Websites break California privacy law at ‘industrial scale,’ survey finds

The Markup · collected 2026-09-04 · by Colin Lecher
Read the original at The Markup ↗

Summary

A new audit by researchers at webXray has found widespread noncompliance with California's privacy law, with major companies such as Google, Microsoft, and Facebook parent company Meta ignoring the requirement to not track users who set a specific "Global Privacy Control". The report estimates that if all websites found to be violating the law were fined, it could result in billions of dollars in penalties. Google was found to continue tracking users 86% of the time despite receiving the signal, while Microsoft failed to honor the signal in 50% of instances. The researchers say the companies' failures are due to a lack of effort to comply with the law.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-04, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
33%
9 of 27 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
94.1
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-04 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Websites across the internet may be violating California's online privacy law, according to an audit conducted by researchers at webXray, a firm founded by a former Google privacy engineer. The audit found that these websites are ignoring a requirement to not track visitors who have set a privacy control, known as the Global Privacy Control (GPC) signal. This could result in billions of dollars in penalties if all the non-compliant websites were fined by the California Privacy Protection Agency. The agency's executive director, Tom Kemp, acknowledged that the report highlights the importance of opt-out rights, but declined to comment on the specific findings.

Written for “California Data Privacy Law Violations” on 2026-09-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.35 for article 4104 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-04

Story

📰 California Data Privacy Law Violations
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 33% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
World & Nation
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 9% hedged 7 of 80 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes proposed regulations on AI and social media in California, while Article B reports on a survey finding websites breaking California privacy law at 'industrial scale'”
The Markup
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 17% hedged 13 of 75 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A describes an audit finding tech companies ignoring California privacy law, while Article B discusses the digitization of students' lives and mentions California's data protection laws without referencing a specific event”
The Markup
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 13% hedged 2 of 15 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A discusses a survey finding websites failing to abide by California privacy law, while Article B talks about a bill advancing in the California legislature related to background checks for online dating apps”

Publisher

The Markup · 20 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.118 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Colin Lecher
9 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The upshot, some believe, could be new forms of regulation, including at the federal level.
🔮 In a press conference this week on New York City’s $12 billion budget gap, Mayor Zohran Mamdani zeroed in on the previous administration’s artificial intelligence chatbot as one of “a number of different things we’re going to pursue for savings.”
🔮 But The Markup and CalMatters’ August story examined how several data brokers used code called the “no-index” tag on pages where consumers could exercise their right to opt out.
🔮 Kevin DeLuca, an assistant professor of political science at Yale University who has studied similar news sites, sometimes called “pink slime” news, told The Markup and CalMatters earlier this year that such sites may not be outright lying.
🔮 A new audit has found that websites across the internet may be failing to abide by California privacy law, ignoring a requirement to not track visitors who set a privacy control.
🔮 Meanwhile, the Defense Department has signed off on the earliest contracts for the “Golden Dome,” a proposal to build a missile-defense system above the United States that may eventually cost hundreds of billions of dollars.
🔮 The “no-index” code tells search engines like Google not to catalog those pages, making it less likely that anyone would see them.
🔮 If you don’t live in California, but have friends or family in California who would be interested in helping us investigate, please share this article with them.
🔮 This story was produced in partnership with Agência Pública as part of a series on how regulatory solutions adopted in Brazil could point the way for the U.S.
More on this subject from Colin Lecher
All 9 articles by Colin Lecher →

Topics

CalMatters California Google Markup webXray

Subjects

California GPE · 6× Google ORG · 4× Microsoft ORG · 3× webXray ORG · 3× Meta ORG · 2× CalMatters ORG · 1× Klaxon ORG · 1× Markup ORG · 1× Tom Kemp PERSON · 1× the California Privacy Protection Agency ORG · 1×

Narrative

“As outlined in our Privacy Statement, when we receive a GPC signal, we opt the user out of sharing personal data with third parties for personalized advertising, and our advertising systems are designed to reflect that choice,” Courtney Ramirez, a Microsoft spokesperson, said in a statement.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-04
🔮 A new audit has found that websites across the internet may be failing to abide by California privacy law, ignoring a requirement to not track visitors who set a privacy control.

