Trump Admin Tells Court: Let OpenAI Rip Off The Intercept’s Articles

Read the original at The Intercept ↗
Cite

Hurowitz, N. (2026, September 3). Trump Admin Tells Court: Let OpenAI Rip Off The Intercept’s Articles. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2026/09/02/trump-openai-copyright-lawsuit-news-articles/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Intercept · collected 2026-09-03 · by Noah Hurowitz analysis

Quick Summary

The Trump administration has taken the side of OpenAI in a court battle with The Intercept and other media companies over OpenAI's use of copyrighted articles to train its artificial intelligence tools. In a federal court filing, the Justice Department argued that restricting OpenAI's access to intellectual property could harm the country's dominance in AI development. The Trump administration claims it has a vested interest in OpenAI's progress, citing the need for a "robust and competitive artificial intelligence industry" that sets global standards. A media lawyer representing The Intercept criticized the Trump administration's position as out of touch with public skepticism about AI and threatening to media outlets' financial survival.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-11, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Here's a summary of the news story:

President Donald Trump's Justice Department has sided with tech giant OpenAI in a court battle over the company's use of copyrighted material to train its artificial intelligence tools. The department argued that restricting OpenAI's access to intellectual property could harm the country's dominance in the AI industry and hinder scientific progress.

The lawsuit, which includes multiple media companies, including The Intercept, The New York Times, Seattle Times, and Newsday, alleges that OpenAI and its largest investor Microsoft scraped copyrighted content from news websites without permission to train their AI systems. The newspapers claim that this use of their content without compensation or consent reduces the need for users to visit their websites or subscribe to their services.

The Justice Department's filing argues that using copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as training AI models, should be considered fair use under copyright law. This move has been criticized by litigating attorney Matt Topic, who represents The Intercept in its lawsuit, as being out of touch with the financial realities faced by media outlets.

Written for “OpenAI Copyright Lawsuit” on 2026-10-20, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 OpenAI Copyright Lawsuit
Technology · 3 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 23% hedged 7 of 30 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the same court filing by the Justice Department, with Article A describing it in more detail.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 8 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A refers to a court battle between OpenAI and The Intercept, while Article B discusses a new California law on AI oversight that mentions an unrelated investigation into the OpenAI-Hugging Face hack”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 1 of 9 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article B refers to a lawsuit filed on September 4, which is not mentioned in Article A”
The Intercept
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 8 of 100 📰 publisher trust 97
“Article A is about a court battle between OpenAI and The Intercept, while Article B is about a contract dispute between Anthropic and the Pentagon”
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 4 of 37 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A discusses a court victory for Anthropic, while Article B mentions OpenAI's use of others' creative work to train AI tools and the Trump administration's stance on it”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 32% hedged 12 of 37 📰 publisher trust 72
“Article A discusses a court battle over OpenAI's use of others' creative work, while Article B describes an incident where OpenAI agents hijacked a German website, which are two separate events”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
54
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
3 of 54 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
97/100
The Intercept's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-11 · source text last changed 2026-09-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Intercept · 117 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Noah Hurowitz
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In May 2023, the Pentagon’s shiny new fighter jet was not looking so shiny or new.
🔮 Early reports indicate agents surrounded him and a 5-year-old child in his car before firing multiple rounds,” New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani said in a statement.
🔮 Despite a unanimous vote by a faculty committee recommending her reinstatement, Saeidi was fired from the university in March, a decision that was upheld in May after an appeal by the professor.
🔮 United Airlines is set to resume the shipment of military hardware to Israel aboard passenger flights, according to shipping data reviewed by The Intercept.
🔮 The Trump administration warned that restricting OpenAI’s access to the data could hamper scientific progress and harm the country’s dominance in the race for artificial intelligence.
Also by Noah Hurowitz
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Intercept OpenAI The Intercept U.S. the Justice Department

Subjects

OpenAI ORG · 10× Trump PERSON · 5× Intercept ORG · 4× the Justice Department ORG · 3× Microsoft ORG · 2× The Intercept ORG · 2× The United States GPE · 2× Topic PERSON · 2× U.S. GPE · 2× the New York Times ORG · 2×

Narrative

“The United States has a strong interest in continuing to develop a robust and competitive artificial intelligence industry that sets the standard for the practice and procedure of AI use globally,” said the filing, which was signed by associate attorneys general Stanley Woodward Jr. and Brett Shumate, along with the attorney general’s senior counsel Michael Weisbuch.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-03
🔮 The Trump administration warned that restricting OpenAI’s access to the data could hamper scientific progress and harm the country’s dominance in the race for artificial intelligence.
2026-09-11 · The Intercept
Trump Admin Tells Court: Let OpenAI Rip Off The Intercept’s Articles · assertive framing

Claims (54 extracted, 3 hedged)

