QBERT 2026 NFL quarterback ratings

Read the original at Silver Bulletin ↗
Cite

Silver, N. (2026, September 5). QBERT 2026 NFL quarterback ratings. Silver Bulletin. https://www.natesilver.net/p/qbert-2026-nfl-quarterback-ratings

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Silver Bulletin · collected 2026-09-05 · by Nate Silver commentary

Quick Summary

The article reports on updates to the QBERT quarterback rating system, which was launched last year and provides ratings for every NFL quarterback since 1950. Key changes include giving quarterbacks credit for completions on dropped passes and yards gained from defensive pass interference calls. The new version of QBERT also treats intentional grounding calls as incompletions. The system now favors rushing quarterbacks more than previously, but does not give equal value to all rush plays.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-05, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Nate Silver, founder of the Silver Bulletin, has released an update to his quarterback rating system, QBERT, which provides ratings for NFL quarterbacks in 2026. The system rates each quarterback on a level playing field, taking into account advanced statistics data and historical performance. QBERT serves two purposes: it rates past quarterbacks on a fair basis while also projecting future QB performance to feed into another model called ELWAY. According to the update, most quarterbacks tend to improve in their second season, which is why Silver believes that QBERT1, a newer version of the system, will be more accurate. The updated page includes new features such as an interactive comparison tool for quarterbacks throughout NFL history, allowing users to see how QBERT ratings have evolved over time.

Written for “NFL Quarterback Rankings” on 2026-10-21, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 NFL Quarterback Rankings
Sports · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 1% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
How our ELWAY forecasts work different event · 80%
Silver Bulletin
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 18 of 314
“Article A describes a static landing page for QBERT, while Article B mentions an update to ELWAY and references QBERT as a component of it.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
74
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
1%
1 of 74 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
1
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Silver Bulletin · 45 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Nate Silver
31 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 But leave that philosophical question aside for now — because after a long week of travel,1 I could use a simpler Model Talk.
2026-10-17 · assertive framing · The good, bad and ugly outcomes in the Senate
🔮 Below, you’ll find our forecast for each 2026 Senate race, along with how our numbers have changed over time and which states are likeliest to decide control of the chamber.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · FLIPR 2026 Senate forecast
🔮 Although our critics might disagree, we seek to avoid false equivocation at Silver Bulletin.
2026-10-09 · assertive framing · Could Minnesota spoil the blue wave?
🔮 It’s not unreasonable to approach election polls from a position of mild — maybe even more-than-mild — skepticism.
2026-10-03 · assertive framing · What if the polls are wrong again?
🔮 That definitely will not happen before the midterms.
2026-10-01 · assertive framing · SBSQ reboot thread
🔮 We think it’s an important story, providing historical context on midterm elections that helps to explain FLIPR’s increasingly optimistic forecast for Democrats.
2026-10-01 · assertive framing · Why did Ohio stop being a swing state?
🔮 The 2026-27 NBA season begins on Oct. 20, when the New York Knicks will lift the championship banner to celebrate their first NBA title in 53 seasons.
2026-09-28 · assertive framing · NBA Future of the Franchise Rankings 4.0
🔮 Our Silver Bulletin polling average forecasts a much closer race — with Turek ahead by 1.9 points — though that would still be an impressive result in a state that Donald Trump won by 13 points in 2024.
2026-09-22 · assertive framing · Diesel prices could crush Republicans in the heartland
🔮 It’s sometimes nice for forecasters when races are toss-ups; it keeps you from putting your neck out too far.
2026-09-20 · assertive framing · Expert ratings are ignoring signs of a blue wave
🔮 A snail will spend the rest of eternity trying to track you down.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · We’re not ready for superpersistent AI
Also by Nate Silver
The good, bad and ugly outcomes in the Senate
2026-10-17 · Silver Bulletin
FLIPR 2026 Senate forecast
2026-10-15 · Silver Bulletin
Could Minnesota spoil the blue wave?
2026-10-09 · Silver Bulletin
What if the polls are wrong again?
2026-10-03 · Silver Bulletin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 31 articles by Nate Silver →

Topics

ELWAY NFL QBERT QBERT1 the Substack App

Subjects

NFL ORG · 3× QBERT ORG · 3× Josh Allen PERSON · 2× Maye PERSON · 2× Stafford PERSON · 2× Dan Marino PERSON · 1× Joe Montana PERSON · 1× John Elway PERSON · 1× Marino GPE · 1× Patrick Mahomes PERSON · 1×

Narrative

QBERT ratings for each QB so far in 2026 Projected QBERT ratings for each QB’s next start QB depth charts with injury and point-spread ratings A breakdown of each QB’s weekly ratings for 2026, allocating credit between his passing and rushing performance and adjusting for the difficulty of the conditions he faces14 An updating lifetime leaderboard of the top QBs in NFL history.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-05
🔮 The charts and tables will be updated regularly, and some of the text will change, too.
2026-09-05 · Silver Bulletin
QBERT 2026 NFL quarterback ratings · assertive framing

Claims (74 extracted, 1 hedged)