Claims (27 extracted, 9 hedged)

The Markup, now a part of CalMatters, uses investigative reporting, data analysis, and software engineering to challenge technology to serve the public good. asserted
Markup → use → good
Sign up for Klaxon, a newsletter that delivers our stories and tools directly to your inbox. asserted
that → sign → inbox
A new audit has found that websites across the internet may be failing to abide by California privacy law, ignoring a requirement to not track visitors who set a privacy control. uncertain
who → find → control
The report, from researchers at webXray, a firm headed by a former Google privacy engineer, said the findings suggest major companies may be simply ignoring the law, and could point to “industrial-scale noncompliance with California requirements.” uncertain
companies → head → requirements
WebXray estimates that if the California Privacy Protection Agency fined all of the websites it found failing to comply with the law, it could result in billions of dollars in penalties. uncertain
it → estimate → penalties
“While we don’t have comment on the finding of this specific report,” Tom Kemp, executive director of the privacy protection agency, said in a statement, “we do appreciate that the report brings visibility to the importance of opt out rights.” asserted
report → have → rights
Why a new California law could change the way all Americans browse the internet Legislation recently enacted in California will make it easier for consumers nationwide to protect their data Under California law, businesses are required to respect a signal called the Global Privacy Control. uncertain
businesses → change → signal
If users navigate the web with the control turned on — either through a setting in the browser or a third-party tool — it tells websites not to sell or share their personal information. asserted
it → navigate → information
The California Consumer Privacy Act requires businesses to acknowledge the control and to not track people who use it. asserted
who → require → it
The state privacy agency has fined companies millions for failing to honor the control, among other violations. asserted
agency → fin → violations
To understand whether the law is truly being respected, the researchers visited more than 7,000 popular websites from a California internet address. asserted
researchers → understand → address
According to the report, major tech companies continued to track users, even with the signal turned on. uncertain
signal → accord → users
Google continued to track users in 86% of cases despite receiving the signal, according to the report. uncertain
Google → continue → report
When visitors traveled to the websites while using the signal, the sites still frequently set a cookie from Google to follow those visitors. asserted
sites → travel → visitors
Similarly, according to the report, Microsoft failed to honor the signal in 50% of instances. uncertain
Microsoft → accord → instances
The report found that trackers from Facebook parent company Meta don’t just ignore the signal — they fail to check for it at all, leading to tracking 69% of the time despite the signal. asserted
they → find → signal
All of those failures could be remedied with slight changes to the tracking code to respect the signal, the engineers said in the report. uncertain
engineers → remedie → report
“They don’t make any substantive effort to comply,” said Tim Libert, founder and chief executive of webXray. asserted
Libert → make → webXray
The report also found that third-party tools that purport to help businesses place advertisements that comply with the law still frequently failed to honor the anti-tracking signal. asserted
that → find → signal
In one case, a product did not honor those requests more than 90% of the time, the report found. asserted
report → honor → time
The tech companies dispute the idea that they are failing to abide by the law. asserted
they → dispute → law
“As outlined in our Privacy Statement, when we receive a GPC signal, we opt the user out of sharing personal data with third parties for personalized advertising, and our advertising systems are designed to reflect that choice,” Courtney Ramirez, a Microsoft spokesperson, said in a statement. asserted
Ramirez → outline → statement
“Certain Microsoft cookies are necessary for operational purposes, and may therefore be placed and read even when a GPC signal is detected.” uncertain
signal → place → purposes
Jackie Berté, a spokesperson for Google, said the company complies with the law and that the audit was “based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how our products work.” asserted
products → say → misunderstanding
A spokesperson for Meta didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. asserted
spokesperson → respond → comment
“The idea that I misunderstand anything is a demonstrable falsehood,” Libert said, pointing out his work on cookie policy at Google. asserted
Libert → misunderstand → Google
“I would assert that, when I was there, I knew more about it than anybody else,” he added. asserted
he → assert → anybody
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support