Trump’s ‘not good’ approval rating could hurt party in midterm elections: Byron York

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Chase, M. (2026, September 6). Trump’s ‘not good’ approval rating could hurt party in midterm elections: Byron York. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/4715498/trumps-approval-rating-hurt-party-byron-york/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-06 · by Mackenzie Chase

Quick Summary

Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York believes President Donald Trump's job approval rating of slightly below 40%, according to RealClearPolitics polls, could hurt his party in midterm elections, as historically low approval ratings have negatively affected sitting presidents' parties. York notes that nominees in competitive races may see Trump's influence as a roadblock, but his ability to get attention and enthusiasm for himself and his administration could still yield surprises. The midterm elections will test the impact of Trump's agenda on his party's performance, with York noting that being "on the ballot" metaphorically has different implications than actually being on the ballot. According to York, the president's team has had success in countering Iran's nuclear ambitions through economic warfare and other means.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Donald Trump's approval rating has dropped to a record low of 33%, according to a Financial Times poll. This marks the lowest number recorded since the newspaper began asking the question in May and is a three-point decrease from the previous month. The drop is attributed to pessimism about the economy and cost of living among Americans, with almost two-thirds of registered voters saying they believe the economy is heading in the wrong direction and 57% saying they are worse off financially under Trump's presidency. Fuel costs have also hit an unprecedented high, with diesel soaring to a record national average of $5.85 a gallon. The low approval rating presents a headache for Republicans ahead of the midterm elections, which take place in November.

Written for “Trump Approval Rating Plummeting” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 4 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Approval Rating Plummeting
Politics · 5 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Independent
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 4 of 38 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles report on the same topic (Trump's job approval rating) and both are dated September 6th or 7th, indicating they describe a similar point in time.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 15% hedged 4 of 26 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A discusses Trump's job approval rating, while Article B reports on Republican candidates removing Trump mentions from their campaign websites due to his low approval rating”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 3 of 29 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A discusses President Trump's job approval rating leading into the midterm elections, while Article B describes a strategy to make the midterm elections about Trump”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 15% hedged 7 of 48 📰 publisher trust 69
“Article A discusses a hypothetical scenario where Trump might want Republicans to lose, while Article B refers to real poll numbers and historical data about midterm election performance”
Noahpinion
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 6% hedged 5 of 78
“They cover different aspects of Trump's job approval rating, one focusing on why it's 'not good' and the other discussing its impact on midterm elections”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 2 of 16 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A describes a specific poll result, while Article B discusses the general trend and implications of Trump's approval rating without mentioning the same poll or specific numbers”
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 6% hedged 1 of 18 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a rally that Trump will be speaking at, while Article B discusses Trump's job approval rating and its potential impact on midterm elections, without mentioning any specific event”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 25 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A discusses President Trump's low approval rating, while Article B describes a Republican convention in Dallas to rally voters around Trump, indicating two separate events”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 4% hedged 2 of 51 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article B describes a broader economic impact of Trump's policies, whereas Article A mentions his job approval rating as a predictor for midterm election performance”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 5 of 44 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A discusses Trump's job approval rating, while Article B reports on a convention where Trump made an appeal to voters, but they describe different events and timeframes”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
12
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
1 of 12 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
5
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3267 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Mackenzie Chase
57 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York said Sunday that the immigration fraud allegations against Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) could derail her entire career if true.
🔮 San Antonio Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones also posted a statement Sunday, saying she was “deeply saddened” by news of the airman’s death. “
🔮 The November 2026 Supplemental Security Income payments, worth up to $994 for an individual filer, will be sent to recipients in 12 days.
🔮 The second round of October Social Security payments for retirees, now capped at $5,181, will be issued in three days.
🔮 The November 2026 Supplemental Security Income payments, worth up to $994 for an individual filer, will be sent to recipients in 13 days.
🔮 The second round of October Social Security payments for retirees, now capped at $5,181, will be issued in four days.
🔮 Charlie Kirk would’ve been celebrating his 33rd birthday Wednesday, as the White House called him a “Christian martyr” and a “titan” in a tribute online.
🔮 Benson said he believes that comes from “name ID” and “recency bias” but remained adamant that she would be a bad candidate.
🔮 The November 2026 Supplemental Security Income payments, worth up to $994 for an individual filer, will be sent to recipients in 16 days.
🔮 The first round of October Social Security payments for retirees, now capped at $5,181, will be issued today.
Also by Mackenzie Chase
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 57 articles by Mackenzie Chase →

Topics

Fox Business’s Iran RealClearPolitics Republicans Washington Examiner

Subjects

York PERSON · 7× Trump PERSON · 5× Byron York PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Fox Business’s ORG · 1× Iran GPE · 1× RealClearPolitics ORG · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× Washington Examiner ORG · 1×

Narrative

Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York said President Donald Trump’s job approval rating was “not good” leading into the midterm elections, noting that historically, that has proven to negatively affect how the sitting president’s party performs.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 York said nominees in highly competitive races may see that as a roadblock; however, Trump’s influence may still pull off some surprises.

Claims (12 extracted, 1 hedged)

Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York said President Donald Trump’s job approval rating was “not good” leading into the midterm elections, noting that historically, that has proven to negatively affect how the sitting president’s party performs. asserted
party → say → elections
“Well, old thinking says that the president’s job approval rating is one of the best predictors of how his party is going to do in midterm elections,” York said on Fox Business’s Kudlow on Friday. asserted
York → say → Friday
Despite Trump’s low approval ratings, the president said to “pretend I’m on the ballot,” encouraging voters to head to the polls as if he were the one up for reelection. asserted
he → say → reelection
York said nominees in highly competitive races may see that as a roadblock; however, Trump’s influence may still pull off some surprises. uncertain
influence → say → surprises
“You would not think that lots and lots of candidates in sort of toss-up districts would want to have him around,” York said. asserted
York → think → him
“That’s the old thinking. asserted
That → ’ → ?
I basically think that that’s correct. asserted
that → think → ?
On the other hand, the president has been his best communicator, forever, and he tends to get a lot of attention and a lot of enthusiasm.” asserted
he → tend → enthusiasm
York said the Trump administration has succeeded in destroying, at least temporarily, Iran’s ability to produce a nuclear weapon. asserted
administration → say → weapon
However, while the economic warfare, blockades, and bombing campaigns were “very, very powerful,” it’s still not clear whether Trump’s influence will be enough to carry Republicans over the finish line, York said. asserted
York → ’ → line
The midterm elections will affect Trump’s ability to continue his agenda, making him “metaphorically” on the ballot, but York noted it does not have the same impact. asserted
it → affect → impact
“There’s a difference in being on the ballot and not being on the ballot, and the fact is that the president is not going to be on the ballot,” York said. asserted
York → ’ → ballot
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support