Open Thread

Reason Magazine · collected 2026-09-05 · by Eugene Volokh
Read the original at Reason Magazine ↗

Summary

The website The Volokh Conspiracy is promoting a subscription to Reason magazine as a way for readers to celebrate their independence, targeting law professors, contrarians, libertarians, and those who value independent perspectives. No specific details are provided about the promotion or its terms. The key angle of this article is a promotional pitch rather than a news report.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-05, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
0
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
no claims
nothing to measure
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
86.1
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
unclustered
not grouped into a story yet
Narrative spread
none derived
Analyzed 2026-09-05 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.85 Confidence high
Leaning score +0.85 for article 4799 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-09-05

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges an unknown share of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Open Thread different event · 100%
Reason Magazine · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 86
“The articles are two separate 'Open Thread' posts on different dates without any description of a specific event.”
Reason.com
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article B does not mention Supreme Court or September 3, 2005, indicating it covers a different topic.”
Reason Magazine
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 22% hedged 7 of 32 📰 publisher trust 86
“The articles cover different topics: one discusses a court case (Douglas v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.) and the other promotes a magazine subscription.”
Reason Magazine
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 19% hedged 11 of 59 📰 publisher trust 86
“Article B is an open thread and does not describe a specific legal case or incident, while Article A reports on a specific court decision”
Reason.com · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 94
Reason.com · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 94
Reason.com · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 94
Reason.com · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 94
Reason.com · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 94
Reason.com · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 94

Publisher

Reason Magazine · 39 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.026 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.141 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-09-05
Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
25 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 Perhaps most analogously to alienation of affections, if Alan breaches his contract with Betty, and Cathy encouraged him to breach it, she will in many situations be liable for intentional interference with contract.
2026-09-06 · assertive framing · Alienation of Affections as Complicity
🔮 In a phone call on March 2, Gelb told Netrebko to issue a statement specifically denouncing Putin, or she would be fired.
🔮 A malicious act "include[s] any intentional conduct that would probably affect the marital relationship.
🔮 If you have followed the factual allegations in the case, please post a comment and indicate how you would have voted if you were a juror, based on your knowledge (even if limited) of the factual allegations, and why you would have so voted.
🔮 As part of this mea culpa, Ms. Hall assured the court that she had taken the remedial measure of verifying that the remaining citations in the brief were legitimate authority and pledged that, going forward (presumably in her representation of other clients), she would not rely on any AI tool "for legal research without confirming each authority" or file anything that includes citations she has not independently verified.
🔮 Such a requirement would be impractical, unduly burdensome, and unnecessarily duplicative given the availability of reasonable alternative procedures to guard against erroneous citations.
🔮 If it were, then any profit-seeking news organization could face liability for its failure to investigate, contrary to the principle that a publisher is not "required to seek out contrary stories" to insulate itself from a finding of actual malice.
🔮 Under the rational basis standard, government conduct "is presumed to be valid and will be sustained if the classification drawn by the statute is rationally related to a legitimate state interest."
🔮 To state a violation of § 784.049, a plaintiff must plausibly allege - Defendant published a sexually explicit image of Plaintiff on an internet website; - The image contained or conveyed Plaintiff's personal identification information; - Defendant acted willfully and maliciously, for no legitimate purpose, and with the intent of causing substantial emotional distress to Plaintiff; - Plaintiff did not consent to the publication…. The dispute was about whether the video showed a "sexually explicit image," and the court said no: [T]he statute defines {"sexually explicit image"} as any photograph or video that depicts "nudity" or depicts "any person engaging in sexual conduct." …
🔮 Roe is a Saudi Arabian citizen who, until May 2021, was living full-time in Riyadh and working as a result estate [real estate? -EV] investor.
More on this subject from Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-09-04 · Reason Magazine · 100% similar
Open Thread
2026-08-31 · Reason.com · 100% similar
Open Thread
2026-08-28 · Reason.com · 100% similar
Open Thread
2026-08-27 · Reason.com · 100% similar
All 25 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Reason

Subjects

Reason ORG · 1×

Narrative

No narrative derived. That requires at least one asserted claim.

Claims (0 extracted, 0 hedged)

No claims extracted from this article.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support