That is 0 articles you have read today.
The Aporia is free and carries no advertising, so readers are the only
thing paying for it. If you are getting this much out of it, a small
donation is what keeps it independent.
Daily limit reached
You have read 0 articles today.
That is more than the 15 a day The Aporia gives away,
and well past what it can carry on nothing. Your allowance resets at
midnight.
There is no advertising here and nothing about you is sold, so readers
are the only thing paying for it. If the site is worth this much of
your day, it is worth a few dollars.
Everything else stays open: the
maps, the
directory and
search do
not count against this, and neither does re-opening something you have
already read today.
President Trump directed the cancellation of nearly $1 billion in federal spending through a controversial method known as "pocket rescission," which Congress has 45 legislative days to override but effectively blocks spending when used late in the fiscal year, which ends Wednesday. The funds include $567 million for refugee services and other programs aiding migrants, along with smaller amounts allocated for international education and housing initiatives. Lawmakers from both parties, including Republican Senator Susan Collins and Democratic Representative Rosa DeLauro, criticized the move as illegal under the Impoundment Control Act, which regulates presidential power to withhold funds appropriated by Congress.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-26,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
President Trump ordered the cancellation of $810 million in congressionally approved funding on Friday, marking the second use of a "pocket rescission" in 49 years. This controversial move zeroes out funds for illegal immigrants and race-focused programs across seven federal departments, including HHS, Education, and Homeland Security. Key cuts include $10 million from minority business grants, $10 million for legal services aiding illegal immigrants, and $70 million allocated to "woke" international education initiatives. Critics argue the move undermines Congress's constitutional authority over spending; Republican Senator Susan Collins called it an "illegal action."
Written for “Trump Pocket Rescission Spending” on 2026-10-05,
grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.
President Trump moved to cancel almost $1 billion in spending that was approved by Congress, the White House said late Friday, marking the second time the administration has employed a rarely used tactic that some lawmakers in both parties have called illegal.
asserted
lawmakers → move → parties
The administration said it was calling off $567 million in spending on services for refugees, asylees and other migrants through the Department of Health and Human Services.
asserted
it → say → Health
The White House is also rescinding $50 million for several other programs that aid immigrants and noncitizens, $70 million in "Woke International Education" grants and fellowships and $56 million in Housing and Urban Development programs.
asserted
that → rescind → programs
"President Trump is committed to utilizing all possible tools to cut wasteful and harmful government spending that does not benefit American citizens," the White House said.
asserted
House → commit → citizens
The White House said it would claw back the spending through a controversial maneuver called a "pocket rescission," in which the president notifies Congress shortly before the end of the fiscal year that it doesn't wish to spend funds that lawmakers appropriated.
asserted
lawmakers → say → that
Under the Impoundment Control Act, the president can propose rescissions of budget authority, which Congress has 45 legislative days to approve.
asserted
Congress → propose → days
But if proposals are made late in the fiscal year, the funds can effectively be withheld until they expire.
asserted
they → make → year
The fiscal year ends on Wednesday.
asserted
year → end → Wednesday
The Trump administration
to cancel $4.9 billion in foreign aid funds approved by Congress.
asserted
administration → cancel → Congress
That marked the first pocket rescission since 1977, during the Carter administration.
asserted
That → mark → administration
Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who chairs the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, strongly criticized the latest pocket rescission.
asserted
who → chair → rescission
In a statement Friday, she said lawmakers were informed of $810 million in pocket rescissions "without warning or consultation."
asserted
lawmakers → say → warning
She said it appears that the White House's Office of Management and Budget "intentionally withheld these funds for months to execute this unlawful cancellation of appropriations that were approved on a bipartisan basis and signed into law."
asserted
that → say → law
Collins noted that the Government Accountability Office has called pocket rescissions illegal.
asserted
Office → note → rescissions
"Any effort to rescind appropriated funds without congressional approval is a clear violation of the law," said Collins, a frequent critic of pocket rescissions who is running for reelection this year.
asserted
who → rescind → reelection
"I will work with my colleagues to address these illegal actions."
asserted
I → work → actions
Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, said the Trump administration is "once again trying to steal more money promised to communities across the country."
Since returning to office last year, Mr. Trump has sought to call off spending on programs that do not align with his policy priorities, drawing lawsuits.
asserted
that → say → lawsuits
Last year's pocket rescissions drew a legal challenge from organizations and businesses that receive funding for foreign aid projects.
asserted
that → draw → projects
The Supreme Court
to cancel billions in foreign aid funds, pointing to the president's power to oversee foreign relations, but did not reach a final decision on the merits.
asserted
Court → cancel → merits