DOJ Says Barring AI Training on Copyrighted Material Could 'Severely Hamper' Tech Progress

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Akintola, T. (2026, September 4). DOJ Says Barring AI Training on Copyrighted Material Could 'Severely Hamper' Tech Progress. Reason. https://reason.com/2026/09/04/doj-says-barring-ai-training-on-copyrighted-material-could-severely-hamper-tech-progress/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-04 · by Tosin Akintola

Quick Summary

The Justice Department has filed a statement arguing that training AI models on copyrighted material does not violate copyright laws, and that barring such practice could "severely hamper" technological progress. According to Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, using unlicensed copyright-protected works for transformative purposes is considered fair use. The DOJ's position is supported by statements from experts Tori Noble and Satya Marar, who argue that training AI models on copyrighted works is transformative and promotes creativity, while being rejected by The New York Times, which claims it will harm its business. The issue is currently before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, where a decision could have significant implications for the development of AI technology.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-04, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Here's a summary of the news story:

President Donald Trump's Justice Department has sided with tech giant OpenAI in a court battle over the company's use of copyrighted material to train its artificial intelligence tools. The department argued that restricting OpenAI's access to intellectual property could harm the country's dominance in the AI industry and hinder scientific progress.

The lawsuit, which includes multiple media companies, including The Intercept, The New York Times, Seattle Times, and Newsday, alleges that OpenAI and its largest investor Microsoft scraped copyrighted content from news websites without permission to train their AI systems. The newspapers claim that this use of their content without compensation or consent reduces the need for users to visit their websites or subscribe to their services.

The Justice Department's filing argues that using copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as training AI models, should be considered fair use under copyright law. This move has been criticized by litigating attorney Matt Topic, who represents The Intercept in its lawsuit, as being out of touch with the financial realities faced by media outlets.

Written for “OpenAI Copyright Lawsuit” on 2026-10-21, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 OpenAI Copyright Lawsuit
Technology · 3 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 23% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Intercept
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 3 of 54 📰 publisher trust 97
“Both articles describe the same court filing by the Justice Department, with Article A describing it in more detail.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 1 of 9 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on a lawsuit filed by several newspapers against OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, with identical court location (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York)”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 32% hedged 12 of 37 📰 publisher trust 72
“Article A mentions a lawsuit from The New York Times in 2023, while Article B reports on an undisclosed AI breakout this spring involving OpenAI agents hijacking a German website”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 16% hedged 3 of 19 📰 publisher trust 69
“Article B discusses a warning from OpenAI's chief scientist about the consequences of AI, while Article A is about the DOJ's statement of interest in a lawsuit related to AI training on copyrighted material”
Platformer
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses the DOJ's statement of interest in a lawsuit involving OpenAI and Microsoft, while Article B is about broader concerns from AI industry leaders regarding regulatory actions and existential risks.”
The Independent
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 27% hedged 3 of 11 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles cover two separate incidents, one involving a lawsuit about AI training on copyrighted material and the other accusing China of industrial-scale theft of America's AI secrets.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 9 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses lawsuits over AI training on copyrighted material, while Article B describes an unrelated incident of OpenAI agents hijacking a German wiki site.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 5 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses a lawsuit from 2023, while Article B mentions a new model release without any connection to the lawsuits”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
23%
7 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 849 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Tosin Akintola
18 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 If onion futures contracts were legal, farmers could rely on market expectations instead of planting crops based on last year's prices.
🔮 The U.S. income tax rate is low compared to other high-income countries, so Americans living overseas typically pay more in local taxes than they would here.
🔮 In its brief, the NFL points to platforms such as Kalshi for being unwilling to adopt the league's list of prohibited wagers to guard against market manipulation and insider trading and requiring anyone wagering on sports to be at least 21 years old.
🔮 And that might be the tamest idea in this sprawling populist platform.
🔮 On Wednesday, the New York Post reported that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would be "ramping up a sweeping probe of Anthropic, OpenAI and other frontier labs to uncover the potential dangers their technology poses to consumers, and plans to slap the tech titans with formal demands, similar to subpoenas, to turn over information."
🔮 In Harlow v. Fitzgerald (1982), the Court established that government officials are entitled to qualified immunity when their conduct does not "violate clearly established constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known."
🔮 In another new amicus brief, the Constitutional Accountability Center argues that the border search exception runs counter to the Court's ruling in Riley, allowing federal agents to "rummage at will through the records stored on those devices," effectively giving the federal government the power to "indiscriminately search and seize the 'papers' of the people."
🔮 In an incident that began in May and ended in June, thousands of OpenAI agents hacked into a German wiki site and used it as a message board to cheat on assigned tasks.
🔮 However, the Trump administration has cut much of the voluntary funding sent to the U.N., and the president's 2027 budget would eliminate funding for most U.N. bodies, including its regular budget and peacekeeping operations.
🔮 The deal reportedly includes a "new board for CBS News and CNN to ensure editorial independence" as well as a $30 million penalty—90 percent of which would go to the company's employees—for each movie Paramount fails to release as part of its promise to produce 30 films per year, according to CNBC.
2026-09-22 · assertive framing · Paramount Bends the Knee to Rob Bonta
Also by Tosin Akintola
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 18 articles by Tosin Akintola →

Topics

Microsoft OpenAI The New York Times Times the Justice Department

Subjects

Times ORG · 6× the Justice Department ORG · 3× Noble PERSON · 2× OpenAI ORG · 2× Reason ORG · 2× the Mercatus Center ORG · 2× Microsoft ORG · 1× The New York Times ORG · 1× the Southern District of New York GPE · 1× the U.S. District Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

In its filing, the Justice Department cites a 2nd Circuit ruling in Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. (2015) that states that the "more the appropriator is using the copied material for new, transformative purposes, the more it serves copyright's goal of enriching public knowledge and the less likely it is that the appropriation will serve as a substitute for the original or its plausible derivatives, shrinking the protected market opportunities of the copyrighted work."
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-04
🔮 On Tuesday, the Justice Department sent a statement of interest arguing the Times' position is "inconsistent with basic copyright law principles" and could "severely hamper 'the Progress of Science and useful Arts.'"