As with our other landing pages, it’s best viewed on the web rather than over email or in the Substack App. asserted
it → view → App
The charts and tables will be updated regularly, and some of the text will change, too. asserted
some → update → text
Last year, we built QBERT, our quarterback rating system. asserted
we → build → QBERT
It serves a dual purpose: Rating every QB since 1950 on a level playing field, taking advantage of advanced stats data for recent QBs while being as fair as possible to historical QBs for whom this data isn’t available; Projecting future QB performance to feed into ELWAY, our NFL projection model. asserted
performance → serve → ELWAY
The 2026 version of ELWAY will launch very soon. asserted
version → launch → ELWAY
We don’t think there’s anything quite like QBERT1 out there. asserted
We → think → QBERT1
Still, quarterbacks typically round into form in their sophomore seasons. asserted
quarterbacks → round → seasons
For instance, this page now includes a mini-interactive that lets you compare quarterbacks from throughout NFL history and see how their QBERT ratings have evolved over time. asserted
ratings → include → time
Here’s Josh Allen versus Patrick Mahomes: Or Joe Montana, Dan Marino and John Elway himself. asserted
Allen → ’ → Mahomes
We’ve also put a lot of work into QBERT on the backend. asserted
We → put → backend
Last year, I argued that Drake Maye ought to have been the NFL MVP rather than Matthew Stafford. asserted
Maye → argue → Stafford
But the new version of QBERT thinks that was a bad take and Stafford had the better season. asserted
Stafford → think → season
(Note, though, that the chart below combines regular-season and playoff data, so Maye’s mediocre playoffs are a factor here.) What’s changed in the system? asserted
What → note → system
We are quite confident that drops should be attributed to the WR, not the quarterback.2 asserted
drops → attribute → WR
Not only does QBERT now give a QB credit for a completion on a drop; we also estimate the additional yards and touchdowns (and even the avoided interceptions3) that would have resulted from the caught pass. asserted
that → give → pass
QBs who had fewer drops than expected, like Maye last year, suffer a slight penalty.4 asserted
who → have → Maye
Trevor Lawrence and Bo Nix had outlier-high drop rates, on the other hand, and benefit substantially from this new treatment. asserted
Lawrence → have → treatment
Yards gained on pass interference calls deserve credit. asserted
Yards → gain → credit
Last year’s model ignored penalties. asserted
model → ignore → penalties
But having collected penalty data, we now simply treat defensive pass interference (DPI) calls as completed passes, giving a QB credit for the completion, the first down, and the air yards associated with the “catch”. asserted
we → collect → catch
This benefits QBs like Dak Prescott, who had 268 yards essentially erased from his stat line last year on DPIs, by far the highest in the league. asserted
yards → benefit → league
Furthermore, intentional grounding calls are now treated as incompletions.5 Other QB-related penalties are still ignored because we’ve found they don’t provide much signal. asserted
they → treat → signal
QBERT likes rushing QBs more than the consensus, but not all QB rushes are created equal. asserted
rushes → like → consensus
We now give far less credit to TDs from sneak plays versus other rushing TDs and also apply a penalty term to sneaks to ensure that they don’t have positive expected value relative to other QB plays. asserted
they → give → plays
Over the past three years, two QBs have benefited disproportionately from sneaks: Jalen Hurts (30 sneak TDs) and Josh Allen (21). asserted
QBs → benefit → sneaks
Isolating sneaks does result in slightly more credit to non-sneak rushing TDs, however.6 Pocket passers were being undervalued. asserted
passers → isolate → TDs
Last year, the coefficients used in QBERT were fitted on data from 2016-2024. asserted
coefficients → use → 2016
We’ve now collected advanced-stat data going back to 20067 and refitted QBERT over a larger sample. asserted
We → collect → sample
This matters because 2016-2024 was a highly favorable era for mobile QBs like Lamar Jackson, Allen and Mahomes, whereas the late 2000s and early ‘10s were more favorable to pocket passers (Brady, Brees, Manning). asserted
2000s → matter → passers
This makes QBERT more robust across eras and also brings it more in line with the conventional wisdom, helping modern pocket passers like Stafford. asserted
QBERT → make → Stafford
Touchdowns now matter less, and the process that produces TDs matters more. asserted
that → matter → TDs
Last year’s version of QBERT was essentially pegged to ESPN QBR. asserted
version → peg → QBR
QBR is a smart system, much better than traditional NFL passer ratings, and still serves as an important scaffold for our system. asserted
QBR → serve → system
Our reverse-engineering of QBR suggests that it places an extremely high value on touchdowns, equivalent to something like 45 yards per passing TD.8 uncertain
it → suggest → passing
Other systems like ANY/A assign less than half as much credit to TDs. asserted
systems → assign → TDs
While there is some persistent skill in red zone play, TDs are both noisy and opportunity-dependent, and TD rates don’t “travel” all that well when a QB changes teams. asserted
QB → be → teams
Long story short: the reward given to TDs has been reduced by 50 percent, with credit instead flowing into categories like first downs that better predict touchdowns in the long run. asserted
that → give → run
The 2025 version of QBERT accounted for the game script, giving more credit to quarterbacks who establish early leads. asserted
who → account → leads
The rationale was that offenses are less efficient with a lead late in the game because it’s rational for them to play conservatively and run out the clock.9 asserted
them → ’ → clock.9
However, upon review, essentially all of the difference stems from replacing quarterback plays with handoffs to running backs. asserted
all → stem → backs
…and 34 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support