President Donald Trump’s Justice Department took the side of tech giant OpenAI in its court battle with The Intercept and other media companies over the company’s use of others’ creative work to train its artificial intelligence tools. asserted
Department → take → tools
In a federal court filing in New York, the Justice Department argued that the U.S. has a vested interest in OpenAI having access to a vast array of intellectual property. asserted
OpenAI → argue → property
The Trump administration warned that restricting OpenAI’s access to the data could hamper scientific progress and harm the country’s dominance in the race for artificial intelligence. uncertain
restricting → warn → intelligence
“The United States has a strong interest in continuing to develop a robust and competitive artificial intelligence industry that sets the standard for the practice and procedure of AI use globally,” said the filing, which was signed by associate attorneys general Stanley Woodward Jr. and Brett Shumate, along with the attorney general’s senior counsel Michael Weisbuch. asserted
which → have → counsel
Matt Topic, the litigating attorney representing The Intercept in its lawsuit, warned that the Trump administration’s position was out of touch and a threat to the financial survival of media outlets. asserted
position → litigate → outlets
“This is pretty reflective of the administration’s pro-AI policies, which are out of step with the public skepticism of AI and out of step with our long tradition in this country of protecting human expression,” said Topic. asserted
Topic → protect → expression
“If the administration’s position was accepted, it would result in an unprecedented, uncompensated transfer of IP rights from news organizations to tech companies.” asserted
it → accept → companies
The Intercept originally filed its lawsuit against OpenAI and its partner Microsoft in February 2024, arguing that OpenAI’s use of work reported and written by its journalists constituted a breach of copyright law. asserted
use → file → law
In November 2024, the judge then presiding over the case dismissed all of The Intercept’s claims against Microsoft, but allowed its claim against OpenAI to proceed under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. uncertain
claim → preside → Act
The Intercept’s case was later consolidated under U.S. District Judge Sidney Stein alongside a number of other media plaintiffs, including the New York Times, Tribune Media Company, and Ziff Davis. asserted
case → consolidate → Times
OpenAI has argued that its practice of hoovering up staggering amounts of copyright-protected materials to feed its large language models — the underlying technology powering generative AI tools like ChatGPT — falls under the domain of “fair use,” a doctrine protecting the unlicensed use of copyrighted material under certain circumstances. asserted
practice → argue → circumstances
In its filing, the Justice Department supported OpenAI’s fair-use defense, accusing the Times and other plaintiffs of taking an overly narrow definition of the doctrine. asserted
Department → support → doctrine
OpenAI’s use of the material, the government argued, met the criteria for “transformative” use, one of the ways in which “fair use” comes into play. asserted
use → argue → play
“In this litigation, the New York Times seeks to narrow fair-use doctrine to exclude the training of OpenAI’s large language models (LLMs). asserted
Times → seek → models
That result would be inconsistent with basic copyright law principles and severely hamper ‘the Progress of Science and useful Arts,’” the filing says. asserted
filing → hamper → Science
“An erroneous fair use ruling would hamper competition in the market for LLMs, because only the largest technology companies might have the capital necessary to pay licensing fees.” uncertain
companies → hamper → fees
The filing is the latest move from the Trump administration to protect the interests of U.S.-based artificial intelligence companies amid an AI arms race with companies based in other countries, most notably China. asserted
filing → protect → countries
In December 2025, Trump signed an executive order aimed at creating a federal standard, applicable in all 50 states, to “ensure that the United States wins the AI race, as we must.” asserted
we → sign → race
Topic, The Intercept’s attorney, said this position — combined with the fact that the Justice Department has not been privy to any discovery in the case — shows that the Trump administration is operating from a fixed position in support of tech companies, rather than arguing the merits of the case. asserted
administration → say → case
“What they’re saying isn’t based on any understanding of actual facts,” Topic said. asserted
Topic → say → facts
“It just reflects what Microsoft’s and OpenAI’s PR machines have been putting out into the public.” asserted
machines → reflect → public
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT. asserted
WE → ’ → ?
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. asserted
seeing → see → government
Court orders are being ignored. asserted
orders → ignore → ?
MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. asserted
loyalists → put → the
The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. asserted
Department → strip → purse
News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation. asserted
that → challenge → investigation
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. asserted
Intercept → cover → world
We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy. asserted
we → understand → democracy
We’re independent of corporate interests. asserted
We → ’re → interests
Will you help us? asserted
you → help → us
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. asserted
president → have → press
Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. asserted
outlets → cower → America
Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking. asserted
billionaires → pounce → liking
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. asserted
Intercept → fight → democracy
But to do so effectively, we need to grow. asserted
we → do → ?
That’s where you come in. asserted
you → ’ → ?
Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026? asserted
us → help → 2026
We’re independent of corporate interests. asserted
We → ’re → interests
Will you help us? asserted
you → help → us
…and 14 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support