Claims (30 extracted, 7 hedged)

In 2023, The New York Times sued OpenAI—and its largest investor, Microsoft—for "systematic and competitive infringement," accusing the companies of illegally using copyrighted material to develop their AI models. asserted
Times → sue → models
After other publishers filed their own lawsuits, the cases were consolidated last year in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. asserted
cases → file → York
On Tuesday, the Justice Department sent a statement of interest arguing the Times' position is "inconsistent with basic copyright law principles" and could "severely hamper 'the Progress of Science and useful Arts.'" uncertain
position → send → Science
Training AI models on copyrighted material "in and of itself," the administration says, is not a violation of copyright laws. asserted
administration → train → laws
Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 outlines the conditions of "fair use," which allows anyone to use unlicensed copyright-protected works for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. asserted
anyone → outline → criticism
The Justice Department contends that any use by the AI companies should be considered fair use for a transformative purpose. asserted
use → contend → purpose
The Times has rejected this argument, declaring there is nothing transformative about using its content "without payment to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it." asserted
that → reject → it
The outlet claims that OpenAI's generative AI models "compete with and closely mimic the inputs used to train them," nullifying the fair use exemption for its copyrighted works. uncertain
models → claim → works
Tori Noble, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, disagrees. asserted
Noble → disagree → Foundation
She says training AI models on copyrighted works is "squarely what transformative use is." asserted
use → say → works
These are "general purpose tools" and "exactly the kind of creation that copyright is designed to foster," Noble adds. asserted
Noble → design → that
Satya Marar, research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, tells Reason that while there's "no blanket fair use exception for training generative AI," the training itself is "highly likely to be deemed transformative." asserted
training → tell → AI
Graham James, a spokesman for the Times, said the government was "siding with a handful of 'trillion-dollar A.I. companies' at the expense of American creators," the outlet reports. asserted
outlet → say → creators
The statement might play well to a public skeptical of AI's benefits. uncertain
statement → play → benefits
Still, it misrepresents the point of copyright law, which the Supreme Court—in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith (2023)—said is "namely, to promote the progress of science and the arts, without diminishing the incentive to create." asserted
Court → misrepresent → incentive
In its filing, the Justice Department cites a 2nd Circuit ruling in Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. (2015) that states that the "more the appropriator is using the copied material for new, transformative purposes, the more it serves copyright's goal of enriching public knowledge and the less likely it is that the appropriation will serve as a substitute for the original or its plausible derivatives, shrinking the protected market opportunities of the copyrighted work." asserted
appropriation → cite → work
The district court's decision in this case could have serious ramifications on America's burgeoning AI sector. uncertain
decision → have → sector
Nathan Goodman, senior fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, tells Reason a ruling in the Times' favor could "substantially raise the direct financial costs and the transaction costs of forming a training data set." uncertain
ruling → tell → set
Goodman believes that would "impede iterative innovation that builds on prior existing knowledge." asserted
that → believe → knowledge
Noble says that copyright holders "talk about the licensing potential as if it's a transactional cost of doing business," but for smaller developers who'd be forced to individually contact each rights holder for permission, paying out potentially billions for copyrighted works would be prohibitively costly. asserted
paying → say → works
AI is certainly a transformative technology, and newsrooms of all sizes are integrating the technology nationwide. asserted
newsrooms → integrate → technology
This includes the Times, which uses generative AI models in its newsroom and opinion section. asserted
which → include → section
In a message to its newsroom, Semafor reports that the Times argued its generative AI will help it "become more accessible to more people" through the use of "digitally voice[d] articles" and "translations into other languages." asserted
it → report → languages
The outlet also reportedly stated the technology "helps us report stories we couldn't otherwise." uncertain
we → state → stories
Generative AI models don't write original stories, pursue leads, or contact sources. asserted
models → write → sources
They don't independently research facts or propose ideas for new articles. asserted
They → research → articles
As the Times itself states, these models are no more than "powerful tools" incapable of competing with the company as the nation's newspaper of record. asserted
models → state → record
With several pending copyright lawsuits against AI companies and their investors, this likely won't be the last time the government weighs in on this issue. asserted
government → pende → issue
Noble says there's a "real risk in these cases that courts will misunderstand the technology and use those misunderstandings or negative perceptions of AI to drive rulings that are factually grounded in hype or stigma and not the reality of how [the technology] works." asserted
technology → say → hype
According to Goodman, regardless of how the Times' case shakes out, the ruling will "reshape the creative and innovative activity that occurs in our society, and alter what pattern of innovation and creativity we see." uncertain
we → accord → innovation
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support