Missouri’s congressional map fight is hurtling toward another potential Supreme Court showdown, with courts at odds over which districts should govern the November election after more than 1.2 million Missourians voted in the August primary under a different map.
asserted
Missourians → hurtle → map
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled Monday that Missouri must use its 2025 congressional map in November, finding that switching to the state’s 2022 districts after the primary would violate the U.S. Constitution.
asserted
switching → rule → Constitution
But the appeals court paused its order until Sept. 28, 2026, opening a narrow window for another visit to the U.S. Supreme Court.
asserted
court → pause → Court
Abhishek Kambli, a partner at Holtzman Vogel and former deputy associate attorney general at the Justice Department, told Fox News Digital the Supreme Court’s previous intervention does not necessarily signal how the justices will handle the latest ruling.
asserted
justices → tell → ruling
"It’s unpredictable how they’ll rule, mostly because we didn’t get their reasoning in the last order," Kambli said.
asserted
Kambli → rule → order
"So, we don’t know the precise reason why they decided to stay at that time."
asserted
they → know → time
The Supreme Court previously stayed a federal district court's temporary restraining order requiring Missouri to use the 2025 map.
asserted
Court → stay → map
The Eighth Circuit has now directed the lower court to enter a permanent injunction requiring the newer districts, putting the dispute in a different procedural posture.
asserted
Circuit → direct → posture
"So unless the Supreme Court steps in again, the state will be required to use the seven-one map for this election," Kambli said.
asserted
Kambli → step → election
Missouri held its Aug. 4, 2026, primary under the 2025 map.
asserted
Missouri → hold → map
Roughly a month later, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that voters could challenge the map through a referendum, leaving the 2022 districts in place for the November election.
uncertain
voters → rule → election
Kambli said switching congressional maps between the primary and general election raises serious constitutional concerns.
asserted
switching → say → concerns
"You would have had a large number of Missourians who would have been disenfranchised because they voted for one set of candidates in the primary and will be voting for another set in the general," Kambli said.
asserted
Kambli → have → general
"And what's even more concerning is sometimes those candidates are unopposed so that they miss their only chance to vote as a result of what the Missouri Supreme Court did here," Kambli continued.
asserted
Kambli → miss → what
"So that's what's really at issue — is whether everyone gets an equal voice in a situation where the primary election is integral to the electoral system of the state.
asserted
election → get → state
But Yale law professor Akhil Amar and University of California, Davis, law professor Vikram Amar have argued the opposite.
asserted
Amar → argue → opposite
After the Supreme Court’s earlier stay, Vikram wrote on SCOTUSblog that using the 2025 map in November would not protect anyone’s right to vote if those lines were never legally in effect.
asserted
lines → write → effect
Akhil agreed with his analysis.
asserted
Akhil → agree → analysis
"HB1’s district lines lack the force of law, full stop," Vikram wrote.
asserted
Vikram → lack → law
"These lines cannot be used wrongly in November just because they were previously used wrongly in the primary.
asserted
they → use → primary
Two wrongs do not make (or vindicate) a right (to vote)."
asserted
wrongs → make → right
Meanwhile, Kambli placed much of the blame for the eleventh-hour legal scramble over which map to use on the Missouri Supreme Court, arguing the turmoil was "entirely preventable."
asserted
turmoil → place → Court
Kambli argued that the Missouri Supreme Court could have resolved the map dispute earlier, noting that the issue remained unsettled even after the candidate filing deadline passed.
Alicia Bannon, senior director of the Judiciary Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, pointed instead to delays by Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins as a key reason the dispute dragged on.
uncertain
dispute → argue → reason
Opponents of the 2025 map submitted more than 300,000 signatures in December 2025, but Hoskins did not formally reject the referendum petition until Aug. 4, the day of the primary.
asserted
Hoskins → submit → primary
"Time passed.
asserted
Time → pass → ?
And passed further," Bannon wrote for State Court Report.
asserted
Bannon → pass → Report
"As early as December 2025, Hoskins asserted in separate federal litigation that a referendum on redistricting was not authorized by the state constitution.
asserted
referendum → assert → constitution
But he held off on issuing a certificate on that basis — which would have triggered judicial review — instead going through a lengthy process of verifying petition signatures."
asserted
which → hold → signatures
Bannon wrote that the Missouri Supreme Court’s criticism of Hoskins’ delays stood out, particularly the court’s rejection of his argument that it had waited too long to intervene.
asserted
it → write → argument
The Missouri Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the referendum could proceed and faulted Hoskins for the delay, saying he had "created the confusion, expense, and practical difficulties of which he complains."
uncertain
he → rule → which
Kambli argued the Purcell principle, under which federal courts generally avoid changing election rules close to Election Day because of the potential for disruption, weighs in favor of keeping the 2025 map because Missouri already used it for the primary.
asserted
Missouri → argue → primary
"The Eighth Circuit said that the Purcell principles support the injunction, not go against it," Kambli said.
asserted
Kambli → say → it
Bannon also warned that courts being too cautious can create its own problems.
asserted
courts → warn → problems
"It’s an approach that’s understandable in some circumstances but can also incentivize shenanigans to evade judicial review while harming voters’ rights," Bannon wrote.
asserted
Bannon → ’ → rights
Bannon suggested earlier court action in Missouri could have helped avoid the last-minute dispute, including by moving the primary or setting a firm deadline for the referendum petition.
uncertain
action → suggest → petition
But regardless of whether the Supreme Court decides to weigh in, the referendum will still be on the ballot.
asserted
referendum → decide → ballot
"If the Supreme Court does not stay the Eighth Circuit injunction, there's no doubt that the 7-1 map is what will be in effect for this election.
asserted
what → stay → election
There's still going to be a referendum on the ballot deciding that issue for future elections, but for this one, that's how it'll be decided," Kambli said.
asserted
Kambli → be → one
The Aporia
