal
2026-09-04 · The Globe and Mail
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

American Canada Canadian Ottawa U.S.

Subjects

Canada GPE · 10× Canadian NORP · 7× U.S. GPE · 7× American NORP · 3× Carney PERSON · 2× Globe ORG · 2× The Trump administration ORG · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Mark Carney PERSON · 1× Ottawa ORG · 1×

Narrative

Canadian unions, in particular, have been vocal supporters of Mr. Carney’s tariff countermeasures, saying that Canada should fight back against Mr. Trump’s tariffs, which are designed to target Canada’s industrial base, and force concessions. “The Canadian countertariffs are a good first response, but we need to take action at home to keep workers on the job by fast-tracking procurement dollars, implementing national industrial strategies, and calling on corporate Canada to step up and Buy Canadian,” said Lana Payne, Unifor’s national president, in a statement on Aug. 25.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 The policy will hit a range of products from steel and aluminum to textiles, stoves and hundreds of other goods.
2026-09-07 · The Globe and Mail
Trade talks remain frozen as Canadian countertariffs set for Tuesday · assertive framing

Claims (34 extracted, 3 hedged)

Talks between Canadian and American officials remained at an impasse Sunday, with Ottawa saying that there have been no formal meetings to avert the imposition of fresh retaliatory tariffs. asserted
Ottawa → remain → tariffs
Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government has pledged to impose levies on $28-billion worth of U.S. imports effective 12:01 a.m. Tuesday. asserted
government → pledge → imports
The policy will hit a range of products from steel and aluminum to textiles, stoves and hundreds of other goods. asserted
policy → hit → goods
The planned tariffs are a response to new 50-per-cent levies that President Donald Trump imposed on Canada after Mr. Carney withdrew from trade talks on Aug. 21. asserted
Carney → impose → Aug.
In the lead-up to those U.S. tariffs, Canadian and U.S. officials held near-daily meetings as they tried to strike a deal to avert the levies and reduce others that the White House had previously imposed. asserted
House → hold → that
Instead, Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc is spending the Labour Day weekend back in his home province of New Brunswick, a federal official said. asserted
official → spend → Brunswick
Mr. LeBlanc, the official said, has had no formal talks with his U.S. counterparts this weekend and none are scheduled. asserted
none → say → counterparts
The official said that the last time any formal talks took place was Aug. 21 – the day the negotiations in Washington fell apart. asserted
negotiations → say → Washington
Similarly, Canada’s top trade negotiator, Janice Charette, has had no formal talks with her American counterparts and none are planned, a second official said. asserted
official → have → counterparts
The Globe and Mail is not identifying the officials, who were not authorized to release the information. asserted
who → identify → information
Mr. Carney’s office said the Prime Minister has not spoken with the President since the week formal trade talks ended. asserted
talks → say → week
Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne’s office said Canada’s plan for countertariffs remains whole and they will come into effect as planned on Tuesday. asserted
they → say → Tuesday
The new tariffs are aimed at shoring up the domestic market for Canadian companies hit by U.S. tariffs while also ramping up political pressure south of the border. asserted
tariffs → aim → border
But the tariffs can also hurt Canadian businesses that rely on imported material and products from the U.S. Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters, an industry group representing manufacturers of all sizes, has repeatedly warned that countertariffs will increase costs for businesses reliant on American inputs, particularly smaller manufacturers with little ability to quickly change their supply chains. asserted
countertariffs → hurt → chains
The association has called for the federal government to continue providing tariff remission for companies that cannot competitively source other input alternatives. “The ultimate objective must remain the removal of U.S. tariffs and a durable agreement that restores certainty for manufacturers and workers on both sides of the border,” said Dennis Darby, president and CEO of CME, last week. asserted
Darby → call → CME
The Trump administration has already pledged to retaliate if Canada goes ahead with its countertariff response. asserted
Canada → pledge → response
On Friday, The Globe reported that White House officials are hoping to hit back against Canada’s retaliation no later than Wednesday. asserted
officials → report → Wednesday
The Trump administration is considering banning imports of Canadian alcohol, dairy products, and possibly steel, The Globe reported based on a source. uncertain
Globe → consider → source
Debate continues within the Trump administration on how tough the measures should be, with some in the President’s orbit calling for even more punitive actions. asserted
some → continue → actions
What those would consist of remained unclear. uncertain
consist → consist → What
Late last week, Mr. Trump suggested in a social-media post that the trade war between the two countries would lead to Canada’s economic collapse. uncertain
war → suggest → collapse
The ramifications will be “worse than anything that has ever happened to a Canadian Politician. asserted
that → happen → Politician
Just watch!” he threatened. asserted
he → watch → ?
Over the weekend, Mr. Trump and his officials continued to attack and deride Canada. asserted
Trump → continue → Canada
The President’s social-media page again posted about the renaming of Lake Ontario to Lake America and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent compared Canada to a “yippy dog.” asserted
Bessent → post → dog
He argued that Canada’s countertariffs will have a negligible effect on U.S. prices. asserted
countertariffs → argue → prices
“It is not much of a hit to us, if any,” he told Fox News. asserted
he → tell → News
In the past few weeks, the Prime Minister has repeatedly said Canada will only return to the negotiating table when the U.S. changes its attitude. asserted
U.S. → say → attitude
“When the Americans stop doing memes, stop throwing shade, stop trying to be tough and start being serious about having those discussions, we can have those discussions,” Mr. Carney said on Sept. 1. asserted
Carney → stop → Sept.
U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters last week that he was confident the trade war would ultimately end with a negotiated deal. asserted
war → tell → deal
“That’s where this is going to wind up – the sooner, the better,” Mr. Johnson said. asserted
Johnson → ’ → ?
Canada’s retaliatory tariffs are increasing political pressure on Republicans by targeting industries in states that are vulnerable in this fall’s midterm elections. asserted
that → increase → elections
For example, the state likely to suffer the single biggest hit from Canada’s tariffs is Republican-run Ohio, where Democratic candidates are mounting competitive gubernatorial and senate campaigns. asserted
candidates → suffer → campaigns
Canadian unions, in particular, have been vocal supporters of Mr. Carney’s tariff countermeasures, saying that Canada should fight back against Mr. Trump’s tariffs, which are designed to target Canada’s industrial base, and force concessions. “The Canadian countertariffs are a good first response, but we need to take action at home to keep workers on the job by fast-tracking procurement dollars, implementing national industrial strategies, and calling on corporate Canada to step up and Buy Canadian,” said Lana Payne, Unifor’s national president, in a statement on Aug. 25. asserted
Payne → say → Aug.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support