Trump’s ‘not good’ approval rating could hurt party in midterm elections: Byron York

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-06 · by Mackenzie Chase
Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗

Summary

Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York believes President Donald Trump's job approval rating of slightly below 40%, according to RealClearPolitics polls, could hurt his party in midterm elections, as historically low approval ratings have negatively affected sitting presidents' parties. York notes that nominees in competitive races may see Trump's influence as a roadblock, but his ability to get attention and enthusiasm for himself and his administration could still yield surprises. The midterm elections will test the impact of Trump's agenda on his party's performance, with York noting that being "on the ballot" metaphorically has different implications than actually being on the ballot. According to York, the president's team has had success in countering Iran's nuclear ambitions through economic warfare and other means.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
12
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
8%
1 of 12 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
96.1
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

President Donald Trump's job approval rating is currently below 40%, according to the RealClearPolitics average of polls. This could potentially hurt his party in the midterm elections, as historically, a sitting president's low approval rating has been correlated with poor performance by their party in these elections. Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York made this observation on Fox Business's Kudlow, suggesting that while Trump's influence may still have some impact, it could be a "roadblock" for nominees in highly competitive races.

Written for “Trump Approval Ratings Impact” on 2026-09-07, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.35 for article 6017 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-09-07

Story

📰 Trump Approval Ratings Impact
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 6 of 76
“Article A discusses Trump's foreign policy obsession and its impact on his approval rating, while Article B only mentions Trump's job approval rating without any context”
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 5% hedged 2 of 40 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A describes a podcast discussing various topics, including Trump's role and midterm elections, while Article B quotes Byron York discussing Trump's approval rating in relation to midterms. They do not describe the same specific event.”
CBC | World News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 11% hedged 4 of 36 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes Trump's promise to campaign for Republicans, while Article B discusses his approval rating and its potential impact on midterm elections”
Silver Bulletin
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 38 of 569
“Article A discusses a future model for forecasting midterm elections, while Article B analyzes Trump's current approval rating and its potential impact on the election”
The Independent World
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 2 of 16 📰 publisher trust 58
“The articles report on two different aspects of President Trump's job approval rating, with Article A mentioning his overall approval rating and Article B reporting on a specific poll that found it at a record low.”
US news | The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 15% hedged 7 of 48 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses a hypothetical scenario where Trump might want Republicans to lose, while Article B refers to real poll numbers and historical data about midterm election performance”
Noahpinion
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 6% hedged 5 of 78
“They cover different aspects of Trump's job approval rating, one focusing on why it's 'not good' and the other discussing its impact on midterm elections”
The Independent World
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 2 of 16 📰 publisher trust 58
“Article A describes a specific poll result, while Article B discusses the general trend and implications of Trump's approval rating without mentioning the same poll or specific numbers”
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 6% hedged 1 of 18 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a rally that Trump will be speaking at, while Article B discusses Trump's job approval rating and its potential impact on midterm elections, without mentioning any specific event”
The Straits Times World News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 25 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A discusses President Trump's low approval rating, while Article B describes a Republican convention in Dallas to rally voters around Trump, indicating two separate events”

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 113 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.078 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Mackenzie Chase
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Concha said it would be extremely difficult to find an impartial jury, given the insurmountable amount of media coverage.
🔮 York said nominees in highly competitive races may see that as a roadblock; however, Trump’s influence may still pull off some surprises.
🔮 While there’s been no official order from Trump to change the name of New Mexico, it’s also unclear how such an order would play out.
Also by Mackenzie Chase
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Fox Business’s Iran RealClearPolitics Republicans Washington Examiner

Subjects

York PERSON · 7× Trump PERSON · 5× Byron York PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Fox Business’s ORG · 1× Iran GPE · 1× RealClearPolitics ORG · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× Washington Examiner ORG · 1×

Narrative

Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York said President Donald Trump’s job approval rating was “not good” leading into the midterm elections, noting that historically, that has proven to negatively affect how the sitting president’s party performs.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 York said nominees in highly competitive races may see that as a roadblock; however, Trump’s influence may still pull off some surprises.

Claims (12 extracted, 1 hedged)

Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York said President Donald Trump’s job approval rating was “not good” leading into the midterm elections, noting that historically, that has proven to negatively affect how the sitting president’s party performs. asserted
party → say → elections
“Well, old thinking says that the president’s job approval rating is one of the best predictors of how his party is going to do in midterm elections,” York said on Fox Business’s Kudlow on Friday. asserted
York → say → Friday
Despite Trump’s low approval ratings, the president said to “pretend I’m on the ballot,” encouraging voters to head to the polls as if he were the one up for reelection. asserted
he → say → reelection
York said nominees in highly competitive races may see that as a roadblock; however, Trump’s influence may still pull off some surprises. uncertain
influence → say → surprises
“You would not think that lots and lots of candidates in sort of toss-up districts would want to have him around,” York said. asserted
York → think → him
“That’s the old thinking. asserted
That → ’ → ?
I basically think that that’s correct. asserted
that → think → ?
On the other hand, the president has been his best communicator, forever, and he tends to get a lot of attention and a lot of enthusiasm.” asserted
he → tend → enthusiasm
York said the Trump administration has succeeded in destroying, at least temporarily, Iran’s ability to produce a nuclear weapon. asserted
administration → say → weapon
However, while the economic warfare, blockades, and bombing campaigns were “very, very powerful,” it’s still not clear whether Trump’s influence will be enough to carry Republicans over the finish line, York said. asserted
York → ’ → line
The midterm elections will affect Trump’s ability to continue his agenda, making him “metaphorically” on the ballot, but York noted it does not have the same impact. asserted
it → affect → impact
“There’s a difference in being on the ballot and not being on the ballot, and the fact is that the president is not going to be on the ballot,” York said. asserted
York → ’ → ballot
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support