The Justice Department has filed a statement arguing that training AI models on copyrighted material does not violate copyright laws, and that barring such practice could "severely hamper" technological progress. According to Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, using unlicensed copyright-protected works for transformative purposes is considered fair use. The DOJ's position is supported by statements from experts Tori Noble and Satya Marar, who argue that training AI models on copyrighted works is transformative and promotes creativity, while being rejected by The New York Times, which claims it will harm its business. The issue is currently before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, where a decision could have significant implications for the development of AI technology.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-04,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
In 2023, The New York Times sued OpenAI—and its largest investor, Microsoft—for "systematic and competitive infringement," accusing the companies of illegally using copyrighted material to develop their AI models.
asserted
Times → sue → models
After other publishers filed their own lawsuits, the cases were consolidated last year in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
asserted
cases → file → York
On Tuesday, the Justice Department sent a statement of interest arguing the Times' position is "inconsistent with basic copyright law principles" and could "severely hamper 'the Progress of Science and useful Arts.'"
uncertain
position → send → Science
Training AI models on copyrighted material "in and of itself," the administration says, is not a violation of copyright laws.
asserted
administration → train → laws
Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 outlines the conditions of "fair use," which allows anyone to use unlicensed copyright-protected works for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
asserted
anyone → outline → criticism
The Justice Department contends that any use by the AI companies should be considered fair use for a transformative purpose.
asserted
use → contend → purpose
The Times has rejected this argument, declaring there is nothing transformative about using its content "without payment to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it."
asserted
that → reject → it
The outlet claims that OpenAI's generative AI models "compete with and closely mimic the inputs used to train them," nullifying the fair use exemption for its copyrighted works.
uncertain
models → claim → works
Tori Noble, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, disagrees.
asserted
Noble → disagree → Foundation
She says training AI models on copyrighted works is "squarely what transformative use is."
asserted
use → say → works
These are "general purpose tools" and "exactly the kind of creation that copyright is designed to foster," Noble adds.
asserted
Noble → design → that
Satya Marar, research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, tells Reason that while there's "no blanket fair use exception for training generative AI," the training itself is "highly likely to be deemed transformative."
asserted
training → tell → AI
Graham James, a spokesman for the Times, said the government was "siding with a handful of 'trillion-dollar A.I. companies' at the expense of American creators," the outlet reports.
asserted
outlet → say → creators
The statement might play well to a public skeptical of AI's benefits.
uncertain
statement → play → benefits
Still, it misrepresents the point of copyright law, which the Supreme Court—in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith (2023)—said is "namely, to promote the progress of science and the arts, without diminishing the incentive to create."
asserted
Court → misrepresent → incentive
In its filing, the Justice Department cites a 2nd Circuit ruling in Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. (2015) that states that the "more the appropriator is using the copied material for new, transformative purposes, the more it serves copyright's goal of enriching public knowledge and the less likely it is that the appropriation will serve as a substitute for the original or its plausible derivatives, shrinking the protected market opportunities of the copyrighted work."
asserted
appropriation → cite → work
The district court's decision in this case could have serious ramifications on America's burgeoning AI sector.
uncertain
decision → have → sector
Nathan Goodman, senior fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, tells Reason a ruling in the Times' favor could "substantially raise the direct financial costs and the transaction costs of forming a training data set."
uncertain
ruling → tell → set
Goodman believes that would "impede iterative innovation that builds on prior existing knowledge."
asserted
that → believe → knowledge
Noble says that copyright holders "talk about the licensing potential as if it's a transactional cost of doing business," but for smaller developers who'd be forced to individually contact each rights holder for permission, paying out potentially billions for copyrighted works would be prohibitively costly.
asserted
paying → say → works
AI is certainly a transformative technology, and newsrooms of all sizes are integrating the technology nationwide.
asserted
newsrooms → integrate → technology
This includes the Times, which uses generative AI models in its newsroom and opinion section.
asserted
which → include → section
In a message to its newsroom, Semafor reports that the Times argued its generative AI will help it "become more accessible to more people" through the use of "digitally voice[d] articles" and "translations into other languages."
asserted
it → report → languages
The outlet also reportedly stated the technology "helps us report stories we couldn't otherwise."
uncertain
we → state → stories
Generative AI models don't write original stories, pursue leads, or contact sources.
asserted
models → write → sources
They don't independently research facts or propose ideas for new articles.
asserted
They → research → articles
As the Times itself states, these models are no more than "powerful tools" incapable of competing with the company as the nation's newspaper of record.
asserted
models → state → record
With several pending copyright lawsuits against AI companies and their investors, this likely won't be the last time the government weighs in on this issue.
asserted
government → pende → issue
Noble says there's a "real risk in these cases that courts will misunderstand the technology and use those misunderstandings or negative perceptions of AI to drive rulings that are factually grounded in hype or stigma and not the reality of how [the technology] works."
asserted
technology → say → hype
According to Goodman, regardless of how the Times' case shakes out, the ruling will "reshape the creative and innovative activity that occurs in our society, and alter what pattern of innovation and creativity we see."
uncertain
we → accord → innovation
